Wikia

Wookieepedia

Wookieepedia:Good article nominations

Talk116
112,994pages on
this wiki

Redirected from WP:GAN

       
Good article
nominations
             
GoodIcon

This page is for the nomination of good articles. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like. For a list of Good articles, see Wookieepedia:Good articles.
A Good article is an article that adheres to quality standards, but cannot reach FA status due to its limited content.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
  4. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  5. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  6. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  7. …have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic if the length of the article supports it. This may not be appropriate on articles with limited content.
  8. …have no more than 1 redlink for articles less than 500 words, no more than 3 redlinks for articles 500 words or more, and no redlinks in the introduction, infobox, or any templates.
  9. …have comprehensive detail with all information covered from all sources and appearances.
  10. …be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  11. …have all quotes and images sourced.
  12. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article would be preferred, though not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section.
  13. …ideally include a "Personality and traits" section on all character articles if information is available.
  14. …ideally include a "Powers and abilities" section for Force-sensitive characters and a "Skills and abilities" section for non–Force-sensitive characters, where said powers and/or abilities are stipulated.
  15. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  16. …include a reasonable number of images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available.
  17. …counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, be at least 250 words long (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Alternatively, a good article cannot exceed 1000 words. Articles that do so should be nominated for Featured status.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of good status. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{GAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for GA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{GAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Per AgriCorps consensus, nominators are restricted to four nominations on the GAN page at any one time. Once one nomination is removed from the page as either successful or unsuccessful, another can be added.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. Once a nomination has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be AgriCorps votes—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. Alternatively, if a nomination receives a total of five AgriCorps/Inquisitorius votes—three of which must be AgriCorps votes—with no outstanding objections before one week has passed, the nomination will be considered successful.
  5. The article is placed on the Good article list.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 2 weeks.


Good article nominations

To nominate an article for Good article status, place the {{GAnom}} template on the top of the article and then follow the instructions above. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above. If an article has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be an AgriCorps vote—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. For complete instructions on archiving nominations please see here.

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Scizzic

  • Nominated by: praguepride (Talk) 21:38, June 14, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A little ugnaught who could use some love :)

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Good jobb Prague and good luck !Emperor Jarjarkine StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Senate Hall 13:18, June 25, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Emperor's advices

  • First of all, there is a redlink in the intro.
  • 2nd, make sure linking the entire intro. There are some links missing.
  • 3nd i noticed that, the first sentence of the first paragraph is kinda strange.
  • Scizzic's early life was unknown but he first met Talandro Starlyte in Cloud City around the planet Bespin I think saying:Scizzic first met Talandro Starlyte in Cloud City arround the planet Bespin but otherwise, his early life was unknown. But thats just my opinion.
  • On the P&T Section, the ship word is pretty redundant, especially last sentence about what he loved.
  • The Skills and abilities sections, i think you should add more links thant that. I added some but, mabye i forgot some of thems. For now, thats all i've seen.--Emperor Jarjarkine StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Senate Hall 22:10, June 14, 2014 (UTC)
    • Added a few more but removed the link on eye because it's not describing the eye as a biological entity so much as it is a way of phrasing his ability to evaluate items. --praguepride (Talk) 14:42, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • The book mentions that he modified Lynnori's Starbound Misfit.
  • I would say that his computer and droid programming abilities are high enough to be mentioned.
  • I'm really not seeing the logic you used for mentioning his skills. You leave off some that he is very skilled in and mention some that he is only marginally skilled in. Please be consistent.
  • It says that his operation was so profitable that he was very wealthy and happy about his position despite the conditions and the station's remote location.
  • You should mention in the biography that he loved machines and was more interested in the mining equipment than mining when he was young.
  • It says that people believed that he spent time on Cloud City. You need to be careful to indicate that the source does not confirm that this was the case, but that people believed it to be true.
    • Done--praguepride (Talk) 11:12, July 24, 2014 (UTC)
      • "It is believed" is present tense. The body of all articles are written in past tense. It would be better to say something like: "Some individuals believed that..."--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 22:16, August 1, 2014 (UTC)
  • Please mention that he still performed minor repairs on the station after starting at the Graveyard.
  • He carried a laser cutter. Please mention this.
  • I think that his discovery of a more efficient configuration of power couplings should be mentioned.
  • In the infobox, saying that his affiliation is a space station doesn't sound right. It would probably be better to mention the Graveyard here.
    • Changed but my thought was that he was affiliated with the running and operation of the space station... --praguepride (Talk) 14:07, July 23, 2014 (UTC)
  • Please group together those short sections in the biography section. Also, each separate section should be sourced separately.
  • You should start off the biography section by introducing the character and saying who he is.
  • Does the source say that the events of the book occur before 0 BBY? If not, you need to provide a source explaining how you got to this reasoning.
    • Removed --praguepride (Talk) 11:13, July 24, 2014 (UTC)
      • During my CAN review of another article from this book, I thought we determined that the events of the book took place after the destruction of the first Death Star, but before the Battle of Endor. This would mean that Scizzic would be at the station at some point after 0 ABY, but not that all of the events mentioned occurred in or before 0 ABY. Since the book doesn't give the ABY date, you should probably just say that Scizzic was working at the Graveyard at some point following the Battle of Yavin.
      • You still mention 0 BBY in the intro.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 22:16, August 1, 2014 (UTC)
        • Changed 0 BBY into Galactic Civil War that covers that time period.--praguepride (Talk) 10:40, August 4, 2014 (UTC)
          • You need to mention the era in the body as well. The Galactic Civil War does not give enough information to put the article in the Rebellion era. Please mention the Battle of Yavin as well as the source mentions it.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 22:21, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
            • Added to both introduction and bio praguepride (Talk) 16:47, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
              • From what I can tell, the source does not confirm that he worked on the station before the Battle of Yavin. The way you currently have it worded implies this, please reword it.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 21:34, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  • Behind the scenes: The Star Wars Roleplaying Game is the Wizards of the Coast game. You should link to Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game.
  • You need to add a {{1stm}} tag to the sources section even if there is only one source.
  • As a note, when pipelinking an article you should capitalize the first part like: [[Transport|space transports]], not [[transport|space transports]].
  • Please go through all of your nominations and check to fix these issues.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 01:45, July 15, 2014 (UTC)
  • The introduction should be expanded. It is rather short in comparison with the body of the article.
  • You start off the majority of your sentences with "he" or "Scizzic." Could you try and vary your sentence structure a little more?
    • Rewrote a few sentences. Let me know if it's enough.--praguepride (Talk) 10:40, August 4, 2014 (UTC)
  • Please mention the name Starlyte Station upon the station's first mention in the biography. It makes it clearer that the name goes with that station.
  • "He turned his talents towards starship repair and the Graveyard quickly became littered with an amazing variety of ships and ship parts and Scizzic would cannibalize his collection of abandoned vehicles in his repairs." Please break up this sentence, you are trying to say too much at once
  • "the results were very reliable and worth the extra cost". The part about it being worth the extra cost is a point-of-view statement that should not be in the article. If the book says that some people believed that his services were worth the extra cost, then you need to say something like: "Some people believed that Scizzic's services were worth the extra cost."
  • I'll look it over again after you fix these objections.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 22:16, August 1, 2014 (UTC)
  • "A skilled mechanic, he was initially hired to become the primary mechanic..." Could you reword the intro so that you don't use mechanic twice in the same sentence?
  • Context on the Starbound Misfit in the intro.
  • "Scizzic lived up to Talandro's expectations and restored all of the important systems up and running in a very short period of time." The sentence doesn't flow well, please reword it.
  • "The Graveyard quickly became littered with an amazing variety of ships and ship parts and Scizzic would cannibalize for parts during repairs." He's cannibalizing ship parts for parts?
  • Is it the Graveyard or "the Graveyard" in the source. You have it both ways in the article.
  • "Because of his talent for repair, he eventually moved into starship repair." This sounds rather circular, please reword.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 22:21, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
  • You should always refer to a character by their last name except in instances where two individuals have the same last name. Please go through the article and fix instances where you use a first name.
    • I was concerned there might be confusion between Starlyte and Starlyte station but in hindsight it's not that confusing. Fixed! praguepride (Talk) 12:04, September 8, 2014 (UTC)
  • You have a lot of places where you use the same verb multiple times in the same sentence or in adjacent sentences. For example you use carry three times in the equipment section. Please fix this.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 21:34, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
    • I fixed the Equipment section. I didn't see any other blatantly repetitive sections but if there are I will fix. praguepride (Talk) 12:04, September 8, 2014 (UTC)
  • Can you make it clearer in the biography that the ship Starlyte bought for Lynnori was the Starbound Misfit?
  • Please provide context on the Graveyard in the introduction.
  • Can you make it clearer why the appearance of the Graveyard would affect the profitability of his repair business?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 19:14, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
Nivlacantor
  • This is looking good but this sentence needs a comma after station or something. "A skilled mechanic, he was initially hired to become the primary technician for the station however he eventually branched out and created Graveyard where he would perform starship repair as well." Nivlacanator (talk) 17:22, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  • Objection(s) overridden by AgriCorps 18:26, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Imperial officer (Metalorn)

  • Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 05:43, July 4, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: With eyes like that, he must be Officer Derpy. If they were facing inward, well...

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. 501st dogma(talk) 22:54, July 28, 2014 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • "...planet's malevolent governor, Corwyth." Malevolent is a bit POVish, so it should be reworded to avoid this.
    • I mentioned again that Corwyth was an Imperial, similar to the intro.
  • Not sure what Tagge's visit has to do with the officer. Mention of it can be removed.
    • Removed.
  • "It wasn't long before Organa encountered a lone stormtrooper, whom she dispatched by using an adhesive spray to clog the trooper's ventilation system in his helmet. Unaware of the tracking device in the trooper's blaster, Organa took it for herself. " Same here, this can be shortened quite a bit, to saying that Organa took down a stormie and stole his blaster.
    • Fair enough.
  • "Reporting back to Corwyth, the governor could only vent his frustrations on his radio officer. " How does this relate to the officer?
    • Imo, it sounds better than just "The officer reported back to Corwyth." It's kinda like a bit of cause and effect.
      • Sure, keep it. 501st dogma(talk) 17:54, July 6, 2014 (UTC)
  • "When he prepared to fire the weapon on Princess Organa, he lowered its power setting in order to leave the ore machines undamaged." This is unnecessary in the Equipment as well. If you're trying to say that the blaster had an adjustable power setting, just say that he preferred a blaster pistol that could be adjusted for power.
    • Reworded t a bit, then.
  • Go through a make sure all the article pertains to the officer, and doesn't go on tangents too much. Good work. 501st dogma(talk) 20:23, July 4, 2014 (UTC)
    • Removed some other information in the bio, namely the first paragraph. Figured all that huff about the population could be shortened a bit, while still giving some context to the situation. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 16:54, July 6, 2014 (UTC)
  • Body could use some context on the Galactic Civil War. Currently you don't actually link to the Rebels. 501st dogma(talk) 14:21, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
    • They're linked under the word rebellion in the first paragraph in the body. Changed it a bit to be a bit clearer, or something. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 03:07, July 8, 2014 (UTC)
      • Looks good.
  • Nitpicky, but context for Alderaan would be nice. 501st dogma(talk) 22:33, July 8, 2014 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • After skimming through the story, it would seem to me that this officer and the Imperials don't realize at first that it's Princess Leia who they're hunting. Only Tagge knows later on. If this is correct, the article should explain this, because it comes off as though they know specifically that they're after Leia Organa.
    • Ah, I see your point. I tried to fix this to reflect this information.
  • The BTS. First: The issue's publication date needs to be sourced to something. I have no idea what that source is in the Star Wars 30 article for the September 1979 date, because the cover of the issue itself clearly says December 30. I would probably just go with that date, since we can verify it.
    • So would that just be a matter of self sourcing (The Dec date), or should I just add a reference at the end of that line to clarify that?
    • As an update I am still looking into this. Checking libraries. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 03:27, August 17, 2014 (UTC)
      • I'm just using the year now, although I could probably use the September date. I saw this source on the comic's page, but I have no idea if it's reliable, or what it even is. I guess it's a placeholder for now.--Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 03:14, August 31, 2014 (UTC)
        • And that's why it's not a good enough source. You have no idea what "The Comic Reader #172 and The Comics Journal #49" is or whether it's even reliable. You'll need to find something else. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 13:38, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
          • Like I said, it's not permanent. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 17:44, September 3, 2014 (UTC)
            • Well, you should be aware that this does not satisfy the objection. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:51, September 3, 2014 (UTC)
              • Of course I'm aware of that. It's a placeholder for my eyes while I get it in order. I just think aloud, or, write aloud, rather. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:08, September 5, 2014 (UTC)
  • Secondly, the rest of the BTS noting that the comic was republished in different omnibuses is trivial and unnecessary. You should just cut that, and omnibuses are never listed in the Sources list. Those should be removed too.
    • I disagree, but I removed them anyways. I removed them as sources too. That makes sense.
  • Reviewing notes:
    • Don't use contractions in formal writing.
      • Whoops, I knew that. Damn. I'll be more careful next time.
    • Please familiarize yourself with the MOS's policy on ranks and titles. "Princess" should not be capitalized throughout.
      • Understood. I'm gonna have to do a sweep in other articles now, and probably pay closer attention to the MoS. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 03:19, August 6, 2014 (UTC)
    • You have a habit of formatting quotes incorrectly in relation to the original source. This isn't the first time I've caught you on this. It's gotten to the point that I have to go check the source myself, because I know without looking that you didn't transfer it over correctly. Please pay attention and get this right. It's a simple matter of transcribing the quote and its formatting exactly as the source does. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:14, August 3, 2014 (UTC)
      • I might need a bit more clarification on this one. In the comic, when the word is bolded or italicized, the word when put into a page quote receives ''(word)''s. Since quotes are italicized already, what this does is that it removes the style from the word for a similar effect. I'm not totally sure what's wrong. I looked at an edit and it appeared that I was just screwing up some of the punctuation. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 15:06, August 5, 2014 (UTC)
        • This might be easier to elaborate on in IRC, if you ever stop by. I'm in there regularly. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 00:55, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
          • I'll try to get a word on this then, on the off chance I stop by. If you're not busy, I'll try to flag you down in the IRC then. :) --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 03:14, August 31, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

  • Chrono source might be too much. Also, couldn't decide if some of that stuff is unnecessary info or useful context as too what's going on. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 05:44, July 4, 2014 (UTC)
  • Would the compendiums be sources or appearances? Or neither? They're under Sources, right now. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 02:03, July 13, 2014 (UTC)
    • Believe that's right. 501st dogma(talk) 22:54, July 28, 2014 (UTC)


Funeral of Anakin Skywalker/Canon

(1 ACs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Sorry that this took so long. Clone Commander Lee Talk 10:48, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Looking good! Nivlacanator (talk) 20:29, September 3, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ACvote IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 02:17, September 8, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Lee's charge
  • Intro: Context needed for Kenobi, Yoda, Endor and the Ewoks.
  • No head quote?
    • There are no quotes about the funeral in Return of the Jedi. Any suggestions? - Brandon Rhea(talk) 14:28, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
      • Meh, I thought there was one, but that was the novel. That really sucks... Clone Commander Lee Talk 14:51, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  • You have two redirects in the article, please kill them. More to come. Clone Commander Lee Talk 12:07, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
    • I found one, but don't see a second. Can you point it out? In the future, pointing them out up front would be very helpful for anyone whose nomination you're reviewing, rather than making them search through every link on the page. It's a time saver for everyone. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 14:28, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  • Howard G. Kazanjian. BTW you can make your redirects be in orange by editing your preferences. Clone Commander Lee Talk 14:51, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
  • It's generally discouraged to have any links in the bolded part of the intro. Please try reworking this. 1358 (Talk) 21:11, August 17, 2014 (UTC)
Floyd
  • Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but is there anywhere in a canon source where it's called the "Death Star II"?
  • I'd also like a touch of context on the Death Star in the intro. Just saying it was a space station or a superweapon or something should suffice. Same thing in the body.
    • I actually missed the part where you say it's a "space station" in the intro, but my objection stands regarding the body of the article. IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 01:53, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
  • "Once on Endor, Luke built a funeral pyre and lit his father's armor on fire." He also lights the body as well, correct? IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 05:04, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
    • All we know is that the armor was burned. That's part of the update I mentioned in the comments section (which I still need to do). The Databank makes reference to burning "remains" and, on one page, more specifically "armor." I'm leaving it somewhat vague since we don't know for sure, but Lucasfilm—per George Lucas—has treated it as just his armor for the last 10 years. On the DVD commentary for Jedi, Lucas specifically said that Anakin's body disappeared on the Death Star. Not sure if we can treat that as canon, though, hence the vague text. Better to be safe than sorry. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 19:37, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
Winterz
  • What..nothing on Anakin appearing as his younger self and the fact that this was changed in recent modifications (on the Bts and body)? Winterz (talk) 22:32, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
    • I'd ask two questions about that. One, is that relevant to the funeral scene, since that took place after the funeral? Two, is that relevant to canon, where—strictly speaking—the Hayden version is the only one that existed? Not sure what you mean by "body" either since that info wouldn't go into the in-universe section. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 22:38, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
      • When you mention that the spirit of Anakin appeared you should note that it was his younger self seeing that even canonically speaking, Anakin didn't look like that when he died and since you're already putting that in the body, the whole explanation as to Hayden appearing and so should also receive some note on the Behind the scenes section. Winterz (talk) 22:50, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
Nivlacanator
  • In the second paragraph it does sound a little funny: "Luke escaped the Death Star II, where Anakin had died, just before the space station was destroyed by the Rebel Alliance during the battle. Once on Endor, Luke built a funeral pyre and lit his father's armor on fire." It may be a little bit of a run on sentence. And should it be "the second Death Star" not "Death Star II"?Nivlacanator (talk) 20:33, September 3, 2014 (UTC)
  • Objection(s) overridden by AgriCorps 01:45, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
    • It's two sentences, so how could it be a run-on sentence? Additionally, as I indicated above, the Star Wars.com Databank says Death Star II. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 03:57, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
Cadeth
  • What NuCanon source identifies Vader as a Dark Lord of the Sith? Is that explicitly stated in the movie? Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 18:54, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

  • FYI to anyone who may review this soon: looks like the SW.com Databank has been updated with more specific information that requires an update to this page. I will be making those changes here soon. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 17:24, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
  • Doesn't The Making of Return of the Jedi count as only a Legends source? Per this CT thread, the consensus was that the pre-Legends announcement OOU sources that provide only BTS info are still to be counted as Legends sources no different from the ones that actually had canon Legends info. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:18, September 8, 2014 (UTC)
    • That CT makes very little sense. If we're going to count The Making of Return of the Jedi as acceptable to use in the BTS of this page, which it needs to be in order to properly document information about this subject, it seems contradictory that it wouldn't also appear in the Sources section. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 01:28, September 8, 2014 (UTC)
      • The referencing in BTS is valid, but that does not automatically equal it being a Canon source. Take the Canon article Jerjerrod's BTS citing some stuff from Legends sources, which are still left out of the sourcelist because they don't belong in there. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:14, September 8, 2014 (UTC)
        • Legends is a brand that refers to now-non-canon Star Wars stories. We shouldn't be applying that to reference books that simply document real-world information, because that's not what the official Legends brand is meant for. I'm going to wait for some second opinions here, because considering The Making of Return of the Jedi a Legends source is, in my opinion, blatantly wrong. It's neither Canon nor Legends. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 04:24, September 8, 2014 (UTC)
          • Tbh I would still agree with your opinion, but that CT had the majority consensus of treat as Legends, and that became site policy. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:24, September 8, 2014 (UTC)


Desolation Station

  • Nominated by: QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 15:05, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: 50 words short of an FAN. FFUUUUUUU-

(2 ACs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Fun? Clone Commander Lee Talk 09:54, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ACvote 50 words is nasty. Winterz (talk) 22:27, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Hey, I understand your reluctance. We've been discussing this on IRC, and it's a weird topic. Good work though. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 20:11, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Cadeth
  • Please reload your infobox.
    • Done.
  • Context on Galactic Civil War in the description.
    • Added.
  • Man, we really need an asteroid base category.
    • I have created one. On a cursory glance, I have found only one other base to add in it. If you're willing to fill that category up, go ahead.
      • Actually, I meant a category for just asteroid stations/bases, which I've made.
  • Was the station itself named in the Atlas Companion? I think the companion only refers to systems, not the actual planets/stations/etc. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 18:12, August 23, 2014 (UTC)
    • The Atlas refers to a "Desolation Station system." The name of the station is in the name of the system. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 10:11, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
      • Yes, but that's a mention of the system and not the actual base. It's a fine line, but it's why planets don't (and shouldn't) list the Atlas and the Companion if only their system is listed. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 16:11, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
        • Except that there may be several planets sharing the same name, which is why we can't assume that "Yavin system" is an indirect mention of each of its twenty-whatever moons, I agree. However, Desolation Station is a unique thing. We know it's a one of a kind thing. We therefore know that if a system is named "Desolation Station system" it refers to this very exact station. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 17:57, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
          • The problem is that the Companion lists systems, period. We don't list the Companion in the sources list of any planet just because the system has the same name. If we allow this, then we have to allow this elsewhere, which is not something we should do. It's a slippery slope that we shouldn't start down. Basically, if we've got an article for the system, the Companion shouldn't be listed in the planet/station/etc.'s Sources. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 18:44, September 9, 2014 (UTC)
            • By that logic, if a book mentions Anakin Skywalker as "Obi-Wan Kenobi's Padawan," we should not count it as a mention of Obi-Wan, since it refers to his Padawan. Except that we always counted it as such. But whatever, I'm done trying to prove my point, as I see that's it's pointless and I don't really care anymore at this point. The source has been removed. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 19:58, September 9, 2014 (UTC)
Cav
Toprawa
  • I'm objecting to Reference 4, which claims that NEC dates the formation of the Rebel Alliance to 2 BBY. NEC only dates the formation of the Alliance, which is formally the Corellian Treaty, to "less than two years before the Battle of Yavin." According to this text, that could easily be 1 BBY. It's simply not specific enough to source the 2 BBY date to. You'll need to find another source.
  • This might be a little frivolous, but I think the infobox's "Class" field should specify "Space station."
  • Is the punctuation in the Description quote exactly how the game presents it in text captions? Because there are errors there that should be changed otherwise. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:55, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Wry

  • Nominated by: QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 12:44, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Consider this an advertisement for my FAN :P

(2 ACs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. 501st dogma(talk) 12:07, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 17:04, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ACvote IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 02:18, September 8, 2014 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • One thing: Since the others came to call him Wry, wouldn't that be considered a nickname? If so, a nick template is needed. 501st dogma(talk) 23:49, August 17, 2014 (UTC)
    • As I gathered from the novels, the clones did not want to have anything reminding them of their past at the facility, so they essentially replaced their Subject designations with the names they gave to each other. As far as the clones were concerned, those were their real names. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 08:24, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
Floyd
  • Would like a little more context on Thrawn in the intro.
    • Added.
  • "and earned himself the name "Wry" among the Community members." Why is this in the P&T? Does the name actually have anything to do with his personality? IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 05:01, September 3, 2014 (UTC)
    • It might. It's evident in Riptide that the clones' names reflected something special about them. Seer was named so because of her visions, Scar had a prominent scar on her body, and Two-Blade, well, wielded two blades. By that logic, Wry's name might have something to do with his personality. Maybe he had a dry, sardonic sense of a humor. However, since it's not clearly stated in the book, I had to word it vaguely as well. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 13:27, September 3, 2014 (UTC)
      • Well if there's nothing conclusive, I don't think that tidbit needs to be in the P&T. You having it there, saying he "earned" the name, suggests that it had something to do with his personality, but you say that nothing's stated. IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 02:06, September 5, 2014 (UTC)
        • Very well. I've removed that part. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 09:45, September 5, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Senalak

  • Nominated by: 501st dogma(talk) 21:39, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: No more pesky dogs peeing in your garden from now on

(3 ACs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Is Senalak really decapitalized in the CSWE? Clone Commander Lee Talk 10:47, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
    • Yep. 501st dogma(talk) 12:52, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:36, September 9, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ACvote IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 03:39, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 04:05, September 16, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Comments

  • I updated the plant infobox to say "Specifications" instead of "Food specifications" here, as that would be inappropriate for this plant, but it hasn't updated here yet. :/ 501st dogma(talk) 21:39, August 26, 2014 (UTC)


Paarin Minor

  • Nominated by: Clone Commander Lee Talk 23:26, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Attempt number 4 to promote this article to GA or CA status. Or as I would call it: There and Back Again. Thanks to ExiledJedi for beefing it up.

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. 3rd time I've looked at this article. Please pass so I don't have to look at you anymore. :P 501st dogma(talk) 01:10, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Ecks Dee
  • I feel like the intro focuses too much on giving context to things instead of actual information. See if you can cut the context for Clone Wars and add something else instead. 1358 (Talk) 17:41, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
    • Well, the only thing I could do is remove the mention of the Clone Wars. Otherwise, there is not really stuff to add. Clone Commander Lee Talk 17:48, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
    • Changed somehow after IRC discussion. Clone Commander Lee Talk 09:45, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Kaara

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. 501st dogma(talk) 12:21, September 8, 2014 (UTC)

Object

One thing
  • "Vran was furious about her death, using his grief in the fight against the Klatooinians." Not seeing how this is relevant here in the P&T. 501st dogma(talk) 00:46, September 8, 2014 (UTC)
    • This was meant to show that he cared about his sister to some degree. Removed. Clone Commander Lee Talk 09:46, September 8, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Jedi Temple Guard

  • Nominated by: —Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 17:46, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Been a long time, hopefully this can get back to GA status.

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:16, September 11, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Barriss didn't bomb the Temple. Filoni did. 501st dogma(talk) 01:05, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Stormtrooper (Level 1997)

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Clone Commander Lee Talk 10:16, September 6, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Lee's charge
  • Have a good look at the intro, please.
    • Bolded, is that everything I can't spot anything else. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:23, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
  • His dead needs to be mentioned in the infobox. "Shortly after the destruction of Alderaan, Coruscant" for example.
    • Without dates I hadn't really thought about it, but included. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:23, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
  • "Thrown to his dead": You should mention the catwalk here.
  • "Confident swagger": I'm curious, can you say that?
    • Changed it to just walked with confidence, is that better? Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:23, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nice. And you never hit a girl. Clone Commander Lee Talk 15:07, September 4, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Mark II assault droid (Cold War)

  • Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 20:43, September 9, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: From CAN

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Dekluun

  • Nominated by: Clone Commander Lee Talk 22:00, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Consider this my last nomination.

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. 501st dogma(talk) 23:24, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Object

We'll see about that :P
  • Are the —— 's really necessary? Is that how the quotes are like in the book?
    • I'm afraid so.
      • It's so ugly though >.>
  • In the P&T, you mention a clone army, but before that, there is no specification that the GA's troops are clones save for a pipelink. It would be best if you could state it out right. 501st dogma(talk) 18:00, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Ho'Din-style veggie omelet

  • Nominated by: Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 18:36, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another CA is coming to the GAN page...

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Ottau

  • Nominated by: Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 16:03, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Project Hero has returned. You may now rejoice.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Whip Hand

  • Nominated by: 501st dogma(talk) 18:21, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: For Jang. Not that he was ever a punishing admin. :P

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Battle of Sagma

  • Nominated by: 501st dogma(talk) 18:27, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Thanks to Cav for both finding additional material for the article and adding it

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

In other languages

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki