Wikia

Wookieepedia

Talk:Xendor

115,169pages on
this wiki

Back to page

Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Xendor."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit the Knowledge Bank. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

LinkFA-star

Xendor is a featured article, which means it has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wookieepedia community. If you see a way this page can be updated or improved without compromising previous work, please feel free to contribute.

LinkFA-star

This article was showcased on Wookieepedia's Main Page on 6 April 2009.

Article milestones
Date Process Result
11 June 2008 Featured article candidate Success
28 June 2008 Featured article
Current status: Featured article

SourceEdit

  • Any source for this? MarcK 16:41, 11 Jul 2005 (UTC)
    • Tales of the Jedi: The Golden Age of the Sith and SW Gamer: The Emperor's Pawns. See Timetales for more detail - Kwenn

Correlian?Edit

  • Where is this established? I've never read anything that suggest Xendor came from Corellia.
    • Oops. Seems 12.64.120.196 added that. -- Riffsyphon1024 02:15, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)
      • Sorry about that. I saw it on the Xendor entry on Wikipedia, which was a lot more detailed. That has also been removed. My Bad.--User:12.64.120.196

ImageEdit

  • "Possible Xendor"? Is the man in the picture stated to be Xendor or not? Charlii 16:30, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
    • No, he is not, the wording describing the picture though, alludes to the person that became the first Dark Jedi. Does anyone know how to keep in the note of a "possible Xendor" in the template boxes? Otherwise it should probably be off to the side. (Note, that's what I had originally done) Cull Tremayne 05:34, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
      • I copied the ALT text into a caption so the "possible Xendor" can stay in the box. Darth Culator 11:47, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Crispin what now?Edit

  • Why are the Crispin novels listed as sources? They don't concern themselves with primordial Jedi. 72.228.255.171 07:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

ImageEdit

  • I know this is an old topic, but this image is most definitely not Xendor. This image comes from a holocron owned by Thon. In it a tree-like Jedi describes how before recorded history "magicians" used what was in reality the Dark Side to make themselves appear to be gods.

How is that relevant? This ocurred before recorded history. Xendor lived in recorded history; The Great Schism ocurred after the founding of the Republic and was recorded (otherwise we wouldn't know about it). Bredd13 01:24, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Home worldEdit

How was Xendor from Kashi if he was born 500 years after the planet went supernova? All sources clearly say that the Kashi system was destroyed in 25,000 BBY, the same approximate time of the Jedi Order's beginning. Yet Xendor, who lived 500 years later, came from Kashi before it was destroyed. Xendor was human, so he wouldn't have had extraordinary longevity. Was is perhaps destroyed closer to 24,500 BBY, around the time of the First Great Schism?

An official retcon from Lucas Film to clear this up would be nice. At the very least, I think the discrepancy should be brought to our attention on all related pages, such as the Kashi page, the Kashi Mer page, Xendor's page, etc.



Lol dude, that sounded soooo nerdish XP --Thrawn Du Gard 17:07, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Connection to the Second Group of Dark Jedi and the SithEdit

it may seem like I'm beating a dead horse here, but a question must be asked: All official information on Sith history - Evil Never Dies, Star Wars Insider, etc. - all hold Xendor as someone important to the Sith. If his line of Dark Jedi have absolutely no connection to Ajunta Pall's Dark Jedi from 6,900 BBY, how then is Xendor considered such a prominent figure in Sith history, even being given the title of honorary "first" Dark Lord of the Sith? This is why, I believe, that there must be a connection between the Dark Jedi of 24,500 BBY and those of 7,000-6,900 BBY. I think that Xendor's line of succession must have survived in secret somehow and become intertwined with that of Ajunta Pall and his followers.

The Xendor/Kashi IssueEdit

In regards to the issue as to how Xendor, (a human who lived c. 24,500 BBY), could have been from Kashi, (which was destroyed c. 25,000 BBY), may I offer the following possibility:

  • It's certainly conceivable that not all of the Kashi people were on Kashi when it was destroyed. If so, then Xendor may have been a descendant of two of the survivors. In that case, "Kashi" could be considered a cultural designation for those survivors and their descendants.
  • As a side note, it is interesting to speculate if there was any connection between Xendor and
~ Jaywin
Actually, according to the Kashi Mer talisman article, Xendor did come into possession of the talisman. ~ Jaywin


He wasnt the first dark jedi!Edit

After he was banned from the jedi ordre he join a group of other dark jedi. Wolfr 16:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

  • No, he did not. I don't know why there are people who keep saying this but there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that the Legions of Lettow preexisted Xendor. All sources suggest that he founded the group himself. 24.3.94.134 21:48, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


Nice Revision!Edit

I just wanted to say that I really like what you all have done with this page. Quite a major rewrite! The only complaint I have is that the picture is gone, but other than that this article is quite great now. I hope it gets featured as I saw it was nominated. Though obscure, Xendor is one of my favorite characters in Star Wars lore. 24.3.94.134 00:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Image, againEdit

Why does the image keep getting edited out? I thought we established about that that was indeed Xendor? This article will look very weak as a featured article when the time rolls around without an image. Was this some sort of administrative decision that we don't know about? Or is someone just adamantly against it? 24.3.94.134 02:16, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

  • You'll have to point out where the image was established as being Xendor, since it clearly wasn't on this page. -- I need a name (Complain here) 10:32, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
    • I think the image should be kept in some fashion, maybe in the BTS section, since it is a canon image of one of the first dark side users, which could very well be Xendor... Charlii 12:22, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
      • But it's just idle speculation. There's nothing really to back it up, at all. Thefourdotelipsis 12:39, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
        • It was up for such a long time. I don't see why there's such a problem with it all of a sudden. 24.3.94.134 19:20, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
          • Just because it was up there for a long time doesn't make it right. And it's gone now because I've made the article as accurate and complete as possible. Sans speculation. Thefourdotelipsis 00:53, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Image, yet again Edit

The first canon image of Xendor is an illustration of a manuscript by Sorzus Syn which shows Starkiller fighting with a lightsaber. Xendor may have looked just like Starkiller, but he could not have had a lightsaber any more than a Neanderthal man could have had an electric razor -- in both cases, the relevant technology is millennia out of place. This should be noted, and the image should not be presented as what Xendor is actually supposed to look like. --R5-X41238-G8-R3-3124-D2 18:02, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

  • There is a much nicer image of Xendor in The Essential Guide to Warfare which clearly shows that he is wielding some sort of electrically-charged sword rather than a lightsaber. I do hope someone uploads it. 50.73.188.54 17:40, April 4, 2012 (UTC)
    • Oh, good. It has been uploaded. Super! 50.73.188.54 18:55, April 27, 2012 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki