Wikia

Wookieepedia

Watchlist Random article Recent changes

Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

Talk108
103,636pages on
this wiki

Redirected from WP:CAN

             
Comprehensive
article nominations
        
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
  4. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  5. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  6. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  7. …have no redlinks.
  8. …have all relevant canon information presented.
  9. …be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  10. …have all quotes and images sourced.
  11. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  12. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  13. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  14. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:

  1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating.
  3. Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
  4. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  5. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  6. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  7. There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination—just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are four EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again—someone is always watching you.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.


Contents


Comprehensive article nominations

Trogwhale

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:46, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another for the burner.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 20:06, May 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 08:15, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  3. - Princess GLG 10:52, May 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. 501st
    • Shouldn't that be a 1stm tag in the Sources? 501st dogma(talk) 20:56, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
    • "Due to the threat the trogwhales posed the sentient Nikto species,<s> who were also native to Kintan, drove them to extinction." This sentence doesn't really work, as the parts before and behind the pair of commas aren't grammatically connected.</s> 501st dogma(talk) 00:09, May 15, 2013 (UTC)
      • I've taken out the commas is does it work now? Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:25, May 15, 2013 (UTC)
        • I've fixed it. 501st dogma(talk) 20:06, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Spine dragon

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:57, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another Kintan monstrosity

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 00:10, May 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 08:19, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  3. - Princess GLG 10:56, May 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. I think you should add a History section, and some of the stuff in the Description part should be added to it. 501st dogma(talk) 21:02, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
    • Split it into the two sections. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:30, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Spinefish

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:17, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:This time a beastie from Vodran

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 20:38, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 08:21, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  3. - Princess GLG 11:44, May 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. How about a 1stm in the Sources? 501st dogma(talk) 20:11, May 15, 2013 (UTC)
    • I'll stop missing obvious stuff like this one day... Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:56, May 16, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • I'm not going to make this an objection (especially since I've already voted for the article) however, when you say The Vodran caught them during a primitive stage of their societies history, at a time when they lived above the rivers... at first it is hard to tell whether it its the Vodran's primitive stage or the Spinefish's. If you could make this more clear it would make the article easier to understand. - Princess GLG 12:22, May 24, 2013 (UTC)

Tuskbeast

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:33, May 15, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:The final Kintan monster for the burner

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 20:16, May 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 08:23, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  3. - Princess GLG 11:49, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Tuskbeast spear

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:33, May 15, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:Sub-page for Tuskbeast

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 20:41, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 09:17, May 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. How about a CAnom template on the page? :) 501st dogma(talk) 20:18, May 15, 2013 (UTC)
    • I guess that is normally useful for a CAnom :P fixed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:55, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. …
    • Can you mention that the Nikto are sentient?
    • Source for the era in the infobox. - Princess GLG 11:49, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

CoCo District Constabulary

  • Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 04:03, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Been wanting to get to this for a while now.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:45, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 22:33, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
  3. - Princess GLG 11:49, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. Ayrehead
    • Needs a 1st appearance tag.
      • Done.
    • Do we know who wrote the Holonet news article? Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:00, May 16, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Grahurr

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:09, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 11:30, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
  3. - Princess GLG 11:49, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. You might want to say that he was confronted by an Imperial individual, or fought the individual. 501st dogma(talk) 20:43, May 16, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • He was found on Hutta in TOR, does that make him eligible for the barnburner?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 14:05, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
  • This isn't yet an objection as I'm not sure which format is meant to be followed but other articles for TOR I've seen include in the article the assumption that optional bosses in the game are killed by players for 100% completion. One example is SavageBob's currently FAnom'd Kintan crusher page which assumes that Gargath is killed even though he's totally optional. Is there a policy on this across the wiki? If not one needs to be made. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:45, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
    • Okay, I'll include the assumption and clarify it in the BTS.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 03:44, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
      • Thanks although I'm still not 100% sure this is the correct format. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:09, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
  • So, he's just a Wookiee you get to kill? I'm asking because I haven't played the game. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 20:42, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
    • Yep, he's just standing at a campfire on Hutta. If you approach him, he attacks you.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 22:55, May 17, 2013 (UTC)

D'nar

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Enjoying the mini-boss articles and looking forward to more. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:12, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ECvote He looks cool. 501st dogma(talk) 22:13, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Jinzler (talk) 22:24, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
  4. - Princess GLG 11:49, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. Jinzler
    • Is there any information that can be added regarding why/how the player gets into a fight with him? --Jinzler (talk) 08:10, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
      • If the player gets close enough, D'nar will attack, but the player can also attack D'nar from a distance. He is just like the rest of enemies on the planet except tougher. I don't really see this adding much to the article, but I will add it if you think it is necessary.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 13:07, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
        • Thanks for clarifying, the article should be fine as it is then. I'm not that familiar with TOR and I just wanted to check whether there was any additional storyline here that could be included. --Jinzler (talk) 19:49, May 18, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • D'nar looks Mandalorian, but the game does not confirm it.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 04:24, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
  • I think Jinzler forgot to support... 501st dogma(talk) 22:13, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
    • Haha, yeah it seems I did... --Jinzler (talk) 22:23, May 18, 2013 (UTC)

Tyrelli Habitat

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:10, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 11:41, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
  3. - Princess GLG 11:49, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Rass

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:58, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:A Hutt space hunter for the burner

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 11:43, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
  2. - Princess GLG 12:48, May 18, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  • Should not Rass by capitalized in the body of the article? - Princess GLG 17:09, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
    • Nope in both sources it's uncapitalised. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:13, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
      • That's... interesting. - Princess GLG 19:29, May 17, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Imperial Academy of Yinchorr

  • Nominated by: —Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 00:47, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Everything I can see seems to point to this being a totally different academy than the Imperial Royal Guard Academy. If someone can find some different proof showing that I'm wrong, feel free to present it.

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:04, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 20:21, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 22:21, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ECvote—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 14:52, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:30, May 23, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Tetan carbonite smelter (Carbonite Guild surrender)

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:23, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 22:26, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
  3. - Princess GLG 12:11, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Fire-kraken

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:21, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:An aptly named species for the burner

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 12:19, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
  2. - Princess GLG 12:19, May 22, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. Regarding TCSWE: Could you add the volume number thing, like you have in the reff to TCSWE, to the Sources instead of the generic TCSWE? Also, for that volume and entry thing, you should not add the page numbers. Good work. 501st dogma(talk) 22:30, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
    • Added without page number. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:40, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Princess
    • Planet and novel need to be linked. Predator should not be linked as it goes to an article about a ship. (Some of these stuff I'm listing here could be considered "just do it", but since I've seen them in some of your other articles I'm decided to bring them to your attention.)
      • That's fair I do need to improve my linking I always forget just how many general term articles we have. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:12, May 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • The double bracket of the infobox needs moved up.
    • Please check your spelling in the Bts.
    • Nice article. - Princess GLG 12:48, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
    • One more thing. I believe you need to use … at the end of the first line of the quote. (View this in source mode to see what I'm saying.) - Princess GLG 22:21, May 21, 2013 (UTC)
      • Changed. Thanks for reviewing! Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:04, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
  3. I am fairly certain that you need a comma after "deception" and before "which" in the BTS. Fe Nite (talk) 01:51, May 24, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • I'm not entirely sure how to treat the singular/plural problem and have put in the best solution I can think of however if I've done it wrong and need to change the article entirely to an individual I can. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:21, May 19, 2013 (UTC)

Bombing of Fountain Palace

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 22:42, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:12, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. 501st
    • 201 words. Needs an intro, or the loss of two words.
      • Cut out a couple words.
    • Could we get an article for the captured bomber? 501st dogma(talk) 15:20, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
    • Do you know which encyclopedia entry it was posted in? If so, the source should be presented like this here in the Sources section, with the volume entry and such. If you don't have the book, you can request the entry here. 501st dogma(talk) 19:46, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
      • I do know what entry it is, however, because it is in the SWE not the CSWE I thought it did not need to be done like that? In any case, I did add the page number. - Princess GLG 20:04, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
        • I cant seem to find examples of it done that way either, so I'll strike this. You can remove the page numbers if you want. 501st dogma(talk) 22:42, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead
    • Could you add that the Jedi were moved to the private island as one of the outcomes in the infobox.
      • Like that?
    • Could you remove the page number in the sources? Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:11, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
      • Done. Thanks for the review. - Princess GLG 12:24, May 22, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Inspector-General

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Nice work.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 14:52, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 15:21, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:31, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
  4. - Princess GLG 12:11, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified bomb conspirator

  • Nominated by: - Princess GLG 18:36, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: WP:N

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:27, May 21, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 23:01, May 21, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. 501st
    • How about a conjecture tag?
      • Added. I always seem to be forgetting those.
    • Alphabetize categories. 501st dogma(talk) 20:21, May 21, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

2-237-93

  • Nominated by: Stake black msg 13:32, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 20:19, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  2. - Princess GLG 12:11, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. 501st
    • Can you tell us what the image is in the infobox? Its not really clear what a random lizard-thing has to do with it.... 501st dogma(talk) 20:34, May 23, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • Now I know you have made a boat load of M&A status articles…and most of them have the same BTS…however, despite this is it ok to have Lucasfilm in the article just by itself or should it be Lucasfilm Ltd. or Lucasfilm Limited? Fe Nite (talk) 01:45, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
    • It's certainly not incorrect to use "Lucasfilm" in prose. Stake black msg 17:57, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Ton E'rau

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 11:07, May 25, 2013 (UTC)
  2. - Princess GLG 12:11, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. 501st
    • Check the quote's spelling and punctuation. Either that "but" is supposed to capitalized, or the period before that is a comma.
      • Good catch.
    • Could you give some context on TK-934? Is he also a stormtrooper? 501st dogma(talk) 20:25, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Exiled Jedi
    • I think that you should mention that E'rau kept the information from the Baron in the article.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 16:07, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

TK-934

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. TK-934, why aren't you at your post? Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 17:55, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 11:07, May 25, 2013 (UTC)
  3. - Princess GLG 12:11, May 25, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 16:05, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. There are various sources that confirm all stormtroopers during the GCW were Human. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:47, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  2. 501st
    • Could we get an article for the Eastern Arch Platoon?
      • Done.
    • In the second sentence, kill one of the certains.501st dogma(talk) 20:27, May 24, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Spiced Mynock Wing

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:18, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 20:28, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  3. - Princess GLG 12:11, May 25, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 16:03, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified enlisted trooper (Spiced Mynock Wings)

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:54, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 21:18, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  3. - Princess GLG 12:11, May 25, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 16:01, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. Ayrehead
    • Could you mention the fact he was enlisted in the Empire somewhere in the body?
      • Done.
    • Can the stormtrooper corps also be mentioned or is that speculation? Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:17, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
      • IMO, there isn't really a need to since I already stated that he was a stormtrooper.—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 16:20, May 24, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Wolga

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:52, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 17:53, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 11:02, May 25, 2013 (UTC)
  4. - Princess GLG 12:11, May 25, 2013 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 15:55, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. Ayrehead
  2. 501st

Comments

Retrieved from "http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Comprehensive_article_nominations?oldid=4505412"
Advertisement | Your ad here

Photos

Add an Image
54,649images on this wiki
See all photos >

Recent Wiki Activity

See more >

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki