FANDOM


             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  13. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  14. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all sixteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Nelvaan

  • Nominated by: MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 07:22, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Since I wrote/am writing several of the Legends counterparts for this topic...

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Something something astrography Imperators II(Talk) 12:45, May 22, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:06, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 08:11, June 11, 2017 (UTC)
  4. ECvoteVery well, I support your reasoning. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 15:41, June 20, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Nelvaan is placed on the map in the Star Wars: The Force Awakens Beginner Game, and the article needs to be updated accordingly. Imperators II(Talk) 09:06, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
    • Oh wow, I didn't actually expect other canon sources to acknowledge it. Anyway, updated. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 09:45, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
      • Impressive. I'd like to see two more things, however:
        • The image should be re-cropped to 400px width per the Layout Guide.
          • Larger image uploaded. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 00:24, May 18, 2017 (UTC)
            • DarthRuiz30 is right, that's not actually the Beginner Game map, it's an FFG Legends map. You'll have to reupload it. ~~
              • JMAS was able to upload a scan of the TFA BG map for me. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 05:45, May 19, 2017 (UTC)
        • It should be noted in the article's body and the infobox that Nelvaan lay on a large hyperroute and what other worlds it was thus connected to. I think it can be deduced from its sources that it's the canon Triellus Trade Route; if not, you can always just go with "unidentified blah hyperspace route blah". Imperators II(Talk) 16:30, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
          • Yeah, I agree that it can be deduced to the Triellus Trade Route based on a couple sources. I'll update accordingly when I get the chance. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 00:24, May 18, 2017 (UTC)
            • I've updated the article and tried to make the reference note the least convoluted that I could. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 04:07, May 22, 2017 (UTC)
  • The backup link in ref 7 doesn't really work. Can you provide the correct link?
    • Ah, it appears when I pasted the link I forgot to remove the "starwars.com." Taken care of. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 06:13, May 22, 2017 (UTC)
  • Let's see that intro that'll bring this to the glory of GAN. Imperators II(Talk) 05:49, May 22, 2017 (UTC)
    • Never mind, this falls under the exception of Rule 13. Imperators II(Talk) 05:50, May 22, 2017 (UTC)
      • Yeah, I think even with an intro, the majority of the article would still be Bts. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 08:02, May 22, 2017 (UTC)
AV
  • Since grid point exist IU (see Standard Galactic Grid), that information will have to be moved to the article's main body. But, hey, that means you get to remove that sentence from the Bts entirely. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 14:55, May 22, 2017 (UTC)
    • How do we know that these grid coordinates are not simply game mechanics? MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 22:41, May 22, 2017 (UTC)
      • The system used in Rogue One: Rebel Dossier (written as an IU document) matches the TEA system to a T, and both were created, at least in part, by Jason Fry. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 13:05, May 23, 2017 (UTC)
        • Just a notice that I haven't forgotten about this. I'm on vacation and will check this as soon as possible. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 11:55, May 27, 2017 (UTC)
          • Ok, if that source is written from an IU perspective, that makes sense. Do we know if the grid is identical to the one used for the Beginner Game? MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 23:29, June 1, 2017 (UTC)
            • Same notations, and the man behind RD is also the guy who created that particular grid system. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:12, June 2, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

  • Just so there are no objections about it later, Fred, I uploaded a cropped version of the map image that is scanned from TFA BG book. Someone seemed to be causing a stink about the fact that the version you uploaded was from a Legends source, even though the section of the map you are using is identical on both versions. - JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 12:47, May 18, 2017 (UTC)
  • Im fairly certain that this article will surpass 250 words after I update with the trade route info and add an intro. It's already at 222. Might be moving this to the GAN tomorrow. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 09:29, May 19, 2017 (UTC)
  • I see the note above about grid points being IU now, but I'm still not sure if it should be listed there since it is against our Layout Guide stipulations. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 15:32, June 19, 2017 (UTC)
    • Perhaps we can update it with different requirements for canon and Legends articles. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:40, June 19, 2017 (UTC)
    • In the case of canon articles, mentioning the coordinates in article's body does not conflict with the Layout Guide, since the policy right now only prohibits doing so for Legends articles: "All infobox material must be detailed in the article proper, with the following exceptions: [...] Map grid coordinates from The Essential Atlas and Star Wars: The Essential Atlas Online Companion, which are not necessarily intended as in-universe material". Imperators II(Talk) 05:34, June 20, 2017 (UTC)
      • We may need to write up a CT on this, but until then, I feel we sure err on the side of accuracy as opposed to uniformity. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 05:41, June 20, 2017 (UTC)


Yoon Cloud

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 20:07, June 3, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Better a 12-armed glider than an 8-armed facehugger.

(0 ECs/3 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:54, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:05, June 12, 2017 (UTC)
  3. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 04:52, June 24, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Sajar Ohmo

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:41, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Now that the spoiler period is over time for some philosophical nonsense.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 12:46, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:04, June 12, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 15:36, June 19, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Fair enough. ProfessorTofty (talk) 15:42, June 21, 2017 (UTC)

Object

  1. As vague as it all is, do you think maybe something of what he said should be mentioned within the article body itself? Perhaps something like "he spoke of the darkness and the light"? ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:27, June 20, 2017 (UTC)
    I really don't feel that would add anything to the article, we have literally no idea what the context for the quote is, for all we know it could be a metaphor and not be about the light and the dark at all in any meaningful capacity. Since the quote is right there I feel it's better to just leave it upto the reader to interpret. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:13, June 21, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Weldsingers of Grace

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:45, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I like to imagine they're burly construction workers who sing beautifully.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 12:47, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:04, June 12, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

HX-1072

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:49, June 13, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A different name from a list in a different replica journal.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Lol, good work. Also, why doesn't the IA work for the Amazon link? Imperators II(Talk) 11:36, June 13, 2017 (UTC)
  2. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 04:50, June 24, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Cartusio system

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:53, June 15, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: An article I wrote nearly a year ago. This is sort of TCW, right?

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Home to the Astrography whale. Imperators II(Talk) 19:52, June 15, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:44, June 21, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Jillsaria system

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:54, June 15, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:"Jillsaaria"? Never heard of it.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 19:49, June 15, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:45, June 21, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Crakull

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 15:46, June 19, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:20, June 21, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • The article doesn't currently state that Rokur Gepta was actually born on Crakull only when. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:52, June 21, 2017 (UTC)
    • Huh, for some reason I failed to specify that. Thanks, done.
  • Is there not a "prior to" you can include for the settling of Croke Reach? Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:52, June 21, 2017 (UTC)
    • Unfortunately, no. Explume Minor and the Croke Reach are only mentioned in The Unknown Regions in connection to the Croke civil war, which isn't precisely dated by the book, as explained on the civil war's Wook article. Imperators II(Talk) 09:14, June 21, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Kokash system

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Huh I've never heard that term before. Literally thought you meant something like a mob shakedown for money which was why I was confused. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:18, June 21, 2017 (UTC)
  2. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 04:57, June 24, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • Is there any more context for what a shakedown cruise is? Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:47, June 21, 2017 (UTC)
    • Not sure what you mean, "shakedown" and "shakedown cruise" are real-life terms that basically mean testing a new ship or an aircraft in order to prepare it for regular service. Imperators II(Talk) 09:10, June 21, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Aradia system

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:53, June 21, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.