Audiophiles Edit

Hey J,

Are you still able to upload audio from Tales of the Jedi: Dark Lords of the Sith? If so, I have a few I need please, when you have time.

• 11:46 to 11:48—sound of lanvarok disc being hurled.
• 11:48 to 11:41—Primitive weaponry…but accurate, said by Exar Kun.

That's based on a total play time of 1:08:34. Thanks either way.—Tommy 9281 Friday, November 25, 2011, 18:02 UTC

• should be able to manage that for ya. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 18:29, November 25, 2011 (UTC)
  • Hey, how're those audio clips coming?—Tommy 9281 Friday, December 2, 2011, 00:25 UTC
    • *face palm* completely spaced on it. I'll get them done by this weekend. Thank YOU for giving me the timestamps which will make it MUCH easier for me to do. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 00:32, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
      • No worries :P And that's based off of a 2nd disc with no track breaks. I have both, just the single hour & change long version on the pc only. Thanks again.—Tommy 9281 Friday, December 2, 2011, 01:00 UTC

Here I was all ready to upload and add them to the article, and MJ slapped the inuse tag on it. LOL Anyway, here are the files, ready to copy and paste when MJ is done. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 02:59, December 2, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Fives Edit

Yeah, I'm aware of the change. :P JangFett ^(Talk) 04:34, November 28, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Sniper droid Edit

Done and done. :) Trak Nar ^{Ramble on} 01:01, November 29, 2011 (UTC)

Kiros Edit

So, another request. Could you upload several pictures from Kidnapped? Basically, what I want to do is replace all the comic images in the article with images of the same scenes from the episode. QuiGonJinn ^(Talk) 11:44, November 29, 2011 (UTC)

• Done, regarding all the images in the Kiros article. Did you also want everything found here also to be converted, as much as is possible give the changes to the storyline? - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 23:58, November 29, 2011 (UTC)
  • D'oh! Stupid me. I was talking about the Battle of Kiros, but I got distracted and didn't make it clear. I'm really sorry. Yeah, if it's not too much, the request stands. QuiGonJinn ^(Talk) 12:06, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

Delete Edit

All set.—Tommy 9281 Friday, December 2, 2011, 00:18 UTC

Images of the Sith Emperor Edit

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/File:Sith_Emperor_1.png

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/File:Sith_Emperor_2.png

since when is youtube not a good source? i seen images on a lot on wikis from it. —Unsigned comment by Lichlord08 (talk • contribs).

• Wookieepedia is not other wikis, it is not wikipedia. If your picture didn't come from an officially licensed source, then is is not welcome here. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 01:35, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
  • Fair enough.

Re: Qui-Gon Edit

Yeah, the Zygerrian thing is going to keep me occupied for a while, but as soon as I resume my work on Qui-Gon and find myself in need of images, I'll certainly drop you a note. Preserving the images from deletion won't be a problem, I think. We can always find some relevant mainspace article to add them to. QuiGonJinn ^(Talk) 10:40, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

Overwritten Edits? Edit

I'm sorry, I'm a little confused/concerned by a comment you made (apple fly) about my recent edits to the article CT-7567. You seem to imply that my edits will be overwritten by "CC's work". Is that actually the case? I'm new here, and I joined in part because pages like that one where both poorly written and factually inaccurate. I welcome criticism and I understand that anything I post here is subject to revision, but it's a little disconcerting to hear that my work is going to be overwritten "anyway".

If to could clarify what you meant by that comment, I'd appreciate it. For now I'm assuming that my contributions are not welcome on that article, which is disappointing to say the least.--Sachariah 04:06, December 8, 2011 (UTC)

• There is a WookieeProject The Clone Wars on which the founder, CC7567 has marked Rex as a long term project he is working on, on one of his user subpages. So, while any quality edits you make to improve the current article are welcomed, and may be incorporated by CC's work on his subpage, when he is finished writing the article, he will likely replace the entire article as it sits now with that he has written and been working on a very long time. So any work you do may get overwritten, not because it is poorly written or anything like that, but simply because someone is working on it currently in the plans to make the Rex article a featured article here. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 04:13, December 8, 2011 (UTC)

TEA image reply/question Edit

Hey, JMAS. Thanks for all your help with those TEA images. I don't mean to be a bother, but is there any chance that you can get a clearer image of this pic? By your response, I wasn't a hundred percent sure whether you could or not. Thanks again for your help.--Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 20:42, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

• That one wasn't on Chris Trevas's FB profile, but I think I can get an improved version of that. Do you have an article to put it in though? If not, "I'm afraid she's scheduled to be terminated." - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 20:46, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
  • Yeah. I should be able to find a place. Thanks. :) --Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 20:55, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
    • Done. If you place it in an article, please be sure to remove it from here. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 20:57, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
      • Will do. Thanks for your help. :) --Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 21:00, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

Re: WTCWtalk Edit

Sure thing. Thanks as always. :) CC7567 ^(talk) 06:23, December 11, 2011 (UTC)

Ringo Request Edit

Hi, JMAS. Could you upload [[1]][[2]] from the Dutch starwars.wikia for the Ringo and Oz articles? Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 12:53, December 16, 2011 (UTC)

More Mos Eisley Madness Edit

Hey, JMAS,I had a question/request for you. Would it be possible to upload the image from the article "Rogues Gallery: The Usual Suspects: Who's Who in Mos Eisley"—Star Wars Insider 130 to the Wook? Ideally without the lines and text, but if that's impossible, that's impossible. I don't think that image has appeared anywhere else previously (though File:Mos Eisley BTS group shot.jpg is close), and the identifications made by Chee are throwing a bunch of previous cantina IDs into doubt (see Forum:SH:More_Mos_Eisley_Madness). Also, the image would be good raw material to get good infobox images of the two Lutrillians, since neither of them is Solomahal, the only OT Lutrillian for whom we have a decent headshot. If you're too busy or unable to help, no problem at all. I thought if anyone could do it, though, it'd be you! Thanks. ~Savage 16:20, December 16, 2011 (UTC)

• I can probably edit down to get any headshots you need from it, and on those headshots, edit out lines. However, the full image, the most I'll be able to do is blank out the text in the bubbles. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 23:25, December 16, 2011 (UTC)
  • OK, both of those sound helpful. The full image would at least be useful for us to debate how to treat the new information, and for some BTS sections. The headshots that would be useful at this point are the two Lutrillians and the white-haired Nimbanel. I really appreciate it, man. ~Savage 15:38, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

Candidate Edit

Uh, hello. I have watched Palpatine looks for a job many times on youtube. It's funny and professionally made , it deserves entry here.24.193.147.106 04:01, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

• It was unsourced, and did not meet our Notability Requirements. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 04:37, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
• What about the Curry PC and World Commercials and the Spike TV commercials.R they okay?24.193.147.106 05:01, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Frog-lady Edit

I think that'd be a bit of a stretch. :P He does say that, but the name itself is too ridiculous to sound official, and even if it were official, we should wait for printed confirmation given the ambiguity of the name. It sounds like he used "frog-lady" for lack of a better term. CC7567 ^(talk) 03:14, December 18, 2011 (UTC)

Contrail Edit

Hey JMAS. Would it be possible to upload the full image of CT-4981 and Vader from Vader Adrift as CC has requested here? QuiGonJinn ^(Talk) 13:09, December 27, 2011 (UTC)

• I think the version I have puts a gap between the two pages, but if I'm able, I'll do it. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 23:20, December 27, 2011 (UTC)
  • Looks great. Thanks a lot. QuiGonJinn ^(Talk) 12:54, December 28, 2011 (UTC)

Ask lobot Edit

Yeah,its driving me crazy. Why arent all the Ask Lobot question and answers up on the internet. Do u know where they are listed, they might have unknown info that couldcontribute to this wiki.24.193.145.164 01:39, December 29, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Image usage Edit

I was planning to use it for the Prelude section of the Battle of Kamino (Tipoca City assault), but I'm not sure if it would be entirely appropriate just because it might be too distracting (:P) from the purpose, which is just to show Grievous and Ventress as rivals. It sounds worth looking at, though, so yeah, could you upload it for comparison? CC7567 ^(talk) 03:21, December 29, 2011 (UTC)

• I like the image, but to be honest, I think it's too distracting and not directly relevant to the Battle of Kamino's prelude, which would be my use of it. It might work for Grievous, though—there's an imageless section on the Battle of Kamino there. CC7567 ^(talk)

Suicide Edit

Hey man, I saw nothing wrong with that image in the Suicide article. Because the intro states it, as well as it's mentioned in the image itself, it pretty much fits. JangFett ^(Talk) 03:28, December 31, 2011 (UTC)

• And you clearly didn't see that I reverted my own edit before you posted this. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 03:42, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
  • This? JangFett ^(Talk) 03:43, December 31, 2011 (UTC)

Info/Image request Edit

Hey, I'm wondering if you can please assist me with images and information from Star Wars: Republic 28: The Hunt for Aurra Sing, Part 1 specifically in regards to the Republic Peace Officers. Images of them, if there are any, would be great but I'm also needing as much information as possible including quotes. I'm hoping you still have access to the comic. Thanks! Coruscantfan ^(Talk) 05:03, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

Ackbar Edit

There seems to be a misunderstanding. When I said to leave the SWE infobox image out of the Ackbar article until it's been discussed in the talk page, I did not expect for you to put it back in the article. Normally if an infobox image is taken to the talk page, there's a gallery with the original Ackbar infobox image and yours, and it's put to a vote. This time, it was not present, and I reverted your edit of putting back the SWE image and commented on it, although I received a comment that wasn't my intention. No, I do not own the article, but I'm sure you know what I meant when I said "take it to the talk page." Ackbar, and his image, is one of those characters that should be discussed first. JangFett ^(Talk) 17:59, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Keeper Agruss Edit

Thanks, JMAS. Those will work perfectly. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 20:37, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

Indigo Studios Edit

I have trouble accepting that Indigo Studios is the actual author of Hasbro images. First, they misspelled their client's name on their site—Harbro instead of Hasbro—and, second, they have Darth Vader's ship, Anakin Skywalker's Jedi Starfighter, and a TIE Interceptor labeled as a "V-wing" on the box image. If they truly were the authors, they would have the final proper images. Can we get a verification of the claim to authorship by Indigo Studios from Hasbro? Because I have worked in the industry long enough to know that fraudulent websites will make sensational claims to get business. Otherwise, the art taken from the actual box should remain the canon image, shouldn't it? Gethralkin^Hyperwave 08:03, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

• Additionally, is there any supporting source to the claim that they are the authors of Hasbro's Star Wars merchandise? Gethralkin^Hyperwave 08:15, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • I don't think they necessarily designed every box art in the Hasbro line, but did for the V-wing and the other ones. As far as the V-wing on the boxes, I would guess that is an early production design where they digitally placed their artwork on a pre-existing packaging box for the V-wing to submit for proofing purposes. So they misspelled Hasbro. It's a typo. I've seen plenty of other professional websites with typos, not to mention they correctly spell Hasbro for other product lines they developed packaging art for. Trust me, they would not put that there if they hadn't actually been hired by Hasbro to create that artwork. Otherwise they'd have Hasbro and LucasFilm on them faster than you can blink. I can confirm the Sith Infiltrator box artis the same box art as the final Hasbro product, so they are the designers for that. Based on that, I trust the others to be accurate as well. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 23:35, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
    • Well, I have seen before where a certain website claimed that a software company called Cyan was their client, except that they actually didn't yet they even produced images they claimed to have done for them. So, just because someone states that they are working for a company does not make it so and it isn't unheard of—it's called resume padding. A company operating unethically can and will do that sort of thing. If we can get a confirmation from Hasbro that they are the designers of those images, then I personally would feel better. However, you do make a good point about the veracity of Lucas Licensing. Then again, in searching for the Indigo Studios site, instances of the results—some that mention their founder by name—pulls up flagged warnings of untrustworthy activity from watchdog applications like WOT. If they are the real thing, then great because the image is better. However, I am concerned of the authenticity of canon because they are the only source of verification here. I will call Hasbro and ask, though, and get it straight from them. Everyone should be back to work by now. Gethralkin^Hyperwave 14:58, January 10, 2012 (UTC)
      • You will not get any sort of confirmation from Hasbro on who does the artwork for any of their present or past Star Wars toy lines. I've asked them before, who the artist was that designed the box artwork for their Unleashed line figures. They refused stating it was proprietary information. And after a fair amount of searching, I discovered it to be Clark Mitchell. I'm not saying that a company won't pad their resume like you're saying. What I'm saying is, LucasFilm watches for that kind of thing very closely, and would have shot them down by now, if it wasn't legitimate. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 01:15, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
        • You make a good point. I may still be able to get an answer, however, with the connections that I have. Meanwhile, even if it is authentic, it is a non-canon concept art image because it was discarded for final use—like deleted scene material—and should not be used to represent the main topic of the article. A note should also be added concerning that concept art is being shown. Gethralkin^Hyperwave 14:27, January 14, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Lux Edit

Thanks as always. We'll see what happens to Mr. Baldy—doesn't look like age has had a pleasant effect. :P CC7567 ^(talk) 04:47, January 13, 2012 (UTC)

• What do you think about the new images from the Encyclopedia? It doesn't look like any of them are worth using over the current infobox image—hopefully we might be able to get a better one from the episode of his older self. CC7567 ^(talk) 04:50, January 13, 2012 (UTC)

A Word of Advice Edit

You might want to cool it with the mass main image changing. Multiple users have expressed concerns with the Encyclopedia images, and unilaterally deciding what is best for so many articles isn't a productive way to address the issue. Traditionally, situations where multiple users disagree on what main image is best are brough to a vote; during such a scenario, the original image usually stays in place until the vote has finished. When more than one user reverts your image change, it might be worth considering that you're not the only one who knows what's best image-wise. Menkooroo 06:50, January 14, 2012 (UTC)

• You know, for a character page, I'll agree with you. Those should be discussed on the talk page. And from here on out, I will. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the Encyclopedia images. They are high quality promotional images. Regarding the Chief article, the picture of the Ewoks was dark, you can barely see Chirpa in it. The main visible character is Logray, a Shaman, not a chief. That image is also already used on TWO other article pages. There is no reason it has be on a third, minor article. There is nothing wrong with image diversity. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 06:54, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Fair point, and thanks for understanding. Sorry if any of the reversions caused hard feelings. Cheers. Menkooroo 06:58, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
    • No worries. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 07:00, January 14, 2012 (UTC)

Ming Po Edit

Hey, JMAS; I was actually preparing to put Tryla's pic in the Ming Po infobox. We tend to always have dudes, so since we've got an interesting-looking female, I thought she'd be appropriate. What do you think? (Also, I should probably just ask you beforehand next time, since it seems you get these images ready beforehand. If you have a better version of the Tryla pic, please feel free to just delete mine! :)) ~Savage 21:19, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

• No worries; I'd just as soon leave it to one of the two alone. If we combine them, we raise certain canon issues: did Tryla stand just to the side of Pieter in just that pose? Do you see what I mean? It's not a big deal, but I'd rather have just Pieter than to have something that stretches canon. ~Savage 22:41, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
• Notice that the lighting is off too; Pieter is lit from the left, but Tryla is lit from the right. Sorry to cause a stir; you should just revert to Pieter probably. And thanks again for your image work! ~Savage 22:43, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • There is no canon issues. They are promotional images from the same official source, the Encyclopedia. As far as the lighting, I'm not seeing that being any problem. The light "source" is from the front, and they are each turning in towards each other, so their opposite sides are illuminated. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 22:59, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
    • I see where you're coming from, but I still disagree. The canon issue is that now we have an image of two characters in two very distinct poses standing next to each other, which implies that this situation occurred in-universe at some point. However, it's a situation we engineered, not one that we took from an official source. Ideally, should this article ever get expanded, one of the images would be used for the infobox and the other for the "Biology and appearance" section, so it's not really an issue to go back to just one. Again, sorry for causing a stink in the first place. :( ~Savage 14:08, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
      • There is no way to imply these images came from any situation or scene. They were on a transparent/white background at their source and they still are here. Had they been placed on an actual pictorial backdrop, I could understand where you are coming from. Take the Tryla image, she looks timid, likely due to being oppressed by Death Watch. But it is still a promotional image. You can't say a promotional image came from "such and such a situation" IU because there is no background to the image, it's completely neutral. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 00:22, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
        • I disagree; I think placing them beside one another implies some sort of relationship or scene, as if they occupy the same time and space. It is an interesting question, though, and I'm not trying to pick a fight. Would you mind a Senate Hall thread, since this is something I've been wondering about in general? Again, I don't want to be combative. I can just leave it alone until such a time as Ming Po gets expanded big enough to support both images separately if you'd prefer; at the end of the day, I appreciate your help on all things image! :) ~Savage 03:34, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
          • Of course there is some sort of relationship. They are grandfather and granddaughter. Duh. :p Really though, go for it. Although, I can almost assure you it's going to bring out the promotional image haters the TCW haters just based on the topic and subject of the images prompting the thread. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 03:50, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
            • OK, check out Forum:SH:Imagine compositing and canon, and feel free to edit my original question if you think I've misrepresented something. I think I presented both our opinions fairly, but I may have unintentionally shown some bias. :) ~Savage 16:06, January 22, 2012 (UTC)

Conqueror image Edit

Hello there JMAS, I had a question for you concerning an image you uploaded to Wookieepedia, Conqueror_superlaser.jpg. It's the JPEG of the 'Conqueror' Star Destroyer from the Star Wars Galaxies trading card game. I guess my question is...where did you get it?! I noticed it's a different version from the "Threat of the Conqueror" poster, without the troopers in the foreground, but its also not a cropped copy of the card itself because the card information isn't where it would be either. I would really love to get my hands on a higher resolution copy to use as a desktop background. It's just about my favorite EU ship. Any help would be great! - Blaise

• It is cropped from the in-game card, nothing more. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 08:09, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
  • Hmm, I see. Thank you anyway JMAS. I guess the next step is to contact the artist :) - Blaise
    • You can feel free to try. But I find it highly unlikely the artist will just freely part with a high resolution copy of their artwork. I've searched the internet for the full artwork of most all the artists for the SWG TCG, and that image is not one I've seen in any higher resolution. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 08:42, January 21, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Hardcase Edit

Hey JMAS, thank you for your concern, but I might be uploading a different image with him in an episode. What I have in mind is similiar to Hevy's P&T image. JangFett ^(Talk) 03:46, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

I need you to answer a question. Edit

Dear JMAS, I have to ask you a question.Do you remember that picture of naked Aayla secura.I clicked on it and your profile came up.Did you upload that photo and if so, where did you get it?I would like to know. signed,mr.noobody. —Unsigned comment by 71.50.211.22 (talk • contribs).

• 1. You need to sign your posts with 4 tildes (~~~~). 2. If you click on the image, it will tell you in the summary below the image what the source is. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 00:13, February 8, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Neeyutnee Edit

Yup, thanks. CC7567 ^(talk) 05:34, February 11, 2012 (UTC)

DC-17 hand blasterEdit

Hello. I was wondering if you would be able to replace the current image of the DC-17 hand blaster, with the one being shown at the Official Star Wars website under "Blasters". Thank you in advance. DarthPrime 06:11, February 11, 2012

• I've had that one cropped and cleaned up for a while now ... and I've considered replacing the one in the article. But the quality of that image isn't anywhere near the quality of the one currently in the article. The tiny size and lower quality just can't justify replacing the current higher quality image, even though it shows the blaster in the hand of a clone trooper. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 06:20, February 11, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Search Edit

Yes, I'm taking care of that. I'm making more search icons too to even it out. I noticed you uploaded too many TCW. :P JangFett ^(Talk) 05:37, February 12, 2012 (UTC)

• The micro series could have search icons too. I made a Mace Windu one and it might be the best out of my three at the moment. Williams has a new crop too. JangFett ^(Talk) 06:08, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
  • You should definitely consider creating EU icons. We shouldn't end up like the SWE—the saga and only TCW. JangFett ^(Talk) 07:02, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
    • I wanted to get some easily made ones using the already transparent backgrounds conveniently provided by the Encyclopedia. Now that those are out of the way, yeah, I can start looking at some other EU characters. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 07:06, February 12, 2012 (UTC)

Red fly studioEdit

I recently uploaded a picture for red fly studio. However, the picture was poor quality and when I tried to reload a new one, nothing happened. I was wondering if you could go and delete this useless file. Thanks,--501st Dogma^(Comlink) 22:40, February 12, 2012 (UTC)

• I'm not an admin, so I can't. Just mark it with the {{Ifd}} tag. However, sometimes you just have to refresh your page after a couple minutes to allow the page cache to update. I see the updated version of the image. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 22:43, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
  • Ok, sorry for bothering you. The new image has finaly showed up.--501st Dogma^(Comlink) 22:50, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
    • No bother. :) There are times when the Wikia servers are acting up and they don't update a new version unless an admin deletes the old version and actually moves the file to a new file name. If that ever happens, you can take the image with {{WISS}}. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 22:53, February 12, 2012 (UTC)

Battle of KadavoEdit

Hey, JMAS. It looks like I'm nearly done fixing the Zygerrian TCW mess. The only article remaining is the Battle of Kadavo. Could you grab some images from the episode to replace the comic ones in the article, like you did with the Battle of Kiros? Basically, I'm looking for an equivalent of this for the prelude and a couple of others. One for the main pic and another one for the "Battle" section. These two can be from any scene; just pick whatever ones you think suit best. QuiGonJinn ^(Talk) 20:38, February 17, 2012 (UTC)

• Are you OK with me adding them to the article in spite of the inuse tag, or would you prefer them put on your talk page? - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 23:02, February 17, 2012 (UTC)
  • Sure. Go ahead and add them to the article. QuiGonJinn ^(Talk) 00:48, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
    • Sorry for the delay. I'll try and get this done in the next few days. I'm not too keen on the images presented in the episode gallery, and they're the best quality. And the video file I have I think is corrupted, so I'm going to have to re-access that before I can get screenshots. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 23:41, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Journal of Gnost-Dural Edit

Hey JMAS, I don't know if you would be able to, but there are a few images from The Journal of Master Gnost-Dural that I was hoping to add to several articles. Do you have/could you get any access to the book to be able to upload some of the images I need? Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 09:00, February 24, 2012 (UTC)

• I'll see about getting access. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 23:51, February 24, 2012 (UTC)

DraaEdit

Hi, just wondering if you could upload another picture of Draa. I'm currently working on him on my workbench to get him up to GA status. I've looked through the gallery on SW.com but found nothing. It would be great if the article had an image of him doing something else than firing a missile. Thanks, 501st Dogma^(Comlink) 22:45, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

• Ignore the comment above. I've managed to find pictures of Draa here. I'll upload them, but thanks for your time. 501st Dogma^(Comlink) 23:25, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • Sorry about that. I completely spaced on this. Glad you found images you need. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 23:26, March 6, 2012 (UTC)

SOTE Edit

Hey, JMAS. Seeing as you've uploaded most, if not all, of our SOTE trading card images, presumably from that secondary "Art of" book, would you be able to get a better version of this? Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:10, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

• I'm 99% sure that one wasn't in the "Art of" book. But I'll take a look, and scour my other sources. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 23:36, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

TOR armor and clothing Edit

Hi JMAS I noticed you removed the deletion tag on Trandoshan desh guantlets and was wondering if you could do the same to a number of other articles I have written on the same grounds including Ithorian mariner's loose wrap. I have contacted the user who marked them for deletion but we cannot come to an agreement on if they should be deleted or not as he believes that they do not merit their own articles. I obviously cannot remove the deletion tags myself as I created the pages but belive that they are written well within Wookieepedia's guidelines on what merits its own article. They make up the majority of the Speedy deletion category at the moment and so should be easy to find. If I've misinterpreted the guidelines and they do merit deletion my apologise and I would greatly appreciate being told where I've gone wrong so I can apply it to future articles I write. Ayrehead02 22:50, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

• I just removed the tag on the one I saw that was definitely distinctive. But I've commented on Alexsau1991's talk page regarding what his proper course of action should be. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 23:14, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your help on the issue. Sorry to further ask for help but I'm to using the trash compactor and can't find how to link the rest of the articles into the same thread and creating individual threads seems hugely inefficient Ayrehead02 23:23, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
    • Sorry meant new to using the trash compactor Ayrehead02 23:23, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
      • Added them to them comment section for now. Thanks again Ayrehead02 23:28, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
        • You shouldn't have to create the TC article. Alexsau1991 should. They want the pages deleted, then it is their job to create the TC and mark each article appropriately. If they don't in a reasonable time, then I'll remove the Speedy Deletion tags myself. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 23:33, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
          • Ok thanks! Ayrehead02 23:36, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
            • Decided I'm not even going to wait. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 23:36, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

Atlas Edit

Hey JMAS, would you be able to get a grab of the wampa-tauntaun image from the Atlas on page 185, I believe it is? Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:13, March 11, 2012 (UTC)

WP:TOR Edit

"Our time has come." Hello <insert name here>! So, it's been a little over three months since The Old Republic was released, and WookieeProject: The Old Republic, which was founded almost two years ago now, was in dire need of a revamp and update. Participation has slumped, but it's time to get back on the wagon and refocus our efforts. So here are some stats: currently, we have ten Featured Articles, thirty-one Good Articles, and thirty-four Comprehensive Articles. Cal Jedi and Coruscantfan have both been doing great work lately, but we need more users to start undertaking projects from the game and related materials. Comprehensive articles are a great way to get started, so take a leap, pick an article, and get crackin'. Beyond status articles, there are a few other ways you can help WP: TOR with it's primary goals. Those of you who have a current subscription to the game are welcome to visit our new guild page, where we're setting up in-game groups to help catalogue and confirm information here on Wookieepedia. Aside from that, our article lists can always use expansions. We have some fun new programs and challenges coming to WP:TOR in the future, so take a look at our news and discussion area for updates, and always remember to add any of your new status article successes to the news board. If you have any questions or comments, head on over to the forums or let me know on my talk page. Take a look around the updated project page, and happy hunting! Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 09:37, March 11, 2012 (UTC)

Comment Edit

I happened to delete your last comment you made on one of the talk pages in my circus of file page moves. Just letting you know in case you wanted to repost it here. I'm hoping the cache doesn't take too long for that file to come back. Toprawa and Ralltiir 04:33, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Visionaries Maul image Edit

Hey JMAS, I noticed that you uploaded a new image of Maul from Old Wounds, but the one that yo uploaded is actually only found in the "Revenge" trivia gallery—it's not the original found in the comic itself. If you compare it to the original, Maul it much heavier and the waist/hip cybernetic area is much different. Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 06:04, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

• It's the same image, according to the Trivia gallery. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 06:09, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  • Yeah, but if you look at the actual comic, it's not. There are clear modifications. So the image can't be sourced to the comic if that's not where you got it from, correct? Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 06:14, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
    • Hey JMAS, I just wanted to let you know that I've re-uploaded the old version because, given that it is being used to illustrate the events of the Visionaries comic in the article, it should remain in this version. The TCW trivia version is found nowhere in the comic itself, so doesn't really belong under that file name. Feel free to upload it to a separate file and use it elsewhere, however. But these are not the same thing and so aren't really interchangeable. Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 09:52, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
      • While I understand your reasoning, the image I uploaded is the image as it was illustrated by the artist, digitally scanned by people at LucasFilm. The version we had previously was a scan someone took from the comic, meaning it is likely just scanned with the image proportions skewed. Now, I don't own the Visionaries comic to do a direct comparison, but I think the official version as presented on SW.com is more likely the actual image as it was drawn and presented in the comic. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 17:45, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
        • I have no idea what or why they did that over on the TCW gallery, but I can say with 100% certainty that that is not the actual image as drawn and presented in the comic. I have it directly in front of me and it's very clear that the one from the gallery has been considerably altered. I haven't a clue as to why, but it's definitely not from the comic. Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 20:30, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
          • Good, you've got the comic to verify, and I do not doubt you at all. But man, now I'm curious. Did Dark Horse possibly alter the original artist rendition for the comic, or did SW.com mess with the proportions. LOL - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 22:25, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Added message. Edit

Hey man, thank you for the tip. Roger Murtaugh 06:34, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

• No problem. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 06:35, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

dude i think ur clone wars pics r amazing!

The Essential Guide to Warfare image Edit

Hey JMAS; quick heads-up about your comment on File:Essential Guide to Warfare cover.jpg. The cover wasn't exactly the same. The previous image simply had "Essential Guide to Warfare", while the new version had "The Essential Guide to Warfare". A minor change, perhaps, and one we puzzled over in IRC trying to determine the exact nature of the change, but the upload was indeed correct. We figured that someone would upload a higher quality version at a later stage. - Cavalier One^{(Squadron channel)} 09:34, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

DL-44 Edit

Didn't mean to replace your DL-44 with my DL-44 search icon. I didn't know that file name was used and I had my 'ignore any warning' off. I'll try a different blaster since your DL-44 is more higher in quality. :P JangFett ^(Talk) 03:47, May 7, 2012 (UTC)