Wikia

Wookieepedia

Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

Redirected from WP:CAN

127,004pages on
this wiki
Talk114
             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …have all relevant canon information presented.
  10. …have all quotes and images sourced.
  11. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  12. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  13. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  14. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  15. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  16. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Skako

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:07, February 20, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/5 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 21:22, February 20, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Cwedin(talk) 21:52, February 20, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 04:49, March 5, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:51, April 4, 2016 (UTC)
  5. ProfessorTofty (talk) 18:28, April 10, 2016 (UTC)
  6. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 23:38, April 11, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

  • I've removed the BTS bit about Skako Minor - the disambiguation template is sufficient in such cases. Unsigned comment by Imperators II (talk • contribs).
    • Cool, I just added that in case the subject came up during the nomination process. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:23, February 20, 2016 (UTC)
  • Should the bit about Skako's unique atmosphere and Skakoans having to wear pressure suits when offworld be sourced to Ultimate Star Wars instead of the character encyclopedia, since that's where that information originally came from in canon? Cevan IMPpress (talk) 23:15, April 11, 2016 (UTC)
    • I updated the references to instead point to the newer source, which provides more detail on the subject. USW says that Tambor must wear a suit, not the entire species, and says a atmosphere and pressure, not atmospheric pressure. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 23:20, April 11, 2016 (UTC)
      • Got it; that makes sense. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 23:38, April 11, 2016 (UTC)


Estaria

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 19:42, February 24, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Chill, bro, this place is only moderately corrupt.

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Cwedin(talk) 23:03, February 26, 2016 (UTC)
  2. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 01:43, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 19:59, March 20, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:52, April 4, 2016 (UTC)
  5. AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:37, April 23, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Rakata Prime

  • Nominated by: TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 00:31, April 4, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The only thing we know about Rakata Prime is it's a planet in the Unknown Regions. I also think the behind-the-scenes section is well written.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 07:42, April 4, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:19, April 4, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Manoof (talk) 04:19, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
  4. AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:38, April 23, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • Could we get a release year for the TFA visual dictionary and Empire magazine map since the earlier paragraph is dated? Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:57, April 4, 2016 (UTC)
Darth Ravigious
  • I don't think we know enough about it to know exactly what it is. Yeah we have a decent behind the scenes section, but other than that, the article is one sentence. Why not consider Malachor Sith temple instead?
    • As long as the article contains all the information available, not matter how little that might be, it's still suitable for nomination. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:19, April 4, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Apiliria system

(1 ECs/5 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Cwedin(talk) 23:29, April 4, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Not a lot can go wrong in under 50 words. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:07, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
  3. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 11:47, April 6, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Easy one. ProfessorTofty (talk) 18:38, April 19, 2016 (UTC)
  5. AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:40, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  6. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 20:25, April 23, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Bombing on Kalevala

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:53, April 4, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: My first event nomination, which was written as a companion piece for my future nomination of Kalevala.

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Cwedin(talk) 00:11, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 08:59, April 10, 2016 (UTC)
  3. LoLuX12 (talk) 21:04, April 11, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Manoof (talk) 07:08, April 21, 2016 (UTC)
  5. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:19, April 23, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Cwedin
  • Could you add that it took place in the morning, and that Palpatine addressed it in the Senate? - Cwedin(talk) 23:26, April 4, 2016 (UTC)
    • Done, though I could use suggestion on how to implement the time of day into the entry. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 23:59, April 4, 2016 (UTC)
      • Maybe something along the lines of "...engineered a bombing one morning on the planet Kalevala..." - Cwedin(talk) 00:11, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
Ayrehead02
  • Could you add the year of release for the episode to the BTS? Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:12, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
  • Feel free to disagree, but I reckon tt might be worth saying that it was morning for Coruscant when the bombing took place, since it's on Coruscant that Palpatine makes the statement. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:12, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
    • Hidaglo has confirmed that time occurs simultaneously across the galaxy in the Star Wars Universe, so I don't think this is necessary. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:19, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
Imperators II
  • Hmmm... This may be a slight pain, but the full name of the article should be included (since the name's not conjectural) and bolded upon its first mention per WP:MOS. Imperators II(Talk) 08:52, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
    • I've reverted the article to the version prior to adding Cwedin's suggestion, as "later that day" should cover it. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 06:00, April 10, 2016 (UTC)
Manoof
  • Could we get some context on Clone Wars and Kalevala. We need to at least know Kalevala is a planet. Manoof (talk) 06:49, April 17, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Minos Cluster/Canon

  • Nominated by: ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:54, April 9, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Star cluster that is mentioned in passing in The Secret Academy. Been a while since I've done a comprehensive article, thought I'd give it a go. ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:54, April 9, 2016 (UTC)

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 00:06, April 10, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 09:01, April 10, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Cwedin(talk) 22:55, April 11, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 15:09, April 16, 2016 (UTC)
  5. AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:30, April 23, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Cevan
  • Is there a quote that can be added to this article from The Secret Academy? Cevan IMPpress (talk) 22:59, April 11, 2016 (UTC)
    • No. The Minos Cluster is only mentioned in passing in the narration, so any quote could only go in the Behind the Scenes section anyway and wouldn't add anything that isn't already explained in the article. ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:13, April 14, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

You need to check your BTS facts. The Minos Cluster was not first introduced in the HNN article. It was the subject of Galaxy Guide 6: Tramp Freighters. - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 00:10, April 10, 2016 (UTC)

  • Oops. You're right, I was confusing first mentioned with first appearance. Updated. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:17, April 10, 2016 (UTC)


Nintuk (second nomination)

  • Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 02:19, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:CA that was demoted by the EC due to these issues. I believe I have corrected them all.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Cwedin(talk) 07:24, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 21:13, April 22, 2016 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:09, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  4. AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:42, April 23, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Cwedin
  • The infobox should have the "type=Criminal" field.
    • Wow, don't know how that got through so long! Added. Manoof (talk) 06:34, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
  • Looks good otherwise! - Cwedin(talk) 05:08, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
Imperators II
  • You should add the info about the publishing eras in the BTS instead of that reference note.
    • I went ahead and just cut the last sentence in that ref note - it was unrelated to the IU dating and unnecessary. Whether to add the info about publishing eras to the BTS is up to you. Imperators II(Talk) 21:13, April 22, 2016 (UTC)
  • Also, I believe the dating of Palpatine's reign should be in the article body instead of the ref note. Imperators II(Talk) 08:40, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
    • I followed the lead/precedent set by the 88-R Nightscreamer article, which had a similar issue (unknown chronological placement which could be narrowed to a year range). The result is what was settled upon after debate and back-and-forthing with other editors. I'm willing to make the changes though if you insist. Manoof (talk) 08:51, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
      • After some consultation with other editors, I now believe it's fine if you want to leave it as is. Imperators II(Talk) 21:13, April 22, 2016 (UTC)
      • Alright, thanks for the look over! Manoof (talk) 04:15, April 24, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Janyor

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:26, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Janyor of Bith is a major influence.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Cwedin(talk) 03:58, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  2. LoLuX12 (walkietalkie) 04:01, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Reminds me of Janyor's protest paintings on Bith. Imperators II(Talk) 06:48, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  4. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 18:10, April 23, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Flacharia system

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 06:59, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: OMG NOT A ONE-LINER!

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Cwedin(talk) 17:18, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 20:41, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  3. AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:45, April 24, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Manoof (talk) 03:04, April 25, 2016 (UTC)
  5. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 23:46, April 27, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Cwedin
  • The quote links aren't needed.
  • "Species" should be linked.
  • The BTS section should probably start with "The Flacharia system..."
  • Nice work! - Cwedin(talk) 07:12, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
AV-6R7

Comments

Verpine/Canon

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:32, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: People may no longer complain that the Verpine aren't canon.

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Cwedin(talk) 17:42, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvoteRegardless of the title, it looks fine. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 20:44, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 21:09, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  4. LoLuX12 (walkietalkie) 21:22, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  5. Manoof (talk) 03:26, April 25, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

I would ask Cade or another admin to do the canon/Legends swap for this before the nomination passes. There's no reason we need to be passing a nomination with /Canon in its title. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 18:08, April 23, 2016 (UTC)

  • Yeah, it seems like the automated sway system has slowed down. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:12, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
    • The idea behind the system is to let it build up to a big number so things can be done in a big swath, rather than one by one. It's built up but the "doing it" part is not really happening at this point. =/ - Brandon Rhea(talk) 18:24, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
      • Yeah, some of the /Canons that I created months ago are still at /Canon. I asked Cade about swapping the Verpine stuff. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:39, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
        • I was just thinking the same thing the other day. I completely agree with the new process, but that relies on it actually being done every so often. It wouldn't be right to go back to canon articles being at /Canon as a regular thing simply because that process isn't being run. ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:48, April 25, 2016 (UTC)


Tiona Madee

  • Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 03:19, April 25, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: 1st crew member nomination, possibly paving the way for more... Manoof (talk) 03:19, April 25, 2016 (UTC)

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Nice work! - Cwedin(talk) 03:40, April 25, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 07:51, April 25, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

  • As a note, I am not sure any crew members could be considered part of the Uprising, since we don't know if they simply worked for the smuggler or for the uprising. Unless specified of course. I can't see anything on the website or in-game, crew members are always referred to as "your crew"... Manoof (talk) 03:19, April 25, 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm not making an objection because "I do not know," but should something like "assorted missions" be fleshed out as to what missions she could have possibly gone on? I'm thinking back to some of the bigger articles for TOR, but I don't think any of the companion/crew articles were ever to fleshed out, so I'm not sure. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 03:34, April 25, 2016 (UTC)
    • I'm not sure what you mean. Possible missions that crew can be sent on obtain various "resources": crystals, material, credits, chromium (premium currency), data disks, faction reputation/currency for the 5 factions, crew xp or crew finder (to get new crew members), gear (armour/weapons) or battle runs during sector battle events. Missions that reward the same resource can have very different descriptions eg. get the resource directly or do something and be paid in that resource. Additionally many missions can be done multiple times, it is possible to have several of the same missions being completed at the same time. There is no restriction on what crew can go on what mission, and a possibility of success, given as a percentage, is determined by the difficulty of the mission and attributes (strengths, level and for unique character, the ability) of the crew. Because of all of this, I don't think it can feasibly be fleshed out. Manoof (talk) 06:52, April 25, 2016 (UTC)


Thuna system

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Cwedin(talk) 19:22, April 25, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Seems very straightforward. I say yes. ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:41, April 25, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Miggs McKane

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:24, April 29, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Continuing the theme of Jakku scavenger nominations after Roodown.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki