Entertainment
 

Wookieepedia:Canon policy

From Wookieepedia, the Star Wars wiki.

This page is a proposed Wookieepedia policy, guideline, or process.

The proposal may still be in development, under discussion, or in the process of gathering consensus for adoption. References or links to this page should not describe it as "policy".

Wookieepedia policies
Article policies
Attribution - Be bold - Copyrights - Deletion policy
Hyperspace content - Layout Guide - Manual of Style
MOS: Proper use of the dash - Neutral point of view
Notability of fan projects - Naming policy
Protection policy - Sourcing - Spoilers
Three-revert rule - Trivia - Vandalism
User policies
Administrative autonomy - Blocking policy - Equality
No personal attacks - Privacy policy
Signature policy - Single-issue voters
Sock puppetry - User image policy - User page policy
Site policies
Consensus - Images - Interviews
Policy and consensus updates
Site feature policy - What Wookieepedia is not
Proposed policies
Bots - Canon policy - Civility
Guidelines
Avoid instruction creep - Avoid self-references
Dispute resolution
Don't disrupt Wookieepedia to prove a point
Soft redirect - Wookify

The goal of Wookieepedia is to be a reliable, concise guide to all readers. To this end, it is necessary for us to restrict to some extent the type of information we accept. Wookieepedia follows the canonical hierarchy established by Lucas Licensing in 2000. While some non-canon material may be covered on Wookieepedia, it should be clearly marked as such.

Contents

[edit] Canon resources

The following outlines resources that canon, those that are non-canon and those of unclear canon status. A discussion of how canon resources "rank" follows.

[edit] What is considered a valid resource?

[edit] What is not considered a valid resource?

  • Anything published under the Infinities label
  • Fan-made blueprints and specifications
  • Fan fiction of any kind
  • Conjecture based our own universe (with the exception, of course, of any such conjecture officially published by Lucas Licensing)
  • Websites, unless information is clearly stated as sourced from a valid reference.
  • Game elements that appear only when triggering a non-canonical branch of the game; that means persons who appear when the Jedi Exile is male, or events happening when Kyle Katarn chooses the dark side ending of the game.

[edit] What is unclear?

  • Dark Horse Comics Tales #1 - #20
  • Unlicensed game magazines
  • Comments by Lucasfilm VIPs other than those listed above
  • Outcomes of alternative solutions to side-quests, such as the fate of the droid C8-42 in KOTOR

[edit] Conflicting canon

When two canon sources conflict, one must consider the two sources and compare their origin.

  1. The films and the word of George Lucas are final. They are incontrovertible. When comparing different versions of the films, the most recent are considered the highest canon, and their edits considered Lucas's original intent and final vision. Production notes are considered to be part of the films.
  2. Content published on Starwars.com, including the Databank and blogs by Leland Chee or other VIPs, brings any information to a near-film status of acceptability.
  3. Expanded Universe information and characters not included in the films, including reference books. This also includes the stories presented in games, but not the actual on-screen gameplay or stats.

In some cases, a source may be contradicted into complete non-canon. In others, only part will be contradicted by a higher source, while the rest remains canon. As long as a piece of information comes from a canon source and is not contradicted by a higher source, it is accepted as canon. For example, an EU novel may introduced a starship, but not detail its weaponry. Later, a WOTC RPG supplement may provide game statistics for the starship previously introduced, including its weaponry. So long as the weaponry detailed in the WOTC source are not contradicted by an existing source, they are considered canon. You must be vigilant, however, as Star Wars authors are prone to reintroducing obscure references from the EU, and the WOTC statistics may eventually be overridden.

[edit] Deleting invalid articles

If you believe an article contains nothing but non-canon information, or is sourced solely from non-valid resources, they should be listed on Wookieepedia:Trash compactor. They may be deleted two days after they have been listed. In this time, other users may defend the article's validity.

If an article is concerning a canon subject but contains information from a non-valid resource, the issue should be debated on the article's individual talk page, and the article should be edited as appropriate.

Except in cases of vandalism, obscenity, and other nonsense, you should not edit the article and simply delete the text.

[edit] See also