FANDOM


             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Premium-ComprehensiveArticle

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  13. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  14. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Blue Puff Cube

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:16, February 5, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Apparently these are literally the best food a Wookiee can eat.

(0 ECs/5 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:21, February 5, 2018 (UTC)
  2. I bet they'd go great with hot chocolate. - Cwedin(talk) 02:21, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
  3. Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 18:54, February 12, 2018 (UTC)
  4. I bet they taste like gummies--Vitus InfinitusTalk 18:56, February 12, 2018 (UTC)
  5. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 03:30, February 18, 2018 (UTC)

Object

AV
  • I'd ask that the Bts be fully referenced, the release date in particular. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:20, February 5, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Garollia system

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:35, February 5, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 19:06, February 12, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 1358 (Talk) 07:41, February 16, 2018 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:07, February 18, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Mud-Jumpers

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:13, February 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Given that Mimban will finally be making its on-screen debut, I thought it appropriate to nom the seeming predecessors of the new mudtroopers.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. --Vitus InfinitusTalk 20:36, February 9, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 09:46, February 14, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy
Ayrehead
  • The audio clip should really match the quote in length. I can cut the clip down for you, or you could add the first sentence to the quote. I'll leave it up to you. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:17, February 18, 2018 (UTC)
    • Could you just upload a separate, shortened version of the quote? Another article uses the full quote. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 09:44, February 18, 2018 (UTC)
  • Per recent discussion on IRC, full dates aren't really necessary for the BTS. You should just include the year. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:17, February 18, 2018 (UTC)
    • Unless this becomes codified in a CT, full dates are part of my personal manual of style, and I see no reason to remove valid information from an article. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 09:44, February 18, 2018 (UTC)
      • While the information is valid, it isn't really relevant to the topic of the article. Tope put's it far more eloquently than I can here in his last objection. Plus, per rule 6 of our sourcing page, we should use as few references as possible and having an additional reference exclusively for date and day goes against this. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:58, February 18, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Tector-class Star Destroyer

  • Nominated by: —Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 19:27, February 9, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Is this it now? Once I nominate one page can I ever stop? Is there no end?

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. --Vitus InfinitusTalk 20:32, February 9, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Ecks Dee
  • "After the Rebel Alliance launched an assault on the seemingly incomplete station, which was actually a trap engineered by Emperor Palpatine designed to destroy the entirety of the rebellion at once" What was a trap? The assault or the incomplete station? The station itself wasn't really the trap. Please clarify.
  • "along with a large portion of the gathered Imperial forces." Can this really be sourced to ROTJ? Been a while since I watched it but I don't remember seeing the fleet decimated, aside from the Death Star and the Executor.
  • Some reviewing notes: NOTOC should only be used if there are no IU sections in the article. In this case, we have a History section, so the TOC should be visible. Secondly, while I admire your linking efforts, some of the pipelinking is questionable at best. Have a look at my copy-edit. If you're talking about the Imperial Navy, the first applicable link needs to point to that article instead of going [[Galactic Empire|Imperial]] [[navy]]. Like you'll see, I've rearranged some of the linking. Let me know if you have any questions. 1358 (Talk) 01:06, February 19, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

  • We don't have an imagecat if the images are only from Legends, right?—Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 19:48, February 9, 2018 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I forgot to mention the CA nom in my edit summary. This is the edit: [1].—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 21:06, February 11, 2018 (UTC)


k'Jtari

  • Nominated by: c'Wedin(talk) 21:02, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 20:37, February 13, 2018 (UTC)

Object

AV
  • Where is the "months" figure actually given in Vader 25? - AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:12, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
    • From the coda. "Months ago, Darth Vader arrived for the first time on Tatooine." - Cwedin(talk) 21:16, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
  • Could you be more percise with your dating citation? Galactic Atlas dates the secret mission to Geonosis to 0 ABY, which definately places the previous issues in the same year. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:35, February 16, 2018 (UTC)
Tommy

Comments

Basan system

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 08:55, February 16, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:23, February 18, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Devros system

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 08:52, February 16, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Kiax (god)

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 1358 (Talk) 07:39, February 16, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 08:43, February 16, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:30, February 18, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ivax

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 1358 (Talk) 07:38, February 16, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 08:45, February 16, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ghothia system

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 14:34, February 18, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Floonorp

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:05, February 18, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Proof the Bith Quarren can make good music out of literal trash.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 15:28, February 18, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy

Comments