Contents 1 Cleanup 2 Re: War of the Gungan Tribes 3 Reminder 4 Cookie 5 Category:Battles 6 Sith Master 7 Liberation of Kashyyyk 8 Re:Dates 9 Article about Kaan 10 Congratulations are in order! 11 Congratulations 12 More Congrats 13 /* judicial forces */ 14 21 BBY 15 Hutta 16 Reverting of your edit 17 CAN objection 18 2 ABY 19 3,955 and Revan 20 Re: SIS on Nar Shaddaa 21 Jedi Emergency 22 WP:TOR 23 Havoc Squad(ron) 24 Ref Tags 25 Cookiee 26 Outbound Flight (starship)

Cleanup Edit

Hey Imperators! I just nominated Skirmish in Yinta Lake spaceport for good article status and you put a cleanup template on there. If you could please let me know what's wrong with it as soon as possible I'd appreciate it. thanks! Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 21:35, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Re: War of the Gungan TribesEdit

• Seems to definitely be that way. Thanks for the tip, good find. Atarumaster88 ^{(Talk page)} 18:53, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Reminder Edit

I don't mean to be a bother, but it's been over a week since I fixed your objection on Skirmish in Yinta Lake spaceport. Could you please check it again? Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 22:28, June 25, 2011 (UTC)

Cookie Edit

Toprawa and Ralltiir has awarded you a Wookiee Cookie! I usually don't give out the Cookie unless I see someone doing something who I feel really deserves one, and I'm impressed at your ongoing work with the Super-Terrific Wookiee-Tastic Year-Article Sourcing Beautification Project. The fervor of the project itself has sort of died off, but you're the one I continually see making an effort to bring the project as close to completion as humanly possible. So, as the creator of the project, and as a Wookieepedian, my thanks go out to you. Please accept this award as a token of my gratitude and as recognition of your diligence. Good work. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:39, June 28, 2011 (UTC)

• Allow me to second that gratitude above. (: –Tm_T ^(Talk) 19:22, June 28, 2011 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the recognition! Though I hope the project will only die off when it's more or less completed. :D Imperators II^(Talk) 13:17, June 29, 2011 (UTC)

Category:Battles Edit

Hello Imperators II,

I am impressed by your reorganiztion of the battles category. You really cleaned that up since the last time I looked at it. The work you did must have taken considerable time and patience to accomplish. I just think that you deserve an award for your hard work.

Exiled Jedi (Greetings) has awarded you a Wookiee Cookie! For your work on the battles category.

Farewell and keep up the good work.

Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 22:47, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

Sith Master Edit

Hey, Imp, just to let you know, I addressed your Sith Master objections a few days ago. If you have time, please a look. Thanks, JangFett ^(Talk) 16:01, July 9, 2011 (UTC)

Liberation of Kashyyyk Edit

All the sources place the Liberation of Kashyyyk in 4 ABY, including TEA (p 196). Hk 47 10:07, July 12, 2011 (UTC)

• You are right for p 72 but p 195 confirm also 4 ABY. According to the fleets movments on the map 4 aby is more logical. And there is also The New Essential Chronology that states it 8 month after Endor (always 4 aby).Hk 47 10:07, July 12, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Dates Edit

Hey Imperators! Thanks alot for that info. It really helped! I appreciate you bailing me out. :p Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 00:23, July 16, 2011 (UTC)

• OK great, thanks. I guess I'll leave it up to Tope now on which one I should use. Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 18:02, July 21, 2011 (UTC)

Article about Kaan Edit

Why did you revert my edit of Kaan? It now says that he was once a Jedi. The only source that was cited was a very poor one, Dark Forces: Jedi Knight. The book uses the term "Jedi" questionably. It was revealed that Jerec was once a Jedi, but this has nothing to do with Kaan. Just because there are sources that reveal that Jerec was once a Jedi, it is only speculation that Kaan was, because no source that doesn't use the term questionably says that Kaan was. I was not trying to remove facts, which is vandalism. I was just trying to remove speculation and a source citation based on speculation. Please remove all references of Kaan being a Jedi or add a template for possible speculation. 173.51.117.61 23:35, July 16, 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations are in order!Edit

Hey Imperators, I just wanted to tell you congratulations for winning WotM! You really deserved it. Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 03:13, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

• Agreed, you're doing a fantastic job. Keep it up. Kilson^{(Let's have a chat)} 03:16, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
  • Thank you, guys! :) Imperators II^(Talk)
• Congrats Imperators, well-deserved. Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Talk) 14:16, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations Edit

Congratulations on winng Wookieepedian of the MonthGTQ^(Problems?) 03:31, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks! Imperators II^(Talk) 06:50, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

More Congrats Edit

Hey Impreators! Just stopping by to say great job on winning! You deserved it. Keep up the good work, ner vod! Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 19:50, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

• Yeah Imperators, you deserved to get the award.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 20:01, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
  • I'm a bit late to the party, but you have my congratulations as well.—Axinal ^{Convocation Chamber} 01:48, August 7, 2011 (UTC)

/* judicial forces */ Edit

The information i added is correct and does have validated credentials to reinforce it. The units alreadey listed in the article and the two i have added which are the republic security force and the judicials both come from the same source which is the star wars data bank. And your comment that wookiepedia is not a source is true but if it says in the article at least 3 times which it does that the republic security force and the judicials are a part of the judicial department then i dont think you need to be so paranoid and insecure and think it is lying. —Unsigned comment by 68.83.26.244 (talk • contribs).

21 BBY Edit

Hey, Imperators, just wanted to tell you that the anon edit in 21 BBY was correct. Since we're not sure when certain TCW battles take place, our best option we have right now is to place them c. 21 BBY or in 21 BBY, per the Star Wars Annual 2011 magazine. Hope that helps. :) JangFett ^(Talk) 19:30, October 1, 2011 (UTC)

• The Battle of Mon Calamari (non conjecture name) is already a battle during the Clone Wars. As for the newest /Second battle of Mon Calamari/, just because there isn't a "Battle of Mon Calamari" in 21 BBY does not mean there should be one. Like any other second or repeated battle on a planet, it's proper to keep its conjectural title name until a source establishes its official name to avoid confusion. JangFett ^(Talk) 18:15, October 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • Yes, the current article title is correct and fine. In the article, however, the behind the scenes section should have "Second battle of Mon Calamari" because saying "Battle" would indiciate it's a confirmed title, which is false. The intro would normally be "A battle took place…" to also show that the article's name is conjecture. This happens quite a lot for TCW and this Mon Calamari battle isn't the first. :P JangFett ^(Talk) 18:23, October 4, 2011 (UTC)
    • Basically it's been this way for all of the TCW articles and probably even before TCW. I would say go for it and change the article's name until a source establishes its official canonical name, but because we have the {{Conjecture}} template, personally I don't really see the need of moving the article. JangFett ^(Talk) 18:48, October 4, 2011 (UTC)

HuttaEdit

Hey Imp, thanks for adding in the Crystal Cave skirmish. I had forgotten about that. But I wanted to ask you—what was the Mission to Hutta that you added? I don't recall any unique event to that effect. Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 18:55, October 8, 2011 (UTC)

• Also, I noticed that you were the one who stated the Annexation of Kiffu was a conflict of the Cold War; while I don't doubt that, I'm not able to confirm it myself because I can't find my Fatal Alliance copy at the moment. Could you perhaps provide a quote for the article or point me to the specific passage that confirms its placement during the Cold War? Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 19:02, October 8, 2011 (UTC)
  • Haha woops, I totally forgot about that. Well thanks for the info, on both accounts! Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 20:00, October 8, 2011 (UTC)

Reverting of your edit Edit

Hi Imperator, sorry about that reversion, didn't notice the earlier link...oops --Dkwolf27 18:02, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

CAN objection Edit

Hey Imperators, please take a look at your objection to Sith tome (Dromund Kaas Academy). Cheers, 1358 ^(Talk) 15:58, December 15, 2011 (UTC)

2 ABYEdit

Thanks for correcting my formatting earlier. After reviewing that edit, I noticed that I had forgotten to update the sources, and was missing punctuation in the references section. Why did you remove the source I added? That article needs more sources, and that is a valid source. I'm also confused about your removal of the periods in the references; I realized that I had left them out when reviewing your edit, but then you took them back out again. References are supposed to have periods after them if there is any other text beyond the title of the work. --Matthias777 19:08, December 16, 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks for the quick reply! I admit that I am new to editing Wookieepedia, so please forgive my misunderstanding on the Sources vs. Appearances issue. As to the punctuation when utilizing comprehensive reference formatting, I have been following the precedent of Eyrezer, an admin who has used comprehensive referencing in his edits. This is also the accepted form of punctuation for comprehensive referencing in general works, as well as on other wikis---if one refers to Wikipedia, for instance. Based on this, I would like to change the punctuation in that article back to include the periods at the end of the reference. In my humble opinion, the aforementioned method of formatting comprehensive references is the de facto standard, and we should both attempt to correct references to this format whenever we see them formatted otherwise. Please let me know your thoughts. --Matthias777 20:05, December 16, 2011 (UTC)

3,955 and Revan Edit

Hey there, Imp. You added an update tag saying that 3,955 BBY was mentioned in Revan and it's now up with the AC again. You didn't say what the context of the mention was though, so I can't fix it myself (or find someone to since I don't own that yet). Could you tell me what it was or do it yourself, if it's not a major thing, so we can save the article? NaruHina ^Talk 21:31, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks! Go team. :) NaruHina ^Talk 21:49, December 19, 2011 (UTC)

Re: SIS on Nar ShaddaaEdit

You're absolutely right—I hadn't even really noticed that line in the comic. I'll move the link on the directory; thanks! Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 20:08, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Jedi Emergency Edit

Hey again. I was dinking around with one of my pet projects when I noticed you made this edit. Do you have the Jedi Emergency main book? NaruHina ^Talk 02:26, January 17, 2012 (UTC)

• SavageBob already helped me out, but thanks for letting me know. I'll keep in mind that you have it too. NaruHina ^Talk 00:47, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

WP:TOR Edit

Although you aren't signed up as an official member of WP:The Old Republic, you've been extremely helpful in the past and so I'm hoping you'll take a look through the contents of this message and the project page and sign yourself up. :)

"Our time has come." Hello <insert name here>! So, it's been a little over three months since The Old Republic was released, and WookieeProject: The Old Republic, which was founded almost two years ago now, was in dire need of a revamp and update. Participation has slumped, but it's time to get back on the wagon and refocus our efforts. So here are some stats: currently, we have ten Featured Articles, thirty-one Good Articles, and thirty-four Comprehensive Articles. Cal Jedi and Coruscantfan have both been doing great work lately, but we need more users to start undertaking projects from the game and related materials. Comprehensive articles are a great way to get started, so take a leap, pick an article, and get crackin'. Beyond status articles, there are a few other ways you can help WP: TOR with it's primary goals. Those of you who have a current subscription to the game are welcome to visit our new guild page, where we're setting up in-game groups to help catalogue and confirm information here on Wookieepedia. Aside from that, our article lists can always use expansions. We have some fun new programs and challenges coming to WP:TOR in the future, so take a look at our news and discussion area for updates, and always remember to add any of your new status article successes to the news board. If you have any questions or comments, head on over to the forums or let me know on my talk page. Take a look around the updated project page, and happy hunting! Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 09:56, March 11, 2012 (UTC)

Hey Skywarp22 20:59, March 21, 2012 (UTC)

Havoc Squad(ron) Edit

Hey Imperators, I've been meaning to talk to you about Havoc Squad's article. Although I understand that it is called a "squadron" once in Deceived, the game itself consistently refers to it as "Havoc Squad." A squad and a squadron are two very different things, so assuming that one is an abbreviation for the other would be incorrect. Given that the game itself is the more recent release, and that the term "squad" makes more sense given the unit's composition and role, the article should really be at "Havoc Squad." Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 08:08, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

Ref Tags Edit

Hey Imperators, I was wondering if you could answer a question for me. What's the difference between a ref tag and a Ref|ref tag? I understand ones like {TORCite, but this one just seems to do the same thing with more words. Thanks. —Cade Calrayn 13:59, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks for the link - apparently, we use the {Ref thing for infobox info. Thanks —Cade Calrayn 14:05, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

Cookiee Edit

Thanks! —Cade Calrayn 02:12, April 7, 2012 (UTC)

Outbound Flight (starship) Edit

Hi! This might be to much to ask but I'll ask anyway. :p I know this was a while ago, but do you remember why you added the Expand template to Outbound Flight (starship)? I might be willing to work on it if I knew what needed worked on. Thanks!- Princess GLG 21:42, April 9, 2012 (UTC)