Talk:Nar Shaddaa
From Wookieepedia, the Star Wars wiki.
Contents |
[edit] I'm confused! SOMEONE FREAKING ANSWER THIS!
Its says that Nar Shaddaa became an ecumenopolis in 24,500 BBY. But it says the Hutts didn't conquer Evocar until 15,000 BBY. I thought Nar Shaddaa become an ecumenopolis once the Hutts took control of Evocar, so why does it say Nar Shaddaa became an ecumenopolis 9,500 years earlier? From the sounds of things, the Evocii didn't have the technology to create an ecumenopolis on there own and I doubt people would randomly create an civilization on a moon and just completely ignore the planet it orbits (unless the planet is a gas giant or has an toxic atmosphere).
Anyone ever going to answer this?
- Nar Shaddaa becomeing a planet wide city in 15,000 BBY is Non Cannon and it began to be built in 25,000 BBY just as Nal Hutta was terraformed. Fore five hundred years the Evocii were enslaved to build the citys of Nar Shaddaa until at last the moom was complete in 24,500 BBY. The natural resaurces of Nar Shaddaa were the matalic minerals of the origanal terrane.
[edit] Past or present?
What's the deal with the post-vong situation stated across the article? --UVnet 02:52, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- It's Wookieepedia's policy to write articles in past tense, as if looking back on it Linkman95 14:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Droids
Is its' appearance in Droids a retcon?Kuralyov 21:51, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- If it appears in the Toon, I guess it would have to be a retcon, since AFAIK Nar Shaddaa wasn't created until Dark Empire. However, the Droids: Kalarba comic came out after DE.--Valin Kenobi 07:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Gravity
How do you explain that it appears to have normal gravity but it's only the moon of a normal-sized world?
- We're talking about a universe with easily available FTL Travel, human level intelligence droids and a planet destroying super weapon on every corner and you're bothering to worry about gravity on a moon? Suspend just a bit of disbelief here. Oh, and to answer your question: Artificial gravity is everywhere. It's small enough to fit in a starfighter (inertial compensator) and reliable enough that it's used in almost every installation ever mentioned (exception: Centerpoint Station) It doesn't stretch the boundary of belief that it is commonly used to make otherwise inhabitable moons livable.--204.76.128.217 05:35, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- Perhaps Nar Shaddaa has an unusual concentration of heavy elements, or something.--Valin Kenobi 07:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- Right. A planet's size doesn't necessarily correlate with its gravity, all that matters is its mass. Perhaps Nar Shaddaa is extremely dense. Or perhaps it is all artificial gravity. What I want to know is, how can there only be 72-95 billion people on Nar Shaddaa, even if it is only a small moon? The entire planet is a towering city, you'd think the population would at least be in the hundreds of billions. 10:35, 31 August 2007
- It could also be a huge moon like Charon, moon of Pluto. But population data 72-95 billion (upper answer) could also be on the long (british) scale and it would mean 72-95 trillion people. Methyl Orange (contact me) 15:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Or the rotation speed of the moon could simply be fast --Dixieboy 22:49, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Vertical City
In Jedi Knight 2, do we know if the the label "The Vertical City" is a nickname for the planet (like "Smuggler's Moon") or if it is the actual city's name? Either way, I don't believe it's mentioned in the article yet. -BaronGrackle 10:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, it's a nickname. And seeing how "Vertical City" redirects here, I'm deleting the header. Bredd13comlink
ALTA in a GFFA
[edit] Battle of Nar Shaddaa
Should there be at least a passing mention of this Imperial attack on the moon in 4 BBY?
- Seeing as that's an important event, you'd think so.96.246.173.221 16:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
