Shouldn't the Padawan Massacres of Taris be here also? User:RushinSundaws 7:31, February 27 2006

• I agree. But the incident is not yet big enough compared to Great Sith Wars / Mandalorian Wars, etc. Maybe we will revise it after the KOTOR Commencement Story arc finished. Darth Kevinmhk 10:02, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Contents 1 War infobox 2 End 3 Timeline correct? 4 Great Galactic War from SW:TOR?

War infoboxEdit

Is the war infobox teplate really needed for this article? The "Old Sith Wars" describes an entire time period, not a specific war. As such, the infobox is simply not adequate and it shows. In its current form, the infobox is so garbled, vague, and generalized that it is virtually useless. Mind if I remove it? --Sentry [Talk] 08:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

• I agree. It's a period in time defined by wars, but not necessarily a war in itself. And another thing, about the Second Sith Civil War, there seems to be a timeline problem. This article states it as beginning in 3,951 BBY, which is after the events of Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords. However, the article on the civil war states that it was the chain of events dealing with Kreia, Nihilus, and Sion between the events of the two KotORs (3,956 BBY to 3,951 BBY). Is there any reference as to which it is?--KypFisto [Talk] 02:29, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

EndEdit

What would the official end of the Old Sith Wars be? The destruction of Malachor V or the Republic liberation of 400090—no, 400593—sorry, 40072—the G0-T0 territory things? -- SFH 04:54, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Timeline correct?Edit

Is the Great Droid Revolution really the beginning of the Old Sith Wars? What does that have to do with the Sith? I can see how the Destruction of Ambria could mark the beginning of the Old Sith Wars, but not the Great Droid Revolution. And to repeat the question above, is the end of the Old Sith Wars the Destruction of Malachor V or the Liberation of 400100500260026? Again, it would seem to me like the former, not the latter. ~ Jaywin

Great Galactic War from SW:TOR?Edit

Just putting this out there for discussion/debate, but should or shouldn't the Great War (or "Great Galactic War") and Interstellar Cold War from the upcoming MMO be considered at least a nominal part of the Old Sith Wars era, considering their immediate temporal proximity to -- and direct storyline connections with -- the KotOR series, both the comics and the video games?

For instance, we know that the so-called "New Sith Wars" are not considered to have begun until roughly 2,000 BBY, with the rise of Darth Ruin, and we also know that the MMO's events and conflicts are much more proximate to the TotJ/KotOR era than the period encompassing the lives of Ruin, Kaan, Bane, and other latter-day, pre-Ruusan Sith Lords.

And given the fact that BioWare is essentially considering SW:TOR to be a de facto KotOR sequel (roughly equivalent to "KotOR III, IV, V, VI, VII through XII," they said) I move that the Great War and Interstellar Cold War should be justifiably added to the Old Sith Wars section for the time being -- it's likely that future official LFL sources will be placing them under this particular rubric anyhow, and as I mentioned, these events are much closer kissing-cousins to the events of KotOR/TotJ than those of the Ruin/Bane epoch.

Thoughts/ruminations/objections? --The Bandsaw Vigilante 19:38, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

• I agree. This article states that the Old Sith Wars do not include conflicts including the True Sith Empire as a belligerent (that is, the Great Galactic War) but I see no rationale for this in either the article or anywhere else. Considering its chronological proximity to the other Old Sith Wars, and the precedent we already have for grouping together a millennium of spread out conflicts (The New Sith Wars), it seems perfectly reasonable for the Great Galactic War to be included among the list of Old Sith Wars. --Dasein45