This is the talk page for the article "Naga Sadow." This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic. This talk page has archives. 1

Naga Sadow is a former featured article. Please see this article's entry on the Inquisitorius page for the reasons why it was removed.

This article was showcased on Wookieepedia's Main Page from 7 May to 14 May 2006.

Darth Edit

Just FYI, The Essential Guide to Warfare refers to Naga Sadow as "Darth Naga Sadow". It does this only once, and simply uses "Sadow" for every successive reference. Should we move the page based on this, or possibly wait and ask Fry what his intent was with the "Darth" title here when he does his Q and A on facebook on the 11th? Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 01:07, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

• That sounds like a good idea. Also, Jason Fry has said that he will release his endnotes for TEGTW next week, so hopefully they might shed some light on his intentions. --Jinzler 09:21, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • This is becoming a tradition. The origin and use of the "Darth" title is constantly beign retconned, isn't it?--LelalMekha 09:42, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
    • Isn't it just a typo? As far as I know (didn't read the entire book) the Darth Title is mentioned only once. May be the author meant the Dark Lord, I don't know...--ScorpiO 15:51, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
    • During his Facebook chat with Fry and the fans, Urquhart said: "Yes, there was a specific intention with using the name Darth Naga Sadow. It’s meant to indicate Sadow’s ambition, and his status as “supreme viceroy” (i.e. top Dark Lord). The context needed a title that wasn’t Sith’ari. But it doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s a contemporary usage." (Source here) LelalMekha 17:03, April 24, 2012 (UTC)

Questionable accuracy of the main picture Edit

While I know that the current main picture is the best portrait we have of Naga Sadow, it's still technically inaccurate. When I GANd Hakagram Graush, I was asked to move the picture of Ajunta Pall beheading him because it contradicts a single textual evidence. In Sadow's case, it's pretty clear thar Naga Sadow was red-skinned, as mentioned in multiple sources from the original Tales of the Jedi: The Golden Age of the Sith to the more recent Lost Tribe of the Sith series. For the sake of accuracy, we should find another main image. I know it's a shame, because if you overlook that sickly yellow complexion, the current pic rocks... --LelalMekha (talk) 19:26, May 18, 2013 (UTC)