Wikia

Wookieepedia

Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

Redirected from WP:CAN

120,225pages on
this wiki
Talk113
             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
  4. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  5. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  6. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  7. …have no redlinks.
  8. …have all relevant canon information presented.
  9. …be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  10. …have all quotes and images sourced.
  11. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  12. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  13. …include a reasonable number of images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available.
  14. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  15. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  16. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article can also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

LG3-18

  • Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 02:23, March 19, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Combing through the Dark Forces Audio Dramas uncovers some lost relics.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 16:44, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Manoof (talk) 07:06, March 22, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 01:35, April 21, 2015 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • Would a homeworld of Nar Shadda be appropriate in the infobox? 501st dogma(talk) 21:47, March 19, 2015 (UTC)
    • There's nothing really indicating that it was built on Nar Shaddaa. He could have been built elsewhere and brought to the moon and installed by whoever ran the traffic operations, unless you mean to just use Nar Shaddaa as a place of residence, or something. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 16:27, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
      • I was thinking of it as the place of residence, but I'm not set on you adding it. It's up to you. 501st dogma(talk) 16:44, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
CP
  • Which degree of droid is it? Also, I think we can safely add the Nar Shaddaa resident category. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 21:15, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
    • I don't know. The quote in the article, and Ors agreeing to follow his vector, is all that is known about the droid. I'll add the place of residence though, now that there's been an additional voice on the matter. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 21:50, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
      • Well, the Essential Guide to Droids or somesuch source lists the various types, maybe guidance droids will fit into one of those. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 23:32, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
        • I didn't see guidance droids, but the first Essential Guide listed another kind of traffic droid under Municipal. Would that work? And wouldn't Guidance Droid be more like a class of droid? LG and 8-13 are my first droid nominations, but I'm happy to learn. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 23:45, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
          • Yes, that would probably be a similar degree. And what you have about the class looks right. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 23:15, March 25, 2015 (UTC)
          • Sorry to interject here. Clonehunter, the degree is 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th or 5th degree. I don't have the book but I'm guessing municipal droids are 5th degree? Also I think municipal would probably be more of the class with landing guidance droid being the model. Manoof (talk) 06:40, April 3, 2015 (UTC)
            • Oh, sorry, I was going by the old Droid Guide, which according to the page didn't have classes. I guess it'd be whatever municipal relate to in regards of class. Class Three could almost work, too. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:16, April 3, 2015 (UTC)
              • That's cool, but I think 5 would be better as this would be transportation, non intelligent intensive. Its a simple matter of providing a landing approach based on conditions. 3 would be if there were more social functions needed, which he wouldn't. An example of a 3rd degree droid would be 3PO. Keep in mind I don't have the new guide to droids, and am only going off what the articles here say. Manoof (talk) 19:58, April 3, 2015 (UTC)
                • I'd say that what you say makes more sense. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 04:45, April 4, 2015 (UTC)
                  • Does the guide actually classify landing droids under any degree? I'd be hesitant to classify it without something specific backing the degree up. If the reference is kept, it will need some sort of explanation included as LG318 is not mentioned in the guide.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 17:55, April 4, 2015 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • I fail to see how a reference to pilot droids being 5th degree droids is enough for a landing guidance droid to be identified as the same degree. One flies a ship, while the other just directs a ship to land, which is not really the same thing.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 02:20, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • Apologize for the lack of follow-up. 5th degree would be more than fine. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 01:54, May 18, 2015 (UTC)
    • How can we identify it as 5th-degree?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 02:22, May 18, 2015 (UTC)
      • I don't think we can, personally. Unless something specifically states that traffic conducting droids can be placed in a certain degree. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 20:37, May 27, 2015 (UTC)
  • The "somewhat masculine voice" mention in the BTS does not seem right to me. Either you can state the voice is male or you can't. If you can't state this definitively, say so in the BTS. Otherwise, you should add the masculine programming category.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 01:23, May 28, 2015 (UTC)
    • Well, I wasn't really sure how far we could assert something. If I was to go on a limb, I'd say it was a male voice. But being a droid, I hesitated. Here's a video that should start when the droid speaks, if you want to see for yourself. I guess I can just Male-ify this droid for now. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 03:07, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
      • Also, I relaized I missed the fact it's pronounced El-Gee-Three-Eighteen. Would this then read as LG3-18 as opposed to LG318? --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 03:12, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
        • Yeah, I think that would probably be better. However, since we do not know the actual spelling, this template should be used: {{Conjecturespell}}--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 12:11, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
          • Oh, that's a useful template. I've added it, and I've moved the page. It seems I moved everything else correctly, too. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 22:30, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  • You still have the sentence in the BTS, which kind of conflicts with the body: "LG318's gender is never specified, even though the character has a somewhat masculine voice." I would reword this sentence to state that the article bases the droid's gender off of its voice and note that nothing else identifies it.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 12:11, June 28, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Hale Return

  • Nominated by: 501st dogma(talk) 02:22, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I'm not using the planet field for the infobox, as that means it was in orbit of Borosk, which is not confirmed. Also, I'm not filling out the battle field as this is never said to take actual part in the battle.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 14:02, May 16, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 01:57, May 18, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Manoof (talk) 08:30, May 20, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Exiled Jedi
  • The article gives the impression that the platform was always near Borosk. Unless the novel clearly states that it was a completely stationary platform, I think you should alter the article to state the time that the platform is confirmed to be there. It could easily be a mobile platform that the Remnant brings to battlefields.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 13:35, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
    • TCSWE's entry has the Hale Return "stationed near the planet Borosk during the Yuuzhan Vong War." By that wording, it's unclear if it was stationed there for the entirety of the war, or only during a period of the war. 501st dogma(talk) 13:52, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
      • The way the article is currently written it makes it sound like the platform was located near Borosk during the entirety of the war.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 13:21, May 16, 2015 (UTC)
        • Yes, but that is how TCSWE has it too. I'm using pretty much the same wording, expect "stationed" is switched out for "positioned." 501st dogma(talk) 13:48, May 16, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Kiffu/Canon

  • Nominated by: ProfessorTofty (talk) 02:58, May 19, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Pretty much the definition of a simple comprehensive article based on a single source that can't be expanded any further I think. No quote, no image, just a mention in Ultimate Star Wars that it was Vos's homeworld in a list of facts. If I'm not mistaken, no infobox is needed either, since there wouldn't be anything to put in it, other than the name. Everything is sourced. ProfessorTofty (talk) 02:58, May 19, 2015 (UTC)

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Manoof (talk) 08:53, May 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 01:47, May 21, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Although you still need to find a date for the 32 pre-Yavin for TPM. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 01:34, May 23, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Squishy Vic | message 19:36, June 28, 2015 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • As a heads up, sources go after BTS. :P 501st dogma(talk) 20:25, May 19, 2015 (UTC)
  • It would probably be good to give a timeframe that Vos lived in, just so that we know when Kiffu was capable of supporting life (in this case, a Clone Wars time period will do). 501st dogma(talk) 20:42, May 19, 2015 (UTC)
    • Not a bad idea. I've done it. And since you brought that up, I've also put in an infobox indicating an atmosphere breathable to humans, and I also put in the Human/Kiffar species. ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:38, May 19, 2015 (UTC)
      • To build on that, you should say in the body that Voss was a Human/Kifar. Also, I don't think we can say for a fact that Kiffu's atmosphere was breathable by humans, as it is technically possibly that Voss was born/lived in an enclosed structure with an artificial atmosphere. 501st dogma(talk) 16:55, May 20, 2015 (UTC)
        • Yeah, that's good thinking - in a galaxy of fantastical possibilities like what we see in Star Wars, something like that is always possible. I removed it and added the bit about Vos being Human / Kiffar to the body. ProfessorTofty (talk) 01:18, May 21, 2015 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • Does the source say that Human/Kiffar are a native species to the planet, or does it just mention Vos?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 02:51, May 23, 2015 (UTC)
    • It specifically calls it his "homeworld," but nothing else. ProfessorTofty (talk) 02:52, May 23, 2015 (UTC)
      • Well, that is not enough to say that Humans/Kiffar are native to the planet.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 15:09, May 30, 2015 (UTC)
        • Alright, I killed it. ProfessorTofty (talk) 17:03, May 31, 2015 (UTC)
          • Restored based on the latest update to the Databank, which clearly states that it is one of two home planets of the Kiffar species. ProfessorTofty (talk) 22:55, June 9, 2015 (UTC)
  • The information about it being one of the two Kiffar homeworlds should be mentioned before Vos.
    • Moved it so that it's mentioned before Vos is. ProfessorTofty (talk) 01:16, June 15, 2015 (UTC)
  • As the databank entry added new information in a sparse subject, I believe that it is important enough to be mentioned briefly in the BTS.
  • Per this decision, "human" should not be capitalized in Canon articles.
  • I just want to make sure about this: Does Ultimate Star Wars call Vos a human/Kiffar. From the Kiffar databank entry it sounds like Kiffar are not human.
    • Here's the weird thing - not only does Ultimate Star Wars specifically list his species as "human," the only place that the term "Kiffars" appears is in the book's index for the page that Vos's entry is to be found on, but the word "Kiffar" or "Kiffars" actually does not appear on that page. Or, to put it another way, the entry for him actually specifically describes him as "human," while the idea of him being Kiffar is implied by the index, but not directly stated. ProfessorTofty (talk) 01:16, June 15, 2015 (UTC)
  • From just the databank entry, I do not believe that you can say that humans were a native species.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 17:16, June 13, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • Regarding the date thing, I added the standard date tweet that we've been using regarding the timeline of the films. ProfessorTofty (talk) 02:20, May 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • Something to note: it's entirely possible we may be getting more information on this subject in Dark Disciple, due to Vos being one of the two primary characters in the novel. This article may end up exceeding the CA word count by July. I'm leaving this as a comment rather than an objection since this is just a wild guess, but it's something to keep in mind. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 02:56, May 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • Article updated with new information from the Databank. ProfessorTofty (talk) 22:55, June 9, 2015 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the note Tofty, still looks good! Manoof (talk) 04:41, June 10, 2015 (UTC)


Jackelope

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 17:13, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote I'll ride it as long as it doesn't approach Cade lengths. 501st dogma(talk) 18:15, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 03:53, June 23, 2015 (UTC)
  4. ECvote IFYLOFD (Talk) 04:00, June 30, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Drua's mother

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 23:55, June 28, 2015 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • In the infobox, the homeworld field can be specified as Ryloth, as that was where the village was. Also, it would be good to mention Ryloth in the body. 501st dogma(talk) 14:32, June 28, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Manaan/Canon

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:10, June 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Hopefully we can get this over quickly.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Squishy Vic | message 22:40, June 28, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Exiled Jedi
Vic
  • I think we need tiny bit of additional context on who Mantu is in the behind the scenes. Somewhere it should say why he's part of canon and where he came from (Clone Wars TV show). Also, I didn't want to make this edit myself but I'd recommend adding in "Star Wars canon" before "canon" in the BTS, as well.Squishy Vic | message 19:27, June 28, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Bornae

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:21, June 25, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Holiday is over, time to start nominating again.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Squishy Vic | message 19:34, June 28, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki