Wikia

Wookieepedia

Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

Redirected from WP:CAN

130,337pages on
this wiki
Talk114
             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  13. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  14. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all sixteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Amita Fonti

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:53, August 12, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A minor senator.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 05:24, August 13, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Cwedin(talk) 05:27, August 13, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:34, September 1, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • Context is needed for Mandalore. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:54, August 12, 2016 (UTC)
  • You should give a little more detail on the proposal of the peace talks, at least what planet it was made on. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:54, August 12, 2016 (UTC)
Imperators II
  • Please describe Fonti's appearance (clothing etc.).
  • You should give an indication of the timeframe ({{TCWcanondates}} seems to be applicable here). Imperators II(Talk) 14:15, August 12, 2016 (UTC)
    • I've only added the timeframe from Heroes, as a Friend in need takes place within the same year. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 15:01, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

NOTE: We have no idea which Gossam senator Fonti was intended to be in "Heroes on Both Sides," so this article doesn't mention her vote and uses our only confirmed image of her in the infobox.

Cevan
  • I didn't want to list this as an objection, so I'll ask it here instead: do we know for certain that the Gossam in "A Friend in Need" is Fonti? Cevan IMPpress (talk) 20:25, August 12, 2016 (UTC)
    • The character model of the Gossam that appears in "A Friend in Need" is labeled "Amita Fonti Gossam B". In addition, it is the only appearance of that particular character model, so we don't have to worry about any duplicates running around to confuse things. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:28, August 12, 2016 (UTC)


Ipellrilla system

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 16:19, August 28, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The Alcohol Systems Strike Back

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 00:20, August 30, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:18, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Cwedin(talk) 07:03, September 4, 2016 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:26, September 25, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Melus system

(0 ECs/3 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 00:19, August 30, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:15, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Cwedin(talk) 07:05, September 4, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • I think a little more of the information from the Melusi Uprising article could be added as context, at the very least the timeframe. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:20, September 1, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Dowutin precursor species

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Nice work, though AotG never actually called Dowut a planet. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:07, September 3, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 18:00, September 3, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Cwedin(talk) 07:08, September 4, 2016 (UTC)
  4. --LelalMekha (talk) 11:33, September 26, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Shuimi

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:52, September 3, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The idea of Strono Tuggs in a feather crown pleases me greatly.

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:25, September 3, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 17:39, September 3, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Cwedin(talk) 07:10, September 4, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 20:38, September 5, 2016 (UTC)
  5. --LelalMekha (talk) 14:55, September 8, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Prengalli

  • Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 14:53, September 8, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Really, this article is just a small fry.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Lewisr (talk) 15:23, September 8, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 17:40, September 8, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Dr. Porter Resistance starbird (Talk|Contribs) 21:52, September 8, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 16:41, September 10, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Narquois precursor species

  • Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 15:10, September 8, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Let's keep honoring the precursors.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Lewisr (talk) 15:21, September 8, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Cwedin(talk) 16:42, September 8, 2016 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 17:44, September 8, 2016 (UTC)
  4. ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:27, September 21, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Muckrat

  • Nominated by: Cwedin(talk) 05:45, September 12, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The muskrats of Star Wars

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. AV-6R7Crew Pit 06:00, September 12, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 06:47, September 12, 2016 (UTC)
  3. --LelalMekha (talk) 11:31, September 26, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

I've restored some of the BTS:

  • While Kabam is the primary developer, Disney Interactive and Lucasfilm are both involved and are notable enough for a mention;
  • Muckrats are mentioned in dialogue preceding "End of Muckrat Skulls," so saying they were first mentioned in the mission is incorrect;
  • Numbering "End of Muckrat Skulls" as the fourteenth mission can be misleading—the Level number refers to your avatar's required state, not the mission itself. Often times, missions will skip over levels or have numerous campaigns for the same one (i.e. Level 5 has two parts, Level 40 has four, Level 99 doesn't exist, etc.);
  • And lastly, I don't really see the benefit of using IGN over SW.com. - Cwedin(talk) 06:56, September 12, 2016 (UTC)


Dybrin 12

  • Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 11:52, September 17, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A brand new Deep Core world!

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 14:00, September 17, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Lewisr (talk) 17:15, September 17, 2016 (UTC)
  3. AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:24, September 17, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:10, September 17, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

R-H029 sifter droid

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:08, September 18, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I'm reasonably certain Pablo thought this thing appeared on Jakku.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 17:19, September 18, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Lewisr (talk) 18:07, September 18, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Dr. Porter Resistance starbird (Talk|Contribs) 21:23, September 18, 2016 (UTC)
  4. --LelalMekha (talk) 11:35, September 26, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • You'll have to source the names "D'Qar" and "YT-1300 light freighter" to something other than the film. Imperators II(Talk) 17:04, September 18, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Keresia system

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Harda system

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 07:31, September 23, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Ahem. I said, welcome to the Plague Systems!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki