Isn't the name of this supposed to be "Trihexalophince1138," not "Toxin 1138?" JimRaynor55 07:23, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Yes. QuentinGeorge 08:28, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Is Trihexalophince1138 or Trihexalophine1138 the correct spelling? --Imperialles 19:47, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- That's the spelling used on the official CUSWE. Sorry about the typo, I was unsure about the spelling and just copy and pasted that word from a forum, thinking it was correct. JimRaynor55 19:50, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Right, no worries. I moved it. --Imperialles 19:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- shouldn't we mention that the weapon was probably related to, perhaps even an improvement on, the trihexalon from Jedi Starfighter? I doubt the similar name is a coincidence. I think its likely dioxis --> trihexalon --> Trihexalophine1138 form a Trade Federation "swamp gas" poison "family tree"JustinGann 01:42, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- The Essential Atlas refers to it as trihexalon on page 65. Add to that the almost identical appearance, and it seems reason enough to merge them to me.
Should a reference be made to George Lucas' film THX1138? It's pretty obvious that this is a nod to that film, not just with the numbers, but the letters THX as well. --Ravaga