A good article, IMHO, but some queries:

• Spelling in the quote needs cleared up.
• Is it local Sector Commands that employ privateers, or the central Sector Command within the High Command?
• Do we even merge with privateer?

--McEwok 10:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

• RE 1: Feel free to correct spelling and grammar.
• RE 2: The original source article does not really specify, and I don't want to start making conjecture/guesses.
• RE 3: I don't think they should be merged. The source article presents Reb privateers as having special status and being not your average privateer due to the requirements of the Alliance.

KEJ 11:42, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

• RE1: I didn't want to correct it without the source text. I assume that the lowercase letter after a full stop should be a capital, and that "vesselsm" should be "vessels,"—but there are alternatives, and I felt it was best to let someone with the book do this
• RE2: Does it say "Sector Command", or "Sector Commanders"? Sector Command, singular, is an arm of the High Command, whereas Sector Commanders, plural, are local commanders.
• RE3: Okay.

Thanks for the reply! --McEwok 15:09, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

• RE1: 'Vesselm' should be 'vessel,' - I've just corrected that.
• RE2: It actually says "Sector commanders-in-chief".
• RE3: Okay to you too :-)

KEJ 18:44, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

• RE 1: Thanks!
• RE 2: Okay, I'm pretty sure that means commanders-in-chief in individual sectors, rather than the Supreme Commander of Sector Command, who's the person responsible for coordinating all of them...
• RE 3: Aye! :D

Looks great now! --McEwok 12:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)