Wikia

Wookieepedia

Wookieepedia:Good article nominations

Redirected from WP:GAN

130,363pages on
this wiki
Talk117
       
Good article
nominations
             
GoodIcon

This page is for the nomination of Good articles. A Good article is an article that adheres to certain quality standards but cannot reach Featured status due to its limited content. This page is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like. For a list of Good articles, see Wookieepedia:Good articles.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic if the length of the article supports it. This may not be appropriate on articles with limited content.
  9. …have no redlinks.
  10. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article would be preferred, though not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section.
  11. …ideally include a "Personality and traits" section on all character articles if information is available.
  12. …ideally include a "Powers and abilities" section for Force-sensitive characters and a "Skills and abilities" section for non–Force-sensitive characters, where said powers and/or abilities are stipulated.
  13. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  14. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  15. …counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, be at least 250 words long (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Alternatively, a Good article cannot exceed 1000 words. Articles that do so should be nominated for Featured status.
  16. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, select an article you feel is worthy of Good article status. Your nominated article must meet all seventeen requirements listed above to become a Good article.
  2. Add {{GAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for Good article status previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{GAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Per AgriCorps consensus, non-AgriCorps members are restricted to four nominations on the GAN page at any one time. Once one nomination is removed from the page as either successful or unsuccessful, another may be added.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. Any objections may be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. Once a nomination has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be AgriCorps votes—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. Alternatively, if a nomination receives a total of five AgriCorps/Inquisitorius votes—three of which must be AgriCorps votes—with no outstanding objections before one week has passed, the nomination will be considered successful.
  5. The article is placed on the Good article list.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 2 weeks.


Good article nominations

To nominate an article for Good article status, place the {{GAnom}} template on the top of the article and then follow the instructions above. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above. If an article has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be an AgriCorps vote—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. For complete instructions on archiving nominations, please see here.

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Trandosha

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:08, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:A CAN that got too long. The original nomination can be found here.

(1 ACs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 00:51, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
  2. JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 07:22, January 27, 2016 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Because it's the forests, not the game, that make a world a hunter's paradise! Imperators II(Talk) 10:55, January 30, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Added the new character encyclopedia to sources, but there's no new info. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:29, April 4, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • I think you should section the article per WP:LG and provide an intro.
  • I don't see where in the source of ref 11 does it say that it was the proximity of Kashyyyk and Trandosha that caused the rivalry of the two species.
    • Cleaned up to be more ambiguous, but I don't care for the wording. This issue will probably be taken care of once I split the article into sections. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 14:19, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
  • Hmmm... couldn't the mention of the convor in Missing in Action be interpreted to mean that the bird is native to Trandosha?
    • By that logic, the momong could also be a native life form, as in concept art it is referred to as a Trandoshan monkey. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 14:19, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
  • Ref 4 does not confirm/inform that Trandosha orbits a single star like the infobox field does. And adding a source for that (like in ref 2) if you can would be nice. Imperators II(Talk) 09:24, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
  • Intro shouldn't be referenced.
  • "Dosha" is intro-exclusive.
  • Per WP:LG, info on non-sentient species should be in the Description section, instead. And you could add short bits of context for those creatures, just like you did for Trandoshans. Imperators II(Talk) 23:50, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
  • Currently, in the intro it is stated that Trandosha was positioned in the same system as Kashyyyk, while the Description section only says Kashyyyk neighbored Trandosha. I believe you should swap the two, since the Description section does not mention that the system was shared and in general it should be more detailed than the intro.
Jorrel
Ecks Dee
  • Some notes on your referencing: I can see at least one place where identical referencing is used consecutively, which means either one of them is wrong or the first one is unnecessary. Please double-check.
    • I was missing a reference to Journey Through Space. This has been corrected. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 14:42, February 12, 2016 (UTC)
  • As for your references 1+2 and 5+6, I'd recommend you go with just 2 and 6 wherever you currently have both. A well-written reference explains the logic without needing to double-reference. Make sure to link properly in your references too. 1358 (Talk) 21:58, February 11, 2016 (UTC)
    • Killed the double references. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 14:51, February 12, 2016 (UTC)
      • Linking is still an issue. Everything needs to be linked once in every reference as per WP:S#Rules #7. 1358 (Talk) 18:41, February 24, 2016 (UTC)
Cav
  • First things first - is the Netflix audio description really the only source that Wasskah is Trandosha's moon? Because one ref states that it is in the episode guide for Padawan lost but another sources it to the Netflix audio description.
    • The audio description is the only source that explicitly says that Wasskah orbits Trandosha. I think I fixed your objection. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:00, June 3, 2016 (UTC)
      • Okay, so if its only the Netflix audio that establishes this, how can we be sure its "official" and not written by a Netflix employee? Or is the audio description the same as the audio description that appears on the DVD? Because if that's the case, then adjusting the wording to remove Netflix would be advisable. - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 11:07, June 30, 2016 (UTC)
        • I'm not really using it as a source, so to say, but instead as something that clarifies what I'm seeing on screen. This mode doesn't go around naming background characters for the first time or anything like that. It's literally an audio "description" of what's going on onscreen. That said, if anything contradicts it, I'd treat that source as more accurate. I believe that this feature is exclusive to Netflix. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:09, June 30, 2016 (UTC)
          • You don't need to rely on the Netflix audio, which I don't think should be used either. The third slide of the "Padawan Lost" Episode Gallery identifies Wasskah as a "Trandoshan moon." I'm comfortable with interpreting that as meaning it orbits Trandosha. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:01, September 2, 2016 (UTC)
            • I defer to your judgement. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 01:16, September 2, 2016 (UTC)
  • I made some changes to the wording in places. Nothing wrong with it really except it didn't flow very well. Check out my changes and see what you think. - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 15:50, June 3, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

  • I don't want to make this an official objection, as I don't want to be redundant, but I agree with Imperators regarding adding an intro. JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 09:38, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
    • It will be done. I am currently trying to decide what pictures, if any, I'm going to add to the article. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 14:23, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
  • Maybe I'm just not remembering details from the episodes, but can you explain for me exactly how you're deducing that Trandosha is the planet seen in those two TCW episodes? Is it identified by name? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:26, September 2, 2016 (UTC)
    • Your memory isn't fault; however, evidence of this can be found throughout the episode guides for "Padawan Lost" and "Wookiee Hunt." Along with the aforementioned Trandoshan moon bit, the first episode guide show an image of the planet on the slide in the Trivia Gallery while referring to Trandosha. Also, the second episode guide says that "When Chewbacca says his home world is very close, he's not kidding. According to the Expanded Universe, Kashyyyk and Trandosha are in the same star system." Why would that be there if Wasskah wasn't a moon of Trandosha? - AV-6R7Crew Pit 01:35, September 2, 2016 (UTC)
      • Well, my concern is whether any of these Canon sources actually identifies the planet seen in those two episodes as Trandosha. I think the "Padawan Lost" slide is pretty weak to base it on, but I agree at least that this was the creators' intention, so I won't push it. Do any of these other sources listed in the article picture Trandosha or identify it as the planet from these episodes? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:43, September 2, 2016 (UTC)
        • Explicitly, no, but the Databank entry for Trandosha says it appeared in TCW (while incorrectly picturing Wasskah). - AV-6R7Crew Pit 01:46, September 2, 2016 (UTC)


Sakas

(2 ACs/4 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Cwedin(talk) 23:02, March 27, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:49, April 4, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 16:16, April 8, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Manoof (talk) 09:53, May 10, 2016 (UTC)
  5. ACvote IFYLOFD (Talk) 00:06, June 3, 2016 (UTC)
    ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 15:35, June 29, 2016 (UTC)
  6. Assuming the remaining objections are handled. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 23:21, August 29, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Manoof
  • Should you have Alliance Special Forces in the infobox, as a bullet point between the alliance and pathfinders. Otherwise it seems Pathfinders are a stand-alone branch of the Alliance, rather than a specific branch of the SpecForces. Manoof (talk) 07:32, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
  • I would recommend making sure your urls are backed up on the archive. Also, does tumblr count as a social media site, and so requires a screenshot? Manoof (talk) 07:32, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
    • There isn't really a mechanism to do either of these things right now because we don't have a Tumblr template, unless you have an alternative suggestion. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 16:10, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
      • I went ahead and made sure the url is backed up, and added it to the reference. Manoof (talk) 22:12, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
  • Can we say somewhere what species Dameron and Solo are? Manoof (talk) 07:32, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
    • That seems like unnecessary detail. To my knowledge we don't require species-level context for each character who is referenced. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 16:10, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
      • I consider it minimum context for characters, but I leave it up to you. Manoof (talk) 22:12, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
        • I think the rank info, which is provided, is more appropriate context since it reflects what they do and how they relate to Sakas. If someone wanted species info they could look at their respective pages. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 22:17, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
  • In the P&T, can you say something about what sort of fighter she was? Manoof (talk) 07:32, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
    • I'm not sure what you mean by "what sort of fighter" she was. Other than being in the Pathfinders, which is referenced in the biography, we don't know much about her. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 16:10, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
      • She seems skilled with a blaster rifle, did she demonstrate hand to hand combat skills at all? Is it worth mentioning or not really? Manoof (talk) 22:12, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
        • She didn't demonstrate hand to hand combat skills, no. I feel like "skilled with a blaster" is already implied. She didn't demonstrate any particular skills of note, so the fact that she's Alliance Special Forces can speak for itself IMO. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 22:17, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
  • What do you mean by "black site", is this something that should be an article? Manoof (talk) 22:12, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
    • In real life, a black site is a secret base where secret projects are conducted. For example, there are CIA black sites where less-than-good operations have been conducted. What that means in the Star Wars galaxy, though, was never stated. We didn't learn anything about the base beyond the fact that it's an ISB black site, so the most we could do with creating an article is a dictionary definition. In terms of giving more detail about what black site means in this article, we have nothing Star Wars-related to source that to. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 22:17, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
  • My apologies, I know I struck and support voted, but I must not have submitted. Manoof (talk) 09:53, May 10, 2016 (UTC)
Floyd
  • "Nearly three weeks after the Battle of Endor, the battle in which the Alliance delivered a devastating blow to the Empire by destroying its Death Star II superweapon and defeating Emperor Palpatine, Sakas served with the Pathfinders, an Alliance Special Forces unit under the command of General Han Solo, in a raid on an Imperial Security Bureau black site at the Wretch of Tayron, located in the Outer Rim Territories." This is the unwieldiest sentence ever Brandon
  • Is the Wretch of Tayron the black site itself? The way this is worded it makes it seem like the Wretch of Tayron is a larger location that houses the black site. If so, I think the actual facility itself could use a link.
    • It's unclear if the Wretch of Tayron is the location of the black site or the black site itself. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 06:12, May 29, 2016 (UTC)
  • Is there really nothing else you can put in the P&T? She seems to have at least a few speaking lines.
    • The lines are pretty straight-forward, and about the actions being taken. Sakas doesn't have much in the way of characterization. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 06:12, May 29, 2016 (UTC)
Cav
Toprawa
  • I didn't want to have to do this, but I wasn't able to get a hold of Brandon today, so I'm leaving this as a formal objection and striking my support vote for now. Cav's objection above regarding the use of an Equipment section should be followed as he originally requested. Sakas' use of an A280 should be mentioned in this section, as should the fact that she wears the standard uniform of every Endor Rebel soldier. That's the purpose of an Equipment section, and mentioning the A280 in the Bio should not preclude its implementation. In fact, I wouldn't recommend even mentioning specific weaponry in the Bio in an article this short, because then it just becomes redundant. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:12, July 19, 2016 (UTC)
    • How would you advise sourcing the fact that it's the standard uniform for every Endor Rebel soldier? That can't really be sourced to Shattered Empire or Return of the Jedi. Should a reference note be used to say it's similar? Also, so you're aware, I am on vacation without internet access (just phone) starting tomorrow (Thursday) through Tuesday, so I will not see your response to this until Tuesday. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 04:01, July 28, 2016 (UTC)
      • The crux here is less on sourcing and more how you word it, which I would prefer to leave up to you. Sakas and all of the Endor Rebels, both in ROTJ and Shattered Empire, are wearing the same basic, standardized camouflaged uniform. That's what I'm looking to see reflected here in Equipment. If this were a ROTJ-exclusive character, that fact can be sourced to ROTJ, which shows us as much; I'm assuming the same holds true for Shattered Empire. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:51, September 27, 2016 (UTC)
  • I'd like to see the Biography divided into two subsections, which would be best accomplished by inserting a paragraph break in the second paragraph. "Solo and the rest of the Pathfinders..." is a natural division point. This will also allow you to use additional images and quotes if available, which I presume they are. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:54, September 27, 2016 (UTC)
Imperators II
  • "Sakas was present in the command center" - would that be the ISB base's command center? If so, please add the context.
    • Yes. I think it's pretty straightforward as-is, but I've added a word to clarify. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 04:01, July 28, 2016 (UTC)
  • if "Dameron told the story of how he and Sakas raided the base to his son, Poe Dameron," in Before the Awakening, why is the book not listed in Sakas' Appearances section? Imperators II(Talk) 08:03, July 27, 2016 (UTC)
    • She wasn't mentioned, but their actions were. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 04:01, July 28, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Stew (clone gunner)

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:11, August 25, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Just like grandma used to make.

(2 ACs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Tasty. Imperators II(Talk) 04:05, August 25, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:55, September 3, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 20:29, September 5, 2016 (UTC)
  4. ACvote IFYLOFD (Talk) 01:40, September 7, 2016 (UTC)
  5. Cwedin(talk) 07:23, September 12, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • In the Bio quote, is it really not "Separatists"?
    • Fixed.
  • "when asked After two cadets had" - what is happening here?
    • Oops; that was a holdover from a previous version of the article where almost everything was combined into a single paragraph. Fixed.
  • You link to Boba Fett twice. Imperators II(Talk) 03:49, August 25, 2016 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • I feel the BTS should mention that it was Chee on Twitter who confirmed his name change. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:13, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
    • Done. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 15:20, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
      • I'm confused, where does the name Stew actually come from? Is it in the episode or was it revealed by Chee on Twitter at the same time he revealed the old name? Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:26, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
        • Don't be; the original context to the Twitter quote was lost to time, which is why I intially left it out of the Bts. Stew is used in The Complete Season Two. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:37, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
          • Ok could you mention that in the bts? The reference for the name should maybe be Complete Season 2 instead of the tweet as well. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:25, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
            • I'll just update the ref to Season 2. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:32, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
              • I ultimately decided to cite both sources in the Bio and not try to make a claim where the name originated. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 06:12, September 3, 2016 (UTC)
  • It's definitely worth adding that the Endurance was destroyed shortly after this by Boba as it seems relevant to him even if we don't know what happens to him during it. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:13, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • Could you expand the intro by at least another sentence? Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:26, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
Cevan

There already exists a Legends page just called "skeet," so you'll either need to move "mechanical skeet" to "Skeet/Canon," or leave it as is and make a canon skeet page. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 21:27, September 3, 2016 (UTC)

SE
  • Regarding the issue of his name, could you re-add something to the bts about it? Maybe that he was initially confirmed to be Stew on twitter, with that name later being used in season 2? We should definitely have something about the origin in the bts. Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:29, September 15, 2016 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • I have some preliminary referencing concerns that I want to bring to your attention to make sure you're aware of this now for this article and in the future for any other clone articles you may write. Clone trooper articles prove to be especially difficult to reference because much of their bio and physical characteristics are coming from general clone trooper source information that just says "All clone troopers are this, this, and that." It seems like most of this article's referencing is clean, as I'm able to check myself from the Databank page, but I want to check to make sure Absolutely Everything You Need to Know actually asserts that all clone troopers are 80 kilograms and that you're not just extrapolating that from something.
    • AEYNtY established 80 kilos to be the average, yes. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:11, September 16, 2016 (UTC)
      • I'm sorry, the "average"? What does the source say exactly? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:16, September 16, 2016 (UTC)
        • 80kg (176ilbs): Average clone trooper weight. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:38, September 16, 2016 (UTC)
          • Ok, well, we don't know that Stew fit this average weight, do we? This is different from other sources saying all clone troopers were 1.83 meters tall, for example. The article should not assert this information. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:41, September 16, 2016 (UTC)
            • I'm not too sure I agree with your reasoning, but removed nonetheless. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:44, September 16, 2016 (UTC)
              • The source says the "average" weight of a clone trooper is 80kg. That means there are clones that weigh more and less than 80kg. That's what an average is. There's no source that tells us what Stew's weight is, so he could easily be more or less than 80kg. To assume that he or any clone is exactly 80 kg, then, is speculation. This is different than height, since the clones wouldn't grow taller or shorter than Jango's genetic makeup, which is precisely 1.83 meters. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:53, September 16, 2016 (UTC)
                • Thanks for explaining your reasoning. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:55, September 16, 2016 (UTC)
  • Multiple-speaker quote in the Bio requires the Dialogue template.
  • Speaking to my first objection point, the very first sentence of the Biography includes two adjectives not supported by the source material. That Databank page does not identify Kamino as an ocean planet nor describe Jango Fett as "infamous." If you choose to keep this wording in the article, these will need other citations, though I would recommend just cutting them, since they're ultimately extraneous to this article. Please handle these objections, and I'll continue with my review. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:37, September 16, 2016 (UTC)
  • I'd like to see the articles for these specific clone cadets pipelinked into this sentence; "After two cadets had failed to hit their targets..."
  • "as revenge for killing his 'father' during the Battle of Geonosis" cannot all be sourced to Attack of the Clones, which gives us no insight into Boba's motivation during the events of this TCW episode. Please adjust the referencing accordingly.
  • Here, too, I think it would be good to specify the name of the cadet in question: "When asked by a cadet..."
  • The bulk of the P/T section focuses on Stew's sense of humor, so why not use that as the section's quote? Whatever his line is about malfunctioning droids would be far more relevant than the current quote, which is really more applicable to Boba Fett.
    • In this case his line in literaly "Malfunctioning droids," so I'm not sure its worth replacing the current quote. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:21, September 17, 2016 (UTC)
      • Stew's line would obviously need to be presented along with Jax's in the context of that exchange between those two characters. The quote that's there now is virtually useless, if not entirely irrelevant to Stew's character, since it provides no insight into his personality, unlike the line about malfunctioning droids. Look at it this way: There's nothing to even add to the P/T that references the section's current quote, which should tell you that it's not the best choice. A quote should illustrate its section's contents -- in this case, there's only one that serves this purpose. You should replace the current quote with the "malfunctioning droids" exchange and modify the section to paraphrase that exchange rather than quoting it directly. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:05, September 22, 2016 (UTC)
  • I'd like to see the Equipment section actually detail how Stew's armor is personalized, namely describing the artwork on his helmet
  • The Databank shouldn't be used as the sole reference for Stew wearing "a noise-insulated helmet and reinforced shoulder and chest armor," because that information doesn't come from there. At worst, this part of the article should utilize double reference notes, one from the TCW episode and one from the Databank, which has the effect of telling the reader that the information comes from TCW, while the Databank explains what this stuff is. For that matter, you should also employ double reference notes for the mention of his Phase I armor, since that name does not come from the TCW episode. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:53, September 16, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Ello Asty

(2 ACs/4 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Imperators II(Talk) 16:35, August 29, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Nice work, though I'm worried that, since he's confirmed to be mentioned in upcoming sources, the article may need an update. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:00, August 29, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Great stuff! Lewisr (talk) 01:17, August 30, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 16:01, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
  5. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:01, September 3, 2016 (UTC)
  6. ACvote IFYLOFD (Talk) 01:39, September 14, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
AV

Previews from the upcoming book Star Wars: Poe Dameron: Flight Log have clarified that Asty is from Abednedo; this will need to be added to the article. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:19, August 27, 2016 (UTC)

Cevan
  • Asty's final words shouldn't be under the 'New Republic service' section. Assuming you still want to include that quote in the article, have it moved to the appropriate section, and, if possible, try to get a quote from Bloodline that's relevant to Asty. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 16:28, August 27, 2016 (UTC)
  • Is there any chance of getting another image somewhere in the article? Perhaps a behind the scenes image, or a full-body shot of Asty in his flightsuit (such as the one featured in the Abednedo article. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 00:25, August 30, 2016 (UTC)
Ayrehead
Floyd
Toprawa
  1. Some basic formatting issues:
    • I would strongly recommend going no further than two or three cascading bullets deep in the infobox's Affiliations field. Wikia skin's very narrow margins make the article's current presentation look terrible. I'd suggest toggling back and forth between skin views to see what I mean. Just stick to his most critical affiliations. Things like "Resistance military" are entirely unimportant here.
    • The Biography has more than enough space to be subsectioned, which will allow you to use more quotes and images if available. More to the point, this will set you up to use some image in the Bio, which is more important than sticking an image in the P/T if you have to choose between them.
    • Once the preceding objection is handled, the article will most likely be more aesthetically prepared for a minor expansion to the intro. Two sentences is pretty short for a Bio so long. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:04, September 27, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Cevan
  • I'm not going to add this is an objection since you aren't guaranteed a response, but you may want to try and contact Pablo Hidalgo or someone else who works at Lucasfilm and may know the answer on Twitter as to why Asty's callsign is Red Six, but he's said to be part of Blue Squadron. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 16:02, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
    • I already did, and was ignored. :( Maybe @WookOfficial could try? Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 16:09, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
      • If that works, I have a list of unanswered questions for @WookOfficial. :P - AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:21, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
        • I don't like to bother creators with continuity questions on the Wookieepedia Twitter, so I'd rather not tweet the question. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 16:57, September 2, 2016 (UTC)


Council (planet)/Legends

(3 ACs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Eh, looks good. You know, it might even pass one day. :P Imperators II(Talk) 06:36, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 04:18, September 8, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Cwedin(talk) 07:10, September 12, 2016 (UTC)
  4. ACvote IFYLOFD (Talk) 02:54, September 13, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Phatrong

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 06:39, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Revisiting one of my previous nominations.

(1 ACs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote The bit about Embo doesn't feel like it belongs anywhere. :/ Imperators II(Talk) 16:01, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Cwedin(talk) 07:18, September 12, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • "Inhabitants" was in desperate need of a paragraph break. I guess Tope would say you should subsection it now. :P Imperators II(Talk) 06:44, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
    • Of course; I'll handle that tomorrow (aka when I get up). I'll also see if I can reorganize any of the info or add some to help the flow. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 06:48, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • Intro should include words about the planet's description and its government (and maybe affiliation).
  • "Though they weren't monolithic some regions had more traditional structures with integrated militaries clovocs were common in several of the largest nations." - what's happening here?
    • Semi-colons are my friends. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 07:07, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
      • Now it's unclear as to who "they" are: "Though they weren't monolithic;" Just go sleep already, AV. :P Imperators II(Talk) 07:10, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
        • Commas are cool, too. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 07:16, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • This article names Ekaqume a "house" while its own article identifies it as a clovoc. Which one is correct? (Currently, the first sentence of Locations contrasts "houses" and clovocs.)
  • Last sentence of Locations is a bit longish. Can you rework it? Maybe put some of the info in Inhabitants? Imperators II(Talk) 07:04, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
Floyd
  • As per the Layout Guide, this article needs a History section. A lot of the information in Inhabitants would fit; as such, this article is going to need to be reworked rather thoroughly. IFYLOFD (Talk) 02:59, September 13, 2016 (UTC)
    • I shuffled some info around if you want to take a look. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:14, September 20, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

  • Is there a quote available, or is the indirect mention within the prose? - Cwedin(talk) 07:13, September 12, 2016 (UTC)
    • Prose: "He was a Kyuzo, a species that originated from a gravity-heavy world." - AV-6R7Crew Pit 07:16, September 12, 2016 (UTC)


PM-1203

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 05:21, September 3, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A CAnom that ran too long.

(1 ACs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote They say those are the best CAnoms. Imperators II(Talk) 05:48, September 3, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 16:41, September 3, 2016 (UTC)
  3. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 06:39, September 7, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Cwedin(talk) 07:14, September 12, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Floyd
  • I would say that you could include a Locations section here with information about the base and perhaps other landmarks if they exist. IFYLOFD (Talk) 03:38, September 13, 2016 (UTC)
    • It's doable, but I don't believe its really necessary in this case, especially since Fort Anaxes is the only location of note on PM-1203. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 04:05, September 13, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Mul Sanaka

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:59, September 9, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Only one character GA from Leia left after this.

(1 ACs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Imperators II(Talk) 07:10, September 12, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Great work on these! - Cwedin(talk) 07:17, September 12, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Floyd
  • Any context on why Sanaka would plan to kill Leia? To protect his financial interest in the band? Needs to be in the Bio. IFYLOFD (Talk) 04:11, September 13, 2016 (UTC)
    • To be honest it's all fairly vague, which is the reason I left this guy and Junn till last. Junn wants Leia dead because he doesn't think that a person like him would do well post rebellion, and I assume Sanaka shares this opinion? It isn't ever directly stated what Sanaka's motivations are, I mean he could just be doing it to clear a debt with Junn and have nothing against her at all. I left these potential motivations out because they're only assumptions, but I can add something based on them if you think I should. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:54, September 13, 2016 (UTC)
      • Well, I mean, in your P&T it says something about a bounty on Leia and that he wanted greater profit. Is that something? IFYLOFD (Talk) 01:40, September 14, 2016 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
  • WP:S#Rules #9 stipulates a backup link must be included when referencing external links. 1358 (Talk) 21:00, September 13, 2016 (UTC)
    • This seems to be a larger issue than just this one nomination, as the Marvel citation template currently contains no means by which to include an archive link, meaning this applies to all of the pages that use it. I'm happy to add the archive link as a cite web on the end of the reference, but before I do I'd thought I'd check if someone with more know how than me might modify the template? Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:36, September 13, 2016 (UTC)
      • It's probably ugly, but I added an archival field to the template that works with WebCite links (since Internet Archive doesn't work in this case). Imperators II(Talk) 07:24, September 14, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Hobin Carsamba

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:57, September 18, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A brief break from Leia before I get round to finishing Junn.

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote I put the video game under the Non-canon appearances subsection per the new addition to WP:LG. Imperators II(Talk) 11:53, September 18, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ACvote IFYLOFD (Talk) 23:43, September 19, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Floyd
  • This is one case where I don't think the Bio needs to be subsectioned. You've only got a few really short paragraphs. IFYLOFD (Talk) 23:18, September 19, 2016 (UTC)
    • It still looks a little chunky in Wikia skin, but removed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:29, September 19, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki