FANDOM


             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  13. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  14. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all sixteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

NR knockoff

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 06:15, August 24, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:02, August 25, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 1358 (Talk) 11:14, September 5, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 14:55, September 7, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • You source "fifth degree NR-5 series repair droid" to Arms & Equipment Guide, but the book is not in the Sources list. Also, could you please expand the fifth-degree reference into a note explaining how you arrive at that classification?
  • I'm slightly perplexed: ref 3 indicates that The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia mentions Kalibac Industries was the manufacturer of the NR-5 (I'm guessing it's stated in ref 5). Why then do you need to introduce another citation and source Kalibac to the Age of Rebellion adventure? Imperators II(Talk) 10:31, August 23, 2017 (UTC)
    • I assumed that I should source that information to the newest possible source available, Perlemian Haul. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:02, August 23, 2017 (UTC)
      • I honestly don't see the need to source it to the newest source if the information in question hasn't changed from an older source, especially if a ref already present in the article can be used instead. It's just confusing to the reader IMHO. Imperators II(Talk) 20:18, August 23, 2017 (UTC)
        • Technically, only the TCSWE's NR-5 entry states the info cited in the first part of the dating ref. As such, I've referenced Kalibac being its manufacturer to Cynabar in the article's body. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:00, August 24, 2017 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • Just for consistency could you use either repair droid or maintenance droid in both the body and infobox. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:00, August 25, 2017 (UTC)
    • Used the former, since its part of the NR-5's full name. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:50, August 25, 2017 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • I do not believe that Cynabar's Fantastic Technology directly states that the droids were marketed in 2 BBY. From what I can see it uses Great ReSynchronization dates, which will require additional sourcing to translate into 2 BBY.
    • What source would you recommend I look at to source this? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:38, September 14, 2017 (UTC)
      • There is a complicated citation that is used in the year infobox. You will need to use that as well as the date from the sourcebook.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 01:57, September 15, 2017 (UTC)
        • The page for that template says "The year-conversion, galacticera, and eras field have all been deprecated. Their contents are automatically generated, and should not be manually added, as the code for those fields has been removed." I can't find said citation. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:06, September 15, 2017 (UTC)
  • Out of curiosity, where does it identify Kraemr as a smuggler? I flipped through the book and didn't see this mentioned anywhere that I could find.
    • I haven't either (just peaked at their article), so I've removed it. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:38, September 14, 2017 (UTC)
  • "It worked for about ten hours before completely frying all of its circuits." Most of this sentence is pretty much verbatim from the source. Could you reword this a little more?
  • A lot of these issues are present in the Tredwall article, which already attained CA status. Please correct the issues on that article as well once they are satisfactorily corrected here.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 17:30, September 10, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Pangorin

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Nice work on your pangolins! Imperators II(Talk) 22:10, August 29, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ECvote First the CAN, then the GAN. 1358 (Talk) 11:48, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:53, September 9, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Congratulations on your first status article nomination! Mine was a creature, as well. :P OK, so there are a few things that need to be done:
  • Currently, pangorin's non-sentience is infobox-exclusive, which means that per our Layout Guide it has to be mentioned in the article's body, as well.
    • Done! Unsigned comment by Jim The Lamproid (talk • contribs).
      • Wait, is that quote you gave below all that's said about pangorins in the book? If so, there's not enough evidence to say they're non-sentient.
        • Well, I thought since they're in a zoo there's little chance they would be sentient, and semi-sentience doesn't really exist in canon atm, but I shouldn't have assumed that. Changed now.
  • The same goes for the link to cave that's in infobox, and I'm puzzled as to why you call them "grottoes" in the body and "caves" in the infobox.
    • I use 'grottoes' in the article and 'caves' in the infobox because the book says: "They went out to the zoo on Sarini Island, watched the Pangorins in their grottoes..." A search for the definition of grotto gave two definitions; 1. "a small picturesque cave, especially an artificial one in a park or garden", and 2. "an indoor structure resembling a cave." since the Pangorins are in a zoo, I assumed the use of 'grotto' meant they were in an artificial cave, and so caves were their natural habitat. Nevertheless, I mentioned caves on the main body of the article. Jim The Lamproid (talk) 21:12, August 29, 2017 (UTC)
  • There's some overlinking - you link to Sarini Island and its zoo twice.
  • Since Life Debt can't be used as a source for its full release date, you should find another source for that.
  • Does Life Debt explicitly say it's set in 5 ABY? The above nomination of Pollus Maksim makes me think that isn't so, so you'll have to use some part of the date referencing used in that article (or write your own, better reference!) to source that date. Imperators II(Talk) 20:33, August 29, 2017 (UTC)
    • Done! I used a much shorter and less complicated reference from the Timeline of canon media page. Thanks for reviewing this article! Jim The Lamproid (talk) 21:12, August 29, 2017 (UTC)
      • It doesn't show up, though, because you named it the same as the regular Life Debt reference. But from what I'm seeing in the source code, the reference note only talks about months after the Battle of Endor (which the article itself doesn't actually mention), but doesn't say anything about the year 5 ABY. Imperators II(Talk) 21:29, August 29, 2017 (UTC)
        • Changed the reference to the one from the Pollus Maksim. Jim The Lamproid (talk) 21:40, August 29, 2017 (UTC)
          • It is unfortunate that, unlike the Pollus Maksim article, here the dating reference note can't be split up into separate notes. :( I've added line breaks to it so that it hopefully doesn't look that terrible in the Wikia skin, though. Imperators II(Talk) 22:10, August 29, 2017 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • Given the complexity of the date reference I might be missing something, but I'm not sure the maths quite adds up because of Star Wars: Uprising. The Leia hologram establishes that part of Uprising takes place 2 months after the Battle of Endor, but surely that doesn't mean that the fall of Cloud City has to take place 2 months after since we don't know how much time passes during the game. What might be a better reference is using Aftermath: Empire's End, which depicts the freeing of Cloud City as taking place at the same time or just before the Battle of Jakku, which is confirmed to take place in 5 ABY by the Atlas. Since we know that Lifedebt takes place before Empire's End this confirms that it can't be any later than 5 ABY. That still leaves the issue though that surely we don't know if 2 months after the Battle of Endor is 4 ABY or 5 ABY, we only know that 3 months after is 5 ABY? Again, if I've missed something I'm sorry, this stuff is not easy to follow at all. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:11, September 9, 2017 (UTC)
    • Ok looking at it further I think the following reference should work:
"Star Wars: Galactic Atlas places the Battle of Endor in the year 4 ABY. Shattered Empire, Part IV, which shows Shara Bey and Kes Dameron settling on Yavin 4, takes place three months after the Battle of Endor, and Star Wars: Galactic Atlas places Bey and Dameron's move to Yavin 4 in the year 5 ABY.
In the novel Aftermath it is said that "months" have passed since the Battle of Endor, meaning it occurs at least two months after the Battle for Endor. Aftermath: Life Debt begins two months after the end of Aftermath, meaning that at minimum it takes place four months after the battle of Endor, which would place it in the year 5 ABY at the earliest based on the fact that 3 months after the Battle of Endor is already 5 ABY. In Aftermath: Empire's End, which is the chronological sequel to Aftermath: Life Debt, the Battle of Jakku takes place. The Galactic Atlas establishes that the Battle of Jakku takes place in the year 5 ABY, therefore the events of Empire's End must take place in the year 5 ABY as well." Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:00, September 9, 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks! Changed to the reference you suggested. Jim The Lamproid (talk) 19:47, September 9, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Ringo Vinda system

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 06:20, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: As of now, this is one of the last systems added to the Online Companion.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 07:28, September 1, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:43, September 9, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 1358 (Talk) 16:02, September 17, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Can the episode number and the season number be sourced to the episode itself?
    • No, but the episode guide on StarWars.com does. Added. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:24, September 1, 2017 (UTC)
  • Please adopt the referencing for the episode's release date used on this GA (you can also see the relevant part of it's GAN page). You could also check whether the link to the German site used in that article can be assigned an IA backup link instead of a webcite one. Imperators II(Talk) 10:25, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
    • I've previously tried this, but I get this in response: "Page cannot be displayed due to robots.txt". - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:24, September 1, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Millius Prime

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 05:46, September 1, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: More of these great, one-off worlds from The Clone Wars.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 19:07, September 1, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:54, September 9, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Would it be possible to use the other image as the main one since it shows the full moon?
    • It seems to be a pretty low-quality image, and I'm not sure where the actually image from the episode would go, but whatever. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:51, September 1, 2017 (UTC)
  • Please add {{Imagecat}}.
  • Would it be possible to create "Category:Separatist-aligned moons" instead?
    • Also added "Moons by affiliation". Let's start giving moons their own cats instead of shoving them in planet cats. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:11, September 1, 2017 (UTC)
  • Hmmm, is the CIS identified as such in the episode?
    • No, but I don't think we need to split hairs over it. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:51, September 1, 2017 (UTC)
      • We do for ships etc., where's the difference? Imperators II(Talk) 19:07, September 1, 2017 (UTC)
  • Just checking: the fact that Kenobi & Skywalker destroyed the node is sourced to "Mystery of a Thousand Moons", but there's no images of the surface of the moon because the destruction was only mentioned in the episode? Imperators II(Talk) 08:14, September 1, 2017 (UTC)
    • The image in the infobox is Millius Prime itself. The episode just did a sucky job clarifying that. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:51, September 1, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

R2-D7

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 07:48, September 8, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:13, September 15, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 21:08, September 17, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Blog backup link!
  • EndorExpress backup links!
  • Could you specify that the Droidnostics Center was on Tomorrowland Starport?
  • I think the BTS quote is redundant, since it's non-narrative text, information from which you have completely covered in the article.
  • "with a black photoreceptor and white plating, with a silver and teal trim." — do you think you can reword this so that it doesn't start with "with" twice in a row? Imperators II(Talk) 08:30, September 4, 2017 (UTC)
  • Please redeco the BTS. Imperators II(Talk) 19:58, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
    • By that I mean please rewrite the BTS so that it's clearer, less convoluted, doesn't use parentheses, and has a paragraph break. (Look at it in the Oasis skin, it needs to be broken up). Also, can you substitute "redeco" for something that's in dictionaries? Imperators II(Talk) 19:58, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
      • Split and rewrit. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:14, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
        • Surely you can't source the information about R4-M9's Power of the Jedi figure to R2-D7's Star Tours figure? Imperators II(Talk) 07:32, September 8, 2017 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • It seems to be operating the track control in the image, is this worth mentioning? Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:32, September 9, 2017 (UTC)
  • I haven't much experience with Star Tours articles, but is referencing the entire first BTS paragraph just to the Star Tours article really the best reference available? Surely something that has the dates and locations written in print would be better at the very least. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:32, September 9, 2017 (UTC)
    • If there is an official source, I have yet to find it. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:22, September 12, 2017 (UTC)
      • Is there not at least a photo or something of the poster? Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:12, September 14, 2017 (UTC)
        • It's been in the External links section the entire time, but I had never thought to actually cite it. Added. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:18, September 14, 2017 (UTC)
          • Could you also source the date? Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:26, September 14, 2017 (UTC)
            • Could you be more specific? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:29, September 14, 2017 (UTC)
              • You currently source the year the ride opened just to the ride itself but there's got to be a better source like the complete guide or something. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:46, September 14, 2017 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • The citation for the date needs additional explanation for why it can be used to source the date for the droid. Since nothing in the reference mentions the droid, it cannot be used by itself.
  • The BTS needs to mention the droid's similarity in appearance to the R4-series agromech droid. You might be able to make the argument that it is not confirmed to be an R4 droid, but you should at least note that it looks similar.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 01:57, September 18, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

  • Do you think there's enough evidence to assume that this guy is a part of the R-series? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:51, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
    • What evidence is there? Just the R2 part in its name? Imperators II(Talk) 19:58, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
      • Yeah, TCSWE just calls i something along the lines of a "conical-headed astromech droid". - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:16, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
        • Yeah, better not to assume it, then. Imperators II(Talk) 20:20, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
          • Yeah, you're probably right. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:26, September 7, 2017 (UTC)


Banasthau system

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:33, September 9, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ECvote A long read but worth it. 1358 (Talk) 17:30, September 19, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

I2-CG droid

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:20, September 9, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A long overdue Roodown sub-nom.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 16:51, September 9, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 02:56, September 13, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Didn't Rey write her journal before the events of TFA? If so, the article should be written in chronological order. Imperators II(Talk) 14:54, September 9, 2017 (UTC)
    • It's a bit confusing as part of it is written during or after TFA, and the rest is left unclear. Since the drawing of Roodown and the droids in the journal is literally a just a drawn version of his exact pose in the film I'd assume that image was drawn after, perhaps on the night after we see Roodown when she meets BB-8. Of course, that last part is simply speculation, but it's why I put it after the events of TFA instead of before. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:17, September 9, 2017 (UTC)
      • Looking at the journal again, it's actually fairly clear she writes about Roodown and draws the droids after meeting BB-8, so I've changed the placement in the Roodown article to match this one. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:20, September 9, 2017 (UTC)
CorellianPremier

Is there anything of note in the Celebration panel for the BTS? Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 16:59, September 12, 2017 (UTC)

  • Nope, just the picture. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:22, September 12, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Huvveck system

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:10, September 10, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 16:47, September 12, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 19:42, September 17, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Seven-string hallikset

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:56, September 10, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The song names can indeed be sourced to the credits of TFA.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 10:48, September 10, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ECvoteAlthough does the Graphic Novel adaptation start before Part III? Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 16:54, September 12, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Tebru

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. I'd assumed there was more detail in the source, but after looking at it I agree. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:36, September 16, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 19:31, September 17, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • Do you think you could make an article for her home? It seems important and detailed enough to merit one. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:12, September 15, 2017 (UTC)
    • Sorry, but I'm gonna have to disagree on this one. The info you see on this article is 100% of the info there is on Tell's home, so it would be kind of redundant to create an article for it. Imperators II(Talk) 22:31, September 15, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Tebru system

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 02:52, September 13, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 19:22, September 17, 2017 (UTC)

Object

The CP

Hi, Imperators. Please check the BTS. Is it "O" or "P"? Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 16:45, September 12, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Thetametabuterin

(3 ECs/2 User/5 Total)

Support

  1. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:14, September 15, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:04, September 15, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ECvote At least there were links to fix here, gosh. :P Imperators II(Talk) 20:26, September 15, 2017 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 22:21, September 15, 2017 (UTC)
  5. ECvote I Can't Believe It's Not Buterin! 1358 (Talk) 13:57, September 18, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Alder-Espirion captain

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:58, September 17, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I wonder if we'll ever see the Alder-Espirions again.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Leia's sparring partner

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:16, September 17, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The final Leia character CA.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Finally nooooooooo Imperators II(Talk) 19:39, September 17, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.