ImageEdit

Exactly why? --Razzy1319 22:23, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

• The current image is better—it gives a better closeup of his face and doesn't contain any speech bubbles. --Imp 22:26, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • its smudgy and blurred. --Razzy1319 22:28, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Tell it to the artist. --Imp 22:31, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Requesting other opinionsEdit

Since razzy and I seem to be at a standstill here, I think we need some more people to help decide which picture is better for the article. The candidates:

--Imp 19:52, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

• 1st. Empty speech bubbles are the ugliest thing EVAH. --Master Starkeiller 12:33, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Anyone else who doesnt have a bias towards speech baloons? meant no offense, Master Starkeiller. --Razzy1319 19:40, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I don't think it's a "bias" to think that speech balloons look silly on a picture in an encyclopedia. If we could get a pic with the detail of pic 2 but without the speech bubbles, that would be perfect. In the absence of another bubble-free pic, number 1 is the best for this situation. —Darth Culator (talk) 20:16, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Yeah but the close up doesnt really show you the character... There a lot of characters with the same bald head and moustache, but how many have the cyborged arm or the western-inspired costuming. There is a lost of context without those elements. The bubbles are no longer distracting since there is nothing in them. --Razzy1319 22:31, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
      • If no one else has an opinion on this I guess the left candidate goes in the article. --Imp 19:50, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
        • I did the best I could to remove the speech bubbles. If you still think it's not good enough, just put the old image back again... ;) Borsk Fey'lya 10:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Dr. RobotnikEdit

This is pretty much entirely off topic, but is this an intended spoof on Dr. Robotnik from Sonic the hedgehog? Teylu 21:01, March 8, 2010 (UTC)