FANDOM


             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  13. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  14. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

K-DROID

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:11, November 16, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Positive, Encouraging K-DROID.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:42, November 20, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 13:58, November 25, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • What kind of station and frequency? Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:34, November 17, 2017 (UTC)
    • Presumably radio, but no sources specify such.
  • Could you make clear that they broadcast the song in 4.3 ABY while G2-9T was listening (I'm assuming). 00:34, November 17, 2017 (UTC)
  • Could you expand the BTS slightly to mention that park goers could hear the radio playing in the line? Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:35, November 17, 2017 (UTC)
Imperators II
  • You have two consecutive [1] references here, please revise.
  • On the G2 repair droid/Legends FAN you state the first source to identify the droid model was TNEGTD. Please update the referencing accordingly.
  • The Blog backup link doesn't work, please provide an archival date.
  • Category:Star Tours is supposed to be an in-universe category, so I don't think it's a good fit for this article. Imperators II(Talk) 19:58, December 3, 2017 (UTC)
    • Removed; personally, I think that cat is in need of a major reworking. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:15, December 3, 2017 (UTC)
  • The dating reference needs to be converted into a manual ref note. The cited article doesn't actually use the BBY/ABY notation, nor, of course, does it explain how "4.3: Death Star III? [WDST]" relates to G2-9T. Imperators II(Talk) 20:40, December 3, 2017 (UTC)
    • How would you go about saying that? I've seen a lot of article that translate, say, "fifteen years before ANH" straight into 15 BBY without a note. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:23, December 12, 2017 (UTC)
      • Firstly, you need to say something to the effect of "The Blog post dates the events surrounding Death Star III to 4.3 years after the Battle of Yavin, which corresponds to the year 4.3 ABY according to the dating system used by sources such as X." Secondly, you need to connect those "Death Star III events" to G2-9T. Imperators II(Talk) 08:54, December 12, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

  1. Made an edit to the infobox for clarity. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 13:58, November 25, 2017 (UTC)


Parkellan Sling

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:20, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: SPOILER WARNING FOR BFII

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 14:37, November 25, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Leresen system

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:23, November 29, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Zoraster

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:14, November 29, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Blackfel system/Legends

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:20, November 28, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 20:12, December 5, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Let's see an affiliation category.
  • Blackfel's appearance in Boba Fett is Dead 3 also counts as an appearance of the Blackfel system.
    • For clarification; even if an appearance is limited to just the objects within a given system, it still counts as an appearance of said system, yes? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:20, November 28, 2017 (UTC)
      • This hasn't been codified, but I do agree with such reasoning, yes. For example, the Great Massassi Temple is a part of Yavin 4, which in turn is part of the Yavin system and the Gordian Reach sector; so, I think an appearance of the Temple constitutes an appearance of the moon, the system, and the sector. Imperators II(Talk) 21:27, November 28, 2017 (UTC)
        • Makes senses to me; I'll adopt that idea going forward. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:37, November 28, 2017 (UTC)
  • Please mention the Fallon's arrival at Blackfel (and maybe the Imperial presence in the orbit/system/space?).
  • The Essential Atlas puts the M-7 section (M-8, too, therefore all of the Greater Plooriod sector) of the Expansion Region in the Northern Dependencies.
  • Blackfel was blockaded? Was any reason given for that in the comic? Imperators II(Talk) 19:45, December 3, 2017 (UTC)
    • That was just my wording than anything else; would it be better to refer to it as a fleet? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:50, December 4, 2017 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • Just looking at the picture I'd say this article needs to be expanded to include the ships that are in the system. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:30, November 29, 2017 (UTC)
    • So, the four Star Destroyers, TIEs, and the Lambda? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:41, December 3, 2017 (UTC)
      • More just the 4 Star Destroyer since presumably the TIEs and Lambda are stationed on the Destroyers. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:25, December 3, 2017 (UTC)
        • Should I specify submodel, since the pair in the background don't have distinuishable conning towers? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:21, December 4, 2017 (UTC)
          • Added; what do you think? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 01:59, December 4, 2017 (UTC)
            • You should specify that he was traveling onto the planet, not taking off from it. Also, can the date be referenced directly to the comic or does it need an explanatory ref? Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:43, December 4, 2017 (UTC)
              • Added; the date come directly from the comic. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:10, December 5, 2017 (UTC)

Comments


Tuanulberry bush

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Omalin Fisker

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:40, December 3, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I've been trying to work out who this Infinity character was for ages.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Orroman

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:47, December 8, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Biskar system

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:31, December 8, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Wookiee honor code

  • Nominated by: Cwedin(talk) 04:11, December 8, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

  • For those wondering, I didn't mention Black Krrsantan because he was possessed and doesn't necessarily abide by the same culture as Chewie. - Cwedin(talk) 04:11, December 8, 2017 (UTC)


Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.