I'm not particularly comfortable with the word "unworthy" on a page here that is outside of a quote. Seems POV, at least I think it is. Can we change it to something else? -- SFH 22:23, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• I replaced it with 'don't require' - a tad formal, but less potentially insulting. Dark Spork 19:21, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Contents 1 Criteria? 2 Should all fansites be listed? 3 Uh-oh... 4 broken links

Criteria?Edit

So, what determines that a site goes here instead of just getting it's own article? Is there some sort of debate beforehand, or does someone just make an article and it either stays or goes depending on the content? --Revan Averre 14:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Should all fansites be listed?Edit

• I'm thinking we should use this page to list ALL Star Wars fansites, whether they have their own article or not. What good is a page called "List of fan sites" if it does not include sites like TheForce.net and CloneWarz.com? I say either include them all here, or split into 2 articles: List of major fan sites and List of minor fan sites. --Azizlight 08:54, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Isn't there already a category listing of all the major websites? Maybe this one should just be renamed "List of minor fan sites". =) CooperTFN 09:04, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
    • I agree that either 1) all fan sites should be listed, even if they have their own article, or 2) this article should be renamed to reflect the "minor" status of the sites listed. —Xwing328^(Talk) 04:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Uh-oh...Edit

Someone should tell these people that LFL is going to blacklist them for making fansites. Kuralyov 06:42, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

• What about us? We must really be seen as devils over there. --Imp 07:30, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Some idiot put a piczo site! i feel like deleting it!-Zett_FAN101

broken linksEdit

A lot of these sites go absolutely nowhere. Someone should do an overhaul of this article. Herojoe 17:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

• Be bold. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 17:17, 29 May 2009 (UTC)