Atrulean Starkiller

711 Edits since joining this wiki
November 18, 2007
0 Discussion posts

Welcome, Atrulean Starkiller! Edit

Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:


Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! —SFH 19:58, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Ood BnarEdit

Hey, I see you added The Essential Guide to the Force as one of Ood Bnar's sources. Is this from a pre-release picture? If so, could you direct me towards it? Thanks, -- AdmirableAckbar [Talk] 12:01, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Actually it is from the picture.

  • Could you link me to where you found the picture? Thanks, -- AdmirableAckbar [Talk] 13:28, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

I just found the picture on

  • Could you make a link to exactly where you found it? If you could, it'd be a great help. Thanks, -- AdmirableAckbar [Talk] 00:50, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't really know how I found it. I just kept on surfing the site.

No gallleryEdit

  • Please read this. QuentinGeorge 23:30, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
  • You know when I say "no galleries", I mean no galleries, right? No galleries. QuentinGeorge 04:58, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

If you were really set on deleting galleries, you would have done it ages ago!

  • The decision to phase them out was made fairly recently, and carrying it out isn't as simple as just "deleting the galleries." jSarek 05:16, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Then Explain it to me then.

Jacen's pictureEdit

  • Do not change Jacen Solo's picture without community consensus. I've warned you before about this. QuentinGeorge 06:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

And why not? I have as much right to edit pages as you do!

  • Read the comment. "Do not change Jacen Solo's picture without community consensus." -- AdmirableAckbar [Talk] 23:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)




Please don't edit articles with the {{Inuse}} template on them, like you did with Freedon Nadd. I am doing a rewrite of that article, and that formatting you removed was put there for a reason by me. Greyman(Paratus) 03:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Darth Malak Edit

If I did try to change Malak to Alek, I don't suppose you would mind reminding me where exactly I did change Malak to Alek. Sorry if I did, I've had a long day. Thanks.--Jedi Kasra 21:51, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry it must have been I need a name that did it, I only sent you that message because you were one of the two who accessed Malak after me.

  • Sorry for the late response, but, no worries, man.--Jedi Kasra 02:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from adding Odan-Urr as a Grand Master without adding a source. P.S. There is none, as least not to date. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 07:02, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Ferus Olin Edit

  • As you continue to revert my removal of the P&T you added to Ferus Olin, let me explain my reasoning, seeing as it was too much trouble for you to read my edit summary.
  1. The P&T cited no sources whatsoever, and was improperly formatted. Unsourced data may be taken as non-neutral point-of-view, which is against Wookieepedia's neutral-point-of-view policy.
  2. It was not written very well either, and as the rest of the article is written at decent quality, I thought that a less good P&T would detract from the article.

If you make the effort to actually look at the P&T's of some featured articles and realize how much better they are than what you added, I hope you'll understand why I removed it. By all means, improve what you've written sufficiently for it to be included and I'm all for it. But as a P&T is not essential to the article, I'd be happier to have none at all than one that detracts from the article's quality. Thank you, and have a nice day. Hobbes(Tiger's Lair) 02:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

If I'm doing such a bad job on a P&T for Ferus, why don't you do it instead of deleting it.Unsigned comment by Atrulean Starkiller (talk • contribs).

  • I plan to. However, teenagers have to go to a place called school, and have to do something called homework, which takes up a rather disproportionate amount of their time, and as such I haven't had time to write it yet. Hobbes(Tiger's Lair) 02:48, 30 January 2008 (UTC)nce

Look I'm sorry that I was doing something you planned to do but apparently, I have more time than you do, besides, you don't need to put in a source for every sentence on Ferus' page and I'm just typing down what I know what he is like, I don't see why you have a problem with that.

  • You are correct in that you don't need to source every sentence on Ferus's page. If you have a look, you'll notice that every sentence isn't sourced. However, P&T often draws information from many different resources, and Ferus is no exception— therefore, a lot, if not all, of the sentences in Ferus's P&T do need to be sourced. If you want a bit of information on how to source, you can have a look at this page. Also, the reason I suggested looking at a few featured articles' P&T sections is that they have the best, and some of the things you added do not belong in a P&T. Anyway, I hope you understand the reasoning behind my removal of the P&T, even if you don't necessarily agree with it. Hobbes(Tiger's Lair) 21:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

You were planning on starting on P&T for Ferus around summer weren't you?

Two things:Edit

As Hobbes has clearly pointed out, the P&T you added to Ferus Olin is not in keeping with the article's standards, doesn't make sense in parts, and is unsouced. Thus, please leave it out until you've remedied those points. Secondly, articles should, by and large, use a character's surname, as opposed to his/her first name, so I've reverted those edits. Thanks, -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 18:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Like I said before, shouldn't Ferus have P&T.

  • One that is in keeping with the quality of the rest of the article, yes. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 16:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)


Please cease adding information to articles without adding a footnote or source (like you did here). Also, removing {{cite}} tags without adding a source is vandalism, and you may be blocked for doing so. Lastly, please do not use caps lock when writing messages or edit summaries. And try to keep your edit summaries civil. Yours sincerely, -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 12:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Infobox image Edit

I saw that you changed the pixel size of the infobox picture in the Maris Brood article to 200 px. The standard size for infobox images is always 250 px. Drewton 01:21, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I was trying to fix the words that was being squished between those two pictures.

  • It's very minor, don't worry :) . I was just telling you in case you didn't know that. Drewton 01:37, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


User talk:

Don't ever leave a message like that in all caps again, or I'll give you a cool down ban. Understand? -- SFH 17:53, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Why don't you come after you've signed up before you give me empty threats.

You might like to know that I'm an admin, so it's not an empty threat. -- SFH 19:14, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Also, the administration prefers warnings to use proper spelling and grammar and use the correct name of the site. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 19:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Okay Okay, sorry, I'm just tired of Non-Wookieepedians adding crap and Non- Star Wars related material to the site.


Dark Lizard of the SithEdit


Kindly stop deleting/removing the work I'm doing with regards to this article. The information is factual, and if you cannot find the source, please see for further information. You can also find more info on the Dawn of Defiance page. Please keep in mind that if you continue to edit my work without regarding my inuse tag(s), an administrator will be notified and you will be blocked. Thank you.—Tommy9281(Safe harbor, my friend.) 00:34, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


I'm glad you got the picture.:)—Tommy9281(Safe harbor, my friend.) 00:50, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

if you're done, buzz off Unsigned comment by Atrulean Starkiller (talk • contribs).

Oh, snap!Edit

Dialog-error You have been blocked from editing for one month. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. Instead, I believe you should buzz off for a month or so. Graestan(Talk) 01:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Know that the month block, Atrulean, is far too short as far as I'm concerned. If I had of seen what had happened earlier, know that I would have blocked you for at least 3 months, if not 6 months. You need to remember that when you are warned not to do something, then you don't continue doing that. If after this month vacation you chose to continue disregarding warnings, I'll make sure that you enjoy an even longer vacation. Think on your actions over the coming month, and come back with a better attitude. Greyman Jan.png (Talk) 01:11, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Nayama Edit

Apparently, the surname of "Bindo" is never given for Nayama in the game. Therefore, even if she's married to Jolee Bindo, adding "Nayama Bindo" to her article is OR at best. Please cease to do so unless you can provide a quote in which her surname is given. Thanks, -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 18:11, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

I don't see the problem in adding her technical surname in her article unless you're waiting for someone to confirm it or contradict it.

  • It's not her technical surname unless someone provides a quote to support that, which you've failed to do. As I said, feel free to re-add it when you can back it up, but until then it's OR. And please sign all your posts with ~~~~. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 18:23, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

All right all right, I won't touch her name unless a source confirms it happy?

So you're being smart with me? okay I'm impressed.

Blocked Edit

Dialog-error You have been blocked from editing for six months for general disruptive behavior. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. Graestan(Talk) 22:49, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Fanon warningEdit

Continuing to recreate articles that have been deleted as fanon is a fast-track ticket to getting blocked again. Might want to give that some consideration. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 21:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

    • I was adding a reason why it should be deleted so please don't jump on me.
      • It had already been deleted, yet, for reasons beyond me, you recreated it. Please don't recreate deleted articles. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:53, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

I wasn't trying to recreate it so I'm sorry if you assumed that but I was only adding a reason just as the article was deleted, it was a simple mistake on my part so again I'm sorry.

Ahsoka Edit

Please do not revert back to your non sourced, speculating revision for Ahsoka Tano. The reason why I reverted it is because it is not sourced, and you removed/reworded information that is fine. Their is already a Ahsoka project for WP:TCW that will expand and rewrite that section that you rewritten. While I'm not saying you should not continue to edit Ahsoka, you can always edit, however, please be careful to not remove information that is sourced. JangFett Talk 19:22, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

  • all right then I'll restore it.
    • It already has been done. Keep in mind of the Three-revert rule. JangFett Talk 19:30, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Warning Edit

Togruta is not a Force-sensitive species. If you add that category again, you will be blocked for violating the Three-Revert Rule. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 19:24, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

May I ask why they are not listed in that category when they are described in a highly reliable source as possessing a Force affinity.

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki