Quantcast Talk:Rule of Two - Wookieepedia, the Star Wars Wiki
Recent changes Random page
GAMING
Entertainment
 
Star Wars
Star Trek
Transformers
Muppet Wiki
Digimon Wiki
Marvel Database
See more...

Talk:Rule of Two

From Wookieepedia, the Star Wars wiki.

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] No more need for Rule of Two?

I was going over the Questions and Answers part of starwars.com and I caught this in Episode III Lore section under the "Why do the Sith want revenge?" question:

"By Episode III, the Sith are ready to reveal themselves. There's no more need for subterfuge, no more need for skulking in the shadows, no more need for having only two Lords at a time."

Should this be added into this article? Is this canon? Any input would be great. Stinkywookie 16:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rule of Two Obsession

I wasn't sure where else to put this, because there are many places where Sith are hammered to not be true followers because of lack of the use of the Rule of Two. But based on the statement above and the Sith before the Dark Brotherhood fiasco that led to the Rule of Two, there have on more occasions than not been more than two Sith, and even within the pace of most of the Rule of Two followers, like Sidious & Tyrannus or Sidious & Vader, there were others that were Sith Acolytes of sorts, that undoubtedly followed the Sith Philosophy without the teachings being linked too them, Asajj Ventress to name one, perhaps we should not state that they are simply Not Sith and look at them more as Sith Acolytes or Sith Followers, in the times of Old Republic Sith there were non force users that were claimed as Sith, and the entire Sith had an army full of them, so in the light of Lumiya and the current situation with Jacen where a lot of people have degraded Jacen as a possible true Sith Lord perhaps we should try and run a more open mind about such a thing, and start noting some of our simple Dark Jedi as more of a Sith Follower or if in the employ of a Lord like Asajj a Sith Acolyte, just a thought N.Y.N.E.ComlinkImage:Sithempire2.png 03:15, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Plagueis, Sidious, and Maul

Where does it say in canon that Sidious was training Maul while Sidious was still the apprentice of Plagueis? He was 28 years old when Maul was born, so he just could have recognized Maul's potential, killed Plagueis, and then kidnapped Maul to make him a Sith.--Jedi Kasra 04:11, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Force Unleashed

Star Wars: The Force Unleashed features a currently unnamed, secret apprentice to Darth Vader. JAF1970 21:11, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Vader had many apprentices. So long as they are not Dark Lords of the Sith, the rule is being followed. -- Ozzel 21:14, 30 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Yoda

How did Yoda become aware of the rule of two? I was under the impression from Darth Bane: Rule of Two, the Jedi thought they had killed the sith and never realized the Rule of Two. Am I missing an important source or is it just a discrepancy?

Boogaboo122 00:06, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

  • The article says: "during the Dark Jedi Conflict, Kibh Jeen told the Jedi that the Sith had survived and were operating under the Rule of Two". This Kibh Jeen guy told the Jedi about the Rule of Two, but no one believed him at the time. 70.17.139.208 00:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

That, and with Darth Maul appearing, there had to be a master and/or an apprentice. Darth Oompa Loompa 00:54, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok but How did Kibh Jeen learn this? was he a official sith? it seems like he only fell so how did he know?

Boogaboo122 16:08, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

  • I was unsure as well as to how the Jedi learned of the rule of two as it was never truely in practice until after the Sith went into hiding with Bane others followed a close version but was not actually put into action, apparently the Rule of two book cannot be entirely cannon until something more definate is revealed. Ryan Fett (For Mandalore!) 00:47, 23 June 2008 (UTC)