Wikia

Wookieepedia

Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

Redirected from WP:CAN

128,156pages on
this wiki
Talk114
             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …have all relevant canon information presented.
  10. …have all quotes and images sourced.
  11. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  12. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  13. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  14. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  15. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  16. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all sixteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Rakata Prime

  • Nominated by: TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 00:31, April 4, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The only thing we know about Rakata Prime is it's a planet in the Unknown Regions. I also think the behind-the-scenes section is well written.

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 07:42, April 4, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:19, April 4, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Manoof (talk) 04:19, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
  4. AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:38, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:03, June 29, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • Could we get a release year for the TFA visual dictionary and Empire magazine map since the earlier paragraph is dated? Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:57, April 4, 2016 (UTC)
Darth Ravigious
  • I don't think we know enough about it to know exactly what it is. Yeah we have a decent behind the scenes section, but other than that, the article is one sentence. Why not consider Malachor Sith temple instead?
    • As long as the article contains all the information available, not matter how little that might be, it's still suitable for nomination. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:19, April 4, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Minos Cluster/Canon

  • Nominated by: ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:54, April 9, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Star cluster that is mentioned in passing in The Secret Academy. Been a while since I've done a comprehensive article, thought I'd give it a go. ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:54, April 9, 2016 (UTC)

(1 ECs/6 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 00:06, April 10, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 09:01, April 10, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Cwedin(talk) 22:55, April 11, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 15:09, April 16, 2016 (UTC)
  5. AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:30, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  6. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:27, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  7. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 23:22, June 3, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Cevan
  • Is there a quote that can be added to this article from The Secret Academy? Cevan IMPpress (talk) 22:59, April 11, 2016 (UTC)
    • No. The Minos Cluster is only mentioned in passing in the narration, so any quote could only go in the Behind the Scenes section anyway and wouldn't add anything that isn't already explained in the article. ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:13, April 14, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

You need to check your BTS facts. The Minos Cluster was not first introduced in the HNN article. It was the subject of Galaxy Guide 6: Tramp Freighters. - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 00:10, April 10, 2016 (UTC)

  • Oops. You're right, I was confusing first mentioned with first appearance. Updated. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:17, April 10, 2016 (UTC)

Can we do the Canon/Legends switcheroo here? I don't think we should pass a nomination with /Canon in it, since that doesn't meet current policies. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 03:36, June 5, 2016 (UTC)


Tiona Madee

  • Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 03:19, April 25, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: 1st crew member nomination, possibly paving the way for more... Manoof (talk) 03:19, April 25, 2016 (UTC)

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Nice work! - Cwedin(talk) 03:40, April 25, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 07:51, April 25, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:51, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  4. --LelalMekha (talk) 18:15, June 5, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • Just one small one: Since you mention the vibroblade in the main body could you also mention the survivalist gear? To be honest I'm not sure the information even needs to be in the bts. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:17, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
    • No worries! I just wasn't sure since it's a specific gear set in the game, and I thought it may have been a game mechanic thing. Manoof (talk) 11:21, May 1, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

  • As a note, I am not sure any crew members could be considered part of the Uprising, since we don't know if they simply worked for the smuggler or for the uprising. Unless specified of course. I can't see anything on the website or in-game, crew members are always referred to as "your crew"... Manoof (talk) 03:19, April 25, 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm not making an objection because "I do not know," but should something like "assorted missions" be fleshed out as to what missions she could have possibly gone on? I'm thinking back to some of the bigger articles for TOR, but I don't think any of the companion/crew articles were ever to fleshed out, so I'm not sure. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 03:34, April 25, 2016 (UTC)
    • I'm not sure what you mean. Possible missions that crew can be sent on obtain various "resources": crystals, material, credits, chromium (premium currency), data disks, faction reputation/currency for the 5 factions, crew xp or crew finder (to get new crew members), gear (armour/weapons) or battle runs during sector battle events. Missions that reward the same resource can have very different descriptions eg. get the resource directly or do something and be paid in that resource. Additionally many missions can be done multiple times, it is possible to have several of the same missions being completed at the same time. There is no restriction on what crew can go on what mission, and a possibility of success, given as a percentage, is determined by the difficulty of the mission and attributes (strengths, level and for unique character, the ability) of the crew. Because of all of this, I don't think it can feasibly be fleshed out. Manoof (talk) 06:52, April 25, 2016 (UTC)


Thuna system

(1 ECs/5 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Cwedin(talk) 19:22, April 25, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Seems very straightforward. I say yes. ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:41, April 25, 2016 (UTC)
  3. 37 words, is this the shortest CA ever? Manoof (talk) 09:55, April 30, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:14, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  5. --LelalMekha (talk) 17:22, June 24, 2016 (UTC)
  6. ACvote hi Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:54, June 28, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

  • I'm a bit surprised there's a system in the online companion that isn't in the book! Manoof (talk) 09:55, April 30, 2016 (UTC)


Miggs McKane

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:24, April 29, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Continuing the theme of Jakku scavenger nominations after Roodown.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Cwedin(talk) 22:14, April 29, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 16:39, April 30, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Good job! Manoof (talk) 11:18, May 1, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • It seems to me McKane had some facial hair. I believe you should add this.
  • Context on Ogem, please. Imperators II(Talk) 18:54, April 29, 2016 (UTC)
    • Ah, I didn't realise it had been given more context elsewhere in canon. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:50, April 29, 2016 (UTC)
Manoof
  • The way your referencing is at the moment, the visual dictionary establishes the time that rey wrote the journal. Is this correct? Manoof (talk) 10:08, April 30, 2016 (UTC)
    • The dictionary establishes the timeframe for TFA, the events of which are referenced as happening at the end of the journal therefore the journal was finished at the same time as TFA. I could write a more detailed reference to explain this if you like. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:52, April 30, 2016 (UTC)
      • No I think that's fine. Having not read the journal, I didn't know it ended concurrent with the movie. Manoof (talk) 07:55, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • I believe the hair attribute in the infobox can say something about his facial hair. He also has a moustache, not just a beard (apologies if this cuts into imperators' above objection). Manoof (talk) 10:08, April 30, 2016 (UTC)
    • As far as I know the hair section of the infobox is just for color, I've never seen facial hair described there. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:52, April 30, 2016 (UTC)
      • Sounds good. Can you clarify he had a moustache, or just say he had facial hair in the article? Manoof (talk) 07:55, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure you can say robes. He is wearing something with a long, loose sleeve, and what could be a vest, but I don't think there is enough detail to say it's a robe, unless the book elaborates. Manoof (talk) 10:08, April 30, 2016 (UTC)
    • Removed the mention of robes. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:52, April 30, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Varvva system

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Cwedin(talk) 04:16, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:10, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Manoof (talk) 12:16, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Varvva, your suspension continues. Hit the radio! Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 15:15, June 29, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Fong

  • Nominated by: Cwedin(talk) 04:11, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Red Leader standing by.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 07:47, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:09, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Manoof (talk) 12:32, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  4. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 02:59, June 23, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments


Trandoshan ale

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:56, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: So many star system nominations! Time for some food and drink.

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote You're not wrong. Imperators II(Talk) 12:32, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  2. A drink sounds like a grand idea! Manoof (talk) 12:56, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  3. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 15:31, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Cwedin(talk) 17:08, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  5. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 23:16, June 3, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Cwedin
  • You should mention its namesake is Trandoshan.
  • The infobox should include "found on Gorse" and "edible by Wookiees." Cwedin(talk) 16:32, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
    • Since Kanan was making up a cover story it isn't really clear if the ale is actually even available on Gorse or if Wookiees can actually drink it. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:01, May 1, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Flatcake

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:46, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Here's the aforementioned food to go with the ale.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 16:14, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Cwedin(talk) 16:37, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Very nice! Manoof (talk) 10:42, May 5, 2016 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:26, June 28, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Manoof
  • Did the droid on the freighter cook the flatcakes, or simply serve them? Manoof (talk) 08:09, May 5, 2016 (UTC)
    • In the scene you see them in he's flipping one of them, which is part of the pancake cooking process and so I assumed he cooked them. If you think this isn't enough to go off I can change it to just served. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:32, May 5, 2016 (UTC)
      • That's fine, I couldnt remember if we see something like that, or if the droid just walked out of a door with them. Manoof (talk) 10:42, May 5, 2016 (UTC)
  • "the pilot" should be changed to something like "his pilot", as use of the word "the" indicates Hera is the one and only pilot. Manoof (talk) 08:09, May 5, 2016 (UTC)
    • I'm pretty sure that since her name is after "the pilot" it's fine, as it implies there's only one Hera not one pilot. If this isn't the case then presumably "the Jedi-in-hiding" would also need changing as would every article that says something like "the planet Coruscant", which includes most are status articles. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:32, May 5, 2016 (UTC)
      • Ok, makes sense. Manoof (talk) 10:42, May 5, 2016 (UTC)
  • Context on Clone wars (ie who were the combatants) Manoof (talk) 08:09, May 5, 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm not hell-bent on it, but can you mention the species of both characters? Manoof (talk) 08:09, May 5, 2016 (UTC)
  • Leading off the above, and please know I'm not familiar with food articles, but can human and twi'lek be added to the edible attribute? Manoof (talk) 08:09, May 5, 2016 (UTC)
    • I left it out since we don't actually see them eating, but since he suggests it and Hera doesn't object I'm probably just being overly picky. Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:32, May 5, 2016 (UTC)
AV-6R7
  • Can we get a release date for AND?
    • The release date for AND is already included? Unless you want the specific day? Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:17, June 28, 2016 (UTC)
  • Could you source the Bts? - AV-6R7Crew Pit 04:56, June 28, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Westhills butter

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:30, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Finally, how about some butter for those flatcakes.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 18:49, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Cwedin(talk) 21:52, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Looks good! Manoof (talk) 08:17, May 5, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

128th Flight (second nomination)

  • Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 03:15, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Former CA I just cleaned up. I believe all issues have been fixed.

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 03:20, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Cwedin(talk) 03:25, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 09:59, May 9, 2016 (UTC)
  4. I'd personally recommend un-sectioning it, but will leave the decision up to you. Ayrehead02 (talk) 06:39, June 9, 2016 (UTC)
  5. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 03:02, June 23, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • The intro and the History section use the definite article with the article's name, while the Characteristics and BTS sections do not; please address this for consistency. Imperators II(Talk) 14:12, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
    • I believe this is done. Manoof (talk) 07:41, May 9, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

  • Not actually sure if this is an objection yet, but why is the article split since it's well under 200 words? It looks odd having such short sections since the contents takes up most of the article. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:15, May 12, 2016 (UTC)
    • Honestly, I have no idea. I did wonder about it, but as it achieved status and passed review whilst sectioned, I left it as is. Additionally whilst sectioning is a requirement if it exceeds the limit, it is not a requirement if it is under. Perhaps something for the ECs to discuss, articles UNDER a certain limit should not be sectioned? This particular article sits at 116 words by my count. Manoof (talk) 11:58, May 12, 2016 (UTC)


Unidentified flying serpent (second nomination)

  • Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 04:05, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Former CA that had an issue with a broken link. I've found an archived version of the page, so that's that issue. Additionally there was a question of whether it flies or not. Viewing the episode on youtube, I would say it does fly as it appears too high up on the background to be on the ground, and moves across the foreground ignoring obstacles.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. And now the Ewoks theme song is stuck in my head. Cwedin(talk) 04:14, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Snakes with eyebrows. What the fuck. Imperators II(Talk) 14:08, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:17, May 12, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Osskorn system

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 17:56, May 25, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The glorious Booze system.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 00:23, June 4, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Manoof (talk) 01:45, June 5, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 06:35, June 9, 2016 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 14:58, June 25, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Manoof
  • I'm not sure on this so I'll throw it out there, but I think we can check different maps and to get an idea of who controlled the region at varies times. For example, we can place it in a triangulation between Ord Mantell, Urce and Orinda (pg 212). Since it is about half way up the entralla route between Orinda and ord mantel, and a third between the route and urce, I think it is safe to say it was in the region patrolled b the 8th sector army bright jewel in 22 bby (pg 98), wild space in the pius dea era (pg 26) and earlier (pg 22) using various other planets as relative reference points(Serocco, ord mantell, iridonia, etc). We can also easily see it is within the empire between 19-17 bby (pg 112). I've only looked at the maps from the essential guide to warfare. This of course assumes it isn't original research, and it is ok to have a reference saying something like "Based off the relative positions of the planets X, Y, Z in the map on page A, and their relative positions to planets U, V on page B, it can be determined that the Osskorn system was part of wild space." or something like that. Other than that it looks fine. Manoof (talk) 01:32, June 4, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Storm Commando

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 23:05, June 5, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A subject reintroduced into canon by a now-defunct game.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 07:40, June 6, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:50, June 7, 2016 (UTC)
  3. One word: "awesome" Geek'ari Talk 19:30, June 9, 2016 (UTC)
  4. --LelalMekha (talk) 17:24, June 24, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Exiled Jedi
  • You should either tie the statement in reference 6 to the Storm Commando by saying that the article assumes that the same holds true for them, or you could remove the "So ULAVs and MLC-3 Tanks are canon but their presence is not." bit from it. I would lean towards removing the last bit.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 14:55, June 25, 2016 (UTC)
    • I opted to go with your second suggestion. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:34, June 25, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Quell

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:50, June 15, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A TCW planet we know next to nothing about.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ProfessorTofty (talk) 21:07, June 18, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 05:28, June 19, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:30, June 28, 2016 (UTC)

Object

ProfessorTofty
  • Manual of style says that if your quote mentions something such as the Lucid Voice, Ryloth, etc., then you need to link it in the quote if you're not mentioning it anywhere else. I'll leave it to you, though, whether you want to just link it or find a way to work it into the text. ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:46, June 18, 2016 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • Since we know what the planet looks like, you should describe whatever you can about it in the article.
    • Done.
  • I believe that you should give more detail to the battle since it took place in the planet's atmosphere. A brief one or two sentence synopsis of what happens in the battle should be fine. Anything that happens in the battle that could affect the planet below should be mentioned, i.e. ships being destroyed and plummeting towards the surface.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 14:45, June 25, 2016 (UTC)
    • There you go. We have no canonical indication of who won the battle, so I left any speculation out. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:05, June 25, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Gorsian dragonfly

  • Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 17:28, June 24, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A rainbow among the ashes...

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 17:44, June 24, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 14:46, June 25, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:29, June 28, 2016 (UTC)
  4. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 02:50, June 29, 2016 (UTC)
  5. -AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:54, June 29, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki