FANDOM


       
Good article
nominations
             
GoodIcon

This page is for the nomination of Good articles. A Good article is an article that adheres to certain quality standards but cannot reach Featured status due to its limited content. This page is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like. For a list of Good articles, see Wookieepedia:Good articles.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic if the length of the article supports it. This may not be appropriate on articles with limited content.
  9. …have no redlinks.
  10. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article would be preferred, though not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section.
  11. …ideally include a "Personality and traits" section on all character articles if information is available.
  12. …ideally include a "Powers and abilities" section for Force-sensitive characters and a "Skills and abilities" section for non–Force-sensitive characters, where said powers and/or abilities are stipulated.
  13. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  14. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  15. …counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, be at least 250 words long (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Alternatively, a Good article cannot exceed 1000 words. Articles that do so should be nominated for Featured status.
  16. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, select an article you feel is worthy of Good article status. Your nominated article must meet all sixteen requirements listed above to become a Good article.
  2. Add {{GAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for Good article status previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{GAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Per AgriCorps consensus, non-AgriCorps members are restricted to four nominations on the GAN page at any one time. Once one nomination is removed from the page as either successful or unsuccessful, another may be added.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. Any objections may be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. Once a nomination has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be AgriCorps votes—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. Alternatively, if a nomination receives a total of five AgriCorps/Inquisitorius votes—three of which must be AgriCorps votes—with no outstanding objections before one week has passed, the nomination will be considered successful.
  5. The article is placed on the Good article list.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 2 weeks.


Good article nominations

To nominate an article for Good article status, place the {{GAnom}} template on the top of the article and then follow the instructions above. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above. If an article has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be an AgriCorps vote—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. For complete instructions on archiving nominations, please see here.

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Sith cave

  • Nominated by: TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 06:20, November 5, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: What a great backstory for Darth Vader's castle!

(1 ACs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote You'd better keep an eye out for that "more to come" :P Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:12, November 5, 2017 (UTC)
  2. This is definitely appearing in upcoming issues of the Vader series --Lewisr (talk) 12:55, November 5, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Jinzler (talk) 22:54, January 13, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Toprawa
  • There really isn't enough room for two images in the article body. I would suggest removing the one of Vader's castle. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:00, December 31, 2017 (UTC)
    • I have replaced the image to the behind the scenes section, but feel free to remove it completely if you want. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 05:27, December 31, 2017 (UTC)
      • That should probably be ok. We might play around with the alignment of all the images as we work through this. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:40, December 31, 2017 (UTC)
  • I'm a bit confused by how the article handles Palpatine's quote about Mustafar housing a dark-side locus, which I understood from the application of the lead quote to refer to this Sith cave, and I reworked the intro to reflect this. But after reading the Description section just now, it seems that you have other ideas. Am I wrong to interpret this Sith cave as being this locus? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:44, December 31, 2017 (UTC)
    • I personally thought that the cave is a place that one can use the power of this locus, but it is not the locus itself. Palpatine's this quote made me think it is actually inside the planet and not the cave on its surface: Deep beneath its surface rests a locus for the dark side of the Force. I might be wrong and I can make the necessary changes to the article body if you think so. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 15:14, January 1, 2018 (UTC)
      • I'm comfortable with your interpretation and have replaced the intro back to that wording. However, I would then suggest using a new quote for the intro. The intro quote is meant to be by or about the article subject, so by using this one, it carries the connotation that this locus is the cave itself, when it's not, which ends up being misleading. With this understanding, I think switching the intro and History quotes is probably the way to go, unless there's some other better quote about the cave itself? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:08, January 2, 2018 (UTC)
        • Unfortunately, these two are the only ones about the cave itself. I have switched the two as you suggested, and have added a third quote for the history section. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 04:50, January 3, 2018 (UTC)
  • The article body needs to give a time frame for Vader traveling to Mustafar. The intro properly explains that this takes place shortly after the Empire's formation, but the History section provides no such detail. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:14, January 3, 2018 (UTC)
    • I thought the "newly-christened Sith Lord" and "19 BBY" should suffice for time frame, but I have added that it takes place shortly after the formation of Empire. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 21:47, January 3, 2018 (UTC)
      • Never rely on the assumption that your reader knows anything about Star Wars. You're presuming that just because you call Darth Vader a "newly-christened Sith Lord" that someone is going to automatically be able to tie that to the events of Episode III -- don't. It's our job to provide proper context so that someone who hasn't necessarily seen all there is to see of Star Wars will understand what he's reading. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:03, January 4, 2018 (UTC)
  • Now that you've added the time frame context with regards to the previous objection, look at this sentence: By order of his Master, Darth Sidious, the newly-christened Sith Lord Darth Vader traveled to Mustafar—where he lost his remaining limbs and suffered severe burns all over his body as a result of his duel against his old Jedi master Obi-Wan Kenobi—after he successfully stole a Jedi's lightsaber shortly after the formation of the Galactic Empire in the year 19 BBY. It's long, ponderous, and difficult to read. It would be better to divide this up into at least two shorter, more concise sentences that will be easier to understand. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:03, January 4, 2018 (UTC)
    • I have divided it up into three sentences and included a more specified time frame, please take a look. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 01:07, January 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • Reviewing note: Remember for future reference that there's a distinct difference between a Sith Lord and a Dark Lord of the Sith. Every Dark Lord is a Sith Lord, but not every Sith Lord is a Dark Lord. It's more precise to refer to Sidious and Vader as Dark Lords of the Sith. In article writing, you can still call them "Sith Lord," but make sure to pipelink to "Dark Lord of the Sith."
    • I was not completely aware of their difference in the new continuity. Thank you for letting me know. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 23:32, January 9, 2018 (UTC)
      • Just to be clear, there is no difference between continuities that I can see. The same has always been true: Per Darth Bane's Rule of Two, there are only ever two Dark Lords of the Sith at any one time, but there are others outside of this order who call themselves Sith Lords but are not true Dark Lords. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:35, January 10, 2018 (UTC)
  • Why is this bit necessary for inclusion in this article? It seems completely extraneous, and the section it's in can be understood just as well without it: "After a successful mission on the river moon of Al'doleem..." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:30, January 7, 2018 (UTC)
    • I wanted to reference that Vader indeed stole a Jedi's lightsaber as his master ordered, but I see your point. I have replaced that line with this if you prefer: "After obtaining Jedi Master Kirak Infil'a's lightsaber..." TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 23:32, January 9, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

  • I agree that Darth Vader's castle will definitely be explored in the future, possibly in the new Darth Vader comic book series. But given the current Inquisitorius arc, it will be at least a few month later that they start another arc. It is also unknown if it will directly effect the "Sith cave" article. So the nomination doesn't violate the FA rule #6 about the article being stable. Not that anyone said that, but just in case :) TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 00:09, November 6, 2017 (UTC)


Unidentified long-legged mount

  • Nominated by: TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 04:54, November 9, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another cool thing that was cut from Rogue One.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

  • A mount appears again in Issue 39 of the Star Wars comics --Lewisr (talk) 08:23, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
    • It seems like this thing could appear throughout the Jedha arc. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:38, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
      • It appears that way, I guess rather than say every issue it may be good Anil if you keep an eye out throughout the arc, if you hadn't already planned that! --Lewisr (talk) 18:41, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
        • Yeah, I know that they can appear throughout the entire story arc, and I have already been following the series not just because of this nomination but it is really interesting! Unfortunately, in my country, I am able to buy the comic book issue a day after the US release and I'll sure update the article if anything comes up about the camels. I don't personally believe that there will be any major edits, Pablo Hidalgo even told me that the camels haven't been named yet. Thanks for letting me know anyway! TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 23:02, November 22, 2017 (UTC)


TK-710

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:50, November 12, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: It seems like Stormtrooper designations are the only names that have been getting changes between Legends and Canon.

(0 ACs/3 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Jinzler (talk) 19:43, January 16, 2018 (UTC)
  2. What are the odds of TK-421 and TK-422 being assigned to the same battle station, in front of the same ship? - AV-6R7Crew Pit 23:30, January 16, 2018 (UTC)
  3. Jaewade (talk) 11:04, January 17, 2018 (UTC)

Object

AV
  • Sources like Star Wars Character Encyclopedia: Updated and Expanded confirm that stormtroopers are exclusively human. Please integrate this into the article. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:04, January 3, 2018 (UTC)
    • I thought this had only been confirmed for First Order stormtroopers, thanks for the heads up. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:13, January 3, 2018 (UTC)
      • You're welcome; it was in the old Encyclopedia as well. EDIT: Come to think of it, I think the Character Encyclopedia confirms that TIE pilots, Imperial gunners, etc. are all human, but I don't have it on me. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:31, January 3, 2018 (UTC)
  • Given the Celebration piece's title and the discovery of his corpse, I think it is safe to assume that TK-421 was shot by Han. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:36, January 3, 2018 (UTC)
    • I don't think that assumption should be made, I'd assume both of them were killed so that could be either being shot. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:20, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
  • Do we usually list audiobooks in an article’s appearances section? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:11, January 16, 2018 (UTC)
Jinzler
  • In the year 0 BBY, TK-710 was stationed on-board the Empire's Death Star battle station while it was in the Alderaan system to destroy the planet Alderaan - I feel like this would read a bit better if some additional context was provided on why the Death Star had been sent to destroy Alderaan. Jinzler (talk) 06:54, January 15, 2018 (UTC)
    • How's it look now? Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:50, January 15, 2018 (UTC)
      • I think it's safer to describe Alderaan as "peaceful" rather than "rebellious", since publicly it was a neutral planet plus the fact that only House Organa was suspected treasonous to the Empire, rather than the entirety of Alderaanians. Jaewade (talk) 20:20, January 16, 2018 (UTC)
        • I've changed the wording to Rebel-affiliated, since I still want to specify why this planet specifically was chosen to be an example. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:23, January 16, 2018 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
  • This sentence is a bit of a run-on, can we please split it? "Shortly after the planet's destruction,[3] the YT-1300 light freighter[7] known as the Millennium Falcon was pulled into Docking Bay 327 on board the Death Star by tractor beams, and after the freighter was searched by troopers, TK-710 and his comrade TK-421 were assigned to guard its entry ramp.[3]" 1358 (Talk) 00:16, January 19, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Toos

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:53, November 12, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Nominations are always better when they come in Toos.

(1 ACs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. I could vote just for the pun. Good article! - Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 21:06, November 13, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Awesome. "How are you?" Imperators II(Talk) 10:57, January 6, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Imperators-Too
  • "human" in intro.
    • Ah, a relic of an assumption. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:33, January 6, 2018 (UTC)
  • Can you please confirm for me that Poul was asking why bay 329 was causing a delay, not bay 327? (The latter would make more sense in the context of Slallen's explanation that they could not yet clear the dock, and it would be less at odds with the intro sentence "[...] Poul demanded they have the bay cleared.")
    • It should be 327, corrected. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:33, January 6, 2018 (UTC)
  • Have you considered swapping the Death Star image for something slightly more relevant, say, an image of Detention Block AA-23?
    • How's it look now?
  • "while peering at this monitor" — I'm not sure whether this should be "the monitor" or "that monitor," but it can't be "this monitor," as that doesn't sit well with our past tense requirement.
  • Also, should there be a canon equivalent for this?
    • I question whether we really need either a legends or canon article for that, but made. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:33, January 6, 2018 (UTC)
  • From the quote it would appear that it was Slallen, not Toos, who reported that sensors were down in AA-23. (This concerns both the body and intro.)
  • The body and the intro directly contradict each other on who commanded Toos to contact AA-23.
  • Is "comm" synonymous with "comms"? You use one in the article text but the other in image caption.
    • They both seem to be used by various sources, but I've changed it to "the comm" for consistency here. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:33, January 6, 2018 (UTC)
  • "then appeared for the first time in the short story" — this phrasing conflicts with the {{1st}} tag in Appearances. Instead, it should specify that he was named in the story.
  • I don't suppose there's any info on who voiced the guy in ANH? Imperators II(Talk) 16:19, January 4, 2018 (UTC)
Jinzler
  • In the introduction if could be beneficial if you could provide some reference to the timeframe that events described occurred in, for example noting that they took place in 0 BBY. Jinzler (talk) 22:50, January 17, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Cobb Sonbepol

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:18, November 21, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Ront Brynloo's fellow cantina patron from Celebration

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Jinzler (talk) 19:43, January 16, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Jinzler
  • In the intro the following is stated: Shortly after the local moisture farmer Luke Skywalker and the hermit Obi-Wan Kenobi entered the bar. I feel like this would read better if some brief additional context was provided on why Skywalker and Kenobi had entered the bar. Jinzler (talk) 21:38, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • The biography starts with in the year 0 BBY - this first sentence could be read as reading that Sonbepol was sat in the bar for the whole year. It might be beneficial to revise this, perhaps to say something along the lines of in the year 0 BBY, shortly before the Battle of Yavin, for example, to date the events described to a more specific time in that year. Jinzler (talk) 21:38, January 14, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Unification Wars (Galactic Republic)

  • Nominated by: Jace Onasi (talk) 04:18, November 28, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Imperators II(Talk) 10:43, November 28, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:18, December 28, 2017 (UTC)

Object

  • Reference 4 needs to cite the specific entry that this CSWE information is coming from. It would not be inappropriate to use the CSWECite template within this manual ref note.
  • Also in regards to that ref note, the wars could just have easily taken place in 25,053 BBY. Is there anything that specifically suggests a great time passed between the wars and the Republic's formation? The better way to word this is "by 25,053," which is basically saying "in or before." Please amend this in all appropriate places throughout the article. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:09, December 31, 2017 (UTC)
Jinzler
  • Just one point from me - in the introduction you refer the conflict as "the Wars", whereas later in the article it is referred to as "the war" and "the wars". Could you please ensure that the article is consistent in terms of whether "Wars" is capitalized and in terms of whether it is referred to "wars" or "war". If any of the sources cited refer to it is "the Wars" then it would be fine to use that term or otherwise just "the wars" would be more appropriate. Jinzler (talk) 22:01, January 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • A nice little article. Jinzler (talk) 22:01, January 17, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

  • Here's a link to the previous nomination.--Jace Onasi (talk) 04:18, November 28, 2017 (UTC)
  • I can confirm that Star Wars: Complete Vehicles does mention the Unification Wars, though it does not provide any additional information from the other cross-section books. I've added it as a source.--Jace Onasi (talk) 04:18, November 28, 2017 (UTC)
  • In the previous nomination, Imperators wanted feedback on the image of the Jedi. The image isn't time-period appropriate, since it is from just after the New Sith Wars. The Jedi also didn't have lightsabers back then. There aren't really any images on the wiki that would appropriately depict the Jedi of the time, however. Check the previous nomination to see the images we suggested.--Jace Onasi (talk) 04:27, November 28, 2017 (UTC)


Gamor system

(2 ACs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:54, December 28, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Jinzler (talk) 23:05, January 17, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 15:45, January 20, 2018 (UTC)
  4. AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:02, January 20, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Exiled Jedi

Comments

Poletec

  • Nominated by: Banana32 (talk) 00:20, December 29, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: This article has come a long way despite the depicted topic only appearing in unfinished episodes of the Star Wars: The Clone Wars.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Uncle Jangeth
  • For now, you'll need to expand the introduction. Run through the article and find relevant information for it. JangFett (Talk) 01:50, January 11, 2018 (UTC)
    • Done. -- Banana32 I-find-this-atire-appealing 20:36, January 11, 2018 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
  • I would argue a typo in concept art does not warrant a mention in the Bts. Typos happen all the time and in this case it's fair to expect it was one rather than intentional. 1358 (Talk) 00:18, January 19, 2018 (UTC)
    • Okay, I deleted the information. --B32 I-find-this-atire-appealing 00:54, January 19, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Viper Sensor Intelligence Systems

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 01:27, December 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I’ve always liked these old HoloNet articles; fanwank to the max. Original nomination can be found here.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Ayrehead
  • I think the intro should definitely be expanded beyond one sentence. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:09, December 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • Could you describe their logo in description? Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:09, December 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • You should mention in the body that the HoloNet News story is called "Sensor Technology Dispute Settled in Takeover" in order to give context to the quote captions. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:24, January 1, 2018 (UTC)
    • Added. Do you think its okay to link to that HoloNet issue? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:28, January 6, 2018 (UTC)
      • I don't think you should link to external sites in article bodies. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:34, January 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • It's also worth mentioning that they employed at least one Vulptereen. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:24, January 1, 2018 (UTC)
    • Now mentioned in caption. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:28, January 6, 2018 (UTC)
      • That info shouldn't be caption exclusive and actually looking at the AAD-4 assault droid page you should include that it was 60 of those droids that marched into the tower and destroyed their security units. The three tanks destroying the administration and accounting divisions of Viper also seems relevant. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:34, January 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • I'd say that the history section is now long enough to split into three paragraphs. I'd also maybe move the image down into it. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:34, January 20, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Orr'UrRuuR'R

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:40, January 1, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: NOMINATIONS! UNLIMITED NOMINATIONS!

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Jinzler (talk) 17:34, January 17, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Jinzler
  • In the year 32 BBY, Orr'UrRuuR'R was among a group of at least four Tuskens who fired from a cliff top at the podracers competing in the Boonta Eve Classic race as they passed through the Canyon Dune Turn portion of the course. This is a bit picky of me (apologies!) but the use of “they” here could be read as referring to the Tuskens or the podracers. Are you happy to clarify this? Jinzler (talk) 21:38, January 15, 2018 (UTC)
    • No worries, should be fixed now. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:59, January 15, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Galtea Binary system

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:48, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:26, January 11, 2018 (UTC)
  3. Icon Faction ImperialCommander Boots 12:19, January 16, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Toprawa
  • I think it would be best if you specified here "former Imperial Moff." I'd add it myself, but I wasn't sure about the sourcing: "When the New Republic corvette FarStar was attacked in the Galtea system by forces loyal to former Moff Kentor Sarne..." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:44, January 11, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified white dwarf

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

KMD-RA-71

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

R3-T2

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:02, January 3, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Background droid who appeared in a LEGO set 41 years after the fact.

(0 ACs/1 User/1 Total)

Support

  1. Provided all sources and adaptations were checked. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:57, January 5, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Hanzo
  • Intro needs expansion and more details such as its escape from the pirates being by 0 BBY. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 12:45, January 4, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Loje Nella

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 05:10, January 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A character who's Bts history is far more interesting that what we actually know of them in-universe.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Ayrehead
  • I think you could expand quite a bit on the ROTJ part of the body. For example, context for Solo and Organa, the fact that the palace is on Tatooine and the fact that Jabba and the court clearly sat in wait in order to catch her. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:13, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
  • I think it's also relevant to mention that Jabba and many members of his court were killed not long after this. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:13, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
    • Is the implantation that Nella may have been aboard the sail barge? If so, that Insider article confirms she survived the events of RotJ. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:49, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
      • Ok well firstly, why isn't the fact that she survives ROTJ in the article? Secondly, the reason to include what happens next in the film is that since Jabba is her employer it seems fairly relevant when he suddenly dies given that it would presumably significantly impact her livelihood. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:17, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
        • The article just doesn't mark a skull next to her name. Expanded. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:27, January 18, 2018 (UTC)
          • I disagree with the statement of mentioning the Battle of Carkoon. From reading the article, I take it that Nella is last seen when Leia is captured, and I feel like that is adequate to instead simply mention that Leia and Han were both imprisoned as a result, and have the article end there. Also, FWIW Who's Who not having a skull next to names of characters isn't a necessary confirmation of survival. Ortugg and Wittin don't have the skulls, but Ortugg's entry in The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia reveals he died on the Khetanna, and The Official Star Wars Fact File 23 confirms Wittin's death at Carkoon. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:16, January 19, 2018 (UTC)
            • Ah ok, Hanzo's right that the skull thing probably isn't worth mentioning. I maintain that Jabba's death is relevant though, so I suppose we'll have to wait for others to weigh in. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:39, January 20, 2018 (UTC)
  • Can Jabba's full name or species be sourced to the encyclopedia entry? Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:13, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
    • Cited old Databank entry. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:00, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • Archives of the old SWBoards can be found here. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:13, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
    • I can't access the posts in question, as when I try to move to another page of a given thread, I get a 404 error. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:47, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
      • Hmm I hadn't quite realized how hard to navigate that site is. It seems like other pages in the thread are available, but you'll need to go through each of the start points for that thread to see the the different pages, if that makes sense. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:17, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
        • Looks like the first was archived, but apparently not the second. How do I link to the archive with this template? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 05:55, January 9, 2018 (UTC)
        • |archiveurl= is now at your disposal. Imperators II(Talk) 16:49, January 9, 2018 (UTC)
Hanzo
  • I'm making adaptations and sources a formal objection. I saw that the scene with Jabba catching Han and Leia (which includes Nella) is a video clip in Jabba's Encyclopedia entry (I know the link is sadly obsolete, but it is the same one used in the NuCanon Databank entry), and am requesting you to check further materials for the possibility of featuring the character.
  • The intro also needs considerable expansion about the character. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:27, January 19, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

  • Unfortunately, we don't have the old Message Boards archived in any satisfactory manner. Luckily, the species of Loje Nella was the subject of much controversy back in our early days (some users were even blocked over the issue), so we have a general idea of what each cited post would have said. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 05:10, January 7, 2018 (UTC)


Jadonna Veloz

  • Nominated by: Jinzler (talk) 21:20, January 13, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: My first nomination in quite a while!

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Qaz-class Star Destroyer

  • Nominated by: — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 23:14, January 13, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Hopefully the first of many.

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:07, January 20, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • Congratulations on your first nomination, Tommy! I've added audio to the Catalyst quote and as such think you might want to swap it with the current lead quote since it now includes the proper pronunciation. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:43, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
    • Thanks, I thought it was about time I had a go! Thanks for adding the audio, that's really useful in this article. Quotes swapped as suggested. — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 12:15, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • I think you can probably cut the Pablo tweet from the BTS entirely since it doesn't really tell us anything new and there's no way to back it up with a screenshot. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:43, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • I don't think the information about the stormtroopers is currently necessary in the characteristics section as you're currently extrapolating from a single trooper and it's covered later in history. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:43, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • I would expand slightly on the mission to Tibrin, something like "Leia Organa's mission to the planet Tibrin", with each of the separate relevant articles linked. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:43, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • You could provide a date for the Battle of Yavin. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:43, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • Clone Wars is currently intro exclusive. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:43, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • You should also add the ship's Legends origins to the BTS. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:10, January 16, 2018 (UTC)
    • Sorry but you may have to elaborate on that a bit, my legends knowledge it somewhat lacking. Does something in legends play a similar role to the ship's comparison with the kyber test? — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 19:17, January 16, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Flatcake

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:47, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
"It's always time for flatcakes."
―Ayrehead02 — Gnome-speakernotesListen (file info)[src]

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Kubindi

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Reviewed via IRC. Imperators II(Talk) 23:13, January 14, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Vorusku

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 12:47, January 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: So apparently "Vorusku" is a name even you could have come up with. Also, thanks go to SinisterSamurai for FA'ing Rorworr.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.