Wikia

Wookieepedia

Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

Talk112
111,638pages on
this wiki

Redirected from WP:CAN

             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
  4. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  5. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  6. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  7. …have no redlinks.
  8. …have all relevant canon information presented.
  9. …be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  10. …have all quotes and images sourced.
  11. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  12. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  13. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  14. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  15. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article can also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination—just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are four EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again—someone is always watching you.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Paarin Minor

  • Nominated by: Clone Commander Lee Talk 20:24, July 2, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: CAN, GAN and now CAN thanks to the mofference

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 14:15, July 3, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ECvote I'm not even sure you need the other sources bit but well see what others say Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:09, July 7, 2014 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • The article has a category for terrestrial planets, but no where in the body does it mention that it was terrestrial. 501st dogma(talk) 12:51, July 3, 2014 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • I'm not sure the Databank or Encyclopedia's inclusion in the BTS is necessary as Warfare isn't included. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:52, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
Cadeth
SE
  • "to create an artificial cloud that hid its clone troopers from the Separatist forces" Can you reword this? The quote doesn't confirm that it hid Clone troopers, just that they drew Separatist forces into the clouds and destroyed them. Supreme Emperor (talk) 15:52, July 21, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Lill

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:44, July 4, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Thought I'd return to some of the first articles I ever created.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 12:04, July 5, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Add a lil lill here, and a lil lill there... 501st dogma(talk) 14:18, July 5, 2014 (UTC)

Object

SE
  • Does the source say Lill is native to Lianna? Or just that the cuisine it was used in was native to the planet?
    • It says a "native puree of lill" which I took to mean the lill was native but I guess that the puree could be? Also added in the word puree. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:14, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
  • Can you reword the last sentence of the bio a bit? As is, it drags a bit imo. Supreme Emperor (talk) 15:04, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
  • Does the source state it is a spice? Or just that it was a strong flavor in it? Supreme Emperor (talk) 16:51, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
    • I was certain it did say it but looking through again I can't find it anywhere. Changed to additive. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:04, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
Cadeth
  • Watch your spelling, please. favored is the American English version.
    • Hopefully the spell check change will stop that happening again. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:28, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  • Please look at your use of punctuation and quotation marks.
    • Should I remove the quotation marks? I'm not sure what our rule on them is. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:28, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  • While it's not outright harmful, please don't capitalize era tags.
  • It's clear that you didn't reload the infobox, since there are still hide parameters. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 15:40, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
    • Those are still in the standard load for the food infobox. Should I remove them? Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:28, July 21, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

How to Do the Allied Tion on 25 Credits a Day

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:24, July 4, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The capitalisation in the title is per the source weirdly

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 12:05, July 5, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 14:19, July 5, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:27, July 10, 2014 (UTC)

Object

  • Is the punctuation of the quote correct? Seems like a comma is missing.
    • Thats how it is in the source strangely, but it does seem like it needs one. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:20, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  • Please rework the first sentence. As it stands, it's like you're saying the GCW gave advice.
  • Travelers has one L in American English. I'd strongly suggest you investigate a way to change your browser's spell-check to American English while on Wookieepedia; it'll save you and your reviewers a great deal of time having to fix these mistakes.
  • As always, watch your lack of punctuation (commas particularly), please. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 15:46, July 21, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Fish stick

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:30, July 4, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Do you like putting fish sticks in your mouth?

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 08:31, July 6, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Clone Commander Lee Talk 10:40, July 6, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 18:12, July 9, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Code-8
Lee's charge
Cadeth
  • Again. Reload your infobox. Please do this for all of your current and future nominations.
    • Reloaded but I'm not sure what its changed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:12, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
      • The hide parameters. I've remove them from both the article and the preload. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 16:21, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  • Capitalization in the eras template.
  • Does the source actually say what fish sticks are, or is this just a real-world description?
  • Look at your quotation. Most of these errors I'm finding are simple ones that you've been told about many times and should know better by now, and the people who reviewed this previously should have caught. This applies to everyone: The CAN is not a fast way to push little articles to status; it should be treated with the same respect that the GAN and FAN processes are, and your articles should be of the same quality as your GAN/FANs. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 15:52, July 21, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Bubble Bowl

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:40, July 4, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Are links in the quote allowed? I can add them to the body if not.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. I'm sure this is in a Spongebob episode. Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 00:11, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 18:15, July 9, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Cadeth
  • Same objections as above, since you clearly copy-pasted most of this article. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 16:03, July 21, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Planechanga

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:42, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Having fun reading through Warfare again.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 12:54, July 10, 2014 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • Picky, but the name in the infobox should be italicized. 501st dogma(talk) 18:21, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
Cadeth
  • Please look at your eras. Pre-Republic is not a publishing era.
  • What exactly is the point of this? [[Rail gun|rail guns]]
  • "hired the aid" is not a proper phrase.
  • If the Sakiyans built them, why are they not in the infobox? Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 16:10, July 21, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Thanium star-glaive

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:49, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: More Warfare wonderfulness

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 12:54, July 10, 2014 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • Page x(?) has a picture of a taskforce including star-glaives over Felucia. Mention of that should probably be added.
    • I missed the little caption giving the location, good catch! Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 01:39, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
  • Page 7 has some info stating that the glaives were mixed and matched in squadrons with the other ships. Make sure there is nothing else you missed.
    • I thought "fielded alongside" covered that but I guess I wasn't specific enough, changed. I didn't add some of the other information as it does not specifically state that its refering to star-glaives just parts of Xim's fleet. Ayrehead02 (talk) 01:39, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
      • That seems the right thing to do. I was just asking if there was any more info on the glaive itself.
  • The image is poor quality. Could you try getting a better one? 501st dogma(talk) 18:36, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
    • Changed to the other image, better? Ayrehead02 (talk) 01:39, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
      • Pretty pretty. 501st dogma(talk) 12:54, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
Cadeth
  • Issue numbers for Insider should not be italicized.
  • Again, Pre-Republic era.
  • Give dates for Xim Week and Warfare.
  • "during its conflict against the Hutt species." Firstly, not sure about the "its"; I think a he would be better. Secondly, "conflict against" is not proper grammar; it should be "war against" or "conflict with".
  • "The battle, including the star-glaives involvement," You're missing an apostrophe, and the structure's very wonky. Something like "The events of the battle were later recorded in the..." The mention of the star-glaives is unnecessary, as it's given in the quote.
  • Reading the Insider article, the BTS can and should be greatly expanded using the info about Fullwood's design process and reasonings for the Xim ships. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 16:17, July 21, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Great Goblin

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:41, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Random page that was too interesting not to nom

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Clone Commander Lee Talk 11:14, July 14, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Hutt crime lord (Great Goblin)

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:51, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Made for above nom.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Maybe change Goblin to Hutt in the BtS though. Clone Commander Lee Talk 11:13, July 14, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Wollwi Enan

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Clone Commander Lee Talk 11:40, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 12:57, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:37, July 14, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Lee's charge
Ayrehead
  • The story just says she dueled him in the Apprentice trials not specifically the Apprentice tournament. Is this definitely the same thing? I thought the trials was a much larger series of tests? Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:38, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
    • Just a logical deduction: since the Jedi Trials imply one's rising from Padawan to Knight (or Knight to Master), they cannot be taken by mere initiates. However, the story does tell that Malleus was sent to the Agricorps following that event, while Etima was chosen as a Padawan. The description of those "Apprentice Trials" matches the Jedi Temple Apprentice Tournament much more closely. --Lelal Mekha Old Republic military symbol (Audience Room) 12:03, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
      • I happy for this deduction to be made but I think it needs to be explained in a reference note or something. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:15, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
        • Another suggestion, perhaps: since the term "Apprentice Trials" isn't used anywhere else and clearly describes the Apprentice Tournament, why not just add "Hammer" to the appearances section of the Tournament's article? Could also add it as an alternate name in the article's intro. I think the reasoning is pretty straightforward here: when two things are beinh described in the exact same way, I don't think we need explicit proof that they are the same. Think of the fibercord whip, also known as smart-rope or monolink filament. --Lelal Mekha Old Republic military symbol (Audience Room) 12:33, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
          • The apprentice trials sound more like the Jedi Initiate Trials than just the tournament, as the tournament is part of the trials. I think the tournament should have an indirect mention in Hammer while the trials have a direct mention, just under a different name as apprentice trials, which should also be added to the initiate trials article. I don't think a reference is needed anymore but could you mention the Initiate Trials in the article. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:16, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
  • Also the facebook link doesn't seem to work is there an archive or something that can be added? Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:41, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
    • I suppose it didn't work because you have to be Ed Erdelac's FB friend to see it. I found a way to get around the problem, though. --Lelal Mekha Old Republic military symbol (Audience Room) 12:03, July 14, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Crockagor

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:20, July 15, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The gladiators were easily my favourite part of the original Clone Wars series.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Ahhh, this show. Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 10:09, July 16, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Clone Commander Lee Talk 12:11, July 21, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Grunda Dolma

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:28, July 16, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another gladiator while I have the sticker book to hand

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. The fight should have been longer. Clone Commander Lee Talk 12:10, July 21, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Comments

  • I believe there is a miniature from the Wizards of the Coast game that resembles this piece. I'll have to do some checking.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 05:04, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
    • Just went through all of the Rebelscum photoarchives and found this[1], is it the one you meant? I can kind of see the resemblance although the colors appear pretty off, still I'll include it if you like since the distinct hair and weapon seem the same. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:34, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
      • Yeah, a quick BTS mention of the piece and miniature set would be good.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 17:47, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
        • Added, had to split the article, but still under word count. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:54, July 22, 2014 (UTC)


Unidentified customs official (Coruscant)

  • Nominated by: Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:09, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:Been far too long since I wrote anything.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:09, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Trip391 (talk) 00:20, July 18, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • Is there no kind of affiliation that can be added? If nothing else isn't he Imperial. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:45, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
    • That i'm not sure what to do about, he is mentioned as a customs official, but no mention of which customs agency he works for.
      • Well since there appear to be several active on Coruscant, not all of which are Imperial, I guess putting any one agency would be speculation. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:09, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
  • Is Roat definitely fictional? If so why did the offical think he should be dead? Did Wedge tell him something or have cybernetics or something?Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:45, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
    • Wedge's Gamble mentions that Intelligence fashioned the identity for him. As for why, the official never says why. He only makes that comment as he walks away, with no explanation as to why. Thanks for the review. Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:04, July 17, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Dantooine/Canon

  • Nominated by: ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:50, July 18, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: My first try at this. All of the linked items are now created and after carefully reading, I believe it meets the other requirements.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Code-8
  • The article is already over 200 words, so it needs to be sectioned off, Per rule 14. Check out the Layout Guide to see what formatting to use. If it passes 250 words you will need to take this to the GAN page. Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 05:28, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
Brandon
  • Per Commander Code-8 on sections. Presumably it should only need a History section.
  • Sources should be added to the BtS section.
  • You could also elaborate on the Legends part, such as names of prominent stories (like Knights of the Old Republic) that included and explored Dantooine. That may take it above 250 words. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 05:57, July 20, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Mei-mei tea

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:27, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:A slow return to Dark Times

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki