FANDOM


       
Good article
nominations
             
GoodIcon

This page is for the nomination of Good articles. A Good article is an article that adheres to certain quality standards but cannot reach Featured status due to its limited content. This page is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like. For a list of Good articles, see Wookieepedia:Good articles.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic if the length of the article supports it. This may not be appropriate on articles with limited content.
  9. …have no redlinks.
  10. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article would be preferred, though not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section.
  11. …ideally include a "Personality and traits" section on all character articles if information is available.
  12. …ideally include a "Powers and abilities" section for Force-sensitive characters and a "Skills and abilities" section for non–Force-sensitive characters, where said powers and/or abilities are stipulated.
  13. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  14. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  15. …counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, be at least 250 words long (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Alternatively, a Good article cannot exceed 1000 words. Articles that do so should be nominated for Featured status.
  16. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, select an article you feel is worthy of Good article status. Your nominated article must meet all seventeen requirements listed above to become a Good article.
  2. Add {{GAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for Good article status previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{GAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Per AgriCorps consensus, non-AgriCorps members are restricted to four nominations on the GAN page at any one time. Once one nomination is removed from the page as either successful or unsuccessful, another may be added.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. Any objections may be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. Once a nomination has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be AgriCorps votes—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. Alternatively, if a nomination receives a total of five AgriCorps/Inquisitorius votes—three of which must be AgriCorps votes—with no outstanding objections before one week has passed, the nomination will be considered successful.
  5. The article is placed on the Good article list.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 2 weeks.


Good article nominations

To nominate an article for Good article status, place the {{GAnom}} template on the top of the article and then follow the instructions above. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above. If an article has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be an AgriCorps vote—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. For complete instructions on archiving nominations, please see here.

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Unidentified false Jedi

  • Nominated by: Cevan IMPpress (talk) 20:55, February 4, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Here's hoping we get to see this full story someday.

(2 ACs/5 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 01:13, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Nice work; it can be difficult working with cut info. - Pyke syndicate AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:46, February 9, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 15:32, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
  4. --Lewisr (talk) 15:32, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
  5. Sol PacificusFirestorm 21:00, April 12, 2017 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Two-sentence GAs, woo-hoo...! Seriously, nice work though. Imperators II(Talk) 05:56, May 30, 2017 (UTC)
  7. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 22:51, August 13, 2017 (UTC)

Object

AnilSerifoglu
  • You can briefly mention the flashback scene in The Gathering, which was a nod to this story as Filoni said during the panel. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 01:39, February 5, 2017 (UTC)
AV
  • IIRC, Dave Filoni talks about Latrans in The Complete S3s Zygerria featurette. Could you check that? - Pyke syndicate AV-6R7Crew Pit 01:16, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
    • Just checked, and he does indeed make mention of Latrans (not directly by name) in that featurette. Thanks for catching that, AV! I should have the information from there up a little later tonight. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 21:22, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
      • Sorry for the delay; I've added the featurette information into the article. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 22:20, February 7, 2017 (UTC)
Sol Pacificus
  • "Tano was no longer able to feel the Jedi as a whole through the Force, something she had been able to do since she was very young and credited with saving her life in her encounter with the false Jedi."
I actually found this sentence really hard to understand, especially coming from someone who is entirely unfamiliar with this character and the story. What is being credited? Ahsoka's ability to feel the Jedi through the Force? Her ability to sense the false Jedi? The false Jedi herself? I think the syntax might actually be a tiny bit off. Actually after reading it several more times, I think I understand it better; you mean to say that her ability to sense the Jedi had saved her life from this false Jedi, and this is perhaps the only reference to this character in the novel? I think it might help if you also clarified how feeling the Jedi as a whole through the Force helped save her life from this character or what it means to sense the Jedi as a whole, though I understand the information is probably very scarce. Anyways, is it possible for you to tweak this sentence a little bit to improve clarity? Sol PacificusFirestorm 08:02, April 4, 2017 (UTC)
Here's the full quote from the novel: "Even the sense of the Jedi as a whole was gone, and she'd been able to feel that since she was too small to articulate what it was that she felt. The feeling had saved her life once, when she was very young and a false Jedi came to Shili to enslave her."
This is the only mention of the false Jedi in Ahsoka (or any canon material for that matter), and we unfortunately do not know how Ahsoka sensing the Jedi as a whole saved her life here—I imagine she was able to sense that the false Jedi was merely posing as a Jedi, but adding that into the article would be speculative. If you'd still like me to do so, I can try and see about clearing that passage up in the article as best I can. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 20:46, April 7, 2017 (UTC)
I think I fixed the sentence. However, it might make more sense to write it from the false Jedi's perspective. That is, to state that the false Jedi had threatened Ahsoka's life, but that Ahsoka's ability to sense the Jedi as a whole had saved her life. That might help the confusion, but then again it might not because rewording it like that make the "sensing Jedi as a whole" sound even weirder. What do you think? Sol PacificusFirestorm 06:25, April 8, 2017 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and rewritten that part—how is it now? Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:25, April 11, 2017 (UTC)
It's good. :) Sol PacificusFirestorm 21:00, April 12, 2017 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
  • Check your image caption punctuation. Only full sentences should have a full stop. 1358 (Talk) 21:39, April 27, 2017 (UTC)
  • According to the MoS, the bolded name in the intro should not contain links. You should instead link the subjects at the next possible opportunity.
  • The Amazon and IMDb references both lack a backup link. Both templates should support adding them.
  • Using {{1stm}} {{Imo}} in the Sources would be better than a custom text. 1358 (Talk) 14:54, May 11, 2017 (UTC)
  • Plo Koon finding Ahsoka and taking her to be trained is Canon, right? That's probably worth mentioning in the intro.
    • Added that in. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 20:11, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
  • "however, the young Togruta's ability to sense the Jedi as a whole through the Force managed to save her." Who is "the Jedi" referring to here? Are we still talking about the impostor? This should be reworded for clarity.
    • "The Jedi" here just refers to all the Jedi in general. Here's the relevant passage from Ahsoka: "Even the sense of the Jedi as a whole was gone, and she'd been able to feel that since she was too small to articulate what it was that she felt. The feeling had saved her life once, when she was very young and a false Jedi came to Shili to enslave her." Do you think saying "Jedi Order" as opposed to just "Jedi" here give it greater clarity? Cevan IMPpress (talk) 20:11, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
      • Might I suggest something like "however, the young Togruta's ability to sense Jedi through the Force saved her."? Removing "the" from "the Jedi" makes it clear that it's referring to Jedi in general rather than a specific individual. 1358 (Talk) 22:21, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
  • Just wondering: Is there really no source that places Ahsoka's birth in 36 BBY? Or is the math necessary? I'd expect a major character like her would have an established birth year but who knows.
    • As far as I'm aware no canon source thus far has explicitly stated what year Ahsoka was born in. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 20:11, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
  • On a side note, I made some minor rewording for better flow. See if it's okay with you. 1358 (Talk) 21:52, August 12, 2017 (UTC)
    • Thanks, looks good! Cevan IMPpress (talk) 20:11, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
Imperators II
  • I'd like to see some indicator of the timeframe worked into the body, i.e., the false Jedi must've come to Shili at some point between the year of Tano's birth and the year of her joining the Order, right?
    • So sorry for the hold-up—I've been away without computer access for a bit. I've gone ahead and added this in now. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 21:45, May 29, 2017 (UTC)
  • So the link in ref 3 doesn't work.
  • "Filoni presumed that, due to the rarity of Force-sensitives in the galaxy, they would be highly sought after and some may attempt to kidnap them. The residents of Tano's town, having never met a Jedi before, would be none the wiser to Latrans's ruse." - could you reword this so that the IU parts are in past tense? Imperators II(Talk) 09:20, May 23, 2017 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Preliminary question: Would we not be remiss in just naming this character Latrans? I haven't looked through any of the BTS source material other than what the BTS itself explains, but if Lucasfilm is intending for this character to be the same from Filoni's developments, it seems ok to me to just use the name. Am I missing something? Maybe you could even ask Pablo or Leland if they consider this character to be Latrans. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 00:35, August 24, 2017 (UTC)
    • I had been under the impression that this sort of confirmation fell into the same category as the canonicity of the currently-unreleased The Clone Wars arcs, being that until the information is given in a firmly canon story it cannot be used in the bodies of canon articles. To me, it just seems a little strange to essentially pick and choose a piece of information from that Celebration panel to consider canon, while leaving the rest in the behind the scenes section. What do you think, though? Cevan IMPpress (talk) 17:29, August 27, 2017 (UTC)
      • I should say, firstly, that I'm not entirely sure what unreleased TCW arcs you're referring to. Can you link me to something? To answer the rest of your comment, maybe that raises a larger question: Are we meant to take what they say in that Celebration panel as canon? I'm not sure myself. I haven't really been following any of this stuff, so I pretty much rely on you guys who work with Canon to know what to do with it. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:46, August 27, 2017 (UTC)
        • Here's a quote from CC7567 on the talk page for The Clone Wars Legacy: "The Clone Wars Legacy incorporates only stories that have been officially released in near-completed form, whether through the episodic story reels or adaptations into other mediums—in other words, only what is listed on the Legacy section of StarWars.com. Unreleased stories do not qualify. In regards to the quote from Pablo Hidalgo, the stories are only canon once they're released as stated previously." Cevan IMPpress (talk) 18:09, August 27, 2017 (UTC)
          • And can you link me to what Pablo Hidalgo quote he's referring to? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:47, August 27, 2017 (UTC)
            • I believe he's referring to Pablo's quote used at the top of that page, taken from The Clone Wars Legacy announcement video. I've been trying to see if I could find a more definite statement on Wookieepedia stating this position on how the unfinished content is being handled, but so far I've had no luck. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:11, August 27, 2017 (UTC)
              • That fact that there doesn't appear to be anything at all really to support what CC is saying is what's making me skeptical. In fact, I would say Pablo's quote at the top of the article is suggesting the exact opposite. It's probably not coincidental that this is the only sentence in that entire article that isn't referenced to anything: "Although scripts for these stories exist, they're not canon unless an official release is made, even if other media refers to these events." I think maybe the best thing to do is try asking Pablo or Leland if they consider canon a) the thirteen unfinished story arcs, b) the name Latrans for this character, and c) the developmental background history of this article's character explained at that Celebration panel, as documented in this article's BTS. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:37, August 27, 2017 (UTC)
                • I can try if you'd like, although I doubt Pablo or Leland (particularly Pablo) will respond as I don't believe they're too keen on "is this canon?" questions. In my opinion, it may not be a bad idea to open up a Senate Hall thread discussing this, as this concerns far more than just the unidentified false Jedi article. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 14:49, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
                  • You should definitely try and ask Pablo or Leland -- not for my liking, but to save your nomination. Because it doesn't really matter what the outcome of the SH thread is, the Wookieepedia community doesn't determine canonicity. We have a fairly major issue here lying at our feet in the unresolved canon status of deleted scenes (both from the films and TCW) and unreleased content from TCW, all of which, correct me if I'm wrong, the Story Group has given little indication about. Either way, we need to get some kind of official ruling on this. But if you're going to ask one or both of them, frame your question specifically for the purpose of this article subject, namely Latrans and Filoni's background development, as we discussed above. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 16:53, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
                  • It's been a week since I last replied to this objection with no response, so I wanted to see where you stand on its progress. Keep in mind that this nomination will be subject to removal one week from now if no response is made. If you are unable to resolve this objection, removing the nomination until you can might be the best course of action. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:52, September 14, 2017 (UTC)
                    • Sorry Tope, been grappling with Irma and its aftermath. I've gone ahead and reached out via Twitter and am currently awaiting a reply. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 16:57, September 15, 2017 (UTC)
                      • And here is Pablo's reply. He says: "I'd rather give Dave the opportunity to more fully tell the story rather than hold him to something discussed in a behind-the-scenes context." In that case, I suppose I should just leave things as they are now? Cevan IMPpress (talk) 17:09, September 15, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

  • That's not an objection, but I have a minor suggestion. Maybe you can name Plo Koon's species, Kel Dor, somewhere in the article, considering the emphasis on his "creepy" and "sinister" appearance. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 01:39, February 5, 2017 (UTC)
    • I'm not sure if that's where you wanted it placed, but I've gone ahead and mentioned that Plo Koon is a Kel Dor. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 20:26, February 5, 2017 (UTC)
      • I would recommend somewhere in the line "creepy" and "sinister" appearance of Plo Koon, the story's hero. But it's just my personal preference, I'm fine with it anyway. The article looks great! TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 01:13, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
        • Thanks! I'll try and mess around with it later and see if I can fit it in down there. If it doesn't work out, I'll leave it as is. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 21:22, February 6, 2017 (UTC)


Anti-Riot Tangle Gun 7

  • Nominated by: MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 03:59, August 16, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Let this one slip.

(3 ACs/0 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Let Fred have this one. Imperators II(Talk) 09:10, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 19:27, September 3, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 04:01, September 18, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ecks Dee
  • Is (Identified as Tangle Pistol) really necessary for all those Sources? Go with one {{1stID}} for each name and you're all clear.
    • Ah, gotcha. Done.
      • Upon consultation with my esteemed AgriCorps colleagues, we reached the conclusion that different capitalizations of the same name do not warrant separate 1stID tags. Only the "first" variant needs the tag.
        • I was thinking the same thing. Fixed.
      • Furthermore, WP:LG#Template_usage says {{1st}} and {{1stm}} should only be used simultaneously if the "mention" came first. This does not appear to be the case in this article. Accordingly, the 1stm should be changed to a 1stID tag. 1358 (Talk) 20:29, August 21, 2017 (UTC)
  • Page numbers and entry names belong in references, not in the Sources section. Wookieepedia:Manual_of_Style#CSWECite. 1358 (Talk) 21:12, August 17, 2017 (UTC)
  • As Toprawa pointed out on IRC, "also known simply as the Tangle Gun 7" in the intro is probably a bit redundant as it's just a shortened form of the proper name. You wouldn't include "Falcon" as an alternate name for the Millennium Falcon either.
    • Fair enough. Fixed.
  • I would recommend creating a category for crowd control weapons, maybe under Category:Weapons by weapon type. I can find a bunch just by looking on Google. 1358 (Talk) 20:29, August 21, 2017 (UTC)
Anti-Gun Tangle Riot
  • Formatting of the dates in BTS should be consistent. Either go with a) just the year for all sources, b) full date for all sources, or c) full date for the first source and just the year for the rest.
  • Since you've done away with noting the various capitalization in the Sources list, this sentence also no longer has any reason to be in the BTS: "In all of these reference guides, the gun is identified as a "Tangle Pistol.""
  • Could you add in the intro the briefest mention of the fact the gun was described in the IU Cracken's field guide? Imperators II(Talk) 22:21, August 27, 2017 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Although I've never played Galaxies, I'm familiar enough with how our articles word content from that game that I'm left to question this sentence. Does the game actually say that the game was available to "various spacers" (plural), or is this the article's poor extrapolation of the fact that it was available to one spacer, the player, within the events of the game? "However, independent weaponsmiths and munitions traders who were in possession of the schematics also produced the weapon for various spacers."
  • Who considered this? Everyone? Airen Cracken? Can we qualify this? "Considered more humane than a blaster..."
    • Clarified. The Empire had it created because it needed a more humane option for crowd control.
  • I find the terminology here sort of strange, so I wanted to confirm. Does the source actually use terms like "seduction" and "mothballed"? "Therefore, when Imperial policy went from one of seduction to brute force, the weapon was mostly mothballed."
    • The source does actually use those words. I included them because I liked them, but I can reword if you think that's best.
  • In the final paragraph of the History, would CRFG not support a contextual mention that Airen Cracken is head of Alliance Intelligence? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:06, September 6, 2017 (UTC)
    • Unfortunately, it only ever calls him a general, and his bio never says anything about Intelligence. Would you like me to add that and source it to something else? MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 19:45, September 6, 2017 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • The weapon is listed in Galladinium's Fantastic Technology for 300 credits with an availability rating of 3, X. The 3 means that the weapon is a specialized item that isn't found everywhere, while the x means that it is illegal on most planets.
    • Added. Did I interpret this correctly? Not an RPG expert.
  • Since it is listed in this source, you should note in the history section that it was available for sale in the 50th anniversary edition of Galladinium's Galactic Datalog of Fantastic Technology. The introduction to the book states that the catalog was released between Episode IV and Episode V.
  • The Far Orbit Project establishes that the weapon was for sale on the black market during the privateer missions of the Far Orbit, which take place around the same time as Episode IV. It is listed as an item with an X availability. The section establishes that the price of the weapon increased on the black market in the Ringali Shell during while the Far Orbit. During the first phase of the Far Orbit's campaign, it cost 300 credits. During the second phase of the campaign, the cost increases to 6,000 credits on the Ringali Shell black market. During the third phase of the campaign, it increases to 9,000 credits on the black market in the Ringali Shell. It is going to be quite complicate to describe what begins and ends each phase on the campaign due to its nature as a loose set of RPG adventures.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 01:40, September 19, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

EG-9

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:21, August 29, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I found writing this article quite enjoyable.

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote This was a bit hard to wrap my head around - it's like there's two completely unrelated droids. I guess that's what happens when you recycle art. Imperators II(Talk) 22:36, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ACvote MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 04:07, September 18, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ah, that cool droid
  • I'm not really convinced that EG-9's name being similar to a completely unrelated droid line constitutes a conflict of sources.
    • Your right, of course. I've removed it from the Bts and relegated it to a (glorious!) see also section instead. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:45, August 29, 2017 (UTC)
      • I agree, knowing this from prior experience, that those See also sections can be pretty invisible. Imperators II(Talk) 11:02, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • Databank backup link!
  • Amazon backup link! Imperators II(Talk) 21:55, August 29, 2017 (UTC)
    • Replaced with SW.com article that reveals the international release date was four days before the NA release, with backup link of course. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:45, August 29, 2017 (UTC)
  • In order to make the intro longer than one sentence, please add a bit to it stating EG-9 was repairing a moisture vaporator in 32 BBY.
  • I want to see some date format consistency in the BTS. Full date for first source, year for the rest; or full format for all; or years for all.
    • Done, barring the film itself. I found differing dates for the Screenplay, so I used the Caro Bay/Barnes and Noble one. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:17, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • Wow, can all those specific ship names really be sourced to Illustrated Screenplay?
  • The last paragraph of BTS is really confusing. "used an image of EG-9 to depict an unidentified droid" — so EG-9 was actually assigned the orange-and-silver appearance before he was made into a Mos Espa droid by the Visual Dictionary? "This droid was later identified as EG-9 in Star Wars: The Phantom Menace: The Expanded Visual Dictionary, making EG-9 canon within the Legends continuity." — this combined with the rest of the paragraph makes me think the Sources list might be missing some helpful {{1stID}}, {{1stp}}, or {{C}} tags. Imperators II(Talk) 11:02, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
    • EG-9 was depicted as being this droid in the "Trash Talking Droids" animatic and the Hyperspace concept art, which seems to only be available in low quality online these days. Strictly speaking, the current tags are accurate. The Screenplay, which we list as a source, also pictured him (or at least a storyboard of him), while Podracimg Tales' was his first IU appearance outside of his deleted scene. I've rewritten the last sentence a bit. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 14:10, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
      • I never knew that Hyperspace piece of concept art existed. It's so cool. Imperators II(Talk) 22:36, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
Fred strikes back
  • "fifth degree labor droid" sounds like there are five degrees of labor droids. I'm not sure how to reword that to make it clearer that the degrees apply to droids in general, but I do think it could be easily misunderstood in its current form. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 08:33, September 5, 2017 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Some formatting issues. Firstly, I'd like to see the BTS subsectioned, particularly to partition off the cut content. It looks like the thing to do would be to put the first and third paragraphs in one subsection and the cut content in another.
  • Podracing Tales should use whichever SW.com template is appropriate.
  • The size of the article just isn't big enough to support a body image. It doesn't look good forced in like that between two sections. I'd recommend just removing the body image. And for that matter, rearranging the BTS per the previous objection might allow you move that concept art image out of the Appearances/Sources, which is never ideal, and into the BTS. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:50, September 20, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

4B-EG-6

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:39, September 8, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Despite literally having EG-6 in its name, every source clearly identifies this droid as a GNK.

(1 ACs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Imperators II(Talk) 15:53, September 8, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Jim The Lamproid (talk) 22:24, September 8, 2017 (UTC)
  3. It's like there's not even any real difference between the two. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 01:14, September 9, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Intro: "4B-EG-6 was ready in the base's landing zones" — ready for what?
  • Could you add some context for why the droids were so excited in "Fan Droids"? IIRC, they were watching a hologram of R2's exploits.
  • I removed the image where 4B-EG-6 was the least visible since he article was becoming a bit overcrowded. Imperators II(Talk) 15:31, September 8, 2017 (UTC)
AV

Comments

K-3PO

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:47, September 14, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Ayrehead
  • Could you actually mention the Empire by name somewhere in the body rather than just pipe linking. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:21, September 15, 2017 (UTC)
  • I think the article should include a little more information about its destruction since we know what point it had been destroyed by and that it was caught in debris in the control room. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:21, September 15, 2017 (UTC)
    • I'll expand upon this section as soon as I get a new monitor for my XBOX, which currently serves as my Blu-ray player, so I can rewatch the battle. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:57, September 16, 2017 (UTC)
  • Would the rank of captain mean that it's part of the Alliance military? Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:21, September 15, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

  • Did you check StarWars.com for anything that might include K-3PO? I know the Legends article doesn't include anything from the outdated Encyclopedia or the ESB parent page, and I most likely had checked that stuff and confirmed he isn't there before they went offline, but what about any of the current stuff on that website? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:12, September 15, 2017 (UTC)


Junn

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:42, September 17, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: One of the more annoying Leia characters to write up since his motivations and actual role are so vague. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:42, September 17, 2017 (UTC)

(3 ACs/0 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:27, September 18, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Ok I'm getting a bit tired of these Leia noms now. :P 1358 (Talk) 17:36, September 19, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Imperators II(Talk) 22:58, September 23, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Toprawa
  • The USW reference should manual-ref-note it or use a double ref note.
  • I'm a bit unclear of what this means by "plant." Can you clarify any? "Junn recognized the signal as a plant and realized it was Leia arriving."
    • Annoyingly not, that's all Junn refers to it as. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:40, September 18, 2017 (UTC)
  • I left a redlink for jacket, which you should create. There's at least one Databank mention and of course the whole thing with Poe's jacket in TFA. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 00:23, September 18, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Tavvar Va'ran

(3 ACs/2 User/5 Total)

Support

  1. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:20, September 19, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 18:56, September 20, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 19:19, September 20, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:27, September 22, 2017 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Always a pleasure to see a Tope GAN. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 22:37, September 23, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.