Now, according to Bob's blog, the Force.net is keeping their CUSWE intact. When i read this, I also got the feeling that he was a little resentful over TFN (though this may have stemmed from the additions he's going to have to make cause of the NEC). That being said, should we maintain a link to the TFN site, or just abandon it? -- SFH 23:45, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

• Abandon it. That version will apparently no longer be updated, and the author of the CUSWE, Bob Vitas, has asked that "if you find a site that still links to the old TF.N address, could you pop the webmaster an e-mail and ask them to change it?" Taken together, it's a disservice to both our readers and to Vitas to leave the old link up. jSarek 02:48, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

• I hear what you're saying, but on the other hand, I think explaining the existence of two versions is relevant to the page, and a link to TF.N is justified by the differences between the two versions: cuswe.org seems to have reverted to the older presentation format, without images—and that's an observation, not a crticism! Feel free to re-edit if you disagree, though! --McEwok 17:46, 28 June 2006 (UTC)