Wikia

Wookieepedia

Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

Redirected from WP:CAN

120,806pages on
this wiki
Talk113
             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
  4. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  5. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  6. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  7. …have no redlinks.
  8. …have all relevant canon information presented.
  9. …be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  10. …have all quotes and images sourced.
  11. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  12. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  13. …include a reasonable number of images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available.
  14. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  15. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  16. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article can also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

LG3-18

  • Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 02:23, March 19, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Combing through the Dark Forces Audio Dramas uncovers some lost relics.

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 16:44, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Manoof (talk) 07:06, March 22, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 01:35, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 23:02, July 26, 2015 (UTC)
  5. These are literally my favorite types of subject: the ones that appeared in one or two obscure sources and have been neglected an article for years, and are finally given one after decades of sitting there, gathering proverbial dust. - AV-6R7 (talk) 23:06, July 26, 2015 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • Would a homeworld of Nar Shadda be appropriate in the infobox? 501st dogma(talk) 21:47, March 19, 2015 (UTC)
    • There's nothing really indicating that it was built on Nar Shaddaa. He could have been built elsewhere and brought to the moon and installed by whoever ran the traffic operations, unless you mean to just use Nar Shaddaa as a place of residence, or something. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 16:27, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
      • I was thinking of it as the place of residence, but I'm not set on you adding it. It's up to you. 501st dogma(talk) 16:44, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
CP
  • Which degree of droid is it? Also, I think we can safely add the Nar Shaddaa resident category. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 21:15, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
    • I don't know. The quote in the article, and Ors agreeing to follow his vector, is all that is known about the droid. I'll add the place of residence though, now that there's been an additional voice on the matter. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 21:50, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
      • Well, the Essential Guide to Droids or somesuch source lists the various types, maybe guidance droids will fit into one of those. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 23:32, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
        • I didn't see guidance droids, but the first Essential Guide listed another kind of traffic droid under Municipal. Would that work? And wouldn't Guidance Droid be more like a class of droid? LG and 8-13 are my first droid nominations, but I'm happy to learn. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 23:45, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
          • Yes, that would probably be a similar degree. And what you have about the class looks right. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 23:15, March 25, 2015 (UTC)
          • Sorry to interject here. Clonehunter, the degree is 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th or 5th degree. I don't have the book but I'm guessing municipal droids are 5th degree? Also I think municipal would probably be more of the class with landing guidance droid being the model. Manoof (talk) 06:40, April 3, 2015 (UTC)
            • Oh, sorry, I was going by the old Droid Guide, which according to the page didn't have classes. I guess it'd be whatever municipal relate to in regards of class. Class Three could almost work, too. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:16, April 3, 2015 (UTC)
              • That's cool, but I think 5 would be better as this would be transportation, non intelligent intensive. Its a simple matter of providing a landing approach based on conditions. 3 would be if there were more social functions needed, which he wouldn't. An example of a 3rd degree droid would be 3PO. Keep in mind I don't have the new guide to droids, and am only going off what the articles here say. Manoof (talk) 19:58, April 3, 2015 (UTC)
                • I'd say that what you say makes more sense. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 04:45, April 4, 2015 (UTC)
                  • Does the guide actually classify landing droids under any degree? I'd be hesitant to classify it without something specific backing the degree up. If the reference is kept, it will need some sort of explanation included as LG318 is not mentioned in the guide.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 17:55, April 4, 2015 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • I fail to see how a reference to pilot droids being 5th degree droids is enough for a landing guidance droid to be identified as the same degree. One flies a ship, while the other just directs a ship to land, which is not really the same thing.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 02:20, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • Apologize for the lack of follow-up. 5th degree would be more than fine. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 01:54, May 18, 2015 (UTC)
    • How can we identify it as 5th-degree?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 02:22, May 18, 2015 (UTC)
      • I don't think we can, personally. Unless something specifically states that traffic conducting droids can be placed in a certain degree. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 20:37, May 27, 2015 (UTC)
  • The "somewhat masculine voice" mention in the BTS does not seem right to me. Either you can state the voice is male or you can't. If you can't state this definitively, say so in the BTS. Otherwise, you should add the masculine programming category.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 01:23, May 28, 2015 (UTC)
    • Well, I wasn't really sure how far we could assert something. If I was to go on a limb, I'd say it was a male voice. But being a droid, I hesitated. Here's a video that should start when the droid speaks, if you want to see for yourself. I guess I can just Male-ify this droid for now. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 03:07, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
      • Also, I relaized I missed the fact it's pronounced El-Gee-Three-Eighteen. Would this then read as LG3-18 as opposed to LG318? --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 03:12, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
        • Yeah, I think that would probably be better. However, since we do not know the actual spelling, this template should be used: {{Conjecturespell}}--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 12:11, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
          • Oh, that's a useful template. I've added it, and I've moved the page. It seems I moved everything else correctly, too. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 22:30, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  • You still have the sentence in the BTS, which kind of conflicts with the body: "LG318's gender is never specified, even though the character has a somewhat masculine voice." I would reword this sentence to state that the article bases the droid's gender off of its voice and note that nothing else identifies it.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 12:11, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  • "The Essential Guide to Droids states that traffic oriented droids, such as LG318, as municipal traffic droids." Aside from the grammar mistake and the old spelling of the droid's name in this reference, I looked through the book and I could not find the term "municipal traffic droid," only the fact that one traffic droid was under the municipal section. Where are you getting municipal traffic droid from?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 14:25, July 3, 2015 (UTC)
    • I must have been extrapolating (?) a connection between the term 'municipal' and the one traffic droid as a general kind of droid, as opposed to anything specific. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 19:51, July 4, 2015 (UTC)
      • I don't think having one traffic droid under the municipal section is enough to state that all related droids can be identified as "municipal traffic droids."--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 15:49, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
        • Ok. So I just removed the whole inference then, unless we still want to call him a traffic droid on its own, as that's basically what he's doing. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:08, July 5, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Kiffu/Canon

  • Nominated by: ProfessorTofty (talk) 02:58, May 19, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Pretty much the definition of a simple comprehensive article based on a single source that can't be expanded any further I think. No quote, no image, just a mention in Ultimate Star Wars that it was Vos's homeworld in a list of facts. If I'm not mistaken, no infobox is needed either, since there wouldn't be anything to put in it, other than the name. Everything is sourced. ProfessorTofty (talk) 02:58, May 19, 2015 (UTC)

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Manoof (talk) 08:53, May 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 01:47, May 21, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Although you still need to find a date for the 32 pre-Yavin for TPM. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 01:34, May 23, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Squishy Vic | message 19:36, June 28, 2015 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • As a heads up, sources go after BTS. :P 501st dogma(talk) 20:25, May 19, 2015 (UTC)
  • It would probably be good to give a timeframe that Vos lived in, just so that we know when Kiffu was capable of supporting life (in this case, a Clone Wars time period will do). 501st dogma(talk) 20:42, May 19, 2015 (UTC)
    • Not a bad idea. I've done it. And since you brought that up, I've also put in an infobox indicating an atmosphere breathable to humans, and I also put in the Human/Kiffar species. ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:38, May 19, 2015 (UTC)
      • To build on that, you should say in the body that Voss was a Human/Kifar. Also, I don't think we can say for a fact that Kiffu's atmosphere was breathable by humans, as it is technically possibly that Voss was born/lived in an enclosed structure with an artificial atmosphere. 501st dogma(talk) 16:55, May 20, 2015 (UTC)
        • Yeah, that's good thinking - in a galaxy of fantastical possibilities like what we see in Star Wars, something like that is always possible. I removed it and added the bit about Vos being Human / Kiffar to the body. ProfessorTofty (talk) 01:18, May 21, 2015 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • Does the source say that Human/Kiffar are a native species to the planet, or does it just mention Vos?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 02:51, May 23, 2015 (UTC)
    • It specifically calls it his "homeworld," but nothing else. ProfessorTofty (talk) 02:52, May 23, 2015 (UTC)
      • Well, that is not enough to say that Humans/Kiffar are native to the planet.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 15:09, May 30, 2015 (UTC)
        • Alright, I killed it. ProfessorTofty (talk) 17:03, May 31, 2015 (UTC)
          • Restored based on the latest update to the Databank, which clearly states that it is one of two home planets of the Kiffar species. ProfessorTofty (talk) 22:55, June 9, 2015 (UTC)
  • The information about it being one of the two Kiffar homeworlds should be mentioned before Vos.
    • Moved it so that it's mentioned before Vos is. ProfessorTofty (talk) 01:16, June 15, 2015 (UTC)
  • As the databank entry added new information in a sparse subject, I believe that it is important enough to be mentioned briefly in the BTS.
  • Per this decision, "human" should not be capitalized in Canon articles.
  • I just want to make sure about this: Does Ultimate Star Wars call Vos a human/Kiffar. From the Kiffar databank entry it sounds like Kiffar are not human.
    • Here's the weird thing - not only does Ultimate Star Wars specifically list his species as "human," the only place that the term "Kiffars" appears is in the book's index for the page that Vos's entry is to be found on, but the word "Kiffar" or "Kiffars" actually does not appear on that page. Or, to put it another way, the entry for him actually specifically describes him as "human," while the idea of him being Kiffar is implied by the index, but not directly stated. ProfessorTofty (talk) 01:16, June 15, 2015 (UTC)
      • Does anything specifically call him a Kiffar?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 14:00, July 3, 2015 (UTC)
        • Yes, the Star Wars Databank. I've now sourced the info about him being human to Ultimate Star Wars and Kiffar part to the Databank. ProfessorTofty (talk) 21:55, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  • From just the databank entry, I do not believe that you can say that humans were a native species.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 17:16, June 13, 2015 (UTC)
  • The Phantom Menace does not state that the character is Vos. You need another source to back that up.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 14:00, July 3, 2015 (UTC)
    • Added reference clarifying that the character was identified as Vos. ProfessorTofty (talk) 21:58, July 5, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • Regarding the date thing, I added the standard date tweet that we've been using regarding the timeline of the films. ProfessorTofty (talk) 02:20, May 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • Something to note: it's entirely possible we may be getting more information on this subject in Dark Disciple, due to Vos being one of the two primary characters in the novel. This article may end up exceeding the CA word count by July. I'm leaving this as a comment rather than an objection since this is just a wild guess, but it's something to keep in mind. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 02:56, May 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • Article updated with new information from the Databank. ProfessorTofty (talk) 22:55, June 9, 2015 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the note Tofty, still looks good! Manoof (talk) 04:41, June 10, 2015 (UTC)


Manaan/Canon

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:10, June 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Hopefully we can get this over quickly.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Squishy Vic | message 22:40, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Might want to mention Selkath are sentient but otherwise great. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:37, July 3, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Manoof (talk) 11:15, July 10, 2015 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 18:07, July 24, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Exiled Jedi
  • I would note that it was mentioned in the new databank as well in the BTS.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 12:18, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  • Per Ayrehead's comment, I believe you should mention that the Selkath are sentient in the first sentence.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 14:08, July 3, 2015 (UTC)
    • Done. Also adjusted wording. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 12:27, July 10, 2015 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure if this is just the Manaan databank entry, but it refers to the plural of Selkath as "Selkaths." If this is always the case, you should change it in this article.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 23:08, July 26, 2015 (UTC)
    • In Mantu's SWE and Databank entries, the plural of Selkath is Selkath. I can change it to Selkaths if you would like, but I'd say that there is enough evidence to the contrary to keep it the way it is. - AV-6R7 (talk) 23:29, July 26, 2015 (UTC)
Vic
  • I think we need tiny bit of additional context on who Mantu is in the behind the scenes. Somewhere it should say why he's part of canon and where he came from (Clone Wars TV show). Also, I didn't want to make this edit myself but I'd recommend adding in "Star Wars canon" before "canon" in the BTS, as well.Squishy Vic | message 19:27, June 28, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • I will be taking a temporary hiatus for the next three weeks as I will be in Europe and may not always have a good internet connection. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:10, July 2, 2015 (UTC)


Seta-Le

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 16:01, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 17:09, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Manoof (talk) 20:16, July 22, 2015 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:06, July 23, 2015 (UTC)

Object

  • "Seta-Le was a female Jedi Master of the Jedi Order who visited the Jedi" has lots of Jedi, any way to get rid of one at least? Maybe the first Jedi - "female master in the jedi order, who visited the jedi holy...". Manoof (talk) 07:55, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
    • Not really. Her title is Jedi Master.
  • I have no idea of the wording in the codex, but by using "to a meditation site" sounds like it was a site regularly used for meditation. I assume this is correct but wanted to double check :) Manoof (talk) 07:55, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
    • If you're asking if it's enough for an article, no. It's just a site used for meditation. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 17:57, July 22, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Gamall Wironicc

  • Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 20:29, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: First CAN (or really any type of nom) of mine in a while.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Manoof (talk) 06:57, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Hm. Good work figuring that out. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 18:12, July 24, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 20:41, July 24, 2015 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • " he was rumored to have sacrificed himself in battle so that his comrades could live on, at some point prior to being stuck on Tatooine." Using sacrificed makes it sound like he died, which he didn't if he later got stuck on Tatooine. Perhaps there is a another word you can use? 501st dogma(talk) 18:36, July 24, 2015 (UTC)
    • The card said those words, and being rumored to have died does not mean actually died. IRL both Osama and Saddam were believed by some to have been already dead shortly after the US invasions of their countries, before their ultimate discoveries made big news. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:18, July 24, 2015 (UTC)
      • Yeah, I guess it's keepable then. 501st dogma(talk) 20:41, July 24, 2015 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • I am going to leave this objection here due to the dead link in the Facebook reference. I am aware that it is not possible to get an image of this, but I believe that there needs to be some sort of agreement on whether or not something like this is allowed as valid sourcing before this article can gain status.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 23:26, July 26, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • Any apparent weird wording of the article is a result of copying the scarce info from the CCG card itself, along with his uncertain era. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 20:29, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  • Hmm, so neither his card text nor the stats reference him as being a Klatooinian. Is it assumption to assert anything about his species at all? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 20:34, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
    • At least we know he's male :P Is there anything on that facebook post that might help? If you can, try to get a screenshot as well! Manoof (talk) 08:02, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
      • No, I can't get a screenshot of that Facebook post since it has been unfortunately long expired, and the citation was initially made way before the Facebook citation template. And while Leland Chee made no explicit mention of Wironicc's species, the closest thing was his thinking to retcon him as a TPM Klatooinian. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:32, July 18, 2015 (UTC)
        • I'm happy with the article as-is, and agree we can't say he is klatooinian with any certainty. Manoof (talk) 06:57, July 20, 2015 (UTC)


DRN-592

  • Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 08:42, July 12, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:Former CA cleaned up, issues here have been addressed in the same fashion as MUQ-751

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:45, July 21, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Z23-Y75

  • Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 08:53, July 12, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:The other droid, cleanup link here

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:43, July 21, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Comments

The Godsheart

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 11:30, July 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: First nomination in two years' time.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:01, July 21, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 18:17, July 24, 2015 (UTC)

Object

  • You mention that the pulsar was listed in the companion but don't have it in sources. I'm assuming this is because the companion is all systems not actual stars? If so this should be clarified in the bts. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:41, July 21, 2015 (UTC)!!!!
Exiled Jedi
  • The full release date of the Atlas is not self-sourcing.
    • Changed to just the year.
  • Per the CA review, the Atlas Companion only mentions the Godsheart system, which should be created and mentioned in this article. This also means that The Godsheart was not mentioned in the Atlas Companion.
    • Corrected.
  • On page 58 of Lords of Nal Hutta, there is a lot of information that needs to be included in this article.
    • How did I forget about that page? Added, thanks!
  • Page 73 of Lords of Nal Hutta mentions that the Godsheart was located off The Dead Road.
    • Added.
  • I believe that the mention of the star in Lords of Nal Hutta is substantial enough to be mentioned in the BTS, especially since it gives more info than the original source.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 03:52, July 24, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Jilrua

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Unagin

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 11:37, July 22, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: unsuccessful CAN, then GA, then former GA... now a CA?

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Roon Comet

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 00:26, July 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: When I saw this article in a stub category, I was certain it would be something grand, important, and with many appearances and sources.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Iridonia/Canon

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7 (talk) 18:33, July 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another planet nom.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 20:39, July 24, 2015 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • Context for Dathomir and Obi-Wan.
  • For the future, note that you can kill the table of contents in small articles like this by placing __NOTOC__ near the top of the page.
    • Thanks for that. It was bothering me, but I was unable to hunt down a solution. - AV-6R7 (talk) 18:55, July 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • It would be good to state that the TCW episode is Canon in the BTS. 501st dogma(talk) 18:42, July 24, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki