Wikia

Wookieepedia

Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

Redirected from WP:CAN

129,043pages on
this wiki
Talk114
             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …have all relevant canon information presented.
  10. …have all quotes and images sourced.
  11. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  12. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  13. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  14. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  15. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  16. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all sixteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Minos Cluster

  • Nominated by: ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:54, April 9, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Star cluster that is mentioned in passing in The Secret Academy. Been a while since I've done a comprehensive article, thought I'd give it a go. ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:54, April 9, 2016 (UTC)

(1 ECs/6 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 00:06, April 10, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 09:01, April 10, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Cwedin(talk) 22:55, April 11, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 15:09, April 16, 2016 (UTC)
  5. AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:30, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  6. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:27, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  7. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 23:22, June 3, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Cevan
  • Is there a quote that can be added to this article from The Secret Academy? Cevan IMPpress (talk) 22:59, April 11, 2016 (UTC)
    • No. The Minos Cluster is only mentioned in passing in the narration, so any quote could only go in the Behind the Scenes section anyway and wouldn't add anything that isn't already explained in the article. ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:13, April 14, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

You need to check your BTS facts. The Minos Cluster was not first introduced in the HNN article. It was the subject of Galaxy Guide 6: Tramp Freighters. - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 00:10, April 10, 2016 (UTC)

  • Oops. You're right, I was confusing first mentioned with first appearance. Updated. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:17, April 10, 2016 (UTC)

Can we do the Canon/Legends switcheroo here? I don't think we should pass a nomination with /Canon in it, since that doesn't meet current policies. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 03:36, June 5, 2016 (UTC)


Miggs McKane

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:24, April 29, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Continuing the theme of Jakku scavenger nominations after Roodown.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Cwedin(talk) 22:14, April 29, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 16:39, April 30, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Good job! Manoof (talk) 11:18, May 1, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • It seems to me McKane had some facial hair. I believe you should add this.
  • Context on Ogem, please. Imperators II(Talk) 18:54, April 29, 2016 (UTC)
    • Ah, I didn't realise it had been given more context elsewhere in canon. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:50, April 29, 2016 (UTC)
Manoof
  • The way your referencing is at the moment, the visual dictionary establishes the time that rey wrote the journal. Is this correct? Manoof (talk) 10:08, April 30, 2016 (UTC)
    • The dictionary establishes the timeframe for TFA, the events of which are referenced as happening at the end of the journal therefore the journal was finished at the same time as TFA. I could write a more detailed reference to explain this if you like. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:52, April 30, 2016 (UTC)
      • No I think that's fine. Having not read the journal, I didn't know it ended concurrent with the movie. Manoof (talk) 07:55, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • I believe the hair attribute in the infobox can say something about his facial hair. He also has a moustache, not just a beard (apologies if this cuts into imperators' above objection). Manoof (talk) 10:08, April 30, 2016 (UTC)
    • As far as I know the hair section of the infobox is just for color, I've never seen facial hair described there. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:52, April 30, 2016 (UTC)
      • Sounds good. Can you clarify he had a moustache, or just say he had facial hair in the article? Manoof (talk) 07:55, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure you can say robes. He is wearing something with a long, loose sleeve, and what could be a vest, but I don't think there is enough detail to say it's a robe, unless the book elaborates. Manoof (talk) 10:08, April 30, 2016 (UTC)
    • Removed the mention of robes. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:52, April 30, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Fong

  • Nominated by: Cwedin(talk) 04:11, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Red Leader standing by.

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 07:47, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:09, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Manoof (talk) 12:32, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  4. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 02:59, June 23, 2016 (UTC)
  5. AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:03, June 29, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments


Trandoshan ale

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:56, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: So many star system nominations! Time for some food and drink.

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote You're not wrong. Imperators II(Talk) 12:32, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  2. A drink sounds like a grand idea! Manoof (talk) 12:56, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  3. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 15:31, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Cwedin(talk) 17:08, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  5. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 23:16, June 3, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Cwedin
  • You should mention its namesake is Trandoshan.
  • The infobox should include "found on Gorse" and "edible by Wookiees." Cwedin(talk) 16:32, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
    • Since Kanan was making up a cover story it isn't really clear if the ale is actually even available on Gorse or if Wookiees can actually drink it. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:01, May 1, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Westhills butter

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:30, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Finally, how about some butter for those flatcakes.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 18:49, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Cwedin(talk) 21:52, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Looks good! Manoof (talk) 08:17, May 5, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

128th Flight (second nomination)

  • Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 03:15, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Former CA I just cleaned up. I believe all issues have been fixed.

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 03:20, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Cwedin(talk) 03:25, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 09:59, May 9, 2016 (UTC)
  4. I'd personally recommend un-sectioning it, but will leave the decision up to you. Ayrehead02 (talk) 06:39, June 9, 2016 (UTC)
  5. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 03:02, June 23, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • The intro and the History section use the definite article with the article's name, while the Characteristics and BTS sections do not; please address this for consistency. Imperators II(Talk) 14:12, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
    • I believe this is done. Manoof (talk) 07:41, May 9, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

  • Not actually sure if this is an objection yet, but why is the article split since it's well under 200 words? It looks odd having such short sections since the contents takes up most of the article. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:15, May 12, 2016 (UTC)
    • Honestly, I have no idea. I did wonder about it, but as it achieved status and passed review whilst sectioned, I left it as is. Additionally whilst sectioning is a requirement if it exceeds the limit, it is not a requirement if it is under. Perhaps something for the ECs to discuss, articles UNDER a certain limit should not be sectioned? This particular article sits at 116 words by my count. Manoof (talk) 11:58, May 12, 2016 (UTC)


Unidentified flying serpent (second nomination)

  • Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 04:05, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Former CA that had an issue with a broken link. I've found an archived version of the page, so that's that issue. Additionally there was a question of whether it flies or not. Viewing the episode on youtube, I would say it does fly as it appears too high up on the background to be on the ground, and moves across the foreground ignoring obstacles.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. And now the Ewoks theme song is stuck in my head. Cwedin(talk) 04:14, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Snakes with eyebrows. What the fuck. Imperators II(Talk) 14:08, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:17, May 12, 2016 (UTC)
  4. AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:46, July 4, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Quell

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:50, June 15, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A TCW planet we know next to nothing about.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ProfessorTofty (talk) 21:07, June 18, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 05:28, June 19, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:30, June 28, 2016 (UTC)

Object

ProfessorTofty
  • Manual of style says that if your quote mentions something such as the Lucid Voice, Ryloth, etc., then you need to link it in the quote if you're not mentioning it anywhere else. I'll leave it to you, though, whether you want to just link it or find a way to work it into the text. ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:46, June 18, 2016 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • Since we know what the planet looks like, you should describe whatever you can about it in the article.
    • Done.
  • I believe that you should give more detail to the battle since it took place in the planet's atmosphere. A brief one or two sentence synopsis of what happens in the battle should be fine. Anything that happens in the battle that could affect the planet below should be mentioned, i.e. ships being destroyed and plummeting towards the surface.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 14:45, June 25, 2016 (UTC)
    • There you go. We have no canonical indication of who won the battle, so I left any speculation out. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:05, June 25, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Redsprout

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:22, June 29, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Time for more food.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 18:29, June 29, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Cwedin(talk) 18:36, June 29, 2016 (UTC)
  3. AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:44, June 29, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Corosia system

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 04:00, July 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Bird is the word.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:43, July 4, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:41, July 4, 2016 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:47, July 5, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Cargamalis system

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 17:37, July 3, 2016 (UTC)
  2. AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:00, July 3, 2016 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 02:37, July 4, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:55, July 4, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Tenara

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Seems like a reasonable enough decision to me. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:10, July 4, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • Doesn't the atlas include material from the Legacy comics? Is there a reason that this isn't used as the end of the timeline instead? Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:37, July 4, 2016 (UTC)
    • Yes, the Atlas does include an epilogue with Legacy material, but that is separate from the main history section of the book, where Tenara is described, therefore I believe the current dating's appropriate. Imperators II(Talk) 15:49, July 4, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Ychthyton system

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. AV-6R7Crew Pit 05:14, July 4, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:36, July 4, 2016 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:28, July 5, 2016 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 22:56, July 16, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Haluria system

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. You must of been waiting a while to do it on this specific day :P Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:51, July 10, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 22:52, July 16, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Stellar Vista

  • Nominated by: TK-999 (talk) 13:48, July 15, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:I remember writing this and consistently writing Stellar Envoy instead of Stellar Vista.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 15:41, July 17, 2016 (UTC)
  2. AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:13, July 17, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Hi TK
  • Rule 8: no redlinks.
  • Any context for Corsin in canon?
  • Link to MC80 star cruiser is infobox-exclusive, as is mention of lifeboats and escape pods. Imperators II(Talk) 04:48, July 16, 2016 (UTC)
    • The only mention of the planet in Tarkin is the quote on the Corsin page, we could probably assume it was a planet or star system, but there's nothing concrete. And I'm not sure about the MC80 question: would all "Mon Calamari cruisers" in canon be automatically MC80 star cruisers as well?TK-999 (talk) 11:28, July 16, 2016 (UTC)
      • Re Corsin: Sure, if the quote's the only mention, leave it as is.
      • Re Mon Cal cruiser: My point is, nowhere in the article body does it state that the Stellar Vista was a "Mon Calamari star cruiser". I don't know if in canon it's an MC80 or just "star cruiser", but the class has to be added somewhere, because currently the body just says it's a luxury liner.
  • Does the novel give Tarkin's motivation for pulling the liner out of hyperspace? If so, please add it. Imperators II(Talk) 12:02, July 16, 2016 (UTC)
    • Added context and mentioned the ship's classification as a star cruiser.TK-999 (talk) 14:36, July 17, 2016 (UTC)
      • I just wanted to say something, on the MC80 star cruiser page it says that 'Some, such as the Stellar Vista, served as luxury liners' which is why I added it in on the Stellar Vista page, sorry if this was a mistake --Lewisr (talk) 15:47, July 17, 2016 (UTC)
        • No probs. I went ahead and removed the references from that page, since I don't think it's safe to assume that every Mon Cal cruiser out there is also an MC80 model. TK-999 (talk) 18:24, July 17, 2016 (UTC)
AV

Are there any quotes that mention the Stellar Vista? - AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:47, July 17, 2016 (UTC)

  • Added it.TK-999 (talk) 20:08, July 17, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki