"after the Unification Wars of 3817" acc. to The Book of Imperial Shuttle Plans. I take 3817 to mean 3817 years after the Republic's foundation in 25000 BBY, so the Wars ended 21183 BBY.

They must have started much earlier, since Arden Lyn/Xendor fought in them much closer to 25000 BBY.

I suppose we should not overlook the plural "Wars"--possibly a group term for a series of wars covering about 3800 years. Compare the 1000 years of the New Sith Wars.

• I'm going to remove that, as "The Unification Wars of 3817" seem to come from Book of Imperial Shuttle Plans: Cygnus Spaceworks. Unless it's in The New Essential Chronology too. — Silly Dan 02:59, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• It most certainly is not. The only Unification Wars in the book are the Koros ones. In fact, I'm fairly certain that the Unification Wars cannot be found in any official source--this article should be removed. TalonCard 07:12, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Found it in the ROTS crossections book. QuentinGeorge 06:42, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Can anyone confirm whether the references cited before RotS:ICS use the term "Unification Wars"? if not, what do they say? And what's the specific reference in RotS:ICS itself? Thanks! --McEwok 18:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Why so interested in knowing if any author prior to Saxton used the term? I wish all SW authors would get the same indepth scrutiny from you, since you seem damn-near obsessed with "exposing" him with whatever it is you're looking for. VT-16 09:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Sio Bibble quote Edit

Isn't the Sio Bibble quote out of place here? I was under the impression the Ruusan Reformations were created with this and Palpatine's statement concerning the age of the Republic in mind. Considering that there have been many full-scale wars since the original formation of the Republic, Bibble is obviously referring to the Ruusan Reformation in this quote. Kaballmo 19:44, October 15, 2010 (UTC)

• Good point. It's gone. Dangerdan97 19:47, October 15, 2010 (UTC)