Wikia

Wookieepedia

Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

Talk112
112,263pages on
this wiki

Redirected from WP:CAN

             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
  4. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  5. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  6. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  7. …have no redlinks.
  8. …have all relevant canon information presented.
  9. …be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  10. …have all quotes and images sourced.
  11. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  12. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  13. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  14. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  15. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article can also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination—just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are four EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again—someone is always watching you.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Lill

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:44, July 4, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Thought I'd return to some of the first articles I ever created.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 12:04, July 5, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Add a lil lill here, and a lil lill there... 501st dogma(talk) 14:18, July 5, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ECvote ^You may be onto something there, dogma. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 20:45, July 29, 2014 (UTC)

Object

SE
  • Does the source say Lill is native to Lianna? Or just that the cuisine it was used in was native to the planet?
    • It says a "native puree of lill" which I took to mean the lill was native but I guess that the puree could be? Also added in the word puree. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:14, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
  • Can you reword the last sentence of the bio a bit? As is, it drags a bit imo. Supreme Emperor (talk) 15:04, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
  • Does the source state it is a spice? Or just that it was a strong flavor in it? Supreme Emperor (talk) 16:51, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
    • I was certain it did say it but looking through again I can't find it anywhere. Changed to additive. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:04, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
  • There is some more info you can add from the Lola Curich Starport section of Mission to Lianna. Specifically it mentions Lill being coupled with potted meats, VegHash and cereals. Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:05, July 31, 2014 (UTC)
    • Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:40, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
      • There is still more information missing from the Galactic Gourmet's Galaxy Guide section. Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:03, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
Cadeth
  • Watch your spelling, please. favored is the American English version.
    • Hopefully the spell check change will stop that happening again. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:28, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  • Please look at your use of punctuation and quotation marks.
    • Should I remove the quotation marks? I'm not sure what our rule on them is. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:28, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
      • Punctuation always goes within quotation marks, even if the quote itself doesn't have the punctuation. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 18:52, July 30, 2014 (UTC)
  • While it's not outright harmful, please don't capitalize era tags.
  • It's clear that you didn't reload the infobox, since there are still hide parameters. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 15:40, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
    • Those are still in the standard load for the food infobox. Should I remove them? Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:28, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  • "making it rather unpleasant." What is "it"? There are several things there. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 16:47, August 5, 2014 (UTC)
  • "the taste as..." same issue here. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 16:47, August 5, 2014 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • Nothing in the article body establishes that the article subject existed during the Rebellion era.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 04:58, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
  • If the source gives any information on the primary species living on Lianna, you should add this information to the article. As it is Liann cuisine, the primary species would eat it.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 20:38, August 18, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to remove nomination (EC only)

  1. ECvote Idle, unaddressed objection over one week old. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 04:25, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 04:27, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ECvoteSupreme Emperor (talk) 04:31, August 7, 2014 (UTC)


Fish stick

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:30, July 4, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Do you like putting fish sticks in your mouth?

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 08:31, July 6, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Clone Commander Lee Talk 10:40, July 6, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 18:12, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:13, August 14, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Code-8
Lee's charge
Cadeth
  • Again. Reload your infobox. Please do this for all of your current and future nominations.
    • Reloaded but I'm not sure what its changed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:12, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
      • The hide parameters. I've remove them from both the article and the preload. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 16:21, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  • Capitalization in the eras template.
  • Does the source actually say what fish sticks are, or is this just a real-world description?
  • Look at your quotation. Most of these errors I'm finding are simple ones that you've been told about many times and should know better by now, and the people who reviewed this previously should have caught. This applies to everyone: The CAN is not a fast way to push little articles to status; it should be treated with the same respect that the GAN and FAN processes are, and your articles should be of the same quality as your GAN/FANs. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 15:52, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  • Context for lill. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 16:53, August 5, 2014 (UTC)
SE
  • Per your Lill nom, we don't know if Lill is a spice or not. Please change it here as well.
    • Oops forgot it was in there. Removed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:49, July 31, 2014 (UTC)
  • The quote says that they were baked in choya, not choya bread. Do we know whether they are two separate things? Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:50, July 31, 2014 (UTC)
    • I suppose they could be different, but I assumed it was just a shortening of Choya bread since its in the same source. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:49, July 31, 2014 (UTC)
      • For all we know, it could be two separate things. Probably best to simply say choya. Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:26, August 4, 2014 (UTC)
        • Will that need a separate article? Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:18, August 4, 2014 (UTC)
          • Don't know why I asked. Made and done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:30, August 6, 2014 (UTC)
  • Again, you refer to Dalkash ale as a food here. Please fix this on all applicable nominations. If an objection is left on one article, please fix it on all applicable nominations, rather than having the same error objected to over and over. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:19, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
  • You have it in the seafood category, but seafood is not mentioned anywhere in the article. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:52, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
    • I added that because it contains fish. Should I remove it? Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:43, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
      • If it is seafood, it needs to be mentioned somewhere in the body. In addition, you mention fish in the infobox but it isn't mentioned anywhere in the body. Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:07, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
        • Added. Fish is mentioned along with the other ingredients in the third line. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:43, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • Nothing in the article body establishes that the article subject existed during the Rebellion era.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 04:59, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
  • If the source gives any information on the primary species living on Lianna, you should add this information to the article. As it is Liann cuisine, the primary species would eat it.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 20:41, August 18, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Bubble Bowl

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:40, July 4, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Are links in the quote allowed? I can add them to the body if not.

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. I'm sure this is in a Spongebob episode. Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 00:11, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 18:15, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 20:48, July 29, 2014 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:54, August 7, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Cadeth
  • Same objections as above, since you clearly copy-pasted most of this article. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 16:03, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
SE
  • You can link to foodstuffs in the infobox and bio. Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:02, August 1, 2014 (UTC)
    • Done. I've never understood why that article isn't just called food, it's not like any sources I've read refer to it as foodstuff. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:38, August 1, 2014 (UTC)
  • You refer to Dalkash ale as a food in the last sentence of the bio, when it is a beverage. Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:30, August 4, 2014 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • Nothing in the article body establishes that the article subject existed during the Rebellion era.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 05:01, August 15, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Planechanga

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:42, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Having fun reading through Warfare again.

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 12:54, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 20:53, July 29, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:17, August 1, 2014 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • Picky, but the name in the infobox should be italicized. 501st dogma(talk) 18:21, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
Cadeth
  • Please look at your eras. Pre-Republic is not a publishing era.
  • What exactly is the point of this? [[Rail gun|rail guns]]
  • "hired the aid" is not a proper phrase.
  • If the Sakiyans built them, why are they not in the infobox? Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 16:10, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  • The book was not released by Jason Fry. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 16:56, August 5, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Hutt crime lord (Great Goblin)

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:51, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Made for above nom.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Maybe change Goblin to Hutt in the BtS though. Clone Commander Lee Talk 11:13, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 23:45, July 27, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 19:57, August 4, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Cadeth
  • Please rewrite the way you introduce the Hutt being a hermaphrodite. All Hutts are, so it's not a unique or distinguishing attribute as your article currently uses it.
  • Same objection about the Anx.
  • For here and above, context on Star Wars Gamer 7. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 17:02, August 5, 2014 (UTC)
SE
Exiled Jedi
  • As per Supreme's objection to Great Goblin, you can work out a timeline in the BTS for when he was alive.
    • Added in something to BTS. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:11, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
  • As the Gamer article was an in-universe publication, you should say that the Hutt was mentioned in an article by University of Sanbra professor Tem Eliss in the body.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 04:17, August 15, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Mei-mei tea

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:27, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:A slow return to Dark Times

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 23:02, August 3, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Clone Commander Lee Talk 10:04, August 4, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ECvoteWow, I shouldn't be surprised that we have 37 articles on tea. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 18:55, August 4, 2014 (UTC)
    • Seriously? Did any of you who supported this actually open up the article in edit mode and look at it? All three of you, if you're not going to actually put forth effort into reviewing articles, then don't vote. It just proliferates bad articles. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 19:21, August 4, 2014 (UTC)
      • I would not be so quick at making accusations at that scale, sir. Clone Commander Lee Talk 19:40, August 4, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Trip391 (talk) 12:28, August 15, 2014 (UTC)

Object

SE
  • Can you also mention that he also ordered food with the tea?
  • Why did Jennir run off quickly? Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:19, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
Trip
  • Is "archepelgio" used in the source? Trip391 (talk) 04:24, August 15, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

  1. It has been brought to my attention that you need to reload the infobox, Ayre. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 19:56, August 4, 2014 (UTC)
    • Sorry, forgot that I made this before the food infobox template was changed. Fixed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:13, August 5, 2014 (UTC)


Perspicacity

  • Nominated by: IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 04:37, August 11, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Destroyed Ships of Serroco, Part 1 of 6

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:26, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:07, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Floyd noms are good noms. 501st dogma(talk) 23:57, August 16, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Comments

CX-03

  • Nominated by: IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 04:37, August 11, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Destroyed Ships of Serroco, Part 2 of 6

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:33, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:09, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ECvote As long as you add that 1stm... 501st dogma(talk) 00:02, August 17, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Comments

CX-09

  • Nominated by: IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 04:39, August 11, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Destroyed Ships of Serroco, Part 3 of 6

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:35, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:09, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 12:21, August 18, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Comments

CX-14

  • Nominated by: IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 04:40, August 11, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Destroyed Ships of Serroco, Part 4 of 6

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:40, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:11, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 12:24, August 18, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Queen of Taris

  • Nominated by: IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 04:41, August 11, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Destroyed Ships of Serroco, Part 5 of 6

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:44, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:13, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 12:25, August 18, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Grubstake

  • Nominated by: IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 04:41, August 11, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Destroyed Ships of Serroco, Part 6 of 6

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:48, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:13, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Grubsteak? Sounds good. 501st dogma(talk) 12:29, August 18, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki