Wikia

Wookieepedia

Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

Redirected from WP:CAN

125,503pages on
this wiki
Talk114
             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
  4. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  5. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  6. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  7. …have no redlinks.
  8. …have all relevant canon information presented.
  9. …be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  10. …have all quotes and images sourced.
  11. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  12. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  13. …include a reasonable number of images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available.
  14. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  15. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  16. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Gamall Wironicc

  • Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 20:29, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: First CAN (or really any type of nom) of mine in a while.

(2 ECs/4 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Manoof (talk) 06:57, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Hm. Good work figuring that out. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 18:12, July 24, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 20:41, July 24, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:27, October 23, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Weird. :) How do you feel about pipelinking "sacrificed" to Death/Legends? Imperators II(Talk) 00:39, January 1, 2016 (UTC)
    • Sacrificed is rather vague, and doesn't necessarily mean dying as a result. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:38, January 1, 2016 (UTC)
  6. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 04:03, January 24, 2016 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • " he was rumored to have sacrificed himself in battle so that his comrades could live on, at some point prior to being stuck on Tatooine." Using sacrificed makes it sound like he died, which he didn't if he later got stuck on Tatooine. Perhaps there is a another word you can use? 501st dogma(talk) 18:36, July 24, 2015 (UTC)
    • The card said those words, and being rumored to have died does not mean actually died. IRL both Osama and Saddam were believed by some to have been already dead shortly after the US invasions of their countries, before their ultimate discoveries made big news. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:18, July 24, 2015 (UTC)
      • Yeah, I guess it's keepable then. 501st dogma(talk) 20:41, July 24, 2015 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • I am going to leave this objection here due to the dead link in the Facebook reference. I am aware that it is not possible to get an image of this, but I believe that there needs to be some sort of agreement on whether or not something like this is allowed as valid sourcing before this article can gain status.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 23:26, July 26, 2015 (UTC)
    • I've decided to remove the Facebook reference. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:53, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
      • Well, without the Facebook reference, the article is missing information, so the article is incomplete. I would argue that this would prevent the article from ever gaining status, but we need some kind of substantial decision on this.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 01:56, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
        • I've added the Facebook reference back in. I would argue that, given the fact I added the Facebook reference to the article back when it was made and available, as well as started this CT which gave a link to the Facebook post, this is a case where an exception should be made, given the amount of users who've given the Facebook post attention back when it was online. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:51, August 3, 2015 (UTC)
          • Well, this brings us back to my original objection. We need some kind of consensus on this one way or the other.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 14:32, August 15, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • Any apparent weird wording of the article is a result of copying the scarce info from the CCG card itself, along with his uncertain era. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 20:29, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  • Hmm, so neither his card text nor the stats reference him as being a Klatooinian. Is it assumption to assert anything about his species at all? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 20:34, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
    • At least we know he's male :P Is there anything on that facebook post that might help? If you can, try to get a screenshot as well! Manoof (talk) 08:02, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
      • No, I can't get a screenshot of that Facebook post since it has been unfortunately long expired, and the citation was initially made way before the Facebook citation template. And while Leland Chee made no explicit mention of Wironicc's species, the closest thing was his thinking to retcon him as a TPM Klatooinian. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:32, July 18, 2015 (UTC)
        • I'm happy with the article as-is, and agree we can't say he is klatooinian with any certainty. Manoof (talk) 06:57, July 20, 2015 (UTC)


Lost Twenty

  • Nominated by: VDO talk 19:24, January 21, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Short and simple. VDO talk 19:24, January 21, 2016 (UTC)

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 20:20, January 21, 2016 (UTC)
  2. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 03:05, February 13, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Episode II should be added to the Appearances section together with the {{Del}} tag.
    • Added, I hadn't known if that was appropriate for NuCanon articles. Thanks. VDO talk 19:43, January 21, 2016 (UTC)
  • It appears to me that the whole "Date established" field should be referenced with that note, not just the part "prior to the Clone Wars". Imperators II(Talk) 19:39, January 21, 2016 (UTC)
    • Changed it to reference entire note. Also, 'secreting', can't believe I missed that typo. XD VDO talk 19:43, January 21, 2016 (UTC)
Cwedin
  • The references in the article body should be consolidated: "…throughout its history.[1] One notable and the twentieth member of the Lost Twenty was the Sith Lord Count Dooku,[1]…" shouldn't need that first "[1]," etc.
  • Could you add an author for Star Wars: Absolutely Everything You Need to Know?
  • Good job, the article looks great! Cwedin(talk) 23:20, February 3, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

  • Just a little preliminary question before voting: why does it say that the term "Lost Twenty" was established after the Battle of Naboo? Surely we don't know when it was first used. --LelalMekha (talk) 20:38, January 21, 2016 (UTC)
    • Considering there were 20 total members, and it's the Lost "twenty", it could not have been used until after Dooku (the 20th member) left the Jedi, which (per Ultimate Star Wars) was after the Battle of Naboo. As well, as seen in Episode II, it had to have been before the Clone Wars started since Dooku was already commemorated in a statue form by then, hence the reference in that establishment date in the infobox. VDO talk 20:41, January 21, 2016 (UTC)
      • I'd remove that. It's entirely possible that there was a "Lost Nineteen" before that, which wouldn't count as its own separate entity, just a different name for the same thing. So I'd just go with "prior to the Clone Wars." - Brandon Rhea(talk) 20:43, January 21, 2016 (UTC)
        • I tend to agree with Brandon here. That's what my remark aimed at. --LelalMekha (talk) 20:48, January 21, 2016 (UTC)
          • Well, likewise, it's entirely possible they didn't have a name for the other group of 19 before Dooku, until Dooku made it 20 and they decided to name it; as you said we simply have no idea. What we do know, definitively, is that Dooku was the 20th member and we only ever have had a group called the "Lost Twenty" (even in Legends) given to us, so the "Lost Twenty" could not have been established until after he left, which is what the infobox is referring to. To answer your original question (why does it say that the term "Lost Twenty" was established after the Battle of Naboo? Surely we don't know when it was first used.), we do know when the term Lost Twenty was used or at least when it came about. VDO talk 20:50, January 21, 2016 (UTC)
            • Likewise it is possible, yes, but our assumption means you wouldn't be including relatively-speculative info while yours means you would be. It definitely should be removed. It's not like a date projection where we can just use simple math. This is assuming the conception of a term/concept. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 20:54, January 21, 2016 (UTC)
              • You're assuming there ever was a "Lost Nineteen" or something similar and, based on that speculation, I should remove what we do know. I'm not assuming anything. We know that Dooku was the 20th member of a title/group called the Lost 'Twenty'. This tells us that this group called the Lost Twenty were not commemorated as such (as Lost 'Twenty') until Dooku's departure, which is all the article is saying. VDO talk 21:07, January 21, 2016 (UTC)
  • After some consultation with people more informed about Canon matters than I, it seems that we don't know yet whether deleted scenes are canon, so I've removed Episode II from the Appearances section. Imperators II(Talk) 23:04, January 30, 2016 (UTC)


Chad

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:23, January 31, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 22:14, January 31, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Cwedin(talk) 22:24, January 31, 2016 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 19:45, February 8, 2016 (UTC)
  4. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 03:06, February 13, 2016 (UTC)

Object

  • The link to sauce goes to the Legends page; there doesn't seem to be a canon page yet, so please create one, or replace it with a link to dressing and create a canon page for that (I'd advise doing the latter). Cevan IMPpress (talk) 15:56, February 13, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Gand (planet)

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:23, January 31, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Zuckuss was a findsman, and, true to his profession, he found a way off-world. Imperators II(Talk) 21:49, January 31, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Cwedin(talk) 22:26, January 31, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Was actually just about to suggest you take this to status on your talk page... Had half the message written and all... :D Nivlacanator(talk) 03:58, February 11, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Context for findsmen needed. Imperators II(Talk) 21:43, January 31, 2016 (UTC)
    • Unfortunatley, there is no context to give. We have next to no information on them. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:45, January 31, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Kubindi

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:23, January 31, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 21:31, January 31, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Cwedin(talk) 17:23, February 6, 2016 (UTC)
  3. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 03:08, February 13, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Sipsk system

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 20:47, January 31, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The...Ugly Duck system?

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:54, January 31, 2016 (UTC)
  2. [flashbacks to Lucas' other sci-fi movie of the 80s] Cwedin(talk) 17:39, February 6, 2016 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 15:47, February 7, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Bulwark

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote This reminded me of Sanctuary, and, sure enough, it was you who wrote up that, as well. :P Imperators II(Talk) 20:26, February 3, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 00:00, February 4, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Cwedin(talk) 17:47, February 6, 2016 (UTC)
  4. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 03:10, February 13, 2016 (UTC)

Object

A planet, and not from the Shadows of the Empire? You've caught me unprepared
  • Please mention information about the planet's grid square in the BTS. Imperators II(Talk) 10:13, February 3, 2016 (UTC)
    • I'm sorry to be disagreeable, but the Layout Guide stipulates that Atlas map coordinates are one of the few things that don't need to be mentioned within the article (per here), which is why I don't add them. I haven't done so for any of my other planet articles (see Sinton, Ione, Hefi, Tokmia, and Kammia as several examples) because I don't really think it's necessary. It feels like it's just saying it for the sake of saying it. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:54, February 3, 2016 (UTC)
      • Fair enough, thanks for pointing out to me that it was an exception in LG. Although don't we say a lot of stuff "for the sake of saying it" :) Imperators II(Talk) 20:26, February 3, 2016 (UTC)
        • To be fair, we do, and it's something I try to remain conscious of. For example, starting every character article with "[Subject] was a [Species] [Sex]..." After a while, it just becomes a stylistic nuisance, to use jSarek's wording from that CT, and I try to at least vary things from time to time. Anyways, thanks for the review. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:31, February 3, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Vaux

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 09:39, February 4, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Cwedin(talk) 18:07, February 6, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

  1. WP:SWR Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 01:08, February 4, 2016 (UTC)


The Pilot's Lounge

  • Nominated by: Cwedin(talk) 03:04, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Why are musicians always Bith?

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. The same reason all Rodians are low-rent bounty hunters. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:26, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
  2. #LucasDidIt Nivlacanator(talk) 04:40, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Bith are either musicians or engineers, the latter of which are sometimes Dark Lords of the Sith. Imperators II(Talk) 10:12, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
  4. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 03:12, February 13, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Valfin system

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 10:05, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Yet another blank system.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Cwedin(talk) 18:11, February 6, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Blevins

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:36, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Now that I have a working laptop again, it's time for some nominations.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Nice article about an Imperial corpse. Imperators II(Talk) 10:29, February 6, 2016 (UTC)
  2. He will not be forgotten. RIP. Cwedin(talk) 18:20, February 6, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Please give a date for the Battle of Endor.
  • Please present the opinion that Blevins was a bully and a braggart from a neutral point of view. Imperators II(Talk) 11:57, February 5, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

C-14

  • Nominated by: Cevan IMPpress (talk) 02:27, February 8, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Well, here's my first ever nomination! Since next to nothing is known about C-14s, I tried my best to not go overboard with extra information and only include what's necessary to understand the context of the situation they were mentioned in.

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. No wonder Ahsoka didn't want to trade. No one even knows what in Malachor a C-14 is! - AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:36, February 8, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Nice find, looking forward to more! Cwedin(talk) 03:50, February 8, 2016 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Nice work on your first nomination! Imperators II(Talk) 09:49, February 8, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:00, February 8, 2016 (UTC)
  5. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 03:14, February 13, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Ecks Dee
  • Please establish a timeline in the article. I'm not sure how well Canon TCW can be dated, but a "during the Clone Wars" is at least necessary.
  • You can probably pipelink Bothawui asteroid field somewhere in the article.
  • Can you add an air date for the episode? I'm not sure if there's a Canon source for it, actually, but the episode guide contains an airdate for it, at least. 1358 (Talk) 10:46, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  • Welcome to the article writing world. :P 1358 (Talk) 10:46, February 9, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Belassar system

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Yes. Agree. Support. Vote "for". Imperators II(Talk) 21:25, February 11, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Cwedin(talk) 21:33, February 11, 2016 (UTC)

Object

And another thing...
  • This map is often a must-check for astrographical articles. In this case, it shows the Belassar system located in New Republic space, like this one. Imperators II(Talk) 21:49, February 11, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

  • No article for the journal, then? Imperators II(Talk) 21:25, February 11, 2016 (UTC)
    • We don't appear to have one, and I'm not sure what we would title it anyway. Probably not necessary. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:50, February 11, 2016 (UTC)
    • With the Warfare addition, I opted to just remove that sentence. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:21, February 11, 2016 (UTC)
  • Is there a reason the quote uses "Hutch" rather than "Dutch?" Cwedin(talk) 21:33, February 11, 2016 (UTC)
    • Sources vary between calling him "Dutch" and "Hutch" for some reason with no official explanation (see the Vander article's BTS). Captive to Evil calls him "Hutch," but "Dutch" is actually the correct version, I guess. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:50, February 11, 2016 (UTC)


Trainer

  • Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 23:38, February 11, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:I believe this may be the last of the JK/MotS MP characters

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote "He would use his lightsaber to trim his facial hair." What the fuck Imperators II(Talk) 23:52, February 11, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ^Quirks like that are what I miss about Legends. And of course Han fighting the otter queen. Cwedin(talk) 00:53, February 12, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Direllia system

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 00:41, February 12, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Welcome to the Plague Systems!

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Cwedin(talk) 01:00, February 12, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Talos Merkin

  • Nominated by: Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 03:52, February 12, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: It'll be just like old times, Luke. They'll never stop us.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Cwedin
  • I'm not sure if this is necessary, but could you add:
a) The result of the Battle of Yavin, or clarification of a Rebel victory;
b) Additional links in the BTS section (Ernek Marskan, Fin Danglot, Milar Travis, and their appearances)?
  • Is the external links section needed? Cwedin(talk) 04:27, February 12, 2016 (UTC)
Imperators II

Comments

  • I don't suppose there's any information on whether Merkin flew an X-wing or a Y-wing? Imperators II(Talk) 10:48, February 12, 2016 (UTC)


Jun (planet)

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 09:08, February 13, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: OMG NOT A SYSTEM!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki