Fandom

Wookieepedia

Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

134,561pages on
this wiki
Add New Page
Talk114
             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  13. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  14. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all sixteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Avenel system

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. I wonder if this originated from confusion with the Avenelle system? Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:10, January 10, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 21:18, January 10, 2017 (UTC)
  3. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 07:12, February 1, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Pyke syndicate AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:23, February 7, 2017 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:07, March 18, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Quilan system

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:47, January 23, 2017 (UTC)
  2. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 07:14, February 1, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 02:23, February 4, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Pyke syndicate AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:25, February 7, 2017 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:14, March 18, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead02
  • Could you add a little more information on the artefact, at the very least that it originated from before The Old Republic game (I assume) and possibly that it eventually ended up on Tatooine just to show that it left the system. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:44, January 10, 2017 (UTC)
    • How does it look? Imperators II(Talk) 23:17, January 12, 2017 (UTC)
      • Wait I'm confused, is it a single artefact or a type of artefact which there are multiple of? The actual article treats it as a single thing. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:21, January 12, 2017 (UTC)
        • From the TOR Crew Skill mission: "The artifact you've recovered appears to be a Quilan Pyradex, one of only a handful ever found." (The original source, Secrets of Mos Eisley, gave no indication there were several Pyradexes). Imperators II(Talk) 23:27, January 12, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Nomaria system

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:33, January 10, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 00:11, January 15, 2017 (UTC)
  3. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 07:14, February 1, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Pyke syndicate AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:25, February 7, 2017 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:35, March 18, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Sedge hat

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:22, January 15, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: It's weird that the hat has more complete infobox than Marak.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 18:52, January 15, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 02:07, January 18, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Pyke syndicate AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:17, February 7, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Cwedin(talk) 20:28, February 10, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Kalevala

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Nice work Lewisr (talk) 02:37, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 20:51, January 31, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:37, February 1, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 21:45, February 2, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • A slight difference in punctuation between the lead quote in this article and that on the bombing.
  • "represented Kalevala" - represented where?
    • Done, though I'm not sure about the world's connection to the New Mandos. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:21, January 27, 2017 (UTC)
  • The Galactic Republic should be added to the infobox.
  • Context for Coruscant, Mandalore and the Death Watch needed. Imperators II(Talk) 08:04, January 26, 2017 (UTC)
  • 210 words, please provide or draft an intro, maybe it goes over 250. Imperators II(Talk) 07:03, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
    • Not enough info for a description section, so I just made a separate history section. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 07:05, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
      • There's kind of a conflict with WP:S Rule #1. Frankly, I don't see a problem with a short description section. Imperators II(Talk) 08:19, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
        • The note also says this: "If, of course, the information does not appear elsewhere in the article, then it is acceptable to source it in the introduction." As such, I would argue that adding a description section to the article would add nothing. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:58, January 31, 2017 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • I feel it's worth mentioning Merrik's death since he ceases to be senator for the planet. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:30, January 26, 2017 (UTC)
  • You don't actually say that Death Watch were behind the bombing. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:30, January 26, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Xephi Sep Award

  • Nominated by: Cevan IMPpress (talk) 21:37, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Always nice to see WEG references in canon.

(1 ECs/5 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 06:27, February 7, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Pyke syndicate AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:13, February 7, 2017 (UTC)
  3. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 10:23, February 9, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Cwedin(talk) 20:39, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
  5. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 20:47, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
  6. Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 18:50, February 17, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Xephi Sep

  • Nominated by: Cevan IMPpress (talk) 00:14, February 8, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Companion to Xephi Sep Award and my first Legends nomination.

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Once you go Legends... Imperators II(Talk) 18:30, February 8, 2017 (UTC)
  2. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 15:51, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Cwedin(talk) 20:44, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Pyke syndicate AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:12, February 11, 2017 (UTC)
  5. Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 18:50, February 17, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Could you mention when the kinesculpture was on the Kuari Princess? That would give the reader some clue as to when Sep lived. Imperators II(Talk) 07:41, February 8, 2017 (UTC)
    • I've looked around and it doesn't seem the events of Riders of the Maelstrom have an exact date, however I've added that it was on the Kuari Princess during the Galactic Civil War. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 13:17, February 8, 2017 (UTC)
  • Does the source explain how an artist's original work can be in two suites at once? Imperators II(Talk) 13:25, February 8, 2017 (UTC)
    • I'm afraid not. Here's the relevant quote: "The suites come complete with [...] original kinesculpture by renown artist Xephi Sep[.]" I didn't want to make any assumptions about the number of kinesculptures in the article, so I kept the somewhat wonky wording of the source material. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 16:07, February 8, 2017 (UTC)
      • Looking at it again, I suppose I could say that each suite featured an original kinesculpture by Sep. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 16:10, February 8, 2017 (UTC)
        • Yeah, I think it's safe to interpret it that way. Imperators II(Talk) 16:18, February 8, 2017 (UTC)
          • All right, I've gone ahead and reworded it. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 16:32, February 8, 2017 (UTC)
  • Hmmm. The Rebellion era is set in the time period from 0 BBY to 4 ABY, while the Galactic Civil War takes place from 2 BBY to 19 ABY. If the source does not provide any more specific details regarding dating, then the Rebellion era will have to go. Imperators II(Talk) 16:40, February 8, 2017 (UTC)
    • The book refers to the Emperor in the present tense, and it was published 2 years prior to the start of Dark Empire, which saw Palpatine's resurrection. With this in mind, I believe it would be set in the Rebellion era, correct? Cevan IMPpress (talk) 17:56, February 8, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Jedi grammarian

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Supporting provided Imperators' and Brandon's objections are satisfied.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 17:53, February 17, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • "the term "heresy" mentioned in the doom of the Ordu Aspectu—a battle" —How can a term be mentioned in a battle?
    • I have changed that part to make it more clear. See if it works. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 22:03, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
  • Please switch to the Marvel citation template.
    • That is actually from comicstore.marvel.com and I'm not sure if it is possible to fit that into the template. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 15:29, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
      • No need to, just locate the issue's entry on marvel.com proper and use it in the template. Imperators II(Talk) 15:37, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
  • I fail to see how Category:Scientific occupations is applicable here. Maybe Category:Linguistic occupations should be a subcategory of that (that's another matter), but the grammarian rank doesn't seem to be connected to science in any other way than being connected to linguistics. Imperators II(Talk) 09:16, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
    • In real life, linguistics is identified as "the scientific study of language," and linguists are considered scientists (according to Linguistics and Scientist articles on Wikipedia). But feel free to remove them if you think they shouldn't be there. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 15:29, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
      • That is exactly why I mentioned the possibility of making that Linguistic category the subcategory of the Scientific category, in which case there'd be no need to include both the Linguistic category and its parent Scientific category on the article. I just did that for you, as I realized it's a {{Sofixit}}. :P Imperators II(Talk) 15:37, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
        • Oh, it wasn't a {{Sofixit}} at all :( I just did not do that because the Linguistic category also includes some articles (like "Interpreter" and "Translator") which do not necessarily study language or do anything scientific. I just forgot to write my opinion here, sorry about that. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 21:35, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
          • Ah, you're right, I hadn't noticed those. I've reverted my edit. Imperators II(Talk) 14:31, February 11, 2017 (UTC)
Brandon
  • Maybe it's just me, but this article feels like a huge reach. Like, I'd read that line and interpret it as Aphra just being cheeky. I don't think it's meant to suggest there was a rank called Jedi grammarian. I question whether this article needs to exist, tbh. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 16:53, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
    • I just didn't think of that while I was reading that part in the comic. I totally get what you are saying, she does that many times in the series (like returning with an awesome cannon and killing the raiders stuff), but I simply didn't get that vibe at that moment. I thought she was just saying that there were many other theories which contradict his father's. If the majority felt like you did, I agree it should be removed. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 21:35, February 10, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

  • Made a slight edit to the article, please take a look.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 17:53, February 17, 2017 (UTC)


Arhul Nemo

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:34, February 16, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: More Rogue One promotional mentions

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 18:48, February 16, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 17:50, February 17, 2017 (UTC)
  3. --Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 08:48, February 19, 2017 (UTC)
  4. I wonder if we'll see Nemo in Rebel Rising? Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:19, February 25, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Saul Karath's predecessor

  • Nominated by: —Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 17:43, February 17, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Getting back in the swing of things.

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Fixed up a couple of things but looks good! --Lewisr (talk) 18:14, February 17, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:35, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 20:16, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:21, February 25, 2017 (UTC)
  5. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:23, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead02
  • Good to see you back! You'll need to add a behind the scenes section but otherwise it looks good. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:14, February 17, 2017 (UTC)
    • Thanks, I plan to be back for a long time. My writing skills have diminished, and this gives me the opportunity to spruce them back up. Fixed the objection, I think.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 18:39, February 17, 2017 (UTC)
      • Can the release year of KOTOR be sourced to the game itself? Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:51, February 18, 2017 (UTC)
        • Removed year and reference, as the statement is self-referencing.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 11:40, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
          • Aaaand I added some stuff.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 13:09, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
            • The external link reference will need an archive link as well. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:55, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
              • Not quite sure how to do that...—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 16:02, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
                • No worries I've added the link for you. For future reference you just need to go to Archive.org and input the web address into the wayback machine. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:35, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
Imperators II

Comments

Ketticus Brayl

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:46, February 18, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: One of the lads.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 13:44, February 18, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 13:08, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:22, February 25, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ketticus Brayl's wife

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:46, February 18, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: What a lovely couple.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Heart-warming. Imperators II(Talk) 13:47, February 18, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 12:52, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:23, February 25, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Bar Neth system

  • Nominated by: Pyke syndicate AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:35, February 18, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 06:09, February 19, 2017 (UTC)
  2. --Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 08:45, February 19, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:23, February 25, 2017 (UTC)
  4. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 18:05, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Praya system

  • Nominated by: Pyke syndicate AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:36, February 18, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 06:10, February 19, 2017 (UTC)
  2. --Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 08:46, February 19, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:23, February 25, 2017 (UTC)
  4. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 18:05, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Q2-B3KO

  • Nominated by: Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:52, February 28, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: "This goes out to all you robots 'cross the galaxy. It's time for you and me to rise up and strike back. Don't stop until we dominate, won't you feel great. When we exterminate all organic life!"

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 20:06, February 28, 2017 (UTC)
  2. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 18:02, March 1, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Nice.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 18:40, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Vendusii system

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:05, March 11, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 00:19, March 13, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.