Talk:V-wing airspeeder
Back to page
Armament
Edit
Should this article list the missile launcher seen in Star Wars: Rogue Squadron? If nobody objects, I'll load up my copy and find out the number and capacity of the launchers and put it in the infobox. —Darth Culator (talk) 03:23, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- If it was included on the craft, you don't need to ask for permission. Admiral J. Nebulax 20:15, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- I only ask because it doesn't seem to be mentioned in any other source (it is notably absent from the NEGVV entry), and gameplay mechanics aren't generally considered canon. —Darth Culator (talk) 21:07, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Oh. Admiral J. Nebulax 21:12, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- I may be beating a dead horse here, but the missle launchers are also absent from the Arms & Equipment Guide write up of the V-wing airspeeder as well. JoJoTrue 21:23, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm, interesting. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 23:02, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- I don't see why the missile launcher can't be mentioned, even if it isn't standardized armament. Gameplay or not, modified weapons-systems aren't rare, neither in the real world nor in SW. :) VT-16 22:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- True. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
23:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- While not on the V-Wing, Seeker Cluster Missles are also available in Star Wars: Battle for Naboo. Joseph Leito 12:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- True. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- I may be beating a dead horse here, but the missle launchers are also absent from the Arms & Equipment Guide write up of the V-wing airspeeder as well. JoJoTrue 21:23, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Oh. Admiral J. Nebulax 21:12, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- I only ask because it doesn't seem to be mentioned in any other source (it is notably absent from the NEGVV entry), and gameplay mechanics aren't generally considered canon. —Darth Culator (talk) 21:07, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Characteristics
Edit
What is the source of the engine description? The speed of sound is about 1200 KpH, so "incredibly fast" seems a poor description of this craft. Adding some context to the description might be worthwhile. Multiple modern aircraft are capable of sustaining 1400 KpH for extended periods of time. I imagine the author of the craft's description simply failed to do any research and picked numbers that sounded large. 118.236.132.43 05:41, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
What happened here? It shows the source code, but only on the article. -Rexpup 19:51, June 30, 2011 (UTC)