Name[]
Cargo ship is not part of the name that's the designation, the name is TB-73 per the episode like when in Rogue One they say Shuttle SW-0608. This should be moved back to the original name--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 23:19, March 10, 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed --Lewisr (talk) 23:30, March 10, 2018 (UTC)
- Should we move
Cargo transport 241 andCargo freighter EF-75?--Vitus InfinitusTalk 23:33, March 10, 2018 (UTC)- Most probably yes, just to 241 and EF-75 I assume? --Lewisr (talk) 23:42, March 10, 2018 (UTC)
- EF-75 yes, 241 I guess so.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 23:48, March 10, 2018 (UTC)
- I did a strike through on Cargo transport 241 because that could be it's designation, like medical frigate 517 so we may not need to change it. I also just checked the subtitles of EF-75 and the F in freighter is capital and the name is in italics while the rest of the sentence isn't.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 00:09, March 11, 2018 (UTC)
- That solves that then! Move EF-75 and keep cargo transport 241 as it is --Lewisr (talk) 00:12, March 11, 2018 (UTC)
- I should clarify, the sentence is: "Cargo Freighter EF-75, stand by for code authorization." Should I move it?--Vitus InfinitusTalk 00:16, March 11, 2018 (UTC)
- That solves that then! Move EF-75 and keep cargo transport 241 as it is --Lewisr (talk) 00:12, March 11, 2018 (UTC)
- I did a strike through on Cargo transport 241 because that could be it's designation, like medical frigate 517 so we may not need to change it. I also just checked the subtitles of EF-75 and the F in freighter is capital and the name is in italics while the rest of the sentence isn't.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 00:09, March 11, 2018 (UTC)
- EF-75 yes, 241 I guess so.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 23:48, March 10, 2018 (UTC)
- Most probably yes, just to 241 and EF-75 I assume? --Lewisr (talk) 23:42, March 10, 2018 (UTC)
- Should we move
- I don't have any real issues with keeping it and just redirecting EF-75 to it --Lewisr (talk) 00:32, March 11, 2018 (UTC)