Wikia

Wookieepedia

Wookieepedia:Good article nominations

Redirected from WP:GAN

120,870pages on
this wiki
Talk116
       
Good article
nominations
             
GoodIcon

This page is for the nomination of good articles. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like. For a list of Good articles, see Wookieepedia:Good articles.
A Good article is an article that adheres to quality standards, but cannot reach FA status due to its limited content.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
  4. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  5. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  6. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  7. …have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic if the length of the article supports it. This may not be appropriate on articles with limited content.
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …have comprehensive detail with all information covered from all sources and appearances.
  10. …be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  11. …have all quotes and images sourced.
  12. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article would be preferred, though not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section.
  13. …ideally include a "Personality and traits" section on all character articles if information is available.
  14. …ideally include a "Powers and abilities" section for Force-sensitive characters and a "Skills and abilities" section for non–Force-sensitive characters, where said powers and/or abilities are stipulated.
  15. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  16. …include a reasonable number of images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available.
  17. …counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, be at least 250 words long (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Alternatively, a good article cannot exceed 1000 words. Articles that do so should be nominated for Featured status.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of good status. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{GAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for GA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{GAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Per AgriCorps consensus, nominators are restricted to four nominations on the GAN page at any one time. Once one nomination is removed from the page as either successful or unsuccessful, another can be added.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. Once a nomination has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be AgriCorps votes—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. Alternatively, if a nomination receives a total of five AgriCorps/Inquisitorius votes—three of which must be AgriCorps votes—with no outstanding objections before one week has passed, the nomination will be considered successful.
  5. The article is placed on the Good article list.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 2 weeks.


Good article nominations

To nominate an article for Good article status, place the {{GAnom}} template on the top of the article and then follow the instructions above. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above. If an article has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be an AgriCorps vote—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. For complete instructions on archiving nominations please see here.

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Escape from Darth Vader

  • Nominated by: ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:30, December 8, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I have been working hard on this one and I think it's ready to go. I've got plot summary, plenty of background info, images, etc. The only thing I'm slightly unsure about is the source in the development. I know Wookieepedia isn't normally a source, but I think in this case it's acceptable because it's referencing the page history simply to prove that the Amazon link is a match; that it proves that the same link that existed then exists now. ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:30, December 8, 2014 (UTC)

(2 ACs/4 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Brandon Rhea(talk) 16:48, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
  2. 501st dogma(talk) 00:59, February 4, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Looks good! Manoof (talk) 11:41, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
  4. ACvote IFYLOFD (Talk) 19:20, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:38, April 15, 2015 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Winterz (talk) 03:09, April 19, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Brandon

  • Right off the bat - the sections were in the wrong order. I fixed it, but please keep the Out of Universe Layout Guide for published narrative works in mind in the future.
  • Is there no information anywhere about the creation/development of this book? No author interviews or tweets or anything? The development section, as it currently stands, is all about the release. Obviously if that's all there is then that's fine.
  • Are there no reviews from significant sources that you can use for a reception section?
  • Also, Wookieepedia is definitely not a source in this context. For all we know, that information was wrong. That will need to either be sourced or removed.
  • More later, if I find anything. Brandon Rhea(talk) 23:58, December 8, 2014 (UTC)
    • Regarding point 1: I was actually using an existing good article for a book as a model for the order of the sections. It would seem that one then has them out of order. I'll have to go back and fix that one later, but thank you for fixing this one. Regarding point 2, given its being a somewhat minor children's book, I wouldn't be surprised if there aren't, but I'll research this one and report back here. Regarding point 3 - good idea. I'll add that. As for the last point, hmm. Okay. This is going to take some digging, but I'll try to find something with a date attached to it regarding the book going that far back. I'll try to take care of all of this tomorrow. In the meantime, any other objections or thoughts from anyone else are welcome. ProfessorTofty (talk) 01:31, December 9, 2014 (UTC)
      • Thanks. Remember, when it comes to things like what I mentioned in the first point, your first stop to figure out how it should be are Wookieepedia policies, not existing articles. They may have been written before policies were updated/created, issues may have been missed, etc. Existing status articles are a good guide for new nominations, and I’ve used then myself, but the policies trump existing status article in regards to how you should do it. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 01:51, December 9, 2014 (UTC)
        • Yeah, I'll definitely make sure to do that in the future. Okay, point 2: there is nothing. Nothing. Michael Siglain has a Twitter, but started in May of this year and says nothing on about this book. Neither does Roux on hers. I couldn't find anything else, anywhere, whatsoever. Point 3: Reception section added. Point 4: Ee. This really stings, but again, there's nothing. I couldn't grab anything off of Internet Archive and I couldn't find anything else anywhere that proves that that listing was there at that time. Information removed. ProfessorTofty (talk) 20:40, December 9, 2014 (UTC)
  • It should be noted: items in the Appearance section should be listed alphabetically, not by order of appearance. I've fixed the Appearances section to reflect.
  • Also regarding the Appearances section, it seems a bit lacking. You mention in the summary, for example, that the ship is pursued by a Star Destroyer (via a link to the ISD page) but that's not in the Appearances section. Please check through the Appearances section and add anything that's missing.
  • Having not read the book, the plot summary seems light on details. Please expand it to include a more detailed summary of the story. Additionally, can you clarify (on this review page) at what point in A New Hope that the story ends? The publisher's summary, for example, mentions Luke, yet your plot summary doesn't.
  • Your linking was a bit inconsistent; sometimes you'd like to something a few times after it was mentioned, or even not at all. I've fixed this as well. Check out the diffs to see what I did.
  • More later, if I find anything. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 03:00, December 21, 2014 (UTC)
    • Thank you for fixing this.
    • The Appearances section is lacking because the book is small. I've added Imperial-class Star Destroyer, but see more my next bullet-point. I will also check the book again just to be absolutely sure, but I really doubt I missed much of anything else. It may have to wait a day or two, though, because I checked it out from the library and I'll have to get it back from there.
    • Having read the book, the plot summary is light on details because the book is light on details. Visit the links and check out the preview pages; you'll see that each page has at most two sentences; some have less than one sentence. If I added anymore detail, I might as well just reprint the content of the book. The story ends with R2 and C-3 landing on Tatooine, followed by a page that presents several of the characters as illustrations, simply as a way of saying "here's what's coming next in the story." The bit about them "meeting Luke" is publisher puffery - that doesn't happen in this book.
    • Thank you for fixing that also! Not sure why I didn't notice that myself, but I checked over your edits. ProfessorTofty (talk) 15:37, December 21, 2014 (UTC)
      • Plot summary updated with a few additional details. I don't think I can do anymore than that without basically just plagiarizing the book. Appearances updated, mainly just starship classification and a couple of other miscellaneous items. Two other Appearance items considered but rejected due to being unable establish notability - "Binary star" and "Cloak." ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:03, December 30, 2014 (UTC)
501st
  • I'm assuming the book doesn't mention Devastator by name, but it should be pipelinked to in the body. Also, it should be added to the Appearances section.
    • You're right, it doesn't mention it by name. I've added it to the Appearances, but I'm not sure how can work it into the body and pipelink it. Should I just mention it by name in the body? ProfessorTofty (talk) 01:59, January 23, 2015 (UTC)
      • Yeah, that would work.
  • You'll need to find somewhere in the body to add that it is 32 pages long, as that is infobox exclusive info right now. I'd place it in the Development section. Author, cover artist and illustrator also needs to be mentioned in the body, preferably in the Development.
    • Okay, that's all done. Cover artist is the same as the illustrator, do I need to mention that specifically, or will just saying that Roux illustrated it do? ProfessorTofty (talk) 01:59, January 23, 2015 (UTC)
      • That'll do just fine.
  • That last part of the Continuity section will have to be sourced.
    • Is it okay now? I just took the Amazon links to the two titles and placed them both at the end. ProfessorTofty (talk) 01:59, January 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • I'd recommend sourcing the article to itself, like here, just so that you can fully source the article. It helps show what info is from what, and avoids the ambiguity currently present when you don't source a section, making the reader wonder if it's from the book, or someone forgot to source it. 501st dogma(talk) 22:04, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
    • So would simply source it as The Rebellion Begins? And should that be at the end of the Plot summary section? ProfessorTofty (talk) 01:59, January 23, 2015 (UTC)
      • Not sure what you mean by the Rebellion Begins, but just source all facts that come directly from the book (i.e plot) to Escape from Darth Vader. 501st dogma(talk) 02:58, January 23, 2015 (UTC)
        • Haha, I had The Rebellion Begins on the brain because I'd been addinga lot of Appearance information to it. Anyway, that's now done. The book itself is referenced at the end of the Plot summary section. ProfessorTofty (talk) 03:44, January 23, 2015 (UTC)
          • Timeline, ISBN, and series fields in the infobox can probably be sourced to itself as well. 501st dogma(talk) 17:45, February 3, 2015 (UTC)
            • Timeline and series done. ISBN cannot be done, on this or any other page. Attempting to do so breaks the infobox. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:09, February 4, 2015 (UTC)
Floyd
  • There are some things in the intro that require context: for instance, the Tantive IV, the Star Destroyer (which I would name) and the two droids.
    • Added material to give context. Alright now? ProfessorTofty (talk) 17:58, March 17, 2015 (UTC)
  • C-3PO and R2D2 must keep Darth Vader from discovering the Rebels' secret plans!" Is R2D2 written this way in the actual summary?
  • I'd also toss a mention of the author into the intro. IFYLOFD (Talk) 04:32, March 16, 2015 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • I've not reviewed many out of universe articles but should the Battle of Yavin timeframe be infobox exclusive? Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:42, April 4, 2015 (UTC)
    • You know, I'm not really sure. Perhaps precedent would be helpful in this case, but I don't know off-hand of any other good or featured articles for books like this. However, I did add a line at the end of the plot summary regarding the book's events being part of ones key to the future of the Alliance, and linked to the Galactic Civil War. How's that? ProfessorTofty (talk) 01:53, April 8, 2015 (UTC)
      • I still think a direct mention of the Battle of Yavin in the body somewhere might be better. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:38, April 15, 2015 (UTC)
        • Okay, I added a direct mention in there at the end. ProfessorTofty (talk) 02:02, April 19, 2015 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • All external link referencing requires the use of Cite web. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:45, July 21, 2015 (UTC)
    • All such links updated to use that, with the exception of one that was changed to an Amazon link. Also made a couple of other tweaks based on developments since this was last reviewed. ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:58, July 22, 2015 (UTC)
      • That's how you use Cite web. All possible fields should be filled in. The instructions are on the template page. Please read them. Additional issue: There's no reason why reference 9 should be a separate citation. Just incorporate it into reference 1. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 04:22, July 30, 2015 (UTC)
  • The Bibliography is meant for officially licensed sources from Lucasfilm and its licensees. Links to Amazon and other bookseller sites belong in the External links section. We don't really have a set practice for this since very few OOU book articles have been taken to status, but there's really no reason to list all of these bookseller sites. I would suggest listing Amazon only, unless you're citing one of the other websites in the article someplace. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 04:22, July 30, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • I will say that it might be worth going through the book and adding every appearance, there's a lot of things on wookieepedia that might not occur to you. For example, if an imperial officer is pictured, you can link to Imperial officer's tunic/Canon, Imperial officer's uniform/Canon, Hat/Canon and Boot/Canon (since Durasteel-toed boots are not canon) to name a few. If the binary star was pictured only, you can always add the {{Po}} tag :) Manoof (talk) 20:03, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
    • That's not a bad idea. Might be worth one more look through to make sure that anything minor like that hasn't been overlooked. I'll check it out ASAP. Still can't do "binary star" though, unless that term is used somewhere in canon that I don't know about. That's the reason I didn't include it before, because as far as I know it doesn't qualify for a canon article. ProfessorTofty (talk) 22:49, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
      • I have another copy of the book waiting for me at the library and will check it out sometime this week and do a final once-over to make sure there isn't anything missed that could be in Appearances. ProfessorTofty (talk) 03:26, March 2, 2015 (UTC)


Porg

  • Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 16:39, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Been awhile since a GAnom. This is Porg, another poster child for Families Rallying Against Katarn. See comments.

(0 ACs/3 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. 501st dogma(talk) 01:14, April 9, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Sorry, thought I had struck and voted already! ^^' Manoof (talk) 10:19, May 4, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:45, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  4. - AV-6R7 (talk) 02:05, July 27, 2015 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • Intro: " the droid information broker hired Porg ..." There is only one true droid information broker..... he is so infamous he goes by no name.....
    • Wow. I can't believe I missed that. The Droid With No Name has since been named in that sentence. Damn, what an oversight on my part. I'm gonna cry in a corner now. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 02:21, April 2, 2015 (UTC)
  • You can't source the date in the infobox just to ERC, as that does not mention him dying. You'll need a double reference here, one from the source and one from ERC (i.e [1][2])
    • I think you mean the TNEC? So it should look like: 5 ABY,[RA][NEC] Nar Shaddaa[RA]? --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 02:21, April 2, 2015 (UTC)
      • You know you are using ERC to source a lot when... 501st dogma(talk) 02:38, April 2, 2015 (UTC)
  • "...lest Katarn agree to a demand of the droid's." Wait, the droid info broker of no name doesn't want Katarn agreeing with his demand? That doesn't make sense given the following sentence.
    • Am I using 'lest' wrong? 8t88 does want Katarn to decode the disc, but if Katarn doesn't, he gets killed. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 02:21, April 2, 2015 (UTC)
      • It should be "lest Katarn not agree." 8t88's is planning for contingencies here.
        • I changed it, but somehow I'm still not making the proper connections to understand this. I scratching my head until it bleeds. Wouldn't it be like "8t88 will double cross Katarn if Katarn does not do 8t88's command?" --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 03:00, April 2, 2015 (UTC)
  • "Porg chose a poor moment to rejoin the fight, and was killed when he got up into crossfire." Waking up and seating up when in sewage is pretty involuntary, so I don't think this tells us much about his character, and can be cut.
  • In the future, note that Sources should just have TCSWE linked, and not the CSWECite, as that is intended for use in referencing. 501st dogma(talk) 02:02, April 2, 2015 (UTC)
  • You're going to have to reload your infobox. 501st dogma(talk) 20:16, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
Manoof
  • "former Rebel Alliance affiliated agent Kyle Katarn" and later "the former agent." both should be clarified—are you saying he used to be a rebel alliance, used to be an agent, used to be an RL agent? The second part makes it seem he is no longer an agent at all, but could also be construed that you are using it as former/latter. Manoof (talk) 08:19, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
    • Sorry, it seems it's bit inconsistent. The novella, as we know, is called Rebel Agent. At the end of Soldier of the Empire and throughout Dark Forces, Kyle is a Rebel Alliance Agent/Mercenary (Again, inconsistent terminology from both the games and the book). In Rebel Agent, it seems to imply (Or even state, think), that Kyle really is no longer affiliated on a technical level, but Mon Mothma still keeps tabs on him. The Nar Shaddaa mission is also mentioned in the audio drama as being a personal mission on the New Republic's time. I think the book even says he is a "former agent," yet still switched between referring to him as either an agent or a rebel (Cuz Rebel Agent, get it?). Due to the fact that Kyle isn't actually working on the behalf of the New Republic on the Dark Jedi matter (According to the novella, game, and audio drama; Mothma pretty much tells Jan Ors to let Kyle do whatever the hell he wants while the NR goes to mess with non Valley of the Jedi related things. Note that Mon, Luke, and Leia discuss getting involved, but then they decide to just let and Kyle and Jan blow sh*t up). So, uh, um... Where was I going... Oh, yah—I refer to Kyle as a former agent during this time as he isn't working for the New Republic technically, and if I refer to him as an agent otherwise, it's just so I don't have to keep calling him Katarn every-time (And to a lesser extent, because the book does it). I hope that clarifies. Or maybe it muddles it up further. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 17:54, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
      • Definitely muggled. I mean muddled :P Maybe get rid of the word "affiliated", it'll flow better. Manoof (talk) 07:42, April 9, 2015 (UTC)
  • Not sure what you mean by "less Katarn not agree to a demand of the droid's". Should less be lest, does this need to be reworded? Manoof (talk) 08:19, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
    • That's supposed to be lest, and it's been changed. It's a leftover from one of my objections. 501st dogma(talk) 16:28, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
  • Please combine the sentences "However, predicting that Katarn may not comply, 8t88 hired a variety of bounty hunters and mercenaries to serve as backup. 8t88 hired Porg, among others." Manoof (talk) 08:19, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
  • It seems like Kyle intentionally shot 8t88's arm off. Was he trying to stop the droid or kill him? Manoof (talk) 08:19, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
    • In the game and novella, Kyle just sort of starts shooting at him, and apparently gets lucky by shooting the arm the disc was carrying. My guess is that he was actively trying to kill, though in the audio drama 8t88 seems to go "Nanana! You can't get me!" and Kyle non-chalantly shoots his arm off, seemingly on purpose, as opposed to a random barrage of fire. Either way, since shooting 88's arm off had little to do with Porg, I wasn't/am not sure if the detail really matters. I figured that what we need to know is that either way, Kyle shot the droid's arm off and went after it, as it carried the disc. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 17:54, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
      • Maybe mention they got in a shootout or something to make it clear Kyle didn't track him down and shoot his arm off. Manoof (talk) 07:42, April 9, 2015 (UTC)
  • I swapped your appearances—they should be in IU chronological order. Since he appeared in both sources (rather than mentioned), the novella, which had the 1st tag, would be first. I MAY be incorrect with this, but that is my interpretation from the Layout Guide—Appearances. Manoof (talk) 08:19, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
    • I'll double check, but I believe the reason for this was that the audio drama actually begins before the novella does. If I'm not mistaken, whatever has the earlier start date goes first. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 17:37, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
      • Ah ok, that would be correct if that's the case. 1st tag would go on the first published. Both articles say they were published on the same day, if that is the case I'd prefer it on the appearance which occurs 1st chronologically. Manoof (talk) 07:42, April 9, 2015 (UTC)
        • I didn't notice those dates, actually. In that case, I think it goes down as {{1st| Simultaneously with etc...}}. I find it odd they would have the same day release, but maybe it isn't. I think I'll dig that up, if possible. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 15:15, April 9, 2015 (UTC)
          • That sounds like a grand plan! I await your results on the investigation! :D Manoof (talk) 07:43, April 10, 2015 (UTC)
            • So. the Dark Horse site lists the publications dates for all of the novellas, both in Hardcover and Softcover formats. Naturally, we'll go with the Hardcover date as it was first. Unfortunately, the Publisher for the audio dramas, HighBridge Audio, only lists the pub date of the Dark Forces: The Collector's Trilogy audio drama (All three audio dramas) as 8/18/1998. The individual CDs have the original publishing years printed on them (Soldier of the Empire - 1997; Rebel Agent - 1998; etc). The website does not list the individual release dates, however, and as such the CD's don't have the exact dates, either. So I got one date, and I'll keep searching for the individual dates, as now I'm curious. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 03:45, April 15, 2015 (UTC)
              • Hmmm ok. And did the audio drama start at an earlier IU time than the novella? It could render this issue moot :P Manoof (talk) 05:14, April 15, 2015 (UTC)
                • The audio drama starts earlier, in universe. (The novella starts with Morgan Katarn finding the planet Ruusan. The audio drama begins with an Imperial attack that led Katarn and others to Ruusan) --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 17:39, April 15, 2015 (UTC)
  • After emailing High Bridge, I got a list of published works from them, both in and out of print. Unfortunately, the list I was provided only contained a date for the Collector's Trilogy. I't s possible that I was provided a list of products released on CD, as opposed to anything released on a tape (As that's how the individual dramas were released). --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 20:14, April 24, 2015 (UTC)

Ayrehead

  • What exactly is the relationship between the Aqualish and Porg? In the intro you say they're partners but in the body it sounds more like he's a separate hunter who walks in on the fight and joins in. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:06, July 1, 2015 (UTC)
    • They seem to know each other (as evidence of the body quote), but I'm using 'partners' a bit loosely. They may have not been partners in the literal sense, but they were both gunning for Katarn. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 19:46, July 4, 2015 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Does the source actually state that Porg "considered himself an honorable warrior," or is this something you're extrapolating from the dialogue between he and Katarn? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:30, July 23, 2015 (UTC)
    • It seems I did. The text itself doesn't actually mention anything about honor, and conversely the audio drama doesn't bring up the word warrior. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 02:21, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
      • It's been my experience in the several nominations of yours that I've reviewed that this is something that you are especially prone to. You have a bad habit of extrapolating source material to create claims that aren't supported by the text. By far, the worst example of this I've come across is Dud Bolt. That article is just riddled top to bottom with poor and incorrect extrapolation of source material. Although this is ancillary to Porg, I bring it up here since we're on the subject. If you ever have plans to retry your hand at Dud Bolt, I don't think it would be unfair to suggest to you that you go back and rewrite nearly that entire article with a new eye for this type of extrapolation. Rule of thumb here: Unless a source explicitly says something, you shouldn't be saying it yourself. Now that being said, do the sources actually say that Porg considered himself a warrior or that he was proud of the manner in which he wielded his ax? This sounds suspect to me as well. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:29, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
        • "The Trandoshan was proud of the manner in which he had disarmed his opponent on the upswing [...] Now, that's the way of the warrior!" Page 56. I apologize for that. It usually looks and sound accurate when I write it, and then I think nothing of it later until it's pointed out, I look at it again, and realize I was wrong the first time. So I don't know. I seem to percieve things incorrectly. Something I still have to work on, it seems. I didn't realize it was such a problem in Dud Bolt, though. It'll probably have to be redone, indeed. Looking at this, I realize the "Warrior" phrase seems sort of indirect. But I'm not sure. However, the phrase comes from Porg's point of view. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 02:54, July 30, 2015 (UTC)
          • Ok, I would suggest wording it something along the lines of "Porg was proud of the manner in which he wielded his ax to disarm Katarn (or whoever it is, I can't remember), a feat he considered to be exemplary of a warrior." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 03:15, July 30, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Most of the quotes come from the Dark Forces: Rebel Agent audio drama, which means that the punctuation is all guesswork, based on a character's pausing and voice inflections. Also, I've added The Essential Reader's Companion as a source under a suggestion I had from Unidentified Gran (Rimmer's Rest cantina), which mentions that 8t88 had hired bounty hunters. This article is roughly 10 or so words under Featured Article eligibility, so if it goes over it will have to be moved, most likely. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 16:39, March 20, 2015 (UTC)

I also noticed there's several other article with similar sounding names to this one, like Porgo Goo and Porgrak. Would any kind of disambiguation be necessary for either this nomination or just in general? --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 03:02, June 7, 2015 (UTC)


Voroos

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:53, May 1, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: And another

(1 ACs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. 501st dogma(talk) 23:00, May 6, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 21:40, May 31, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Manoof (talk) 05:41, July 30, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Exiled Jedi
  • Initial objection: Please expand the introduction.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 13:45, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
  • I see a contraction in the introduction. Please look through the article and remove any contractions.
  • Why is it in the Creatures of unspecified diet category?
  • With the information about the voroos being found on different habitats on multiple planets, I think you can have a short "Voroos in the galaxy section" in addition to the information already in the article. The only part you should remove that is already present is the mention of being found on multiple planets in the behavior section. It should also briefly note the Zoologists' theory about the voroos and palaks.
  • The layout guide says that reproductive characteristics should be covered in the behavior section.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 13:45, May 16, 2015 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Image quality is pretty crappy. If you can't upload a better version, I would suggest asking Darth Culator to clean this version up for you. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:58, July 23, 2015 (UTC)
    • I tried finding a cleaner version and messing around with it myself but to no available, so I'll leave Culator a message. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:03, July 30, 2015 (UTC)
      • Scratch that I'll talk to him next time we're both on IRC. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:05, July 30, 2015 (UTC)
Attack of the Clone
  • What is the singular form of "voroos"? Depending on what it is, your use of "voroos reproduction" needs to either be formatted as "voroos's reproduction" (to preserve the plural form) or "a [singular]'s reproduction." If the singular form isn't known, I would recommend going with the first formatting.
    • They are always referred to as voroos so changed as you suggested. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:03, July 30, 2015 (UTC)
  • "the voroos had large maws relative to the rest of their body"" this needs to be adjusted a bit, since it's not immediately clear that "relative" is intended to apply to "large"—i.e., it should say something like, "the maws were large relative to…"
  • As a note, beetle is a disambiguation page and should not be linked within any IU section of an article, so I've removed the link. CC7567 (talk) 20:41, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • The infobox mentions the average length as 1-10 meters. Since average is a specific number, rather than a range, can this be changed to 5 meters, or the infobox be changed to simply say length? Manoof (talk) 05:48, July 21, 2015 (UTC)
    • I'd rather avoid putting 5 as we aren't given it as an average by any source. I think we'd need to hold a CT or at least check with others before changing the information box. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:03, July 30, 2015 (UTC)


Bug One (droid)

  • Nominated by: 501st dogma(talk) 14:28, June 17, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A change of topic from TNJO. Note that I've asked around and there doesn't seem to be a way to get rid of the extra quotation marks after [thermal detonator explodes] in the Characteristics.

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:08, July 30, 2015 (UTC)

Object

INTENSIFYFORWURDFIRAHPOWAH
  • "Bug One was a masculine programmed YVH-Series bugcruncher battle droid that participated on the side of the New Jedi Order in the Battle of Kr in 35 ABY during the Dark Nest Crisis." Could you please simplify this full-mouth of a sentence? Do you really need all of the Kr context, as an example? The double "in" is painful to read.
    • Axed the 35 ABY part and the Battle of Kr part.
  • "former smuggler" I'd avoid mentioning "former" here. Instead, does he have a rank around this time? Or anything he's going by? Keep it consistent with the era.
    • It looks like he doesn't have a rank, but the character list at the beginning of Joiner King has him as captain (of thew Falcon), so I'll use that.
  • Instead of repeating the same information twice—the Kr mission—can you begin by saying he accompanied Han right off the bat? We shouldn't have to wait another sentence to see why he participated in the battle.
    • It should work now.
  • Wait, are the Kliniks attacking? What is Gorog? I thought that was a nest? I think your prepositions are throwing me off.
    • The Gorog are a nest of Killiks, but Killiks of the nest are refereed to as the Gorog. I've added "Gorog Killiks" once in the body and the intro, before I segway into using Gorog of that helps at all.
  • "In the zero-gravity conditions of the ethmane corridors on Kr" What?
    • There's zero-g in the corridors of Kr. Which had ethmane corridors.....
  • If he was produced by 35 ABY, the infobox should reflect this information. Are you sure by 35 ABY? Or is this an assumption based on the source material?
    • Nope, just missed putting it in the birth field.
  • Check your grammar following "at the time" in the history section.
    • Changed between to involving, as it was hard to word that the Jedi and the New Republic weren't fighting each other.
  • "That year," What year? "By the year" means by it, not during it.
    • It works out since 35 ABY was the last year mentioned in the text, which indicates that "that year" means 35 ABY.
  • The "former smuggler" issue is present in the history section as well
    • Fixed as per above
  • "Tendrando Arms loaned the former smuggler Han Solo Bug One and three other YVH-Series bugcruncher battle droids titled Bug Two through Four." Dogma, you have a grammatical listing issue. Please be aware when you should use commas, not to use commas, or when to use semi-colons. I'm not going to SoFixIt. There's two cases of poor listing in the first few sentences of the history section.
    • added a comma.
  • "Specifically programmed to Solo's specifications," Elaborate.
    • That's all I get from the book.
  • " and a team of four Jedi Knights in the freighter Millennium Falcon" This reads as if they are in the Falcon, while Han and Leia aren't. I'm assuming they're all in the Falcon?
    • Added another comma to clarify.
  • What is this "Colony?" Is that the nest?
    • The Colony is all the nests of Killiks.
  • In the beginning of the intro, and history, you led us to believe that they're going to Kr. You threw me off when you mentioned Qoribu. You need to clarify that Kr is a moon of Qoribu. I thought it was a planet. Furthermore, let me ask you this: When they decide to leave, what's their destination? The moon or Qoribu? These are the questions that need to be answered in the prose. It doesn't matter if you know, your readers might not know, Dogma.
    • I've already clarified that Kr is a moon in both the body and the intro. I also explain that Qoribu is the world which Kr orbits as soon as Qoribu is introduced. I've clarified earlier now that Kr is the moon of Qoribu, but all of the information was already there to be read. Kr was always there destination.
  • "the Millennium Falcon took Bug One and the other members of the team down a hangar shaft in Kr's ethmane jungles to the location of the Gorog nest to rescue Jedi Master Luke Skywalker and his wife Mara Jade, who were fighting Killiks in the nest." Please carefully reread this and try to find a way to simplify your wording. Also, who's flying the Falcon? Please mention this prior to its descent.
    • Who's flying the Falcon is not really relevant to an article about Bug One, as Bug One really only appears once he exits the ship at the bottom of the hangar. I've tweaked the sentence you're having trouble with a bit.
  • "In the hangar at the end of the tunnel" What?
    • There's a hangar at the end of the shaft/tunnel....
  • "Bug One and the other YVHs disembarked from the freighter first into the hangar's zero-gravity condition, before the team ventured into the nest's maze of ethmane tunnels using thrusters or the Force to propel themselves." You need to take this event-by-event. Avoid "before" here.
      • I don't see why before is an issue here. Bug One and his compatriots disembark from the the freighter ahead of the rest of the team, before the whole team moves onward. I've axed the "first" part if that helps to clarify that they disembarked ahead of the others.
    • Why did they go into the zero-g area first?
    • Why did they later venture into the nest's maze?
    • Why/how are they using the Force?
      • Clarified that the entire corridor network has zero-g, and that only the Jedi were using the Force.
  • "Before long," Use a different transition here. I can't help you out, seeing that you have a "before" issue in the previous sentence.
    • There's nothing wrong with using "Before long." It essentially means that not much time was taken for the Gorogs to attack them.
  • "Bug One engaged the first of the Gorog they found in the tunnel." "they" doesn't work here, as you didn't mention the team. I think once you take care of the major issues—i.e, venture into the nest's maze—it would take care of the problem. I honestly don't know what's going on, dogma. Either you're taking too many short cuts with your writing or leaving information out. Details matter. Mind you, I'm not asking for play-by-play information, just clarified order of events.
    • Clarifying above objections should have fixed this.
  • "the Gorog came at the rescue team in a relentless swarm despite their losses" So they attacked, then? I would say that.
      • I say Bug One engaged them earlier, so it's pretty clear they are being attacked.
    • Also what losses?
      • Losses were to the Gorog, and I've moved it earlier in the sentence to clarify.
    • Who damaged Bug One? How did this happen?
      • The Gorog damaged him, and I don't get specifics.
  • "Seeing that only using blasters and lightsabers would not get them through the swarm to Skywalker and Jade," I don't understand what you mean by this. I think it's because I have no idea where Luke and Mara Jade are at. Who's using a blaster? The droids? What about the lightsaber?
    • There - Jedi are using lightsabers, but I'm pretty sure the reader could have implied that already.
  • You have to mention "despite the fragility of the ice-like tunnels they were currently in" earlier.
    • Sure.
  • "However, at the head of the team, Bug One was met by a fierce counterattack from the Gorog at a corner in the tunnels, and a barrage from the electrobolt assault rifles used by the Killiks sent a disabled Bug One spinning into a wall, and an armed detonator from his grenade launcher floating near the team" Huh?
    • There is nothing wrong with this. He's in zero-g. Gets hit. Hits wall. Detonator floats loose.
  • " Before the detonator could go off," I don't think "could" sounds right here. Before the detonator exploded?
    • "Before the detonator could go off" = "Before the detonator could explode" = "Before the detonator exploded." Same thing.
  • "the Jedi of the team" Who?
    • I mention the Jedi of the team way earlier in the article.
  • "and the rescue team went on to relieve the Skywalkers who were fighting farther ahead in the tunnels" Please mention this earlier. It's critical to know their exact location.
    • It isn't actually. All the reader needs to know is that the Bug One and the team are trying to find them in the tunnels, fight through the Gorog, and eventually locate them and meet up with them.
  • "Considered a fourth-degree droid[2] because he was a YVH 5-S Bugcruncher battle droid" Perhaps saying "Since Bug One was a YBH[...], he was considered a..." would be better. Play around with it.
    • There is zero difference between those two sentences.
  • "space chassis" Actually, now that you mentioned this, I have no idea how big Bug One is. I think it'll be better to describe his look and features in the beginning of the Characteristics section to avoid confusion.
    • The YVH-1 is 1.9 meters, but I don't have the height for any other YVH models, though they all are around Human size if you want me to describe Bug One as such.
  • Mention all of his weaponry—also does he use the Force?
    • I'm not sure what made you think he used the force, but I managed to find a reference that the YVH's did indeed use blaster cannons, so it's been added.
  • "and voice of Tendrando Arm's creator Lando Calrissian that all YVH battle droids had" Do you think this is worth mentioning in the history section? If not, I would rephrase this entire sentence. Start by describing the droid, as I said above, and then go into his voice. Save the personality bits for last in the Characteristics section.
    • The voice part isn't worth mentioning. Additionally, there are no personality bits to describe, as all the characteristics section is describing what the droid had/was made of, facts that are true for all of the other Bugcrunchers.
  • Dogma, this article is poorly written. Please take the time to carefully read these objections and reread the article. You need to include important details. Take your time. There's no rush. You're not in the Indy 500, and you're not doing a Menkooroo Barn burner. You're writing a professional quality article. The chronological order, in which the events took place, is messy. Keep the focus on Bug One—everything should be seen from his pov. You literally lost me once you began to explain the jumbled events on Kr. JangFett (Talk) 00:40, July 4, 2015 (UTC)
    • I do appreciate your review, and you do have good points for some of the objections. However, some of the points feel like they were a stretch. 501st dogma(talk) 00:14, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Preliminary objection: I'd like to suggest moving this article to "Bug One (droid)" instead. Since there is no other competing article that would require further disambiguation, the "YVH" part is unnecessary. The simpler the article title, the better. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:56, July 24, 2015 (UTC)
    • Yep, sounds correct. Moved. 501st dogma(talk) 17:17, July 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • Second: Characters get Biographies, not Histories. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:36, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
    • Yep again. Been writing too many ship noms. 501st dogma(talk) 17:52, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
  • For articles like this and your YVH 24-S nom and any other articles like it you may write, instead of just using the plain Scavenger's Guide to Droids as a reference, it's better that you write out a reference note fully explaining how that source works in relation to this character, since this character isn't mentioned in that book. Something like "According to Dark Nest I: The Joiner King, Bug One is a YVH-Series battle droid, which Scavenger's Guide to Droids designates as a fourth-degree droid." would do. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:09, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
    • There, added. 501st dogma(talk) 19:19, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
  • Again, going along with the previous objection, the Star by Star reference should utilize a manual reference note to explain how this citation is used in relation to this article subject, since Bug One is not mentioned in that source. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:22, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
    • There we go. 501st dogma(talk) 20:45, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
  • Do sources ever use the word "bugcruncher" not capitalized like this? If "Bugcruncher," capitalized, is part of the droid series' name, then you shouldn't be using the term lowercase on your own without precedent in source material: "Bug One was a masculine programmed YVH-Series bugcruncher battle droid" Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:10, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
    • Joiner King and Swarm War both use bugcruncher decapitalised when they don't use the full model name, so it should be fine. 501st dogma(talk) 14:39, July 29, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • Regarding the extra quotation mark at the end, removed by adding "trans=1" to the template parameters. "trans=1" removes the quotation mark from the end, and "noquote=1" removes it from the start. :) grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 16:44, June 17, 2015 (UTC)
    • Thank you kindly :) 501st dogma(talk) 18:11, June 17, 2015 (UTC)


Drua

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Having read the book recently, it seems like everything's here. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:39, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Always good to see new canon articles! Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:29, June 27, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Ecks Dee
  • We don't source the introduction.
    • Oops, leftover from before I added the biography. Removed.Squishy Vic | message 12:06, June 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • Please go through the article and correct any "invisible" formatting inconsistencies:
  • Even though I understand what you mean, your first image caption sounds like it's speculating. Try rewording it (and the prose mention as well) to better emphasize that the village was built by slaves AND refugees, not slaves OR refugees.
  • Please try to cut down on your usage of emdashes. 1358 (Talk) 11:52, June 23, 2015 (UTC)
    • Any particular area and reason? Squishy Vic | message 12:06, June 23, 2015 (UTC)
      • Cut down to only 3 in the whole article, 1 in the intro and 2 in the biography somewhere. Squishy Vic | message 05:13, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • In the P&T section you should specify that she looked of an adolescent age at the time of her death or at the time she met Vader or something. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:20, June 27, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Xexto/Canon

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 07:49, June 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: It's amazing what you can find when your not looking for it. For example: the entire population of Troiken loves slingshots.

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Squishy Vic | message 22:50, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 23:01, July 1, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Vic
  • I did minor cleanup but the remainder of the BTS lacks sourcing, this needs to be added for the tidbit about the concept and skeletal design and implementation mentioned in that section. Squishy Vic | message 19:42, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
    • Couldn't find source for portion that I deleted, sourced other part. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:43, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Attack of the Clone
  • A couple preliminaries. First of all, an intro of two sentences is way too short for an article of this length. I'd advise expanding it to at least four to five sentences.
  • Have you checked every single Encyclopedia and Databank entry for mentions or depictions of the Xexto? At the very least, sources that picture the species should be included with {{Po}}, as is the case with some of the Encyclopedia entries already listed.
    • Anything listed on the page is what I could find. - AV-6R7 (talk) 20:57, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
  • At a glance, I'm already noticing several subjects within the article that are missing links, including Alien/Canon and Mouth/Canon. Please go through the article again and carefully check for missing links. CC7567 (talk) 21:19, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
  • Pipelinks need to be capitalized, e.g. [[Species/Canon|species]] instead of [[species/Canon|species]].</s> Normally this is a {{Sofixit}}-level objection, but seeing as I've already objected to this for one of your previous articles, please fix it throughout the article. I'd also encourage you to review the Evazan GAN to see if any other of those objections would apply here.
  • TPM doesn't identify the species by name, so you need to use {{1stID}} to specify which source does. CC7567 (talk) 03:23, July 29, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • I can tell just by looking at the Gasgano/Canon article's sourcelist alone that this article does not have a complete sourcelist. Though unfortunately those Encyclopedia pages are outdated, I'd recommend to do a more thorough check of the current Databank pages. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:56, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
    • I added the ones I could find to the sources section. Thanks! - AV-6R7Crew Pit 04:09, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • I'd also suggest looking at some TPM creation material such as the insider's guide. Gasgano/Canon also includes some material on the species' conceptual stages, such as several artists who worked on the species. There is a Gasgano maquette, but I have no idea where those names came from. The Insider's Guide, I believe, is still a valid source for behind the scenes material, though I don't think it can be added to the actual sources list. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 21:09, June 29, 2015 (UTC)

If I every acquire the book and find the info, I will put it back in. For now, however, it is unverified information. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:13, June 29, 2015 (UTC)

  • It's verified on Gasgano/Canon, check the notes. Also, the insider's guide is a disc set that only works on Windows 95/98. Pretty cheap, but the issue is compatibility, unfortunately. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 00:45, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
  • I will be taking a temporary hiatus for the next three weeks as I will be in Europe and may not always have a good internet connection. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:10, July 2, 2015 (UTC)


Bloodfin

  • Nominated by: Squishy Vic | message 03:51, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another fun, short article. Really dug doing this one. Squishy Vic | message 03:51, June 24, 2015 (UTC)

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. That appears to be all for now. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 04:39, June 24, 2015 (UTC)

Object

AV-6R7
  • The Encyclopedia equivalents of the Databank entries listed in the sources section should be included in the aforementioned section. Also, I would suggest using the image of the Bloodfin from the Sith speeder SWE entry somewhere in the article. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:57, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
    • Serious question, why is that? I'm assuming SWE is considered canon still given the last date it published/closed (July 1, 2014–post new canon date), yet it gives no new information than the current Databank entries. In fact it gives either the same or less. Obviously I will add them to sources, I just need to know what's the point, since the Databank supersedes SWE anyway. Secondly, the article is not long enough to use a third image, and the canon film images supplement it just fine. I think the SWE image can go in the FC-20 article instead. Squishy Vic | message 04:02, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
      • Just to interject, the Encyclopedia preceded the Databank, and both contain canon material. Whether a specific Encyclopedia entry provides unique information does not change the fact that all relevant Encyclopedia entries need to be listed in the Sources. The Sources list should contain all valid source material, regardless of whether each one contains unique or new info. CC7567 (talk) 04:07, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
        • Cool, I knew it predated it, but I did want to know why we needed it. Thanks. Brandon beat me to adding it anyway, so it's there.Squishy Vic | message 04:10, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
          • Yeah, it probably works better on the FC-20 article. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 04:15, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
            • Yep, added it at FC-20 speeder bike/Canon. Squishy Vic | message 04:16, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
              • I added all the missing sources. Every one of those entries mentions the Speeder in one way or the other. Also, this means that its Databank entry isn't the first instance of it being called the Sith Speeder. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 04:21, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
                • Probe droid actually doesn't, however I've also added the Databank entry as they do contain relevant information to its role/purpose. Squishy Vic | message 04:25, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
                  • I removed the probe droid Databank entry because it wasn't relevant to the Bloodfin itself. The SWE entry, however, mentioned it the relationships section. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 04:46, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • 1st ID will need to be changed to the SWE article. - AV-6R7Crew Pit
    • Done.Squishy Vic | message 04:25, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
      • Also, it was first ID'd as the Bloodfin in Star Wars in 100 Scenes - AV-6R7Crew Pit 04:29, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
        • Thanks, I'll add it. I don't have that book unfortunately. Squishy Vic | message 04:30, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
          • Sorry I keep editing the page, but i'm just fixing some stuff not worth bothering you with. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 04:33, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
            • It's fine, I've fixed BTS/Sources to correct the in 100 scenes reference.Squishy Vic | message 04:34, June 24, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Lesim

(2 ACs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 12:25, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. CC7567 (talk) 21:30, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:13, July 30, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Attack of the Clone
  • The Bio paragraph is rather large and can be split up somewhere. CC7567 (talk) 21:12, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • Note I don't include a page for their AT-AT walker, since it's unclear whether that was Tempest 1 or another walker. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:25, July 20, 2015 (UTC)


Arno (stormtrooper)

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 11:52, July 20, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Comments

  • Note I don't include a page for their AT-AT walker, since it's unclear whether that was Tempest 1 or another walker. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:25, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  • The five stormtroopers being male is based on Luke's thoughts to himself, referring to them as "boys." Perhaps that's not solid enough evidence of all of them being male, as most likely they were in helmets and speaking through a filter. Granted, one of them is referred to as a male, but we can't tell which one is meant to be Arno. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:54, July 20, 2015 (UTC)


Dreed

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:02, July 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:Standard Imperial bad guy

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Unidentified Tetan carbonite smelter (Krath coup)

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 11:06, July 22, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: First GA nom in two years' time.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Unidentified Tetan carbonite smelter (Mandalorian attack)

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Mulako Corporation Primordial Water Quarry

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 22:18, July 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: 20-th anniversary year of Darksaber. 989 words.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Unidentified Rebel commander

  • Nominated by: Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 03:14, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I hate to contribute another unidentified, but I planned to write this guy before I learned his name wasn't really his name.

(2 ACs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote IFYLOFD (Talk) 01:20, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:33, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 01:13, July 30, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Comments

EV-9D9/Canon

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7 (talk) 04:53, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Hopefully life wont get in the way of this char nom.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Cubert

It looks great, except I personally think her affiliation should be marked as the Hutt Clan rather than Jabba's palace. And if so, that should be added to the body somewhere, too. Cheers! Nivlacanator(talk) 20:53, July 25, 2015 (UTC)

  • The reason I changed it to his palace rather that the Clan is that in Ultimate Star Wars, characters affiliated with the clan have that marked in their affiliation box. Eve simply has Jabba's palace as hers. It's the same reason I changed 8D8's affiliation to that. In essence, I personally believe it should be kept the way it currently is since she is affiliated to the palace, and we don't know whether or not the Clan is still intact by that point. - AV-6R7 (talk) 21:02, July 25, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Nal Koska

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote IFYLOFD (Talk) 01:39, July 30, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Floyd
  • "During the Galactic War between the Galactic Republic and the resurgent Sith Empire in the year 3642 BBY, an Imperial Intelligence agent was willing to defect to the Republic on Nal Koska." Sentence is identical in the intro and body. IFYLOFD (Talk) 02:44, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
  • "Nal Koska was first pictured in the entry for the planet Nal Hutta in The Holonet feature of the official website for Star Wars: The Old Republic, a 2011 massively multiplayer online roleplaying game developed by BioWare. Nal Koska was depicted in a schematic of the Y'Toub system." Does it depict the planet itself, or just its orbit? If the latter, I don't think you can really say that it was "pictured." IFYLOFD (Talk) 01:17, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
    • The schematic shows both Nal Koska's orbit and a dot on the orbit that represents Nal Koska. Imperators II(Talk) 07:42, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
      • Ah, OK, missed that. IFYLOFD (Talk) 01:39, July 30, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Deltic

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:39, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: One of my favourite characters from A New Dawn.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Exiled Jedi
  • This article is 1,102 words, which is well over the GAN word limit.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 23:42, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
    • Huh I hadn't realised how long it had gotten, I'll move it to FAN then. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:07, July 30, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

In other languages

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki