He's canon, he can be seen in Episode 2. Rod
- But where does the name come from? - Kwenn 17:22, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- It may be in EP2, but it doesn't state who owned it or what happened to it after the film ended. You need sources.HavetStorm 17:27, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- This seems to come directly from Astromech.net. Don't know if they have a canon source or not, though HavetStorm 17:27, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Not at all. It's someone's custom built model. Speedy deletion on its way - Kwenn 17:29, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- exactly same info found here though: [[1]] HavetStorm 17:32, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Please do NOT speedy this. He can be seen in the visual dictionary as well as an on-set photo from Episode 2. While astromech.net DID make a model of him, they have built other canon astromechs as well. As for the name... well, maybe we should leave it up there till we hear otherwise. Rod
- Sorry Rod this got deleted the other day I think - but the talk is still up. If the actual droid is canon excluding the history you should post the fact on kwenns user page then recreate it. HavetStorm 17:51, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- There, a picture of him. I hope this makes kwenn happy. Rod
source?[]
i was wondering, CCG did not publish cards for Episode 2 cause decipher lost its contract, so why is it a source for this page? ArcTrooper1138 04:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- This name is obviously a fanon name. There simply is no source that indicates its name. He does indeed appear in 'AotC', but he doesn't have a name yet. And please stop using Astromech net! They are just as infamous for using fanon as Red6. --Sompeetalay 12:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC)