Popular PastimeEdit

"a popular pastime for Star Wars fans" HAHAHAHAHA! Adamwankenobi 11:27, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

• You know it's true 'wankenobi :-P --Azizlight 11:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Indeed. Adamwankenobi 11:34, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Getting a little out of hand... Adam, do you know the exact episode this is from? Cull Tremayne 11:55, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

• It was SavageBob who added "Dried wank's hide" to the article. [1] I've asked him on his talk page, but unfortunately he's been inactive for over 9 months now :-( --Azizlight 13:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
• Apparently it's Episode 18: The Raich. --Azizlight 14:25, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Tell me this isn't true. I'm having a hard time getting off the floor from laughing. Unit 8311 15:56, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
    • It's in that episode. The Two-headed Gonster uses it to create the magic cap for use against the Raich. Cull Tremayne 23:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
      • Wow. Just... wow. --Azizlight 00:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
        • "Getting a little out of hand." <snicker> The "two-headed gonster" grabs the "wank" and makes a "magic cap"? Sounds like a typical weeknight for me. Cutch 03:05, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
• I am just kidding. Really. Cutch 03:40, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
• We mustn't let the wank go! ;) -- Riffsyphon1024 06:43, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
• This isn't a personal attack, just a paraphrase.

.... 12:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

• So does this mean that one who tends to a wank is caller a wanker? DAWUSS 16:36, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Precisely. Unit 8311 16:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

This's gotta be a joke, right? How'd they let this get into the canon? —Unsigned comment by 86.150.152.55 (talk • contribs).

• • In my experience, almost everything that shouldn't be canon is, such as Dark Empire, NJO, and Legacy. So why not have this be canon, too? I tell you, Star Wars Continuity is going down the drain. 70.105.71.53 22:24, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

• What absolute garbage. They can't have wank in the canon. Savossk 12:09, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Wank in the canon? No comment :-P --Azizlight 14:21, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Someone get a picture of the dried Wank's skin! Stat! Cull Tremayne 14:24, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
      • I despair for the one who put up the image request tag...81.86.76.6 07:33, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
• Is the behind the scenes bit really needed? It makes the article look awfully unproffesional.
  • I know stuff like that is prone to all kinds of fanboyism, but there's lots of precedent in other articles for having real-world meanings of their names. - Lord Hydronium 20:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
    • This is definitely another example (the other being Bollux) of an amusing-sounding British slang term creating a stir when used out-of-context. What next, a lightsaber move called 'shagging'?:PTocneppil 19:59, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

lol 81.103.44.114 23:42, 4 August 2007 (UTC)