Talk:Republic HoloNet News Core Edition 14:10:03
From Wookieepedia, the Star Wars wiki.
Where are you getting this date from? My copy of issue #71 lists the HNN date (perhaps erroneously -- but if so, this should be noted) as 14:9:04. It also lists the CIS Shadowfeed date as 14:9:15. What's the deal? Was errata published listing these dates are wrong (and if so, where?) 71.183.62.71 07:42, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Umm, are you sure you're not confusing this with Republic HoloNet News Core Edition 14:9:04 in Star Wars Insider 70? You might just be looking at a different issue. Cull Tremayne 08:02, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'm guessing that's the issue, since CIS Shadowfeed Dispatch 14:9:15 Edition is also in that magazine. You're just looking at the wrong page. :P Cull Tremayne 08:03, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Nope, issue #71 (Han's on the cover): page 66 and 67. Unless the dates were corrected in some copies, mine definitely states 14:9:04 (for Republic Holonet News) and 14:9:15 (for CIS Shadowfeed). I thought it might be a mistake since issue 70 featured month 14 (but for that matter so did issue 69). Would you guys mind double-checking your issues. Maybe the mistake was caught in later copies.71.183.62.71 17:47, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
And I just checked with a friend of mine. He has the same dates that I have in that issue. So either your magazines have different dates than ours; the 10:3 and 10:5 dates are simply in error; or that errata was published somewhere indicating that the 9:04, 9:15 dates were a mistake.71.183.62.71 17:56, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- So what's the story, guys? I've since spoken to several others who's copies of issue #71 give as dates for the Republic Holonet News: 14:9:04, and for CIS Shadowfeed: 14:9:15. Granted, these are the same dates as are listed in issue #70, but that's what it says. Your dates are different. Where do they come from? If you can't answer that, then they need to change.71.183.62.71 01:48, 10 May 2008 (UTC)