Wikia

Wookieepedia

Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

Talk113
116,230pages on
this wiki

Redirected from WP:CAN

             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
  4. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  5. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  6. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  7. …have no redlinks.
  8. …have all relevant canon information presented.
  9. …be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  10. …have all quotes and images sourced.
  11. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  12. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  13. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  14. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  15. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article can also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Mubasa sauce

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:40, January 4, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The article which caused mubasa hock to move to GAN.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 01:13, January 10, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 16:58, January 11, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Manoof (talk) 05:49, January 29, 2015 (UTC)
  4. JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 23:04, January 29, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Manoof
  • Not sure, but would it be more correct instead of "could be eaten" to say "was eaten", since we know it was eaten by jabba. "Could" kinda implies (to me) that it was possible to be eaten by Hutts, but wasn't necessarily the case. For example, Humans could eat grass. We don't because it's not healthy and messes with your digestive system, but we could.
    • Sorry to intercede here, but it would be incorrect to say "was eaten". We don't know that other Hutts ate it. We know Hutts can consume it, but it would be speculation to assume all Hutts did. Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:10, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
      • Gotchya, kinda like those people on My Strange Addiction that eat weird things like mattresses and cushions... Manoof (talk) 05:30, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
  • "the trandoshan bounty hunter Bossk" implies he was the only trandoshan bounty hunter, maybe use "a trandoshan bounty hunter named Bossk"?
  • Can the "Hutt food" category be used here?
  • I'm going to try to see if there's any indication if Porcellus was jabba's chef at the time in Tales of Jabbas Palace (if he mentiones how long he's been in Jabba's employ). Would he be added to the article as the creator if we know he was around in 1 BBY?
    • After chatting with SE on IRC he may not even have made it even if he was there... STRIKE OUT! Manoof (talk) 05:35, January 28, 2015 (UTC)

Looks hot other than those. Manoof (talk) 02:23, January 28, 2015 (UTC)

SE
  • Context on Gorg?
  • The source also says the Gorg was live when Jabba ate it. Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:31, January 29, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • Just a matter of personal preference, and in reference to the above "could" and "was" discussion, but I think "consumed" would look and flow better than "eaten". JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 23:04, January 29, 2015 (UTC)


Panna cake

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:47, January 10, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The best of the Dex's puns

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 00:53, January 14, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 13:58, January 14, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Manoof (talk) 02:26, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
  4. I didn't grab the "Panaka" pun until I saw it mentioned elsewhere. JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 23:06, January 29, 2015 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • Are Robo-griddle, Carbosyrup and Bantha butter supposed to be capitalized? The quote doesn't have them this way 501st dogma(talk)
Exiled Jedi
  • Preliminary objection: Shouldn't this be at the singular title of Panna cake?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 01:04, January 14, 2015 (UTC)
  • I'm not seeing where the blog says that "Panna cake" is a pun based off Panaka. I just see it mentioned as a pun.
    • True, but surely using common sense we can conclude that's what it is? I can remove it if you want but it seems silly. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:58, January 19, 2015 (UTC)
      • Actually immediately after writing this I thought of another pun it might be. My bad, removed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:00, January 19, 2015 (UTC)
  • From the source, I don't think robo-griddle should be capitalized. You have it both capitalized and uncapitalized.
  • Please provide an additional source for the name of the moon.
  • The source mentions that three of the hotcakes were served in a meal at Dex's.
  • The price for the meal also included a breakfast side dish.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 19:54, January 19, 2015 (UTC)
  • Could you add a quote from the blog to the BTS section?
  • From what I was told during my Dex's GANs, Dining at Dex's should be listed as an appearance, although everything in it is still only mentioned. Please go through your articles and fix this.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 03:34, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
    • Done here. Will fix the remaining articles later when I return from uni. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:01, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
  • As the author's blog is not an official source, it would be more appropriate in an External links section.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 21:42, January 20, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified smuggler (Level 2142)

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:25, January 11, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: First nomination found here.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote I do loath that infobox.... 501st dogma(talk) 22:30, January 13, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote ^Yep. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 00:56, January 14, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Manoof (talk) 02:30, January 28, 2015 (UTC)

Object

  • "promised her and her younger brother" Please reword this. It sounds like the her is referring to the smuggler.
  • Please specify that Alderaan was destroyed by the Empire. Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:28, January 28, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Reffe

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:35, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Second nomination. First here. The source does not state why he started ranting.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 22:38, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 23:12, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Manoof (talk) 05:39, January 29, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Manoof
  • Did he die on Coruscant, or it doesn't specify? Manoof (talk) 02:33, January 28, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Vray

  • Nominated by: - Princess GLG 04:25, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: My first nom in a very long while, so I'm sure there are many mistakes. Object away!

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 21:19, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 01:36, January 25, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Manoof (talk) 03:34, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:56, January 28, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Vong noms are fun
  • Context on the Yuuzhan Vong War would be nice.
    • Better?
  • Picky, but the BtS could have something about the Vray being mentioned only in Star by Star. Right now, it seems like they appeared in the novel.
    • Added.
  • Star says "hundred thousand lives are at stake, General"... before talking about the Vray for the first time. The hundred thousand part probably should be added to the article. 501st dogma(talk) 22:45, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
    • Ah, good catch. Added with "at least" because we don't know if Leia said some number before that.- Princess GLG 04:38, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • When Nom Anor talks to Organa about the evacuation, it is mentioned that the Vray have been evacuating for weeks. That should be added to the article too. 501st dogma(talk) 20:07, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
    • Hmm, not sure how I missed that. Added also. - Princess GLG 21:01, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
A Force user

Welcome back. Just to clarify, does SBS mention the Vray homeworld, or what is meant by "escort the Vray to safety"? Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 23:11, January 20, 2015 (UTC)

  • Thanks. Sorry I left kinda abruptly previously. And nope, not really, just that they were invaded and had to be escorted somewhere else.- Princess GLG 04:38, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
SE
  • Welcome back, great to see you again.
    • Thanks, and congrats on becoming an admin!
  • "There were at least a hundred thousand Vray who had been evacuating for weeks" Does this mean there were a hundred thousand Vray helping evacuate, or a hundred thousand Vray that had been evacuated?
    • It means they were being evacuated. I reworded it to be more clear.
  • "Muun saw protecting the Vray refugees as an opportunity to improve his popularity and status." Improve his popularity and status with whom? Supreme Emperor (talk) 15:58, January 23, 2015 (UTC)
    • It doesn't really specify, but I changed the wording to reflect the book a little more closely. - Princess GLG 00:22, January 24, 2015 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • Context on Han and Leia Solo please. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:42, January 27, 2015 (UTC)
    • Added.
  • How did Lah threaten? Was it in an announcement to the galaxy or something? Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:42, January 27, 2015 (UTC)
    • Not really, he had Nom Anor tell Leia and it just got spread. - Princess GLG 21:41, January 27, 2015 (UTC)
Manoof
  • The first line doesn't read well, as you mention Yuuzhan Vong 3 times in quick succesion. Maybe look at using other words or rephrasing the sentence. Something like "The Vray were a gentle sentient species whose homeworld was invaded by the Yuuzhan Vong during the galaxy-spanning war, started when they invaded from a separate galaxy." You can use pipelinks to keep the links.
    • Changed.
  • Does the novel mention the events happened in 27 ABY? If not that'll have to be referenced separately Manoof (talk) 02:43, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
    • It doesn't. I changed that in the other article but forgot to do so here. Done. - Princess GLG 02:55, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
      • As it is here, you're sourcing the first sentence to ERC as well, which isn't correct. 501st dogma(talk) 03:05, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
        • I went ahead and fixed it for you, check it out :) Manoof (talk) 03:34, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
          • Ah, thanks, sorry about that. - Princess GLG 03:43, January 28, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Crystalplas

  • Nominated by: - Princess GLG 15:56, January 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another small nom from SBS.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 19:41, January 24, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:58, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
  3. A good article, easy to read, well-written, good job.--Emperor Jarjarkine MP-Mandalorian Senate Hall 12:11, January 29, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Great work! Manoof (talk) 08:31, February 1, 2015 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • 27 ABY in the body can't be sourced to Star by Star, as that date is never mentioned in the book. You'll have to use the Reader's Companion instead.
    • Done.
  • How about some eras for the infobox? 501st dogma(talk) 18:35, January 24, 2015 (UTC)
    • Added, I had to miss something obvious. I add the era for Tattooine Ghost even though it was only mentioned in it? - Princess GLG 19:07, January 24, 2015 (UTC)
      • Yes, as the crystalplas would have had to exist at that time to be mentioned. 501st dogma(talk) 19:41, January 24, 2015 (UTC)
A Force user
  • The second sentence seems to have a bit of a run-on going. And the third sentence, beginning with "these galleries were left intact" seems a bit off. Maybe combine some of the words into a single verb? Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 01:41, January 25, 2015 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • Is there someway you could work in the Tatooine Ghost mention? It could even work as a BTS quote in my opinion. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:35, January 27, 2015 (UTC)
    • Um, I'm not sure exactly, how would you suggest doing that? - Princess GLG 03:54, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
      • Looking at it again, I guess it doesn't really give any information. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:58, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
Manoof
  • Is it ever mentioned why the Vong left the galleries alone? Manoof (talk) 02:45, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
    • Some related articles here state that the museum was to use for information but I haven't found where it specifies that in SBS. - Princess GLG 03:54, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
      • I got in contect via IRC with Supreme Emperor and he's said they kept it to understand their enemies and it was used as Tsavong La's personal base of operations. Just make a brief mention of why it was kept and you're good to go :) (I'll sort out the museum's article page) Manoof (talk) 05:22, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
        • Ok, thank you. Added. - Princess GLG 13:30, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
          • I fixed a bit of the grammar up for you. You now have the same issue with referencing, as that information is sourced to Star by Star. Since SBS doesn't tell us why, you'll have to source the last sentence to the complete star wars encyclopedia (which is where SE got it from). Almost done! :D Manoof (talk) 05:46, January 29, 2015 (UTC)
            • Ok, I didn't realize that he found the info in the CSWE. Should I ask him where in the Encyclopedia it is so I can cite it more specifically using the template? - Princess GLG 14:45, January 29, 2015 (UTC)
              • Yes, shoot him a message on his talk page or get in contact on IRC, he tends to hang out on there :) Manoof (talk) 09:15, January 30, 2015 (UTC)
                • I've got it for you: Volume II, the specific entry is Museum of Applied Photonics. Trip391 (talk) 09:41, January 30, 2015 (UTC)
                  • OK, thank you. Added. - Princess GLG 14:14, January 31, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Kikla

  • Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 06:29, January 29, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Exiled Jedi
  • Preliminary objection: I think you forgot the BTS.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 06:45, January 29, 2015 (UTC)
    • Crap! and on the other one >.< Fixed now Manoof (talk) 06:59, January 29, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Aren't these guys and Protas mythical creatures from Kamino? You use the deity info box for Protas, for instance, but the articles themselves don't treat the subject as though it is a legend/mythical/etc. If they are legendary, you should adjust the articles accordingly (I.e., according to Kaminoan legend, the Kikla...). --Eyrezer (talk) 07:20, January 29, 2015 (UTC)

  • Does that mean this article is no longer a species article? I understand what you're saying, but went off the Protas good article, which i assume needs a review? Does this even get an article still? Manoof (talk)


Ancient Trench

  • Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 06:50, January 29, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:Not sure if it should be "Ancient Trench" or "Ancient trench"...

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

  • Well, if you're not 100% sure about what the title should be, you should probably figure that out first. IFYLOFD (Talk) 07:11, January 29, 2015 (UTC)
    • To clarify, both words are capitalized in the story, so I assumed it's ok as it's a proper noun, even though both words themselves are not? Manoof (talk) 10:23, January 30, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki