This is the talk page for the article "Tricky Trap Tree." This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

TitleEdit

Title in inappropriate style, and we're unsure that the character is a Neti--Erl 00:40, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Actually, it's pretty sure she is a Neti. Her description matches their species perfectly, so until it's states that there's another species that's almost exactly the same that she belongs to, it's pretty much a fact that she's a Neti. 199.79.168.160 20:59, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

• Much higher likelyhood of her being Ood Bnar's descendant than Master Saa. Because Saa would be a bit more prominent, I'd think.
  • Also, I do doubt that she is a Neti. Otherwise, why would the one lightsaber swing exhaust her? We see Master Saa doing all sorts of gymnastics. And finally, Neti would be heavily persecuted by the empire, due to their high percentage of Jedi--The Erl of the Tricky Trap Tree ^{talk What I do} 21:54, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
    • I think it's almost certain that she's a Neti, but I suppose the possibility that she isn't should be included in the article. 199.79.168.160 22:58, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
  • It is HIGHLY unlikely to be a Neti. The "tricky tree" was only capable of EXTREMELY slow movement, whereas Neti can move at normal human speedsJustinGann 06:36, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

So? she moves slowly. Whoop-de-doo. We don't know all there is about Neti, perhaps she just recently came out of hibernation and they are slow afterwards. Or perhaps she hadn't had a lot of sun recently. She could have been fighting for a while before that, meaning she could be battle-fatigued. Either way, we cannot accept or dismiss the idea that she might be a Neti. However, even with (possibly) after it in the infobox, we ought to remove that and replace it with Plant-like species (possibly a Neti) because it can be miseleading, but retain the Possibly a Neti part because we should not dismiss it outright. The wording makes it less assumptive. I will make the changes myself.Gnost-Dural 15:42, December 17, 2010 (UTC) I also removed the behind the scenes section, as it was assumptive. PS i really hated doing these, but rules are rule, no matter how bad.Gnost-Dural 15:44, December 17, 2010 (UTC)