One of five?Edit
What is the source for this? I was not aware of any other Providence-class in Rebel service besides Rebel One. AdmiralNick22 16:41, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- He probably mistook the four captured cargo ships as Providences. I'll remove that from the battle article as well. VT-16 00:46, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Is this all the history avalable, was this ship ever part of the CIS Navy or was it ever seen before it was a reble ship? - Admiral Arm-Ja Scobal, Dark Lord of the Sith (Guestbook) 14:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- No information about that is given so far. VT-16 12:40, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
How do we know this is modified instead of the basic model? If the IH had a hangar added to the back that would necessitate removing the wings and shell protrusions. This could be the stock model. —Unsigned comment by 126.96.36.199 (talk • contribs).
Is it really a providence?Edit
Though it does look like a providence, I'm having a hard time accepting that it is same model as those seen in in RotS. The shell at the back, the extra engines, the "spine" that runs along the top and the difference in shape around the comm tower and bridge all seem to point out that it isn't the same make of ship, but is just a newer model. Any opinions? Ironic_smurf 16:08, 02 June 2008