FANDOM


             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  13. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  14. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all sixteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Pollus Maksim

  • Nominated by: Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:35, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/4 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. - Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (Talk) 19:38, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:46, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
  3. --Lewisr (talk) 20:13, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 05:00, August 16, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Have you noticed the automatic maintenance category at the bottom of the article? The Twitter citation is lacking a screenshot.
    • Gah, I made a note to myself to do that but it seems it slipped by regardless. Added now. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 17:23, August 8, 2017 (UTC)
  • Ref 3 needs to be expanded into a manual reference note explaining how Aftermath is connected to the battle for Kuat Drive Yards. (Also, maybe you can utilize some of the well-detailed dating used on Timeline of canon media?) Imperators II(Talk) 15:05, August 7, 2017 (UTC)
    • Courtesy of the timeline of canon media page I've added that the battle occurred in the fifth month after the Battle of Endor. However, I've left the year out as I'm not sure we can say for certain exactly what year the events of Life Debt are in. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 17:23, August 8, 2017 (UTC)
      • Just want to say that Star Wars: Galactic Atlas says that Kes Dameron and Share Bay moved to Yavin in 5 ABY and that was 3 months after Endor, so if its in the fifth month it should also be in 5 ABY too (unless we don't know exactly how long a year lasts) --Lewisr (talk) 17:31, August 8, 2017 (UTC)
        • There's a tweet from Pablo in which he says—in regard to how many months are in a year—to "Go with 12. It's easiest." In that case, the events of Life Debt would indeed be in 5 ABY. I'll try to work on writing up the reference for this shortly—should be a doozy. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 17:38, August 8, 2017 (UTC)
          • You'll still have to note that Aftermath takes place 2 months after Endor. Imperators II(Talk) 17:47, August 8, 2017 (UTC)
            • Apologies for the delay but it's up now, although it's a bit of a mouthful. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 18:59, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
              • Right now what the note does is establish that Kuat happened no earlier than 5 ABY (what Lewisr told you), but it fails to explain why it didn't happen in, say, 6 ABY (what you found out with the tweet). Imperators II(Talk) 06:22, August 14, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

  • Not an objection, in Life Debt its mentioned the guild head of the Kuat Drive Yards surrendered as well as Maksim, do you reckon its worth adding? If you don't then no worries, just something I wanted to check with you --Lewisr (talk) 19:54, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
    • I was wondering about that. I've gone ahead and added a mention of the guild head into the article, as well as created a page for him or her. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 20:10, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
      • Nice job! --Lewisr (talk) 20:13, August 6, 2017 (UTC)

Vote to remove nomination (EC only)

  1. ECvote Unaddressed objection more than a week old. I left Cevan a message. Imperators II(Talk) 08:23, August 21, 2017 (UTC)


Falasia system

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 18:47, August 12, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Just in case you wondered where all the galaxy's flatscreens came from.

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:41, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 20:21, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:31, August 19, 2017 (UTC)
  4. These astrography articles never end. I love it. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 08:12, August 19, 2017 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 01:38, August 21, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Bekk Tunit

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:27, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 20:23, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 17:56, August 14, 2017 (UTC)
  3. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 23:36, August 18, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 23:57, August 18, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Since this is a Canon article, please rearrange the BTS so that the reader is first introduced to the subject's debut in Canon and only then to its Legends origin.
    • Done. Do we actually have a policy on this? I personally prefer chronological, although I'm not going to argue over it. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:47, August 14, 2017 (UTC)
  • Backup link in ref 4 needs to be fixed. Imperators II(Talk) 06:50, August 14, 2017 (UTC)
    • Looking again, that link didn't even give the correct date. Replaced it with a functioning amazon one. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:47, August 14, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Mechro-II

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:28, August 14, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 00:31, August 14, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 06:43, August 14, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:29, August 15, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Stridan

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:24, August 15, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I truly wish the canon status of other FFG stuff was clearer.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. I'd think ST-based FFG stuff can be safely considered canon. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:05, August 15, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 06:57, August 16, 2017 (UTC)
  3. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 08:12, August 19, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Is the shuttle identified as "Upsilon-class command shuttle" anywhere in the expansion, or just as "Upsilon-class shuttle"? Imperators II(Talk) 20:33, August 15, 2017 (UTC)
    • Hmm doesn't seem to be, I hadn't noticed how inconsistent the naming for the Upsilons is. Added another source. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:42, August 15, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

  • I'm fairly certain that there's precedent for ship's being used in infobox images when a picture of their pilot isn't available; however, I can't seem to find an example right now. I know I haven't completely made this up since others have mentioned it recently, so I'd appreciate if others could weigh in. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:42, August 15, 2017 (UTC)
    • The articles for Redline and many other TIE pilots use ships as inforbox images. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:21, August 15, 2017 (UTC)
      • When looking for precedent, you should look among status articles, preferably more recent ones. Imperators II(Talk) 06:57, August 16, 2017 (UTC)
        • Apparently I'd completely imagined this being a thing, there doesn't appear to be any status precedent. JMAS has re-added the image to the BTS, but if people dislike it being there I'm happy to remove it all together due to the length of the article. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:22, August 16, 2017 (UTC)


Dead Moon of Antar

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 07:23, August 16, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Let's be honest, who ever actually checks the timeline sections of Ultimate Star Wars?

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 14:22, August 17, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • "Subjugator-class heavy cruiser" shouldn't be sourced to "Destroy Malevolence".
  • Can the episode number and the season number of "Destroy Malevolence" really be sourced to the episode itself? Imperators II(Talk) 13:11, August 17, 2017 (UTC)
    • No, but it can be sourced to the Episode Guide book. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 14:07, August 17, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Pizilis

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:33, August 19, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Tofallid

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:08, August 17, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: What I assume are basically giraffe-people.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 17:17, August 17, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:34, August 19, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

P'frorin system

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:34, August 19, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:36, August 20, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Tredwall

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:12, August 18, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:34, August 21, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 18:38, August 21, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • "picking on gullible marks" - "pick on" is definitely not the same as "pick up". Please change this.
  • Actually, can you maybe paraphrase that whole last clause so that it's not nearly word-for-word?
  • I think you should add that Tredwall was mentioned in the Cynabar's Droid Datalog. Imperators II(Talk) 21:42, August 18, 2017 (UTC)
  • Can we get context for Selonia and maybe the Vohai Unirail? Imperators II(Talk) 07:07, August 19, 2017 (UTC)
    • Added context for Selonia, but for the Unirail, it would likely add an entire sentence to the article that has absolutely nothing to do with its subject. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:54, August 21, 2017 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • I'm not sure having two distinct quotes together is really necessary especially since it makes the quote so long. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:35, August 20, 2017 (UTC)
    • Removed the second quote. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:40, August 21, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Nelvaanian

  • Nominated by: MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 08:25, August 19, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Might as well write everything related to this place.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:34, August 19, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:31, August 20, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 08:08, August 21, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • It seems "a scale" or "scales" would be more fitting than "the scale". Which one is it? Imperators II(Talk) 08:19, August 20, 2017 (UTC)
    • Indeed, "a" is the more appropriate article. Thanks! MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 21:45, August 20, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Rakhuuun

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 06:26, August 20, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: That's the weirdest spelling of "raccoon" I've seen in a while.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Ayrehead
  • I'm not sure the planet itself should be in the shipyards category unless the source describes the entire planet as being one. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:28, August 20, 2017 (UTC)
    • While I agree with you that the category isn't applicable from a classification viewpoint, I was thinking it would be beneficial for site navigation purposes. A reader would much more likely discover that Rakhuuun had a shipyard (if it wasn't covered in the shipyard article itself) if it was simply in Category:Shipyards than if he/she had to use the WhatLinksHere feature. I can remove it, though, if you disagree. Imperators II(Talk) 07:43, August 20, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Mennis Duren

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:31, August 20, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Annoyingly this seems to be the best image you can get of him in the film, and is even the one used in the featurette.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote What a jolly fellow. Imperators II(Talk) 11:54, August 20, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II

Comments

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.