Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source.
Please do not remove talk page and forum comments, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~.
I noticed you changed Rendili to taking place before TCW. I'm changing it back, since Leland Chee has confirmed that the show takes place after Anakin got his scar, unless you can provide a source. Thanks. —Milo Fett[Comlink] 01:02, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
Aw, come on! In TWC, Anakin had different hair and a Padawan. In Chapter 22 and Rendili, Anakin's hair grew and Ahsoka somehow didn't appear in either of them, which mean she probably died before Ventress's disappearance. The events in Obsession took immediately after Rendili... Get the picture now, pal? Lord KOT 01:23, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
Also, I noticed your the headshot you asked Redemption for. I'll give you a little tip. Don't attempt to change the infobox picture from the current comic image to one from TCW. It has been tried before and a majority of users voted and felt the comic rendition looks better. - JMASHey, it's me! 23:25, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
Better? It's covered in red! If not CGI, why not the picture from the Jedi Trial? That's realistic enough for ya. Lord KOT 23:59, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
Anakin's hair is the least of our worries, as that can be chalked up to artistic license (officially, he'd been growing it out and had kept it in the Padawan topknot); however, him receiving the scar cannot, not to mention all of the mentions of Anakin's "new" knighthood. I advise you to re-read Obsession and note that it never explicitly gives Rendili as the cause of her injuries. The closest it comes is Dooku referring to how she stayed alive on Coruscant--which, in either case, happened prior to this storyline. It may have been intended to happen shortly before Obsession, but it looks like that's no longer the case. Since we have an official source stating that the series definitely takes place after he gets his scar, which we know is in Rendili, this seems like the most logical order for now. —Milo Fett[Comlink] 04:50, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
DRAT! AND DOUBLE DRAT!!!Lord KOT 22:30, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
It would be nice if there didn't have to be any speculation at all, but that's TCW continuity for ya. Also, not that I mind or anything, but correcting capitalization and etc. in other people's posts is generally frowned upon. Just a heads-up. —Milo Fett[Comlink] 00:09, September 16, 2009 (UTC)
Okay then... Lord KOT 02:49, September 16, 2009 (UTC)
Since Redemption was unwilling to upload this, I took the liberty to do so myself. My only question is which panel of the Ventress/Dooku on Skywalker duel do you want uploaded, as they all seem good for that. Jensaarai 07:33, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, but it doesn't seem to appear. Lord KOT 14:36, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
Here's the actual image, someone went and renamed it. Jensaarai 02:58, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
Tell the dude/gal I said thanks! Lord KOT 03:42, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
As for the image for Dooku/Ventress on Anakin, try having all three together. Lord KOT 15:00, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
Top 3 or bottom 3, there are 4. Jensaarai 16:50, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
I meant having all three duelist together. Try the one at the far bottom. Lord KOT 01:27, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
Sorry I took so long. Jensaarai 03:17, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
I would suggest you talk with Chack Jadson (or whoever took it to FA) before making such a major expansion to the article. --Xd1358Talk 18:34, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Hmm...Well, the info you added is mostly unneeded. Things like Dooku/Tyranus is kinda unnecessary, I'd say. Chack Jadson(Talk) 01:34, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
He may have been known publicly was Dooku, but that only hid his true self when he went dark: Darth Tyranus. One man, two identities. As for the details on Grievous, you think about putting in his meeting Anakin in person? Lord KOT 03:27, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
May I ask why you're changing appearances of, for example, Anakin Skywalker to Anakin Skywalker / Darth Vader? I don't know of any policy or precedent that says this should be done. If anything, the links should simply be as close to actual article name as possible. Nayayen(talk) 01:14, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
Well, I like to see things in a more Two-Face fashion: one man, two names. Lord KOT 02:00, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
Please do NOT rush to fix everything revealed in latest KOTOR issue. There is a one month spoiler period - and {{Majorspoiler}} exists for a reason. Thank to you guys I already spoiled the reveal for myself, but please do care about casual readers! MauserComlink 21:03, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Aw, come on! We can't all be kept being left out of the loop, you know. Lord KOT 21:05, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Yes, we can. With the Alek Squinquargesimus = Darth Malak and A'Sharad Hett = Darth Krayt reveals we had a full month before the articles were merged together, the appearances and the image categorization were also now updated right away. Have patience. MauserComlink 21:10, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Alright, but that hardly seems fair! And we want some pictures! Lord KOT 21:12, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
And don't put spoilers in edit summaries, something I'm pretty sure you've already been warned about. -- I need a name (Complain here) 13:01, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from Wookieepedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MauserComlink 14:51, November 28, 2009 (UTC)
I was just curious as to from where you are getting the info that you are adding to Darth Bane. Do you have an advance copy of Dynasty of Evil or something?—Tommy9281(No truth in me) 02:22, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
Not really, but I do plan to get my hands on that book once it comes out. Lord KOT 02:23, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
Well where is the info you added coming from?—Tommy9281(No truth in me) 02:27, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
From the spoilers. What else? Lord KOT 03:25, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
Please note that {{Ref}} tags are supposed to be used on sources in the infobox, and are not to be used in the article body. Thank you. Jonjedigrandmaster(Talk) 15:19, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
I gather that already. Lord KOT 15:50, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
Then please do not make any more edits that remove Ref tags from the infobox and add them to the body, as you did here. Jonjedigrandmaster(Talk) 15:52, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
Hey, just letting you know that "Dialogue" is used only for 3 or more speakers; use "Quote" for everything else. Chack Jadson(Talk) 15:32, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
How was I supposed to know about that? Lord KOT 15:49, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
While I am totally capable of honoring your request, I am not the individual who took either of those articles to FA status. You may therefore want to contact Grunny about Darth Azard, and AdmirableAckbar regarding Vul Isen. Both are exemplary Wookieepedians, and both are more than willing to lend a helping hand when needed. Let me know if they agree to your proposed additions, and then I'll upload the images you need. If there is anything else I can do for you in the meanwhile, don't hesitate to ask :)—Tommy9281 00:37, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
TOR Wiki has been nominated to become an Official Friends of Wookieepedia, and has received support votes from several users including an administrator and a bureaucrat. As Wookiepedian who is following SWTOR I am messaging you to ask if you would consider voting. Thanks. Alexsau1991(talk page) 17:36, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
Please know that you are adding in unsourced information into IU articles without sourcing them. Edits like these: [1] and [2] will be reverted if you don't source them. In the game itself, she is said to be dead, but that retcon wasn't introduced until last Friday, because of the canon-crippling TCW. In the future, please properly source anything. Thank you for your cooperation. JangFett(Talk) 16:20, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
Please source your edits. It's part of site policy. Thanks. Graestan(Talk) 14:53, December 28, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, well I've been sourcing, but the others have repeatedly ignored them. I don't get it. Lord KOT 15:01, December 28, 2010 (UTC)
You're not sourcing. Your edits to Dark Apprentice violated the policy I linked to. Please fix that edit accordingly and begin sourcing. You can't go around adding unsourced material. And please familiarize yourself with the ins and outs of attribution by reading the policy. Graestan(Talk) 15:02, December 28, 2010 (UTC)
I'll try to source more often, though some articles may not demand it. Lord KOT 16:23, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I don't know how to get them except in trailers, where it's generally very hard to get high quality ones. Sorry for that.--ID-21 Dolphin(Talk) 07:52, December 30, 2010 (UTC)
That's okay. You know someone else who can around here? Lord KOT 16:21, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
Please do not edit articles with {{Inuse}} attached. Those articles are currently undergoing major edits, and to avoid edit conflicts, other users should not edit the articles while the notice is up. 1358(Talk) 16:19, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
I see that you have been adding overflow div boxes within infoboxes. However, I would like to point out that it deforms the monobook skin rather badly. I think the infoboxes are fine as is. JangFett(Talk) 04:01, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
Hi Lord KOT! Please remember to leave an edit summary when you edit an article, to do this look above the "save" button. Thanks! --Talrrivanian (Headquarters) 15:00, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
Please stop changing the name of Rugess Nome to Tenebrous. According to the naming policy, Rugess Nome is the proper name of the article and the mention of the character in the body of the article and in the Infobox needs to remain the same as the title of the article. Making major changes like that can cause some to feel that you are vandalizing the article. GethralkinHyperwave 04:12, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
Try not to cut and paste information from one article to another. Besides the fact that each article should be written with the subject of the article in mind, using another user's work and pasting it is representing someone else's hard work as your own. Please don't do this again, thanks.--Demos Traxen (talk) 22:53, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
Well, I had to find SOMETHING for the article, since nobody else would! Lord KOT (talk) 00:04, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
Then simply read the comic and write a new section yourself. The comic only came out four days ago—Impatience is no excuse for the plagiarizing of others' work.--Demos Traxen (talk) 01:24, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
Not so sure if I can do that much. Wish people would read them more often. Lord KOT (talk) 02:31, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
Please note that many of the users are usually busy with other projects. If we don't get to adding information to a project that you are watching, there is no reason why you can't get the source material and expand on those articles yourself. Insulting the userbase by calling us all "lazy" will not get us to do what you want. We are not at your beck and call. If you continue with such an attitude as was displayed here, then you will not only make enemies with other users, but force the administration to do something about it. Please remain civil toward other users. If you want something done, and you want it done now, go get the source material and do it yourself. Ordering others around is not how one contributes to Wookieepedia. Thank you. Trak NarRamble on 06:10, September 13, 2012 (UTC)
Sorry about that. Kinda lost my temper there. I'll keep that in mind. Lord KOT (talk) 00:06, September 14, 2012 (UTC)
In the same vein, please watch your tone in edit summaries. "Whoever is doing misspelled words and adding too much bracketed words should stop and have his or her brain examined" is unnecessary and borders on a personal attack. Please try to be more pleasant in the future. CadeCalrayn 22:09, September 21, 2012 (UTC)
Sorry. Sometimes, I can't help myself. Lord KOT (talk) 22:11, September 21, 2012 (UTC)