Talk:Korto Vos

From Wookieepedia, the Star Wars wiki.

Contents 1 Split 2 Species 3 proof 4 Age

[edit] Split

Shouldn't this article be split into Korto Vos (alias) and plain Korto Vos for Quinlan's son? Admiral J. Nebulax 15:15, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• Done. -- SFH 19:54, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Admiral J. Nebulax 20:29, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Species

If Khaleen was human, and Quinlan is Kiffar, then wouldn't Korto be a human/Kiffar crossbreed? -- Cato Neimoidia 22:12, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

• I suppose so... Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 22:14, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Then should I change it from just Kiffar to Kiffar/human? -- Cato Neimoidia 22:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
    • I'd say yes. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 22:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

here is another tidbit from the Vanity Fair article regarding THE FORCE UNLEASHED video game:

>The prologue allows the gamer to play Darth Vader, who has gone to Kashyyyk, the Wookiee home planet, to hunt down a recalcitrant Jedi.

So speculation that this renegade Jedi is Quinlan Vos seems spot on especially considering that the leader of the team designing the video game is Haden Blackman who has written several Star Wars: Republic comics and Quinlan was last seen on Kashyyyk.

In addition, this also lends substantial credence to the notion that Vader's Secret Apprentice is Korto Vos. It is conceivable that Vader hunts down and kills Quinlan only to find Quinlan's child Korto, and raises the boy as his own, twisted apprentice.

You heard it hear first.

~IDAHO~

[edit] proof

this is proof that kiffar markings are not tatoos you do not tatoo a baby

• In real-life, maybe, but that isn't proof that they aren't tatoos on a baby in Star Wars. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 02:15, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weren't they applied by paint? Kuralyov 02:16, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Even if they were, babies in Star Wars could still get tatoos. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 02:19, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Regardless of what could happen, it clearly shows him wiping some sort of paint stuff on his face. And not with a vibrating needle. Lonnyd 07:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
      • Exactly, but then again, putting tatoos on someone could be different in Star Wars. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 11:59, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

its a freaking baby

• Okay, that was pointless. Keep your opinions off of the talk page. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 11:15, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• ok the markings f the clans are paint applied, and so what you could definatly tatoo a baby we might think of it as unethical but who says the galaxy far away does =]

but anyway its Paint. Jedi Dude

• Exactly. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 19:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Age

Wouldn't he have been born in 18 BBY? Kuralyov 02:16, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

• I believe so. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 02:19, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • If he was born in the comic, than I don't think so, since that was 19 BBY. -LtNOWIS 05:37, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
    • It says that he was born 8 months later. Kuralyov 05:37, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
      • Yeah, because comics can stretch over different years. Take Skywalkers. The majority of the comic is really a flashback. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 13:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Just heard it on a commercial on Spike TV. Darth Vader first finds his apprentice on Kashyyyk. It has also been stated that the apprentice is the son of a jedi. Put one and one together.

Well, Quinlan Vos is still alive in 5 BBY and Korto Vos problably went the the Jedi Praxeum. Think about it. And by the way the apprentice is named Galen Marek and the dead Jedi Father is Kento Marek. Korto would have been 29 or 28 at the time of the opening of the Praxeum.