DAMMIT NO! I was just getting into that feature. I want to petition its continuation. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:10, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

• Since there's been no announcement, official or otherwise, that they've been canceled, and since Somp just heard they'll soon be back, I'm reverting, at least for now. We'll see if they're back in a few weeks or not. jSarek 10:50, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Yep, later on the very day I rewrote this, I saw that post. Hopefully it will turn out to be true. -- Ozzel 10:52, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
    • And actually, we may want to get rid of the quote. I put it on there as somewhat of a joke. -- Ozzel 10:56, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
      • As Darth Culator would point out, we should not be completely devoid of humor. ;-) jSarek 11:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
        • Well, they don't have much time in 2007 to continue to finish it out unless there's one per day now. 50 days to go. -- Riffsyphon1024 07:05, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
          • Well, no, they're obviously not going to finish them this year, but I think we can live with them returning on their old weekly schedule. jSarek 07:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
            • We'd still like to see something though, wouldn't we? I'll be content with something. -- Riffsyphon1024 07:40, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Other new canon/Other new informationEdit

Using the information from any particular official source for individual articles is standard practice here on Wookieepedia. And the practice of linking to things that appear in, or are mentioned by that source in the "Appearances" section of that source's article is fine by me, since it works well for reference purposes. But having the "Other new canon" and "Other information" sections troubles me because information from the source is simply placed right in the source's article and if not actually replacing the source, it comes close to it. Information such as this belongs in the respective IU articles, not the source article. Muuuuuurgh 20:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

• Alright alright. It has been a temporary placeholder for the information but it can now be moved to their respective subjects. -- Riffsyphon1024 20:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

What ever happened to the visual guides? Edit

I really enjoyed reading and looking at the new visual guides that starwars.com came out with, but there has not been a new one since last november. Does anyone know if they are going to come out with new visual guides in the future, or did they cancel it? 'Alpha85 ^{(Kamino Databank)} 14:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

• Looks like after SW.com updated for the Clone Wars movie, they deleted the pages related to it and a bunch of other stuff. -- Riffsyphon1024 08:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
  • They haven't deleted them outright; they just haven't been updated to the new format yet. Bonnie discusses it in more detail in this thread. jSarek 08:48, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
    • Okay I was wondering if that was the case instead. -- Riffsyphon1024 08:59, 21 July 2008 (UTC)