should this article be deleted until dec. 27 in pursuence of the spoiler policy (one month after publication can new info be added) IthinkIwannaLeia 19:42, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

How is this article a spoiler?. - Lord KAJ ^{– Company Office} 19:45, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

• Uh, no it doesn't need to be deleted. That policy is more in line with merging two articles, like Malek and Alek. Greyman^(Paratus) 19:47, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah. You have misenterpretad the meaning of the policy, this article contains nothing remotely spoilerish. - Lord KAJ ^{– Company Office} 19:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Hmm. It appears I have misinterpreted the policy. good to know. thanks guys. I am off to add some more info to other articles. That policy is stupid by the bye. I say spoiler warnings at the top are good enough. IthinkIwannaLeia 06:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Gatekeepers Edit

Can we be certain that the Sith mentioned in the article are really the holocron's gatekeepers? They seem to be but recordings of *their own Holocrons* brought forth by it's sole gatekeeper - Palpatine. Gorthuar 22:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Ancient Sith Holocron Edit

• Wow.. So, is this like, "The Holocron of The Sith"? Their main holocron, the one passed down from Sith-to-Sith-to-Sith-to-Sith? The oldest holocron they've got? Containing all the secrets of the Sith since the very first Sith? --75.185.109.160 01:36, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
  • No. King Adas' holocron is the oldest, the first. And I'm still not positive whether all the entries in the Telos holocron are genuine. While reading "Jedi vs. Sith" I had the impression that it is Palpatine's holocron and the other "gatekeepers" were just recordings of other holocrons in his possession. Gorthuar 06:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
    • K, thanks. But, hm... It seems more like the Sith's most major number one holocron would have had Ajunta Pall as one of it's gatekeepers, so, was the King Adas' Holocron passed down to other Sith? Or is that not said? --The Wolfe22 23:35, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

==Nearly half isn't five? Edit

• I think 'nearly half of the Master's Council' is five. If is would be 4, Solusar surely would have said a third. Can I change it or it is not canon? Darth Morrt 14:38, 25 August 2009 (UTC)