Entertainment
 

Wookieepedia:Good article nominations

From Wookieepedia, the Star Wars wiki.

(Redirected from WP:GAN)
       
Good article nominations
        

This page is for the nomination of good articles. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like. For a list of Good articles, see Category:Wookieepedia good articles.
A Good article is an article that adheres to quality standards, but cannot reach FA status due to its limited content.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
  4. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  5. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  6. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  7. …have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic if the length of the article supports it. This is essential in articles over 1000 words but may not be appropriate on articles with limited content.
  8. …have no more than 3 redlinks for articles less than 500 words, no more than 5 redlinks for articles 500 words or more, and no redlinks in the introduction, infobox, or any templates.
  9. …have significant information, especially a biography for character articles. For articles under 1000 words in length, comprehensive detail is required with all information covered from all sources and appearances. For articles over 1000 words, broad coverage addressing all major aspects of the topic is sufficient.
  10. …be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  11. …have all quotes and images sourced.
  12. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article would be preferred, though not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section.
  13. …ideally include a "personality and traits" section on all character articles if information is available.
  14. …ideally include a "powers and abilities" section on relevant character articles, especially for Force-sensitive characters where said powers and/or abilities are stipulated.
  15. …include a "Behind the scenes" section.
  16. …include a reasonable number of images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available.
  17. …counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, be at least 250 words long (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Alternatively, a comprehensive article cannot exceed 3000 words.

How to nominate:

  1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of good status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{GAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating.
  3. Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
  4. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
  5. Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. Once a nomination has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—one of which must be an AgriCorps vote—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. Alternatively, if a nomination receives a total of five AgriCorps votes with no outstanding objections before one week has passed, the nomination will be considered successful.
  5. The article is placed on the Good article list.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 3 weeks.


Contents


Good article nominations

To nominate an article for Good article status, list it here. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above. If an article has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—one of which must be an AgriCorps vote—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. For complete instructions on archiving nominations please see here. Also remember to add {{GAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating.

Timar Daragon

(1 ACs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. This really has been on the page unfairly for far too long. Grae's objection seems to be fixed. There is still alot of resemblance, but there is no longer a cut-and-paste feel to the article. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 06:54, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
  2. --Eyrezer 09:28, October 27, 2009 (UTC)

Object

  1. Paraphrase more. This cannot read exactly like Hok Daragon. Graestan(Talk) 16:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
  2. This is still too similar to Hok. Yes, a few things here and there have been changed, but there are still several places that could easily be paraphrased, where you could easily substitute a few synonyms to make it so that there aren't so many sentences that read exactly or almost exactly the same. Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 17:51, November 5, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Remove nomination (AgriCorps vote only)

  1. Cut-and-paste of Hok Daragon. Nominator expresses no desire to paraphrase. Graestan(Talk) 18:47, September 9, 2009 (UTC)

Gorrm

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 13:48, October 1, 2009 (UTC)
  2. --Eyrezer 09:33, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 21:59, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
  4. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 10:10, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
  5. CC7567 (talk) 04:48, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

Object

  1. Farl-suggestion:
  2. For starters, there is information which is cited as being from FotSE which is not from that source. Graestan(Talk) 00:42, September 13, 2009 (UTC)
  3. The article is good but it is not sourced properly. He did not appear in Funeral for a Dark Lord therefore he cannot be listed as appearing in "The Golden Age of the Sith" if he did not appear in all the issues. The referencing should also be adjusted like this also. Nayayen(talk) 20:49, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
    • Addressed.
    • One last thing, what is the relevance of the last sentence of the Bts? Do you mean to say that Gorrm got an entry himself or that he was mentioned in Kahorr's entry? Nayayen(talk) 23:54, November 1, 2009 (UTC)
  4. "Kahorr had Gorrm give the police the pertinent documents; by a Merchants' Guild decision, the Starbreaker 12 had indeed been granted to Kahorr." This isn't very clear. Did they give the police the documents, and then have the Starbreaker granted to Kahorr? Or were they showing the police the documents to prove that the Starbreaker had already been granted to Kahorr? Also, please watch your linking; there were several links missing. Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 22:57, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
    • Addressed,
  5. happened upon the Sith Empire, which had been lost since the Hundred-Year Darkness Find a better word than lost. Empires don't become lost. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 07:56, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
    • Addressed.

Comments

Vote to strike Graestan's objections (AC only)

  1. Unaddressed for a rather long time. All other sourcing issues appear to have been fixed. CC7567 (talk) 04:48, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Appears to be fixed. Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 19:28, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

Dor Gal-ram

(1 ACs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Jedi Kasra (talk) 17:45, October 1, 2009 (UTC)
  2. --Eyrezer 20:42, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Nayayen(talk) 23:58, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

Object

  1. Same issue as my objection for Gorrm. He didn't appear in Conquest and Unification so he can't be listed as appearing in the whole story arc. Nayayen(talk) 20:55, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
    • Addressed.
  2. The Grand Master
    • There seems to be a bit of superfluous information in the bio, that really just doesn't add anything to the article for Gal-Ram. (i.e. the extra info about the arrival of the Daragons and subsequent events could be condensed quite a bit to just the necessities)
      • I disagree; I believe this level of context is required to understand what is going on.
        • Not really: it could easily be condensed to something along the lines of "Around this time, the arrival of two Humans, Gav and Jori Daragon, opened up a conflict between Kreesh and Sadow. Eventually, Sadow staged a Republic attack..." As it is now it consists mainly of fluffy detail with no pertinence to Gal-ram. We don't need to know that the Daragons arrived in the Starbreaker 12 during the Funeral of Marka Ragnos, that they arrived in the Valley of the Dark Lords, and that they were arrested and imprisoned. We don't need to know what both Sadow and Kreesh wanted to do with them and why. We just need to know that their arrival caused a rift which eventually led to Sadow's staged attack and self-declaration as Dark Lord, which caused Kreesh to rally his supporters, including Gal-ram.
    • Also, the bio could be broken up into more than just the current two long paragraphs.
      • Addressed.
    • Nice work. Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 18:14, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Koho

  • Nominated by: JangFett (Talk) 18:00, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Poor Denal Koho. :(

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. --Clone Commander Lee Talk 18:19, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 14:14, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Koho's ultimate fate remains unknown? SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 09:33, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
  4. How could I not vote for a Denal-related character? :P QuiGonJinn (Talk) 11:53, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
  5. CC7567 (talk) 23:41, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
  6. Chack Jadson (Talk) 22:00, November 16, 2009 (UTC)

Object

  1. Lee strikes again
    • Please source the quote.
    • Please source the last sentence in the BtS.
    • Possible something else will come, but otherwise another good clone GAN. --Clone Commander Lee Talk 18:05, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
      • All addressed, Lee; thanks for catching these.
  2. Attack of the Clone
    • You're going to have to find a better source for his death. Neither of the episodes or their guides explicitly confirmed that he died. CC7567 (talk) 18:16, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
      • Yeah, I was afraid about this. I'll leave it ambiguous then about Koho's death; however, we know that Denal died.
        • It's sounding more and more like you're disregarding the whole review process that we went through (and are still going through, in fact) for Hunting the Hunters III. Being "afraid about this" sounds like you were just hoping that no one would catch it. It's simple: either a source confirms it or it doesn't. Nothing in between. I don't want to see this happen again. CC7567 (talk) 18:29, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
          • I may but in, but I think meant about being afraid, that his sources don't work and not that no should catch them. Although it is not confirmed it is possible, but his death has no source.--Clone Commander Lee Talk 18:33, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
            • My point about proper source coverage still stands regardless of whatever else happens. CC7567 (talk) 18:43, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
    • An infobox picture, perhaps? I cannot understand why you lack a main picture and yet have one in the body.
      • Unless you want me to crop a image of him, I cannot get anything decent. He was first seen right behind Rex, and then later he's behind Denal. He's in a very obstructive location.
        • You could try asking JMAS if you're unsure about the quality of the image, but you still need an infobox image. Rule 16 states that nominations must "include a reasonable number of images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available," which indeed they are. CC7567 (talk) 18:43, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
          • I uploaded a temporary (Or perhaps permanent) infobox image, CC. :)
    • "Denal told the Duros bounty hunter to surrender, although their capturing of Bane was cut short when they engaged the latter in a duel, which resulted in the death of Denal." This sounds like only Denal and Bane were involved, but then you say "their capturing of Bane." CC7567 (talk) 18:29, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
      • Addressed; hope that helps.
  3. The Grand Master
    • "...the clones joined Jedi General Anakin Skywalker and his Padawan, Ahsoka Tano." Joined them in what?
    • "In retaliation, Skywalker soon ordered Rex..." In retaliation aganist what?
      • Bah, both addressed.
    • Does any source actually explicitly state/show them engaging in "a duel" with Bane? IIRC, the confrontation, or whatever happened, wasn't shown on-screen at all except for Bane's apparent "death." Also, the fact that Bane escaped the confrontation might be worth mentioning in the article. Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 01:38, October 24, 2009 (UTC)
      • Addressed. Thanks for the review, Jonny. :)
  4. A few more
    • It's not very clear in the intro if the battle over Devaron and the battle on Bane's ship are the same battles or two separate battles.
      • Addressed.
    • "Serving under Captain CC-7567, nicknamed "Rex," the clones joined Jedi General Anakin Skywalker..." Who exactly do you mean by "the clones"? The only ones you've introduced so far are Koho and Rex. Do you mean them? Or are therme more clones involved?
      • Eh, it should be "Koho." Addressed.
        • Ok, but does this mean that Rex joined, too or just Koho? And the meaning of the word "joined" is a little unclear here. Do you just mean he fought alongside them? Or did he meet up with them?
          • Hope this is sufficient. :P
    • Parts of the bio seem to be following the battle more than following Koho. For example, when you start off the second paragraph with "As the clone troopers..." Does this include Koho? Try to tweak parts of this section to make it more from Koho's point of view. Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 21:29, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
      • Adressed; thanks, Jonny. Sorry for not addressing these eariler. I've been busy.
  5. Clone attack II
    • Please expand the battle in the intro—throughout the body, in fact. It otherwise sounds like a pointless engagement if you don't mention what the objective was or what the circumstances of Rex's order for Koho and Denal to find Skywalker were.
      • Addressed; hope this helps.
    • The episode is not a source for Denal's death.
      • Addressed.
    • Please get in a note about where he was named in the Bts. CC7567 (talk) 04:56, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
      • Addressed; thanks, CC.
        • Please reread what you just wrote and try to find what's wrong. CC7567 (talk) 04:03, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
          • Grammar fixed.
    • "to retake the stolen holocron" in the intro and "to recover the stolen holocron from bounty hunter Cad Bane" in the body: to retake what stolen holocron? Neither of these mentions are clear.
      • Addressed.
    • It's still unclear why Tano chased after Bane. If you can't get in the mention about the trap, please find some other way of shortening the information. CC7567 (talk) 04:03, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
      • Addressed.

Comments

  • He didn't speak one word. So no P&T. JangFett (Talk) 18:00, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

Space Battle at Kuat

  • Nominated by: Bvdrunner 18:27, October 18, 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I think it's ready...

(2 ACs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. QuiGonJinn (Talk) 18:26, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Keep up the good work :) Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 17:58, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
  3. JangFett (Talk) 12:12, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
  4. CC7567 (talk) 19:09, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

Object

  1. Its not. Before beginning any further review, you need to source everything. If you don't really know how to, I'll do it for you. DjMack 21:18, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
    • No; if it appeared once or if the information comes from one source, then you don't need to source anything. It's self-sourcing. JangFett (Talk) 21:23, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
      • Actually, there is at least one more source, so this article does need to be sourced. QuiGonJinn (Talk) 12:32, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
        • So would the First Battle of Kashyyyk (Galactic Civil War) also not meet the requirments for GA status? It also appears solely in EaW but doesn't cite the guide. I don't actually have the guide so if someone else could summerize the information presented in it that would be much appreciated. Bvdrunner 15:26, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
          • Yes, it would not meet the present requirements. Keep in mind, however, that it achieved good status when the rules were not so strict. As for your request, I'll see what the guide has to say. Now that you've brought the issue up, I think I'll also fix the Kashyyyk battle. QuiGonJinn (Talk) 15:39, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
            • Thanks QuiGonJinn, that would be great. How much extra and relevent information is actually in the guide?Bvdrunner 02:53, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
              • In the interests of making this a learning experience, try it yourself. Lol keep it quiet though, it might not be legal. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 05:25, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
                • Thanks for that. I gave it a shot. It is now sourced with the main updates being the information regarding the Sundered Hearts weakening of the fighters and the fact that the canisters were not gas but "orbital resource" canisters. I also put in the Databank source for the Incom info. Bvdrunner 03:23, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
    • I believe this objection has been taken care off.Bvdrunner 00:37, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
  2. QGJ
    • First of all, what is the source for the "c. 0.6 BBY" date? I don't remember the game being that specific in terms of chronology.
      • I also couldn't find it. It was a layover from a previous editor. Fixed. Bvdrunner 03:33, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
    • Rebel casualties: None. Are you sure? Isn't it possible for some of the escorting corvettes to be destroyed?
      • See above. Fixed. Bvdrunner 03:33, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
        • We generally try to avoid words like "unknown" in articles. I'd advise you to just leave that section blank.
          • Done as well. Bvdrunner 00:37, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
    • Give some context for Emergency Code Zero.
      • Done. Bvdrunner 03:33, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
    • You need to create articles for the Kuat communications officer and the Tyranny commander, so they can be linked in this article.
    • …whose careless commander had allowed to come out of hyperspace with the shields down. "Careless" is rather POV-ish.
      • I agree. I fixed some NPOV stuff earlier but missed this. Fixed. Bvdrunner 03:33, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
    • …the Rebels figured that they then had a clear shot at attacking Fresia. This is rather colloquial. Please reword.
      • Fixed. Bvdrunner 03:33, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
    • Expand the "Behind the scenes" section. See the aforementioned Battle of Kashyyyk for an example. You also need to mention that the battle was identified as "Space Battle of Kuat" in the Prima Guide.
      • Fixed. Bvdrunner 03:33, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
    • Nice job for a first attempt. However, please watch your linking; each item must be linked once in the intro, once in the infobox and once in the main body of the article.
      • I don't see any remaining problems. Thanks for the advice. Bvdrunner 03:33, October 26, 2009 (UTC) QuiGonJinn (Talk) 11:29, October 24, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Fett
    • Missing date in the intro and prelude. Be sure to include this, and source the date in the prelude section. I'll give this another review later on. :) JangFett (Talk) 00:41, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
      • Dates added. Bvdrunner 04:28, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
  4. The Grand Master
    • "However, a serious complication arose when Antilles and his taskforce entered into the Fre'ji system and detected the Imperial I-class Star Destroyer Tyranny in orbit around Fresia." What serious complication arose? (If the "complication" refers to the Tyranny, then this should be reworded to better reflect this.)
    • The aftermath should be shortened a bit. It's a little too detailed on the following mission.
    • Great work for a first nom :). Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 01:15, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
      • All adressed. I hope that the reduction of the aftermath was sufficient enough. Only that one sentence seemed irrelevent and I added a link to the battle it referenced. Bvdrunner 05:51, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
  5. Soresu arrives with a dash of elegance
    • During the battle, the Sundered Heart was able to weaken the attacking fighters, causing their weapons to become less effective. I believe this could be dismissed and removed as game mechanics. The Sundered Heart's special ability is more of a game balance thing than solid canon.
      • Removed. Bvdrunner 16:38, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
    • Are there any other quotes (battle report, mission briefings etc.) from the other missions in EAW that would work in the Prelude and Aftermath sections?
    • And that's all I can find. Nicely done! SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 07:48, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
  6. Attack of the Clone
    • "the officer activated Emergency Code Zero, which resulted in the Tyranny's return to Kuat": can this be expanded any more? It's a bit of a jump that makes it sound like there's a plot hole in the writing.
    • Please use the {{1st}} tag in the Appearances (or, alternatively, the {{1stm}} tag in the Sources) wherever appropriate.
      • There is only one appearance, so the tag is not really necessary. QuiGonJinn (Talk) 18:25, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
        • There's still a source that could have come out before the game, and unless the release dates on their respective articles are misleading, the Prima Guide indeed appears to have been published before the game. CC7567 (talk) 18:39, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
          • Bvdrunner, are you sure about this one? Going off of the game's and guide's articles, it seems to be the other way around. CC7567 (talk) 23:20, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
            • Sorry, it was late and I just wanted to get it done. Won't happen again. I confirmed the release dates on the official sites for each.
    • Other than that, very good work for a first nomination. Keep up the good work. CC7567 (talk) 05:11, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
      • All item's adressed. Bvdrunner 23:08, November 14, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Dying ceremony

  • Nominated by: Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 15:28, October 24, 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: "Well, it's not technically a Hidden One..." Jujiggum runs for cover anyway. Also, the first ceremony nom

(1 ACs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Interesting nom comment, Jonny. ;) JangFett (Talk) 17:33, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Jedi Kasra (comlink) 23:37, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 08:25, October 27, 2009 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Metellos Exchange

  • Nominated by: Nayayen(talk) 12:17, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I didn't want to fluff it over 1000 words for FAN; it stands at just over 900. I also wasn't writing this with the intention of GAing it but, I wrote it like that anyway. Why not?

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Wanna see more of these…--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 13:28, October 30, 2009 (UTC)
  2. I'm probably doing economics next year. Maybe then I'll have some idea what you wrote :P SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 10:00, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

Object

  1. I'll review the article in full shortly. Taking a glance at it though, I do suggest you add a couple other images to it, such as one of Gryph as the professor, or something.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 17:08, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Here we go
    • ?In the intro, the second & third sentences begin with "It". Can you change one of them?
      • Changed the latter one.
    • The Mandalorian Wars need to be mentioned somewhere; I'd like to see it mentioned in both intro and body. For example, the Metellos Exchange was auctioning trade franchises with the planet Mandalore for after the war ended.
      • Mentioned in intro and body.
    • I would also like to see the fact that Nunk Plaarvin was a Ephant Mon. Perhaps in the intro, but definitely in the body.
      • I added the Ephant Mon link in the 3rd paragraph of "History", please try to move it in a earlier spot.
        • Ephant Mon is an individual. He and Nunk are Chevin and that is mentioned in the first sentence of the "Concept" section. Nayayen(talk) 20:57, October 29, 2009 (UTC)
    • I believe it wouldn't hurt to state that Jarael was a female Arkanian offshoot.
      • Done.
    • Context needed for Slyssk.
      • YEEP! I had already given him a bit of context (former member of Raff Syndicate) so I added that he was a Trandoshan. Nayayen(talk) 20:57, October 29, 2009 (UTC)
        • Thanks, that's what I wanted to see.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 13:26, October 30, 2009 (UTC)
    • That's all I have for now. Gutsy move, nominating a corporation. Never could fully understand economics.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 13:53, October 29, 2009 (UTC)
      • Thanks for the review Kasra, luckily I study economics :P. Nayayen(talk) 20:57, October 29, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Sonam-Ha'ar

(1 ACs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Jedi Kasra (comlink) 01:16, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Quixotic Jedi must be inspired in him. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 13:42, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Ronnie Brown would be impressed. Chack Jadson (Talk) 22:07, November 16, 2009 (UTC)

Object

  1. Just a couple…
    • What are the species of these Jedi? Memit Nadill, Odan-Urr.
      • I don't think its really relevant.
    • In the Appearances section, could you only put the comics in which he actually appeared, rather that the overall arc?
      • Addressed.
    • Otherwise, looks good.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 15:35, November 1, 2009 (UTC)
  2. The Grand Master
    • "with a seemingly unstoppable invasion force." Seemingly unstopable? Well, was it or wasn't it?
    • "Taking the oportunity..." and "Seeing an opportunity..." What opportunity did he take/see? (i.e. something along the lines of "Taking advantage of the opportunity" and "Seeing an opportunity to turn the tide of the battle")
    • "stood by his side no matter what." Could this be worded any differently? It sounds a little colloquial, and like it might be overstated.
    • Does the source literally call him "brave?" If not, this is a pretty generic statement, as you can pretty much say that every being in the Star Wars universe was brave because they did something.
    • Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 01:36, November 16, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Tuknatan

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Graawk! Graawk! --Skippy Farlstendoiro 13:54, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Jedi Kasra (comlink) 19:01, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

Object

  1. Skippy Farlstendoiro versus the aliens
    • Per precedent, "unidentified" should not be used in IU articles.
      • Addressed.
    • Biography, first paragraph: Two almost consecutive uses of the word "However". Try to reword one.
      • Addressed.
    • Can you explain why a large portion of the Sith force disappeared? I mean: Sadow was concentrating to create the illusions, and Gav Daragon broke his concentration.
      • Addressed.
    • I've done sofixit here and there in the article, hope you don't mind. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 13:35, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

19,000 BBY

(1 ACs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:20, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
  2. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 08:34, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Great work! JangFett (Talk) 23:33, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
  4. Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 22:29, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

Object

  2. Farlstendoiro and the Old Times
    • Intro: "East" is in inverted commas; I understand why. Could you reword the sentence to avoid unsual usage ?
      • Ok, I do not see the violation considering the colloquial nature of it from an in-universe perspective, but I'll relent. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 03:24, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
    • The galaxy in: This paragraph has two distinct parts: about Kamino and about elsewhere. Could you divide the section in two paragraphs? Also, Impact.
      • I do understand why you ask this and thought long about this. Why it was left alone: This was done to prevent short paragraphs that would not meet proper English writing conventions. The Impact section would have a violating paragraph due to number of sentences. To keep the parallel construction—as well as the fact that the second paragraph of The galaxy... would also be in violation due to sentence structure—it is best to leave them together as one. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 03:24, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
    • Footnotes: Could you replace "Simple math" with some other expression?
      • This was used as provided in WP:NOR and has been used for all the other dates that have been made into GAs to qualify that simple (or basic) math was used to derive the information rather than original research. I am just complying with the guidelines. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 03:24, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
    • Good work. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:25, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
      • Thank you, Skippy.

Comments

18,780 BBY

  • Nominated by: — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 02:00, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: We are never informed how the tower was destroyed. I wish we did know. It would have made this article much juicier.

(2 ACs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. IFYLOFD (You will pay the price for your lack of vision!) 00:05, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
  2. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 10:09, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Hee hee hee…--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 00:58, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
  4. Providing that Toprawa's objections are addressed. Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 01:52, November 16, 2009 (UTC)

Object

  1. Toprawa:
    • What exactly is "The Old Republic" meant to link to? The SW:TOR game? Please fix this redirect: "Simple math was used based upon the dating schemes in The Old Republic timelines."
    • Can we find a better way to word this? I understand what you're saying, it just doesn't read well: "over the next greater than–nine thousand years"
    • Not an objection, but I've gone through (save for the instance in the second objection) and reworded mentions of, for example, "one thousand" to numerics for ease of readability and to keep with something of a site precedent. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:13, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Shar Dakhan

(1 ACs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Nostalgia.—Tommy9281 (No truth in me) 05:24, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Farl got everything I came up with already. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 11:02, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
  3. For Sandokan! --Skippy Farlstendoiro 11:21, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

Object

  1. For Farlstendoiro!
    • No quotes? Rewording: As there are quotes available, would you consider adding one or more?
      • Quotes added.
    • ..."ruled over the world of Ch'hodos, which served as his central base,[1] located in the northern part of the Unknown Regions...[2]" I understand you want to reduce footnotes to a minimum, which is laudable, but I suggest rewording this sentence, as it seems that "his base is located in the northern part".
      • Addressed.
    • "were repelled and eventually defeated." This seems important, do we know any details? Battle, opposing commanders, anything?
      • Entire end of the bio has been changed.
    • Shar Dakhan? Related to San Dokan? --Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:20, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Tommy:
    • It appears that Shar Dakhan led the assault on Coruscant, so you might want to expand the article to reflect this.
      • Yeah, addressed.
    • To touch on Skippy's point above, there are quotes, as found in First Encounter.
      • Addressed.
    • As usual, there is some underlinking. A Wookieepedian of your caliber should not have to be reminded repeatedly of things like this. Please address.
      • Addressed.
    • That's all.—Tommy9281 (No truth in me) 16:00, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
  3. It isn't clear in the intro who wins the Battle of Coruscant: "Dakhan's forces were opposed by a numerically inferior group of Jedi and Republic soldiers, but they were defeated." "They" could refer to either group: please specify. Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 22:40, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Cephalon

(1 ACs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. --Eyrezer 03:22, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Skippy/Several people/Noone votes/has voted/is voting/will vote/shall vote for this article/several articles/other article/no article.--Skippy Farlstendoiro 08:28, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Looks good! I tried to switch out some passive voice for active; please make sure I didn't introduce any inaccuracy. ~ SavageBob 21:43, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
    • I had to change a few things that could be misinterpreted the wrong way (Cephalons probably didn't employ the computers themselves, as the wording suggested) or were not completely confirmed, but thanks for the review! Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 21:53, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
  4. I certainly need to write a sentient species article. :P JangFett (Talk) 23:30, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Object

  1. Looking at the CUSWE entry on this species, it seems to have some information that is missing from this article. For instance, the rumor of an Inquisator going nuts, the term "hypermanifold", "electro-receptive" matrix. If these are in the novel, can you flesh it out a bit more? --Eyrezer 04:51, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
    • Checked SoS, and I did have a two things missing, which I've added (one of them about the "electroceptive matrice," (the "electro-receptive matrix" referred to in the CUSWE). Also, as the Imperial was only rumored to have gone mad trying to understand Cephalons' four-dimensional consciousness, I figured this wasn't hard enough fact to put in the article. However, I will add it if you think I should. Also, the "hypermanifold" simply describes the Cephalon's state of perception in four-dimensions: According to I-5, "They conceptualize space and time as a four-dimensional hypermanifold." As such, I don't think it's really necessary, but I'll add it too, if you think I should. Thanks for the review. Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 14:17, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
      • Yep, I'd like the rumor added. It adds a bit of flavour. It would be nice to have "hypermanifold" in there - sounds like a a nice technical term to include. --Eyrezer 05:00, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

  • Shouldn't the article be at "electroreceptive matrix" rather than "electroreceptive matrice"? ~ SavageBob 23:24, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
    • Well, the novel refers to them as "electroceptive matrices". Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 23:28, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
      • FWIW, "matrices" is the plural of "matrix" so it should be moved to the singular form. Nayayen(talk) 23:35, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Tho'natu

(2 ACs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. I can't decide whether to sigh with relief or gasp at this blasphemy! SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 23:30, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Strange not seeing a FotJ article from you, Jonny. :P JangFett (Talk) 22:38, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
  3. A return to where your GA career began :). Grunny (Talk) 04:53, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
  4. Chack Jadson (Talk) 01:25, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Vontaige

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

  1. Soresu
    • Vontaige served as one of the top advisors to Empress Teta, the ruler of the seven unified worlds of the Koros system, and was an important general in Teta's military. Vontaige served under Teta in the Unification Wars of the Koros system, fighting against rebels on the world of Kirrek. Teta was victorious in the Unification Wars, and Vontaige took his place at her side as one of her top advisors. This is chronologically a little confusing. You start out with him being a top adviser, then him fighting the rebels, and then him becoming a top advisor (again). Please clarify. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 22:21, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Tandun III

  • Nominated by:Apotheoses Jedi 20:40, November 12, 2009 (UTC-6)
  • Nomination comments:

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

  1. Please go through and read all of the nomination rules at the top of this page. At the very least, the entire article needs to be properly sourced, not just a few random infobox items. Also, your intro is rather disproportionate to the article's size. CC7567 (talk) 04:24, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Llaban

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Atar

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Sick of them? hmm. :P JangFett (Talk) 23:39, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Jedi Kasra (comlink) 02:34, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Rasher Ke'e

  • Nominated by: Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 17:43, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Yeah, another quick n' easy GAS officer. One more for LE

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Quick, easy read. :P JangFett (Talk) 22:12, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Retrieved from "http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Good_article_nominations"