Entertainment
 
[Apotheoses Jedi]

Apotheoses Jedi 1,156 edits since June 2, 2008

1,156

From Wookieepedia, the Star Wars wiki.

Contents

[edit] How?

How did you fill in the chart with the biographical information, and the other things? Thanks --Weserman 23:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bendu

  • I saw your post on Tope's talk page and thought I'd throw out my two cents. I don't know much about the Bendu myself, but I talked to someone who does, and his recommendation on IRC was to "What I would personally do is move the symbol information to a new article, and move the "Bendu" page to "Jedi Bendu." Add the "cut" template. Then put in information from the original Star Wars drafts about the Jedi Bendu." Anyway, something to think about. Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 21:54, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

I appreciate your opinion and encourage anyone to give it to me at anytime. I am relatively new at making changes and editions to the site so I'm happy to take any advice, opinion, or criticism that any other wookiepedian may have. Now to the subject at hand. I've decided that what I'm going to do is to merge Bendu with the Order of Dai Bendu and create a separate article, the Insignia of Unity for the symbol of the Dai Bendu and the Republic. Apotheoses Jedi 01:11, 14 November 2008 (UTC-6)

  • Okay, then all you need to do is make sure the information from the existing Bendu article is moved into the Dai Bendu article, then alter the Bendu article to redirect to it. It's also a good idea to copy and paste the history of the original Bendu article onto the talk page of the new article. No deleting necessary! ;-) Cheers. Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 18:33, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Looking for sources

Hey, I've noticed you're trying to find the sources for edits added to a few pages. If you're ever unsure as to something's validity but are hesitant to remove it, just go ahead and slap down a {{Fact}} tag next to a sentence or just add the {{Citation}} template to the top of the article. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:43, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Book of Law

Hey, Apotheoses Jedi :). I just saw you removed quite a bit of information from Book of Law and Book of Shadows, and was looking for clarification as to why this was necessary? Was it a copyright violation? When you remove that amount of information in future, can you please provide an edit summary detailing why, as it helps people watching the RC avoid mistaking it for vandalism. Thank you :-). Grunny (Talk) 08:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

  • I just received confirmation from Jaymach as to the reason, but please do place an edit summary in future as it can avoid confusion. Thank you :-). Grunny (Talk) 08:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
    • No worries :-). Just a few of us see large removals without an edit summary and get worried :P, and yes that information was mostly fanon. Good work finding it :-). Grunny (Talk) 10:29, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Moon infobox

  • Yes, it's because Antar 4 is using a moon infobox. Green Tentacle was able to get it added, so there you go. :-) Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 00:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Star's End

I'd have to read the book again to be sure, but I seen no reason why it can't inhabit the CSA military bases category and the prison category at the same time. Our category structures need overhauling, and its something I do if I run up against a particularly galling categorisation. You may want to check out Category:Corporate Sector Authority fleets as well, which I created last week, and see if you can add to it. - Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 07:26, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Redirect

Simply type "#REDIRECT Whatever page you want to redirect to". :) Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:07, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

  • Type this in the page you want to redirect: #REDIRECT [[Article being redirected to]] Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:05, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Cases articles

Hey, I saw you editing Case of Colla-Arphocc Automata versus the Galactic Alliance article which currently doesn't meet our naming criteria. Such kind of articles usually don't start with "Case of", as you can see here and here, so I'd recommend you to move it to Colla-Arphocc Automata versus the Galactic Alliance. Pranay Sobusk ~ Talk 00:51, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

  • Nice. I'll take a look at the article in the evening of my timezone (UTC2), because I'm busy this afternoon. Pranay Sobusk ~ Talk 10:46, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
    • Alright, I checked out your article. I've corrected the section title of the Bts per the Manual of Style. Furthermore, I'd recommend you rewrite the Bts, because it's currently not understandable for someone like me who hasn't read the novel. This section may help you since it's from the same source. As my personal tip, I'd recommend you to nominate your article for GA so that you're able to improve your article with some help. Let me know if you have any questions. Pranay Sobusk ~ Talk 16:15, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] WP:LE

Hey, Apotheoses Jedi :-). I saw your working on Colla-Arphocc Automata versus the Galactic Federation of Free Alliances, and since you've added it to WP:LE's current individual projects section I wondered if you would be interested in becoming a member of the project? If so, feel free to sign your name on the page under the participants section. We'd be happy to have you onboard :-). Grunny (Talk) 06:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

  • Hey Apotheoses Jedi. Great work so far on Colla-Arphocc Automata versus the Galactic Alliance I'll take a good look at it soon :-). But I saw to move the page you created the new page and then redirected the old one. This is generally not how we move pages since we lose edit history through that method. To move a page, use the move button at the top of an article. Feel free to ask me if you need any help. Glad to have you on the project :-D. Grunny (Talk) 07:44, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
    • No problem, it's an easy mistake :-). Grunny (Talk) 07:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] WP:LE's one-year anniversary

Happy One-Year Anniversary.
Thanks for all your efforts so far, Apotheoses Jedi. WookieeProject Legacy Era wouldn't be the success it is without the efforts of everyone. I've written up a small thank you at Forum:One Year Anniversary, so feel free to read over it :-). Grunny (Talk) 06:39, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Battle of Mindor

I'd be glad to get any help I can. If you want to work on it, just add yourself to the inuse tag. If you want to keep tabs on my progress (and it's a bit slow with RL work and getting two other articles ready to FAN) just follow here User:PointGiven/Workbench PointGiven (But...it was so artistically done...) 22:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Hey if you want to work on Mindor yourself, go ahead. I haven't been on much due to RL things so I'd rather someone with the time to do it, works on the article. PointGiven (But...it was so artistically done...) 04:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Redirecting

To do that you create a redirect, and place #REDIRECT [[Page name]] on the page so it redirects to the real page. You can see it here for the Jacen Solo redirect. Hope that helps :). Grunny (Talk) 03:46, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Workbench

Just create the page User:Apotheoses Jedi/Workbench :-). Grunny (Talk) 06:00, September 3, 2009 (UTC)

Hey Apotheoses Jedi. Can you remove your new workbench from the categories so people don't mistake it for an article. To do it just add a colon to the front of the category link like this: [[:Category:Planets]]. This will turn it into a link so the page won't be placed in the categories. When you copy it back to the actual article, just remove the colons :-). Grunny (Talk) 15:48, September 3, 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Draggulch Period box

  • I just took a look at it and I see that 1,800 BBY is linked inside the template. Are you talking about the page or the little box? Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 21:09, September 3, 2009 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Battle at the Home

There isn't an article for it yet as far as I know, and yes it should be included in that category :). Grunny (Talk) 11:11, September 10, 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Jedi Mind Juice

According to the Living Force Campaign Guide, the substance secreted by Cochlera was rumored to be able to give limited protection against mind tricks to anyone who drank it, provided that it was harvested immediately and then vacuum-sealed. It also says that this effect was never conclusively proven. --Jinzler 22:55, December 10, 2009 (UTC)