FANDOM


             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Premium-ComprehensiveArticle

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  13. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  14. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of one week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Take Them On

  • Nominated by: QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 21:57, December 1, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 12:02, December 3, 2018 (UTC)
  2. They'll be hearing from A-ha's lawyers soon. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 13:00, December 3, 2018 (UTC)
  3. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 14:51, December 3, 2018 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 16:55, December 3, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Permission to Think

  • Nominated by: QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 21:58, December 1, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Would be cool if there was a category for anti-Imperial songs, don't know if any others wrote them. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 13:03, December 3, 2018 (UTC)
  2. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 14:51, December 3, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 16:58, December 3, 2018 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 09:04, December 4, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Permission Denied

  • Nominated by: QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 22:00, December 1, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 14:52, December 3, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Fan26 (Talk) 15:47, December 3, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Good job changing the wording between these articles. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:00, December 3, 2018 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 16:55, December 6, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Dalisor system

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:57, December 3, 2018 (UTC)
  2. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 14:47, December 3, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:06, December 3, 2018 (UTC)
  4. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 16:33, December 5, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Alaris

  • Nominated by: Commander Code-8 Hello There! 11:41, December 5, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: My first planet nom. This is where the fun begins

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 22:32, December 8, 2018 (UTC)
  2. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 07:37, December 9, 2018 (UTC)
  3. Zed42 (talk) 07:53, December 9, 2018 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 18:19, December 10, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Anil
  • I think the first sentence of the article is a little crowded with all those "in the" prepositions. Please see if you can reword it.
    • How's that?
  • I know we don't mention grid coordinates in the body of Legends articles per Forum:CT Archive/Utilizing Atlas grid coordinates, but it would be nice to mention it in the Behind the scenes section, so that it is not infobox-exclusive. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 15:29, December 5, 2018 (UTC)
    • Alright then
  • Also, per Forum:CT Archive/Infobox image size for mobile skin, the infobox image shall be at least 400px in width if you are able to adjust the crop a little wider out. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 18:14, December 5, 2018 (UTC)
    • I've uploaded a wider version that includes the moons and takes up the whole infobox, I think that's the best I can do within reason. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 08:59, December 6, 2018 (UTC)
QGJ
  • This article makes it sound as if the Wookiees were the first to discover Alaris Prime, but it had once been a site of a battle during the New Sith Wars.
    • I gave it a short acknowledgement, hope it's not too clunky
  • Please provide the timeframe for the Wookiees' rediscovery and colonization of Alaris Prime.
    • Done.
  • Attichitcuk lacks any context in the Bts. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 17:32, December 5, 2018 (UTC)
Zed
  • Shouldn't its moon be named in the "Moons" section of the infobox?
    • Sure
  • A minor thing, but the semicolon after "one of its small moons" would probably look better as a comma.
    • The one time I thought I'd used it right.
  • "The planet had eight moons and had the sixth orbital position around the star Kashyyyk." To remove the repetition of "had", maybe replace the second occurrence with something like "held" or "was in". Zed42 (talk) 09:24, December 6, 2018 (UTC)
Imp
  • Same thing with the Slice as with the Alaris Expanse. Imperators II(Talk) 18:02, December 6, 2018 (UTC)
    • Very well.
  • {{Imagecat}}, please. Imperators II(Talk) 18:02, December 6, 2018 (UTC)
    • Done.
  • Is "the outer arm" used by the source? "Arm" is usually used when discussing galaxies, not systems. Imperators II(Talk) 18:02, December 6, 2018 (UTC)
    • Sure does, even with the capitalisation
  • Date for the NSW battle, please. Imperators II(Talk) 18:02, December 6, 2018 (UTC)
  • NSW isn't the earliest known infobit about Alaris Prime, either. TOR Scavenging Crew Skill mission "Hunting Party" mentions two Trandoshan clans holding a hunting competition on Alaris Prime. Imperators II(Talk) 18:02, December 6, 2018 (UTC)
    • I thought this one over and decided that having both those references are honestly unnecessary in regards to this article, so I've removed them and just said that Alaris was uncolonized, which I think gets the point across
      • I think you should now specify which uncolonized, resource-rich world exactly are you talking about there, Alaris or Alaris Prime. Imperators II(Talk) 11:04, December 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • Geonosis and the Outer Rim Worlds, p.75 mentions "middle-period Krorral" style of architecture (eventually integrated in Kamino's cities such as Tipoca City) being used in "the Gkrur clan compounds on Kashyyyk and the Alaris colonies." Imperators II(Talk) 18:02, December 6, 2018 (UTC)
    • Thanks for finding that. Should have known to search through the what links here page. Added in.
      • Before writing up astro articles, I usually check at least this trio of places: Special:WhatLinksHere, Special:PrefixIndex, and finally good old Search. Imperators II(Talk) 11:04, December 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • This is interesting. Star Wars: Force and Destiny Core Rulebook, p.359 reads: "A moon of the gas giant Alaris, Alaris Prime was terraformed over the millennia by Wookiee colonists to resemble Kashyyyk." (The book is set during the Empire years of the Great Jedi Purge, before the Galactic Civil War has begun in earnest.) Imperators II(Talk) 18:02, December 6, 2018 (UTC)
    • It sure is. Added it to the sources, though I won't integrate it in since it only refers to one moon, so it can be included on Alaris Prime's article when I write it up, unlike the previous references
  • You're currently using the date ref to source more than just the dates. Imperators II(Talk) 18:02, December 6, 2018 (UTC)
  • Well, now stating that the moon was "discovered" in the last few decades of the Republic like that kind of conflicts with what I quoted from the Force and Destiny Core Rulebook above. Imperators II(Talk) 04:30, December 10, 2018 (UTC)
    • I should have been explicit with this earlier, but the sources are absolutely conflicting. From GB's databank: The Wookiees have many legends about how the immense wroshyr tree, native to Kashyyyk, migrated across the vacuum of space to Alaris, but no definite theory has emerged. Alaris Prime was discovered independently by Wookiee explorers. The part about the wroshyr trees is also mentioned in The Fact File and Complete Encyclopedia. Unlike the issues that came up with Alaris Prime's mentions in Old Republic era media, which can be reconciled with the assumption that the moon was forgotten for a near millennium, I think this one is doomed to be a canon issue acknowledged in Alaris Prime's Bts. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 14:18, December 10, 2018 (UTC)
      • Let's battle it out on that nomination, then. :P Imperators II(Talk) 18:19, December 10, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Tendo system

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Fan26 (Talk) 04:39, December 7, 2018 (UTC)
  2. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 10:37, December 7, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:41, December 7, 2018 (UTC)
  4. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 12:31, December 9, 2018 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 15:44, December 9, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Plavonia system

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 21:16, December 6, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Somebody say something smart about starfish? Huh? Not so cool now, are ya, huh?!

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Imp's getting snarkier. Fan26 (Talk) 04:40, December 7, 2018 (UTC)
    Don't do CANs, kids. Imperators II(Talk) 10:20, December 7, 2018 (UTC)
  2. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 10:33, December 7, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:44, December 7, 2018 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 15:37, December 9, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Tellanada system

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 21:16, December 6, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Everybody look for the expression of deja vu on Fan26's face...

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Now someone just needs to write up and nominate the Tellanadan moonflower and the Hismauli hawk-snake. Yay space names! Fan26 (Talk) 04:45, December 7, 2018 (UTC)
  2. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 10:34, December 7, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:46, December 7, 2018 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 15:33, December 9, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments