Wikia

Wookieepedia

Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

Talk113
117,324pages on
this wiki

Redirected from WP:CAN

             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
  4. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  5. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  6. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  7. …have no redlinks.
  8. …have all relevant canon information presented.
  9. …be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  10. …have all quotes and images sourced.
  11. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  12. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  13. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  14. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  15. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article can also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Reffe

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:35, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Second nomination. First here. The source does not state why he started ranting.

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 22:38, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 23:12, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Manoof (talk) 05:39, January 29, 2015 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 19:03, February 24, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Manoof
  • Did he die on Coruscant, or it doesn't specify? Manoof (talk) 02:33, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
SE
  • Any more detail available on what he was ranting about? Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:02, February 14, 2015 (UTC)
    • Nope it just says a tirade against Imperial corruption. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:43, February 14, 2015 (UTC)
  • I don't think you need so much context on Anandra Milon, since the article is about Reffe, not her. You could probably cut out the mention of her being a human female and just say "next door to Anandra Milon's uncle." Supreme Emperor (talk) 01:26, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
    • Removed the context. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:01, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • The story specifies he was shot.
    • Changed wording to be more specific. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:22, February 27, 2015 (UTC)
  • It also states the stormtroopers marched into the street and shot him. Please specify this in the article. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:53, February 27, 2015 (UTC)
    • Added that they marched. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:22, February 27, 2015 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • Is "Stormtroopers" supposed to be capitalized in the new canon?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 15:58, February 16, 2015 (UTC)
    • Oops no. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:07, February 16, 2015 (UTC)
      • You missed one. Normally I'd fix this myself, but I've been noticing that you've had a lot of careless errors lately.
  • Are there any quotes related to this character that could be added?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 18:43, February 16, 2015 (UTC)
  • I notice that Anandra Milon's article mentions vigils for the people lost on Alderaan. Did his rant occur during one of these vigils?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 05:54, February 17, 2015 (UTC)
    • There's nothing to suggest that it did. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:48, February 17, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Kikla

  • Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 06:29, January 29, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. --Eyrezer (talk) 14:51, February 9, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 03:28, February 20, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Exiled Jedi
  • Preliminary objection: I think you forgot the BTS.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 06:45, January 29, 2015 (UTC)
    • Crap! and on the other one >.< Fixed now Manoof (talk) 06:59, January 29, 2015 (UTC)
  • So, in the story, how is Protas stated to be mystical? I noticed you linked it to magic and wondered if he displayed some sort of magical powers.
    • The word is specifically used, among others (god, magical, etc). No powers are actually displayed, but that is how he is described. Manoof (talk) 07:39, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
  • I'm not entirely sure what is in the story, but from what I see in the article, you could probably add some information about their habitat in the infobox.
    • Nothing specific, we don't know if they were amphibious, water/land-dwelling. Since it is a Kaminoan legend, we also don't know if the planet had land masses or not at the time. All we know is, they assembled their army, challenged Protas and were soundly defeated. Manoof (talk) 07:39, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
      • You call them water dwellers in the article. Is this correct?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 05:17, February 20, 2015 (UTC)
        • After having another closer look, they are at one time described as a school. This leads me to believe they are indeed water-dwelling, and I've updated the article as such. I'd appreciate if you could check the reference looks ok. Manoof (talk) 07:16, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • Is there any indication of how large these things are?
    • Only that they were significantly smaller than Protas—they are referred thrice as "tiny" but this seems to be in comparison to Protas, and we only know that he is quite significantly larger than aiwha. We COULD assume they were human-sized, but they could have been smaller and there is no indication HOW small they actually were. Added a second mention to make it a bit clearer. Manoof (talk) 07:39, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
  • I would mention the fact that while the Kikla were unable to defeat Protas, the aiwha were later able to defeat him.
    • Added. Manoof (talk) 07:39, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
  • Looking at the short story's article, I notice that it says that they argued amongst themselves. Please mention that here.
    • I thought "divided of mind" made this clear. Clarified. Manoof (talk) 07:39, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
  • It also mentions that the last Kikla was eaten. Please include this in the article.
    • Let me make this a little clearer: Please indicate that the last of the Kikla army were devoured by Protas and that he defeated them in the battle. Right now this isn't clear.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 05:40, February 17, 2015 (UTC)
      • Clarified. Manoof (talk) 07:39, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
  • The short story article does not capitalize kikla, while this article does. Which is correct?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 16:13, February 16, 2015 (UTC)
    • This has me a bit confused now. Checking the source, "kikla" is never capitalized. However as per the MOS, as a sentient species ("a sentient group of kikla swimmers") it should be capitalized, and the addition of "swimmers" in that quote now makes me wonder if they were a subspecies or something... Not sure what to do now... Manoof (talk) 07:39, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
      • In regards to the kikla swimmers question, how many times are they mentioned as kikla swimmers as opposed to simply kikla?
        • Once as kikla swimmers, four times as just kikla. Though the above point regarding their aquatic nature leads me to believe kikla is indeed the species. Manoof (talk) 07:16, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
      • As for the capitalization, the rule you are referring to is for Humans/Near-Humans, which is sometimes capitalized and sometimes not. In this case, I would say that the capitalization of the original source should be used as there are no conflicts. You should probably also add a sentence to the BTS saying something like: "While most Star Wars sources capitalize the names of sentient species,(Include reference that explains this.) the Republic Commando game guide did not capitalize kikla. This will also require you to fully reference the BTS.
        • That's the rule. Added, ref'd, not sure if the ref is sufficient though... Manoof (talk) 07:16, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • Is "Pod" supposed to be capitalized for the Pod of aiwha?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 05:17, February 20, 2015 (UTC)
    • Nope, fixed. Manoof (talk) 07:16, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
CP

Comments

Aren't these guys and Protas mythical creatures from Kamino? You use the deity info box for Protas, for instance, but the articles themselves don't treat the subject as though it is a legend/mythical/etc. If they are legendary, you should adjust the articles accordingly (I.e., according to Kaminoan legend, the Kikla...). --Eyrezer (talk) 07:20, January 29, 2015 (UTC)

  • Does that mean this article is no longer a species article? I understand what you're saying, but went off the Protas good article, which i assume needs a review? Does this even get an article still? Manoof (talk)
    • Yes it definitely still gets an article, but you are correct that personally I would categorize it in Category:Mythology (as Protas is in the deity category). --Eyrezer (talk) 11:58, February 3, 2015 (UTC)
      • Ok so before I run off and make all the changes to the different articles:
  1. Treat the article as a species/whatever article but adjust as mentioned.
  2. Add the mythology category
  3. Not sure on this but do all the current categories still stay?
This was trickier than I thought... Manoof (talk) 04:39, February 4, 2015 (UTC)
  • Above changes (1,2) have been implemented. Manoof (talk) 01:32, February 9, 2015 (UTC)


Ancient Trench

  • Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 06:50, January 29, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:Not sure if it should be "Ancient Trench" or "Ancient trench"...

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 16:25, February 13, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:20, February 16, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 14:56, February 25, 2015 (UTC)

Object

  • Well, if you're not 100% sure about what the title should be, you should probably figure that out first. IFYLOFD (Talk) 07:11, January 29, 2015 (UTC)
    • To clarify, both words are capitalized in the story, so I assumed it's ok as it's a proper noun, even though both words themselves are not? Manoof (talk) 10:23, January 30, 2015 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • Could you make it clearer that the whole article is a legend? Right now it sounds like the only part that is myth is that it was located on Kamino.
    • Flushed
  • Isn't the Ancient Trench under the ocean? This isn't explicitly mentioned here.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 18:57, February 16, 2015 (UTC)
    • Flushed Manoof (talk) 04:40, February 17, 2015 (UTC)
  • In the BTS, you say that the Trench was mentioned, while in the appearances section you say it appeared. Which is correct?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 06:02, February 17, 2015 (UTC)
    • Flushed Manoof (talk) 09:17, February 17, 2015 (UTC)
  • You should change kikla to lowercase here as well.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 19:06, February 24, 2015 (UTC)
    • Good catch! Changed Manoof (talk) 07:29, February 25, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Rho-class airspeeder

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 01:14, February 14, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:36, February 16, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Manoof (talk) 07:13, February 18, 2015 (UTC)

Object

501st
SE
Manoof
Exiled Jedi

Comments

Unidentified Jedi Knight (Zayne Carrick)

  • Nominated by: —MJ— Comlink 06:17, February 15, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Throwaway mention + one edit = CA nomination.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. --Eyrezer (talk) 09:31, February 17, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Manoof (talk) 10:31, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:19, February 22, 2015 (UTC)

Object

  • Unsourced infobox.
    • Yep, I'm rusty. Fixed.
  • No eras in the infobox.
    • Doh! Fixed.
  • Context on Zayne and Dantooine.
    • Done. At that point in time, "Human" is the best that can be done for Zayne, since he's not a Jedi yet.
  • Date for when Zayne was referred to the Enclave. I'm almost certain that it's findable.
    • Researched and done.
  • Links in the quote attribution, as they aren't mentioned in the article - though it should be mentioned that the Knight told Tokare or the other Jedi, rather than just "said." Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 06:25, February 15, 2015 (UTC)
    • Linked. It's never specified exactly who the Knight said that to, so I can't expand on "said". He could have said it to Reiva, who told Vandar, or he could have said it to Vandar, who told Reiva, or he could have said it to another Jedi, who told Vandar, who in turn told Reiva. We don't know. —MJ— Comlink 21:57, February 15, 2015 (UTC)
Manoof
  • Does the release date (or just year) need to be linked in the BTS? Manoof (talk) 09:50, February 16, 2015 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • Author and year of release should be in the bts. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:32, February 16, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Rayc Ryjerd's starship

  • Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 06:25, February 15, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:GA redlist link that has enough information to nom it now...

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 03:30, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:30, February 22, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Exiled Jedi
  • After a brief check of The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia, I noticed a mention of the ship that you missed. While there is not any new information in this source, you should check all of the Ryjerd's sources to check for mentions of the ship.
    • I checked what I could and nothing there. The only sources I can't check are the anime and the insider issues. I think it's safe to say it isn't mentioned in the manga since it is just an adaptation of the movie and he is a background figure, but it seems nobody owns it to confirm anyway. It seems you have the Insider mags, would you be able to check the two articles? I would appreciate the contribution to my debt. Manoof (talk) 04:35, February 17, 2015 (UTC)
      • Checked the manga (which I have digital copies of) and both Insiders and there's no mention of the ship. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:30, February 22, 2015 (UTC)
  • Looking at Rayc Ryjerd's page, it calls him a Bimm, not a Human. While Ryjerd's article sources this information to his card, this information cannot be found on the card and will need another source. Unless there is a source explicitly calling him a Bimm, you are going to need to create a reference saying that his father was Rycar Ryjerd (per SWCCGsmall Star Wars Customizable Card GameJabba's Palace Limited (Card: Rayc Ryjerd)) and that his father was a Bimm. (per SWCCGsmall Star Wars Customizable Card GamePremiere Limited (Card: Rycar Ryjerd))
    • This debt is now paid. Manoof (talk) 04:35, February 17, 2015 (UTC)
  • While there may not be enough information to conclusively state when he owned the ship, you should add a sentence to the BTS mentioning the timeframe he was seen near Jabba. Also, make sure to state that the sources that mention the starship do not explicitly state when he owned it.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 15:36, February 16, 2015 (UTC)
    • I didn't say when he owned it, but I've added a date of purchase as sometime before 4 ABY, and referenced the date accordingly. Is that sufficient payment for this debt? Manoof (talk) 04:35, February 17, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Starblossom/Canon

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:07, February 17, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another 1000 Levels Down nom.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 03:34, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Manoof (talk) 11:15, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 03:42, February 20, 2015 (UTC)
  4. ProfessorTofty (talk) 03:57, February 20, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Manoof
  • Do we know for sure it's a fruit (as opposed to a vegetable, fungi or something else)?
    • Based on the quote included I think we can. Santigo says I wish we had starblossom and thats her response, which implies starblossom is fruit. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:51, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
      • Wow, I think I need to sleep :/ Sorry chief... Manoof (talk) 11:15, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
  • You could probably link Foodstuff/Canon somewhere here (possibly in dealing with the above)Manoof (talk) 10:46, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • I would remove the "or anyone else" from the end of the last sentence of the body as Milon could not possibly know for certain if starblossoms had been growing somewhere else. I'd reword that section to make it clear that this was Milon's opinion.
    • Changed to show it was only as far as Anandra knew. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:00, February 20, 2015 (UTC)
  • Additionally, I would add a sentence to the BTS stating that characters in the story indicate that the fruit was only grown on Alderaan and that it was all destroyed, but that the story never definitively proves that the character is correct.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 04:38, February 20, 2015 (UTC)
    • I've added it, but it seems kind of redundant after adding similar information to the body. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:00, February 20, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Ryan Kaufman

  • Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 09:30, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Offhand introductory sentence to attribute the author leads to an IU character with a real-world name!

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:14, February 22, 2015 (UTC)
  2. —MJ— Comlink 07:37, February 25, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:53, February 25, 2015 (UTC)
  4. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 01:32, February 28, 2015 (UTC)

Object

The Jedi Council is burning the midnight... er, 5:00am oil
  • "thus inadvertently placing himself in the Star Wars universe.": Do we know for certain that it was inadvertent? Maybe he did it deliberately in hopes of getting this article on Wookieepedia. :P
    • Good catch, removed. Manoof (talk) 10:26, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • If there is absolutely nothing to place into the infobox other than the name, then I suggest removing it entirely. As it stands, it looks ugly and serves no purpose.
    • Removed, though I should point out that Unidentified smuggler (Level 2142) has an almost identical infobox and nothing has been said on its nomination. I was also under the impression that infoboxes were, for all intents and purposes, compulsory... Manoof (talk) 10:26, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
      • There are a number of comprehensive articles with similar empty infoboxes, including Roberts. I'm pretty sure it was agreed in a nomination somewhere that empty infoboxes should still be included, although I can't find the specific archive. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:12, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
        • Infobox re-added. Manoof (talk) 23:02, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
          • My objection stands unless and until I see an EduCorps consensus stating that this ugly and useless thing is required. And if such a consensus is produced, I will probably take the matter to the CT for a community decision. —MJ— War Room 06:50, February 22, 2015 (UTC)
  • Good night. —MJ— Holocomm 10:03, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • Instead of saying "demise due to" could you say something like "defeat by"? Its not very clear right now that they defeated him in battle. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:12, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
    • Clarified. Manoof (talk) 23:02, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • Could we get a date in the bts. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:12, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
    • Added Manoof (talk) 23:02, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
Hands
  • So it appears from your categorizing the character as unspecified gender, calling Ryan a male in the bio itself is a mistake. Please don't let this happen again. And IRL I do actually know of females named Ryan too, so who's to say this doesn't also happen in the SW universe? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:29, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
    • I mentioned something similar in the page's discussion, and simply missed that one mention "he". Fixed. Manoof (talk) 23:02, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
      • And I'd suggest to change the BTS sentence too. Perhaps "placing his namesake..." Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 23:54, February 21, 2015 (UTC)
        • Changed. I assume, since you mentioned it, that the way it was before implied the IU character was also male? Manoof (talk) 00:15, February 22, 2015 (UTC)
          • I wasn't so sure about that one to be honest, but I thought it might have. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 00:22, February 22, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Candleberry reduction sauce

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:04, February 22, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A nice change from 1000 Levels Down

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Crystal mushroom soup

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:59, February 22, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Combining my love of food articles and my recent drive to nominate canon articles.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki