This is the talk page for the article "Incom Corporation." This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

Is there any explanation as to why Incom was still the manufacturer of the X-wing (including improved models like the XJ) after Endor? Seeing as the designers of the X-wing formed FreiTek, it would seem like they'd be the natural ones to create improvements on the design. I don't think copyrights would be an issue either; seeing as the New Republic and the Empire didn't even recognize each other as legitimate governments (hence the lack of an official exchange rate for their currency, per Heir to the Empire), the NR wouldn't care about Incom's Imperial copyrights. 68.47.234.131 10:16, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

• Hmm, you do have a point, I guess. Admiral J. Nebulax 12:22, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
  • So, does that mean there hasn't been an in-universe explanation given yet? 68.47.234.131 02:30, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Logo Edit

Has anyone else noticed that the logo looks like an X-wing?

T-23 Skyhopper Edit

How come there's no mention of the T-23 Skyhopper seen in the Young Jedi Knights series? It's clearly stated that it's a different model from the T-16. If it's all right, I'm adding a link to the T-23 article amongst the product listings. Dewback rancher 20:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

early logo Edit

the simbol on the early logo is quite definately the hebrew letter "aleph", which would be the first letter in a hebrew spelling of "incom". it's completely meaningless, sure, but do you think we should have a BTS section for it? or mention it in the article at all? Nadav 11:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Move back to Incom Corporation Edit

In accordance with Paul R. Urquhart's comments here regarding the Torranix/Incom naming, I believe that moving the article back to Incom Corporation would be the best course of action. The intent was clearly to show that Torranix became Incom, and therefore the article should be re-moved accordingly. And thoughts or objections? - Cavalier One^{(Squadron channel)} 21:07, June 8, 2012 (UTC)

• Hmmm, in that case, maybe they should be separate articles. In any event, I would go ahead and move the page back. (P.S. Incom Corporation sounds a lot better anyway.)--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 21:26, June 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure if two separate articles are required since they started life as one company, then became Incom as the years passed. The various fields in the infobox would be more than sufficient I think in this case. I'll give this until Friday in case anyone else objects/comments, and will move it then. - Cavalier One^{(Squadron channel)} 14:26, June 13, 2012 (UTC)
    • I believe it should definitely be moved back, since we go by the most current name. Essential Guide to Warfare states that it started as this name, but was later renamed to Incom. <-Omicron^{(Leave a message at the BEEP!)} 22:18, June 22, 2012 (UTC)