Back to page

127,621pages on
this wiki

Questionable canonicity. Edit

While Disney has stated that the prequels and The Clone Wars are canon, but a recent interview with Abrams makes me think if we should keep an eye on something like this to see if things are changed in the future, in terms of canonicity. Vidboy10 (talk) 14:15, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

  • Yahoo is taking what was said waaaaaay out of context. Midi-chlorians are not of questionable canonicity, and it's not something we need to keep an eye on. The prequels are canon. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 14:52, August 5, 2015 (UTC)
  • The interview says only that midichloriany will not be mentioned in Episode VII. (Sorry for my bad English) Michalomatek 17:06, August 5, 2015 (UTC).
    • Fair game Brandon, just thought I would mention since you know those journalists that try to throw you off guard. And Michalomatek, it was more about the tone that the article gave, which was implying that midi-chlorians aren't canon anymore. But no probelm, everything's now sorted out.Vidboy10 (talk) 01:31, August 19, 2015 (UTC)

The mention of Midi-cholrian levels in the "Star Wars: Absolutely Everything You Need to Know" Edit

Hi there, Just wanted to point out that it's recently come to my attenion thanks to a YTer (Rob Explains) I follow that Midi-cholrian levels are present in the new canon. It also is stated in the book "Star Wars: Absolutely Everything You Need to Know", which is considered apart of the new canon as it has the "Journey to force awakens" banner, that it's 5000 Midis pre cell is a sign of force sensitivity. BUT, one of the higher nidi-cholrian count people from the films and materials released leading up to Force Awaken is Grievious. Grievous who is stated to have more Midi-cholrians than Bane (11.9k to 10.5k) yet not said to be a force sensitive. My personal take is that they are introducing that Midi-cholrians aren't the only source of the force/the only sure fire way to tell who is and isn't sensitive. Could be an accidental oversight but it is glaring how much of an oversight that is, if it's that. And mind you the books where it's stated Grevious got midicholrians from Sifo-Dyas are now no longer canon.- 01:33, November 18, 2015 (UTC)

Wait, does it mention Darth Bane having a Midi-chlorian count? If it doesn't mention it. It's not canon. Midi-chlorian counts from Legends don't count. Vidboy10 (talk) 09:35, November 18, 2015 (UTC)
He read "Absolutely Everything...". If you have not read them book, you haven't nothing to say. Please end with "midi-chlorians aren't canon"!. Unsigned comment by Michalomatek (talk • contribs).
What the fuck? I never said "midi-chlorians aren't canon." And I was just mentioning that if it doesn't mention Darth Bane in the book, (from what I've looked up, he isn't) and specifically his Midi-chlorian count. He must be reading things from somewhere else, most likely SuperShadow. Vidboy10 (talk) 19:16, November 18, 2015 (UTC)
None of what you're saying here "counts." No source ever revealed the midi-chlorian counts of either Bane or Grievous. What you saw online was only SuperShadow's fake material. --LelalMekha (talk) 10:00, November 18, 2015 (UTC)
LMAO!!! Nice one! Vidboy10 (talk) 18:33, November 18, 2015 (UTC)
Let's please remember to keep it civil here too. Thanks all. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 19:41, November 18, 2015 (UTC)
Oh no, I was laughing with him, not at him. Vidboy10 (talk) 02:17, November 19, 2015 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki