Wikia

Wookieepedia

Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

Talk113
122,476pages on
this wiki

Redirected from WP:CAN

             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
  4. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  5. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  6. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  7. …have no redlinks.
  8. …have all relevant canon information presented.
  9. …be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  10. …have all quotes and images sourced.
  11. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  12. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  13. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  14. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  15. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article can also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Unidentified Jedi Knight (Zayne Carrick)

  • Nominated by: —MJ— Comlink 06:17, February 15, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Throwaway mention + one edit = CA nomination.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. --Eyrezer (talk) 09:31, February 17, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Manoof (talk) 10:31, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:19, February 22, 2015 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:01, April 9, 2015 (UTC)

Object

  • Unsourced infobox.
    • Yep, I'm rusty. Fixed.
  • No eras in the infobox.
    • Doh! Fixed.
  • Context on Zayne and Dantooine.
    • Done. At that point in time, "Human" is the best that can be done for Zayne, since he's not a Jedi yet.
  • Date for when Zayne was referred to the Enclave. I'm almost certain that it's findable.
    • Researched and done.
  • Links in the quote attribution, as they aren't mentioned in the article - though it should be mentioned that the Knight told Tokare or the other Jedi, rather than just "said." Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 06:25, February 15, 2015 (UTC)
    • Linked. It's never specified exactly who the Knight said that to, so I can't expand on "said". He could have said it to Reiva, who told Vandar, or he could have said it to Vandar, who told Reiva, or he could have said it to another Jedi, who told Vandar, who in turn told Reiva. We don't know. —MJ— Comlink 21:57, February 15, 2015 (UTC)
Manoof
  • Does the release date (or just year) need to be linked in the BTS? Manoof (talk) 09:50, February 16, 2015 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • Author and year of release should be in the bts. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:32, February 16, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Rayc Ryjerd's starship

  • Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 06:25, February 15, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:GA redlist link that has enough information to nom it now...

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 03:30, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:30, February 22, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 19:14, March 7, 2015 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:02, April 10, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Exiled Jedi
  • After a brief check of The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia, I noticed a mention of the ship that you missed. While there is not any new information in this source, you should check all of the Ryjerd's sources to check for mentions of the ship.
    • I checked what I could and nothing there. The only sources I can't check are the anime and the insider issues. I think it's safe to say it isn't mentioned in the manga since it is just an adaptation of the movie and he is a background figure, but it seems nobody owns it to confirm anyway. It seems you have the Insider mags, would you be able to check the two articles? I would appreciate the contribution to my debt. Manoof (talk) 04:35, February 17, 2015 (UTC)
      • Checked the manga (which I have digital copies of) and both Insiders and there's no mention of the ship. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:30, February 22, 2015 (UTC)
  • Looking at Rayc Ryjerd's page, it calls him a Bimm, not a Human. While Ryjerd's article sources this information to his card, this information cannot be found on the card and will need another source. Unless there is a source explicitly calling him a Bimm, you are going to need to create a reference saying that his father was Rycar Ryjerd (per SWCCGsmall Star Wars Customizable Card GameJabba's Palace Limited (Card: Rayc Ryjerd)) and that his father was a Bimm. (per SWCCGsmall Star Wars Customizable Card GamePremiere Limited (Card: Rycar Ryjerd))
    • This debt is now paid. Manoof (talk) 04:35, February 17, 2015 (UTC)
  • While there may not be enough information to conclusively state when he owned the ship, you should add a sentence to the BTS mentioning the timeframe he was seen near Jabba. Also, make sure to state that the sources that mention the starship do not explicitly state when he owned it.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 15:36, February 16, 2015 (UTC)
    • I didn't say when he owned it, but I've added a date of purchase as sometime before 4 ABY, and referenced the date accordingly. Is that sufficient payment for this debt? Manoof (talk) 04:35, February 17, 2015 (UTC)
      • You need to give a source stating that Episode VI was in 4 ABY.
        • Used the essential atlas Manoof (talk) 04:44, March 6, 2015 (UTC)
  • Is there anything to indicate that he didn't buy the ship in 4 ABY? Similarly, is there anything stating that he didn't buy the ship before the Rebellion era?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 04:23, March 6, 2015 (UTC)
    • I think I get it. Removed the era completely (since I assume it is speculation to have reb, imp or both) and changed the wording. Manoof (talk) 04:44, March 6, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Candleberry reduction sauce

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:04, February 22, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A nice change from 1000 Levels Down

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Nothing seen here. Moving along. Manoof (talk) 05:59, March 9, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 02:34, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 02:13, March 20, 2015 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • I'm not liking the last sentence of the BtS. It doesn't matter that no connection was made, as candleberries are not Nu-Canon. You should just mention that candleberries existed in Legends. That make any sense? 501st dogma(talk) 02:34, March 7, 2015 (UTC)
    • Removed the last part, any better? Ayrehead02 (talk) 03:30, March 7, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Crystal mushroom soup

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:59, February 22, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Combining my love of food articles and my recent drive to nominate canon articles.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote I really don't want to try this.... 501st dogma(talk) 02:37, March 7, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Just keep an eye out on nouns for links ;) Manoof (talk) 06:04, March 9, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 15:11, March 30, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Balazausa

  • Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 23:51, March 10, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(4 ECs/1 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:16, March 15, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 17:41, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 21:06, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 22:09, April 18, 2015 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:45, April 19, 2015 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • Your reference 2 doesn't need the "on Wizards.com part" and the back up link thing.
    • That's automatically generated from the WizardsCite template. Manoof (talk) 06:02, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
      • Then don't use it there. You don't need the wizards icon in front of it for the note. 501st dogma(talk) 16:46, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
        • Cite template removed Manoof (talk) 20:59, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
  • I don't think being a covert contact necessitates the criminal category. 501st dogma(talk) 20:49, March 19, 2015 (UTC)
    • I disagree, as a covert contact for Niik, she is part of his criminal empire, and so a criminal. Whatever activities she does for him, they are most definitely illegal. Manoof (talk) 06:02, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • From the Bank of Aargau article, it seems that the Bank of Aargau was not just on the planet Aargau. Unless the article states that she was located on Aargau, you should be careful not to state this, as he could have contacts in the bank who work off-planet. I'd change it to say something like "the Bank of Aargau, which was headquartered on the planet Aargau." This way the article doesn't assume anything. I'm not sure if the article in question states this, so you might need to check the other articles.
    • The introduction page suggests the content of the 5-part series is all on Aargau, this is reinforce on the page itself, which suggests the RPG information included are for a campaign or scenario on the planet. From those facts, I think it's safe to say she is on Aargau. Manoof (talk) 04:15, March 24, 2015 (UTC)
      • Okay, then I would suggest creating a special reference explaining this.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 23:25, March 30, 2015 (UTC)
        • How's that? Manoof (talk) 00:38, March 31, 2015 (UTC)
          • "Aargau: For All Your Banking Needs suggests the events in the article series takes place on Aargau." This part makes it sound like nothing in the series is explicitly confirmed to take place on Aargau and kind of undermines the reference. The way the reference is currently worded does not really support your claim.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 19:09, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
            • Alright, I've reworded, including a quote from the source, and I think I've fixed it. Manoof (talk) 23:09, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
              • Looking at the source, the only mention of New Escrow Starport involves asking around in spacer cantinas. I seriously doubt this has much relevance to Balazausa, who is a bureaucrat with a bank.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 18:01, April 18, 2015 (UTC)
                • Alright just changed to your original suggestion. Manoof (talk) 22:08, April 18, 2015 (UTC)
  • Please link Niik's organization in the body somewhere.
  • For the date, I would just say "around 3 ABY." Having both dates in this case is redundant.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 02:02, March 24, 2015 (UTC)
    • Removed Manoof (talk) 04:15, March 24, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Utility vibroblade

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 16:40, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Manoof (talk) 07:02, March 22, 2015 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • "It could also be referred to as a blade." This seems pretty redundant, as any weapon with a blade, such as a vibroblade, can be called a blade. 501st dogma(talk) 21:03, March 19, 2015 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • Does the source explicitly state that it was used for general purposes?
  • I don't think the fact that it was used by an Imperial informant is enough to have the Galactic Empire as an affiliation in the infobox.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 17:55, April 18, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

LG318

  • Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 02:23, March 19, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Combing through the Dark Forces Audio Dramas uncovers some lost relics.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 16:44, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Manoof (talk) 07:06, March 22, 2015 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • Would a homeworld of Nar Shadda be appropriate in the infobox? 501st dogma(talk) 21:47, March 19, 2015 (UTC)
    • There's nothing really indicating that it was built on Nar Shaddaa. He could have been built elsewhere and brought to the moon and installed by whoever ran the traffic operations, unless you mean to just use Nar Shaddaa as a place of residence, or something. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 16:27, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
      • I was thinking of it as the place of residence, but I'm not set on you adding it. It's up to you. 501st dogma(talk) 16:44, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
CP
  • Which degree of droid is it? Also, I think we can safely add the Nar Shaddaa resident category. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 21:15, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
    • I don't know. The quote in the article, and Ors agreeing to follow his vector, is all that is known about the droid. I'll add the place of residence though, now that there's been an additional voice on the matter. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 21:50, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
      • Well, the Essential Guide to Droids or somesuch source lists the various types, maybe guidance droids will fit into one of those. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 23:32, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
        • I didn't see guidance droids, but the first Essential Guide listed another kind of traffic droid under Municipal. Would that work? And wouldn't Guidance Droid be more like a class of droid? LG and 8-13 are my first droid nominations, but I'm happy to learn. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 23:45, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
          • Yes, that would probably be a similar degree. And what you have about the class looks right. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 23:15, March 25, 2015 (UTC)
          • Sorry to interject here. Clonehunter, the degree is 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th or 5th degree. I don't have the book but I'm guessing municipal droids are 5th degree? Also I think municipal would probably be more of the class with landing guidance droid being the model. Manoof (talk) 06:40, April 3, 2015 (UTC)
            • Oh, sorry, I was going by the old Droid Guide, which according to the page didn't have classes. I guess it'd be whatever municipal relate to in regards of class. Class Three could almost work, too. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:16, April 3, 2015 (UTC)
              • That's cool, but I think 5 would be better as this would be transportation, non intelligent intensive. Its a simple matter of providing a landing approach based on conditions. 3 would be if there were more social functions needed, which he wouldn't. An example of a 3rd degree droid would be 3PO. Keep in mind I don't have the new guide to droids, and am only going off what the articles here say. Manoof (talk) 19:58, April 3, 2015 (UTC)
                • I'd say that what you say makes more sense. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 04:45, April 4, 2015 (UTC)
                  • Does the guide actually classify landing droids under any degree? I'd be hesitant to classify it without something specific backing the degree up. If the reference is kept, it will need some sort of explanation included as LG318 is not mentioned in the guide.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 17:55, April 4, 2015 (UTC)
                    • Unless someone has it on hands, I'll have to order a copy from a library this coming week. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 17:27, April 5, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Mahreen

  • Nominated by: Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 14:48, March 19, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The Codex Project Returneth

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:00, March 19, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 17:46, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Manoof (talk) 08:24, March 22, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Exiled Jedi
  • "a trade exchange where offworlders were permitted but were strictly regulated by the Selkath." I'm not seeing this in the codex entry, so it needs another source.
    • Hmm. I sourced it to TOR in general, as I'm not aware of a specific element that it comes from....
      • How would something like this be in the game and not be part of a specific element? Is it from a loading screen or ambient dialog?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 19:00, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
  • Shouldn't the infobox be a Republic character one?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 23:42, March 30, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Coronet Ion Works

  • Nominated by: Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 14:48, March 19, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:56, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Manoof (talk) 06:21, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 16:39, April 14, 2015 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 17:50, April 18, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • Could we get a date for the bts. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:06, March 19, 2015 (UTC)
    • As I said in IRC, that's fluff and my choice. There's no actual need for it. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 03:57, March 26, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Coronet Ion Works corporate headquarters

  • Nominated by: Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 14:48, March 19, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:57, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Manoof (talk) 06:23, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
  3. —Tommy 9281 Tuesday, April 7, 2015, 14:25 UTC
  4. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 16:41, April 14, 2015 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 17:50, April 18, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • Could you add context for Coronet Ion works in the first line? Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:04, March 19, 2015 (UTC)
  • The BTS needs a date. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:05, March 19, 2015 (UTC)
    • Same; it's irrelevant here as the entry wasn't released in 2011. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 03:57, March 26, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Thalina

  • Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 07:29, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:Another tale of the aiwha pod nom

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. —Tommy 9281 Tuesday, April 7, 2015, 14:24 UTC
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:16, April 13, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 16:52, April 14, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Spicebrew/Canon

(0 ECs/1 Users/0 Total)

Support

  1. Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 22:43, March 23, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • Your going to need a bts, including the legend origins, the first appearance and its identifying source. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:03, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • Context on Old Jho's pit stop. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:03, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • Timeframe is needed in the body. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:03, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • You should specify that he drinks it during the events of Empire Day. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:03, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • I don't think you can reference the days and months in the bts to the books themselves or the episode. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:04, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
    • Did what I could to source Ezra's Duel with Danger, though Medstar is more difficult. - AV-6R7User talk:AV-6R7 23:08, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • Doesn't Empire day take place every year? If so could you reword the last sentence. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:04, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
Clone
Cadeth
  • That image is rather poor. Please get someone who's actually experienced with image capturing to upload a new one. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 22:30, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
    • I captured it. What exactly needs to be better, instead of me remaining in the dark on a proper procedure? Other than that, it's really the only clear shot of Tsoklo's drink. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 22:43, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
      • I'm aware that you're the uploader, and that's why I asked for a new version, from someone like JMAS or Culator. That image is blurry and dark, and far lower quality than we normally accept from TCW and Rebels. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 03:55, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
Manoof
  • The last sentence of the first paragraph in the BTS needs to be fixed. You could actually remove the entire sentence, keeping the mention that it was an alcoholic drink and rewording the first sentence. Manoof (talk) 06:37, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
  • Unless it has been called something else, you can get rid of the "as spicebrew" part in the Appearances section. Manoof (talk) 06:37, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
    • "as spicebrew" is there because it isn't capitalized in the source in which it's named. - AV-6R7User talk:AV-6R7 17:32, April 18, 2015 (UTC)
  • The closing curled brackets for the infobox should be on the same line as the last attribute, so it should appear as "|affiliation=}}" Manoof (talk) 06:37, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • You cannot source the full release date to the MedStar novel.
  • For consistency, please provide a date for the episode.
  • I see that the owner of the cantina has an article. Please mention him in the article as he is the one providing the drink.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 17:27, April 18, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Old One-Eye

  • Nominated by: Trip391 (talk) 01:23, April 12, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

501st
  • Context on Coruscant.
    • Added
  • We need a timeframe in the body to put it in the Rise of the Empire era. Stating that the rancor lived at the time of the Clone Wars should suffice.
    • Done
      • Context on the Clone Wars would be ideal, especially as you mentioned the GR and the Seppies.
        • Done
  • Context on Rex.
    • Done
  • Skin color needs to be mentioned in the body.
    • Done
  • From the name and the scar covering the eye in the image, it's alright to say that he only has one eye. This should be mentioned in the body. 501st dogma(talk) 23:30, April 14, 2015 (UTC)
    • Mentioned
  • Also, the odds on him should be mentioned in the body. 501st dogma(talk) 23:30, April 14, 2015 (UTC)
  • "Skywalker joined the fight and was able to calm the rancors enough for them to be mounted..." Erm, did they ride them into the sunset or something?
    • They only moved a few feet, but on closer inspection, Anakin does tell Ahsoka to "mount up, [they] still have a Separatist to catch", so I've added that Trip391 (talk) 00:39, April 18, 2015 (UTC)
  • Also, I'm not sure if this is correct, but you might want to add a nickname template. "Old-One Eye" seems like a stage name given to the rancor. The call is up to you though. 501st dogma(talk) 00:02, April 16, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Jubba bird/Canon

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:48, April 12, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Some legends returning to canon

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 00:09, April 16, 2015 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • Article could use the Species of undefined sentience category. 501st dogma(talk) 23:34, April 14, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Malé-Dee/Canon

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

  • Your probably going to need to check the costuming books for information on this guy, since I'm reasonably sure there's loads of BTS stuff about the various senators in them. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:15, April 14, 2015 (UTC)
  • The entire BTS needs to be sourced. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:15, April 14, 2015 (UTC)
  • You need to include in the body that he was in the group who greeted Palpatine after the battle of Coruscant. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:15, April 14, 2015 (UTC)
  • What's the basis for saying he moved in the same circles as Windu and Binks? I'm not sure that appearing in one scene with them is evidence for that. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:15, April 14, 2015 (UTC)
  • Context for the Clone Wars, Windu and Binks. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:15, April 14, 2015 (UTC)
  • Needs a 1st appearance. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:15, April 14, 2015 (UTC)
  • Quite a lot of infobox exclusive information. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:15, April 14, 2015 (UTC)
  • You also need to mention his appearance in deleted scenes in the bts. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:17, April 14, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki