EwokEdit

Well, if he looks like an Ewok...maybe he is. Something for a BTS note, methinks. Perhaps. Maybe. Not. Thefourdotelipsis 23:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

• I think the Bilar theory holds more water, personally. -- Ozzel 06:36, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Pooh for separate article?Edit

Since the name of the character is similar to Jabba the Hutt, should we have another article for the 'Pooh' word? Like having it say "Pooh was a title or species to which Winnie belonged". And thus changing this article to just "Winnie". :P VT-16 06:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Given that, unlike the Hutts, we know nothing of the naming structures of the society to which this individual belonged, we're probably better off leaving it as-is. ;-) jSarek 06:39, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
  • True, but it's a bit strange. Oh well, if SW can have Poggle the Lesser as a full name, then, why not Winnie the Pooh? ;) VT-16 07:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• I think separating them into "Winnie" and "Pooh" is just inviting vandalism, if you ask me. -- SFH 06:40, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Makes you think though...perhaps Pooh is some kind of title for the Grand Pimp of the Hundred Acre Wood...and for that matter, are Pooh sticks canon? Thefourdotelipsis 06:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
  • There already is an entry called "Pooh". KEJ 06:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't think that's the same bear. That bear is for a sound, this bear is a character... i could be wrong though... MiricaEclipse 21:53, December 27, 2010 (UTC)