This is the talk page for the article "The Jedi Path: A Manual for Students of the Force (real-life book)." This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

Canonical versionEdit

What should we do about the fact that this is a book that also exists in-universe? Should we have separate articles (the in-universe one and the real life one) or have a single article and have in-article mentions of the canonical book just link here? —Milo Fett^[Comlink] 07:01, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

• I believe it could work with a link like this: The Jedi Path, making sure to differentiate from the OOU version. -- Riffsyphon1024 07:16, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
  • That would work. But with other things where in-universe things have the same name as out-of-universe things, doesn't the in-universe one usually not have a designator like (in-universe)? For example, we have Millennium Falcon and Millennium Falcon (novel), not Millennium Falcon (ship) and (novel). Obviously the ship came first of course, but doesn't the rule usually apply elsewhere? —Milo Fett^[Comlink] 16:43, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

Great book, but there are errors in text that are hard to ignore. On page 151, There are 2 comments on top right of the page.One by Annakin and one by Ahsoka. The printing that matches Annakins has an "Ahsoka" signature at the bottom of it, followed by Ahsoka's actual comment. Annakins comment on the text was mislabelled as Ahsoka, which is pretty irritating to look at knowing its incorrect. Also, other comments made by Ahsoka in the book dont make sense chronologically. Havent the publishers responsible for this ever heard of "proof-reading"? 24.80.168.161 18:32, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

I saw those mistakes as well. I've been wondering if they could be mentioned in the article, or is that original research? - Esjs^(Talk) 20:49, March 19, 2012 (UTC)

• I've heard that in Australia the box set was released significantly later (and at a cheaper price) by Scholastic Inc. through department stores and that this particular version had the errors inside the book corrected. Errors on the removable items still existed however. Jartka'irn (talk) 09:28, August 19, 2012 (UTC)
  • http://www.bigw.com.au/entertainment/books/sci-fi-fantasy/bpnBIGW_0000000284694/star-wars-the-jedi-path-boxset Jartka'irn (talk) 09:34, August 19, 2012 (UTC)
  • I have also read the "Behind the Scenes Section and, upon looking at my own copy, which is the later released Book only, without the box, I have found that the mentioned errors do not exist. I think they were present in the orginal box set, but were edited out for such later copies as the book exclusive, and perhaps international releases. Can anybody confirm this?--Master Tej (talk) 04:57, January 4, 2013 (UTC)