FANDOM


             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  13. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  14. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all sixteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Yoon Cloud

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 20:07, June 3, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Better a 12-armed glider than an 8-legged facehugger.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:54, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:05, June 12, 2017 (UTC)
  3. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 04:52, June 24, 2017 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 16:45, June 27, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ecks Dee
  • Is there any reason not to classify this as a nebula? Extrapolating Cloud to mean nebula sounds like it'd be acceptable under WP:ATT. 1358 (Talk) 22:45, July 9, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Sajar Ohmo

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:41, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Now that the spoiler period is over time for some philosophical nonsense.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 12:46, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:04, June 12, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 15:36, June 19, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Fair enough. ProfessorTofty (talk) 15:42, June 21, 2017 (UTC)

Object

  1. As vague as it all is, do you think maybe something of what he said should be mentioned within the article body itself? Perhaps something like "he spoke of the darkness and the light"? ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:27, June 20, 2017 (UTC)
    I really don't feel that would add anything to the article, we have literally no idea what the context for the quote is, for all we know it could be a metaphor and not be about the light and the dark at all in any meaningful capacity. Since the quote is right there I feel it's better to just leave it upto the reader to interpret. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:13, June 21, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Weldsingers of Grace

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:45, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I like to imagine they're burly construction workers who sing beautifully.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 12:47, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:04, June 12, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 16:54, June 27, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

HX-1072

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:49, June 13, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A different name from a list in a different replica journal.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Lol, good work. Also, why doesn't the IA work for the Amazon link? Imperators II(Talk) 11:36, June 13, 2017 (UTC)
  2. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 04:50, June 24, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 16:55, June 27, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 15:43, June 30, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Cartusio system

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:53, June 15, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: An article I wrote nearly a year ago. This is sort of TCW, right?

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Home to the Astrography whale. Imperators II(Talk) 19:52, June 15, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:44, June 21, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 15:44, June 30, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Jillsaria system

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:54, June 15, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:"Jillsaaria"? Never heard of it.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 19:49, June 15, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:45, June 21, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ProfessorTofty (talk) 14:43, June 29, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 15:45, June 30, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Crakull

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 15:46, June 19, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:20, June 21, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 15:45, June 30, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • The article doesn't currently state that Rokur Gepta was actually born on Crakull only when. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:52, June 21, 2017 (UTC)
    • Huh, for some reason I failed to specify that. Thanks, done.
  • Is there not a "prior to" you can include for the settling of Croke Reach? Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:52, June 21, 2017 (UTC)
    • Unfortunately, no. Explume Minor and the Croke Reach are only mentioned in The Unknown Regions in connection to the Croke civil war, which isn't precisely dated by the book, as explained on the civil war's Wook article. Imperators II(Talk) 09:14, June 21, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Kokash system

(0 ECs/3 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Huh I've never heard that term before. Literally thought you meant something like a mob shakedown for money which was why I was confused. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:18, June 21, 2017 (UTC)
  2. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 04:57, June 24, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 15:46, June 30, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • Is there any more context for what a shakedown cruise is? Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:47, June 21, 2017 (UTC)
    • Not sure what you mean, "shakedown" and "shakedown cruise" are real-life terms that basically mean testing a new ship or an aircraft in order to prepare it for regular service. Imperators II(Talk) 09:10, June 21, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Aradia system

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:53, June 21, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 15:46, June 30, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Esooma

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 14:17, June 25, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The planet...

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 20:09, June 25, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:49, July 4, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 21:25, July 13, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • The whole first sentence is referenced to the Online Companion, including the fact that Esooma was a planet.
    • Meant to cite that to WbC when writing the article. Fixed. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:51, June 25, 2017 (UTC)
  • You should specify Esoomians were sentient.
  • Is the date 7 ABY explicitly mentioned in Wanted by Cracken, or is that just extrapolated from Cracken's "in the three years since the Battle of Endor" introduction? If it's the latter, it should be properly referenced.
    • All we know is that Wanted by Cracken takes place 3 years ABE and that Esooma is no longer quarantined by that point in time. Is there a better way to write this in the article, or is it good as is? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:51, June 25, 2017 (UTC)
      • The wording itself is fine, but it needs proper referencing, i.e., a ref note explaining to the reader WbC is set in 3 ABE and how that is equivalent to 7 ABY. Imperators II(Talk) 19:57, June 25, 2017 (UTC)
  • In the BTS, you should either go with a) just the publication year for both mentioned sources, b) full dates for both sources, or c) the full date for Wanted by Cracken and just the year for the Atlas. Imperators II(Talk) 18:31, June 25, 2017 (UTC)
    • Turns out the Cargo Bay had the full release date; added an "archivedate" as the backup was broken. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:51, June 25, 2017 (UTC)
Ayrehead02
  • I feel you could included a little more info based on the quote, specifying that the Esoomians couldn't leave under the quarantine and were free to find work offworld after. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:04, June 28, 2017 (UTC)
    • Added, along with a little extra from GG10. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:16, July 3, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Esooma system

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 14:17, June 25, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:...and its system.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 18:34, June 25, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:01, June 28, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 15:47, June 30, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Tuanulberry

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:56, June 28, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I removed TFA as an appearance since "as a dye" simply seemed to indirect.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 19:26, June 28, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 15:47, June 30, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ProfessorTofty (talk) 21:53, July 7, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Canon everywhere! MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 06:44, July 13, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Horax

  • Nominated by: MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 06:35, July 13, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: More canon stuff regarding Nelvaan!

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:31, July 13, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 04:44, July 14, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 22:58, July 26, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • The IMDB link will need a backup archive link. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:46, July 13, 2017 (UTC)
  • The body seems to have duplicate referencing which isn't necessary. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:46, July 13, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.