Talk:One Sith

From Wookieepedia, the Star Wars wiki.

Contents 1 Merge 2 One sith or New Sith Order? 3 Main Image 4 Wha? 5 No appearence in Revelation

[edit] Merge

if This "One Sith" is almost certainly Darth Krayt's new Sith Order. as it says it is then why has this article appeared it should be remerged with New sith Order --Dark Lord Xander ^{(Embrace The Dark Side!)} 09:33, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

• Infact after reading the New Sith Order article it is exactly the same as this one containing the same info only more so why was this page created if there was already one there ?? --Dark Lord Xander ^{(Embrace The Dark Side!)} 09:36, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
  • I think we need the input of some admins first. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 14:05, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
    • At least it must be a reference to Krayt's Rule of One. Bodo-Baas 02:36, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
      • It's pretty obvious that both the One Sith and Krayt's Order are one in the same. If McEwok hadn't been involved, this would have been redirected a while ago. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 11:12, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
    • Then Lets Merge it and Be Done with it --Dark Lord Xander ^{(Embrace The Dark Side!)} 23:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
• How the phrase "We are only one Sith now." got to describe the name of the order and not their ideology, is beyond me. If this is a McEwokism, then he's once again wasting bandwidth. I say redirect or merge or whatever. VT-16 12:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
• Done since these to are crealy one in the same and the information is on the other page i will redirect this one and since no one has voiced there opinon against this there shouldn't be a problem Dark Lord Xander ^{(Embrace The Dark Side!)} 05:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] One sith or New Sith Order?

that's my question. MuanN 19:08, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

• One Sith. IFYLOFD ^{(There is no death. There is the Force.)} 19:10, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Can someone show me where the organization is called "One Sith" rather than the "New Sith Order", that's given in the Legacy 0 issues? Don't use "We are one Sith now" as a source, describing a philosophy does not equate to a name. To illustrate, people wouldn't say a sentence like "We have one common goal" means the person is part of an organization called "One Common Goal". :P VT-16 19:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
  • agree with VT-16. well, i'm OK with the name "One Sith", if there's a source. i'm just curious because this article was named "New Sith Order" for a long time. that's all. MuanN 20:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
• I haven't read Inferno for a little bit but that we are one Sith now line is the only time i remeber them saying that. They never say we are the One Sith or anything like that. I think New Sith Order makes more sense. Steves490 04:23, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
  • i went to "New Sith Order"'s talk page. someone said that in legacy 27 it is called "One Sith". i went look for it and found this. [1] ... whould this work as a source? i find it more acceptable than the quote "You were taught the old ways. We are only one Sith now." MuanN 04:50, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
    • That is better, but it doesn't completely replace the "new Sith Order" which is seen elsewhere, though without the capital 'n' at the beginning. VT-16 08:49, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Main Image

I've been thinking about this for a while, and after looking at what has been the main image for quite a while now I came to the conclusion that the best picture for this article might in fact be the one we have of Krayt, Maladi, Talon and Stryfe near the bottom of the article from issue 30.

I know that the current main image represents Krayt's vision of One Sith, and also manages to present Krayt a the recognizable leader with a number of follower Sith behind him who are unknowns and therefore give the picture a greater sense of objectivity, but despite those positive aspects I don't feel like it's a very good main image at all.

I feel like the other picture allows one to see Krayt a lot more clearly, as well as see some of his Sith and how they look (red skin and tatoos), and although they are individual and recognizable characters I still feel that this little group picture manages to illustrate very well what the "One Sith" is. What are other people's opinions on making this the new main image? -Sauron18 09:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

• i think the original image is more than good enough. as you said, it present Krayt as a leader, greater sense of objectivity. the only negative point of the current image you said is "i don't feel like it's a very good main image". —202.28.183.10 08:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

The current image looks a little intimidating to people who thought Darth Caedus was the last Sith. 90.199.56.28 12:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

The current image also shows what the One Sith is about... lots of Sith Lords under a sole authority. The one with Stryfe and Talon looks like a screenshot and could be replaced with the one of Krayt, Maladi, Wyyrlok and Nihl during the coup on Fel.--Gonzalo84 19:06, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wha?

Who the H is Darth Tuhuka? 209.247.23.40 00:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

• I've removed it, as it looks like fanon. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 00:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] No appearence in Revelation

The One Sith does not appear, nor are they mentioned, in the novel "Revelation". So, it should be removed as a listing of their appearence.