Contents 1 Grammar 2 Name Change 3 Manufacterers 4 Usage by Confederacy 5 Modeled after???

GrammarEdit

Okay folks. We don't say the most bloodiest here on the Wookiee wiki. It's either the most bloody or the bloodiest. Dr.Kermit^{(The Doctor is in)} 20:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• I would like to point out that you misspelled Grammer, when you were correcting others on there writing. So next time, make sure you, yourself, are doing things right, before you criticize others. Mecenarylord 18:00, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
  • And I would like to point out to you, Mecenarylord, that you misspelled "grammar," and used "there" instead of "their." So please don't criticize others for spelling words correctly. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 19:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
    • Oi. Man was that bad. Oh well. Mecenarylord cannot, nor will not be found here
      • Don't worry about it. I'll be shore 2 spel more korrectly from now on. Dr.Kermit^{(The Doctor is in)} 05:16, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Name ChangeEdit

Shouldn't the title of the article be "T-series tactical droid" rather than Tactical Droid? Since the Droid Commando had its name changed to BX-series droid commando, why not change the name of this article? It's clearly the T-series tactical droid as three Tactical Droids have been named, all beginning with a T such as TX-21 and TA-175. Galaxy At War identified Tactical Droids as T-series tactical droid. - Grievous7318 20:18, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

• That would be called fanon. We don't do fanon here. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 01:29, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
  • Wait, what? I thought Galaxy at War identified the tactical droid as the "T-series tactical droid," it even says on the article itself, not sure if that's an error or legitimate canon. I believe one of the Wizards books identified the Droid Commando as the BX-series droid commando and then the Droid commando article was renamed BX-series droid commando. - Grievous7318 20:39, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
    • I stand corrected. Page has been moved. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 01:51, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
      • No problem. Glad I could help. - Grievous7318 20:54, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Manufacterers Edit

Who manufactured these droids? Was it the Techno Union, Trade Federation etc.? I'm pretty sure it doesn't say it in the article, but I might be wrong. —Unsigned comment by Carnage battle droid (talk • contribs).

• I'm pretty sure it does say in the article. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 01:52, December 17, 2009 (UTC)

Usage by Confederacy Edit

These droids did not appear in the films, so does that mean the CIS stopped using them at some point, or is this just considered a coincidence? --Mateo22 ^Contact 17:37, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

• That they do not appear in the films doesn't mean anything. Even Darth Krayt's Sith Empire could have been using the, how could we know. Besides, the {{talkheader}} forbids us to use talk pages for a discussion about the subject. Xd1358 _Talk 17:39, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah um, the answering of my question would have been for the sake of updating information. I was trying to begin no inappropriate discussion of any kind. I see there is no official answer to my question then. --Mateo22 ^Contact 19:20, January 20, 2010 (UTC)

Modeled after???Edit

Were they modeled after a species? B-1's are modeled after dead Neimoidians, and Droidekas are made after Colicoids, and several droids are modeled after the Xi Charrians. Are these modeled after something, too?66.42.173.161 15:49, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

• Nothing confirmed, and this page isn't for speculation on the subject. CC7567 ^(talk) 18:32, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

I was just asking a simple question. you don't get feet like those for an overgrown calculator without it being intentional.66.42.173.161 17:48, April 22, 2010 (UTC)