NamespaceEdit

Wouldn't the language or the species have more in-universe notability than any one individual? --LtNOWIS 23:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

• Yes, they would. How about simply using Teek as a disambig, with all three subjects staying at parenthesized titles? In doing so, we would be assigning equal importance to all three. --Imperialles 00:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
  • That's what Havac just undid. jSarek 01:17, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
    • I think we should be catering to the real world reader here. When people come here to look up Teek, they will almost always be looking for the individual. Why make it more difficult for them? -- Ozzel 01:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
      • Given that post-Battle for Endor EU seems to feature Teek as a species almost as prominently as it does as an individual, I'm not sure it necessarily IS catering to the real-world reader. jSarek 02:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
        • Our policy in the past has generally been to go on in-universe notability, (e.g. David West Reynolds) as we're an in-universe encyclopedia. But I don't think that's codified anywhere. -LtNOWIS 02:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)