This page is a work in progress in an effort to accurately record the procedural bylaws of the AgriCorps for posterity and quick reference.

ProceduresEdit

• The AC has decided that a minimum consensus of at least four AC members present on IRC is needed to remove from an AC meeting page an article nominated for review for a future meeting in the instances that others have satisfactorily handled the objections to that article prior to the meeting. This is done in an effort to eliminate any unnecessary time spent looking at articles during meetings.

• A consensus of at least 3 AC support votes is needed on the GAN page to remove a nomination. This consensus of 3 support votes can alternatively be obtained from present users in IRC. This is typically done when a nomination has become idle after a period of three weeks with remaining outstanding objections from reviewers.

• Likewise, a consensus of at least 3 AC support votes is needed on the GAN page to strike an objection from a reviewer that is deemed otherwise invalid (For what constitutes an invalid objection, refer to the accompanying section below). This consensus of 3 support votes can alternatively be obtained from present users in IRC, in which case a note will be left on the GAN page that the objection has been stricken via AC consensus. However, if the nominator of the article in question is an AC member, he/she cannot be included in the 3 support votes.

• Nominations that exhibit strong evidence showing that the nominator has no inclination to work on the article during the review process will be candidates for the "nonsense nomination clause" and can be removed short of the stipulated three-week idle period with a consensus of 3 AC support votes. This consensus of 3 support votes can alternatively be obtained from present users in IRC, in which case a note will be left on the GAN page that the nomination has been removed via AC consensus.

• A nomination can be removed from the GAN page at the request of the original nominator without the need for a formal vote by AC members.

• Any AC should add the {{Acapproved}} tag to the "Comments" section of a nomination when a) after one week since being nominated, there are b) at least 5 support votes, at least 3 of which are from AC/Inqs, and of those votes 1 of which must be from an AC member, and c) no remaining outstanding objections. This is done as an indicator that the nomination process is effectively complete, the nomination has been successful, and the nomination can now be removed from the page and archived.

• Nominations that receive at least 5 total AC support votes before the standard one week has passed can be removed and archived as successful.

Invalid objection rationaleEdit

• An objection from a reviewer may be considered invalid if said reviewer has been inactive for a period of time longer than one week.

• In the event of two or more objections in direct conflict with each other, a single objection may be deemed valid by consensus, and all other conflicting objections will be considered invalid.

• An objection may be considered invalid if said objection is identified as contradicting established Policies on Wookieepedia. This will specifically include, but not be limited to, the following policies: Manual of Style—Layout Guide—Sourcing—Neutral point of view.