FANDOM


             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Premium-ComprehensiveArticle

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  13. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  14. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Fraser Kelly

  • Nominated by: spookycat27talk 16:26, July 19, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: he was interesting to find info on

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:18, July 19, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 09:52, August 6, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy
  • Please create the imagecat.
  • Does the actual quote say "Ron Howards"? Because his name is Ron Howard, so either you need to change it or you need to add "[sic]" after it. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:13, July 19, 2018 (UTC)
    • Altered; since he does say Ron Howards, so I added the [sic] spookycat27talk 17:29, July 19, 2018 (UTC)
Imp
  • Eliminate all contractions. Imperators II(Talk) 10:05, July 31, 2018 (UTC)
  • "Film" should probably be used instead of "movie." Imperators II(Talk) 10:05, July 31, 2018 (UTC)
  • The Wikipedia link for the Urban thing is quite useless, being as it is about a book. Imperators II(Talk) 10:05, July 31, 2018 (UTC)
  • And please provide some contextual qualifier for the Urban thing (what is it? a film? a television series? a play?) Imperators II(Talk) 10:05, July 31, 2018 (UTC)
  • "He grew up Scunthorpe" — a word seems to be missing. Imperators II(Talk) 10:05, July 31, 2018 (UTC)
  • "Kelly auditioned for a role Solo: A Star Wars Story" — a word seems to be missing. Imperators II(Talk) 10:05, July 31, 2018 (UTC)
  • Is kinofilms.ua a more reliable resource than IMDb? Imperators II(Talk) 10:05, July 31, 2018 (UTC)
    • I'm not entirely sure because of the language barrier, so to be safe I switched it with his agent profile.spookycat27talk 14:51, August 1, 2018 (UTC)
  • "after Disney acquired Lucasfilm" — this isn't exactly what the referenced source says, please find another source for this. Imperators II(Talk) 17:53, August 1, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Battle of Culroon III

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 08:12, July 26, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Great work! --Boot Lover/Riverdale Chauffeur (Wanna Discuss Something?) 00:27, July 27, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:42, August 1, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Riverdale
Imp
  • Please add/create a more specific category. Imperators II(Talk) 14:14, August 8, 2018 (UTC)
    • Battles on Culroon III is the only one I can come up with, but I'm hesitant on that since it would only have the same Legends and canon equivalent. Any other suggestions?
      • Never mind, I overlooked the fact that Canon Culroon III hasn't been placed in any astrographical region yet. Imperators II(Talk) 09:36, August 10, 2018 (UTC)
  • Please combine refs 2 and 3 into one ref note. Imperators II(Talk) 14:14, August 8, 2018 (UTC)
    • Done.
  • The title of the Legends short story should be consistently formatted between BTS and ref. Imperators II(Talk) 14:14, August 8, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Massacre of Myomar

  • Nominated by: Commander Code-8 Hello There! 10:05, July 31, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The things I get up to in boring lectures. I seem to have developed a habit of filling in backstory battles for Imperials.

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Yo.-User:Fan26 (Talk) 10:17, July 31, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:26, July 31, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:46, August 1, 2018 (UTC)
  4. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 16:09, August 11, 2018 (UTC)
  5. spookycat27talk 17:55, August 11, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy
  • "and the Massacre of Myomar was one of several battles commanded by the grand admiral,[3] including the Bombardment of Shalam.[2]" Something seems a bit off with this sentence, could you rephrase it? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 10:15, July 31, 2018 (UTC)
Imp-Il-Raz
  • Please format the title of the article correctly in BTS and in all references, where the corresponding citation template should be used. Imperators II(Talk) 10:17, July 31, 2018 (UTC)
    • Corrected the main reference, I'm not quite following what you're asking for in the Bts, and the citation template looks weird in the timeline reference.
  • If the subject is mentioned in TCSWE but doesn't have an entry of its own, you should use in Sources either {{CSWE|volume number||entry name}} if it's just a single entry, or {{CSWE|jang}} for multiple entries. Imperators II(Talk) 10:17, July 31, 2018 (UTC)
  • The date ref needs to be rewritten. The Insider article doesn't mention a single BBY/ABY date. Imperators II(Talk) 15:23, August 8, 2018 (UTC)
    • Actually the introduction to the Insider article writes the first one out fully as "two years before the battle of Yavin". Have rewritten it to correctly source 4 ABY. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 09:51, August 10, 2018 (UTC)
  • You have an unsourced item in the infobox. That's like a cardinal sin in these circles. :P Imperators II(Talk) 21:11, August 11, 2018 (UTC)
    • There is seemingly no limit to the basic shit I can miss.
  • I feel like the last sentence of the body is redundant to what the text is saying earlier. Imperators II(Talk) 21:11, August 11, 2018 (UTC)
    • It's only there so I could acknowledge the Bombardment of Shalam, I'm not quite sure where else to include it, or if that link is even necessary. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 03:24, August 13, 2018 (UTC)
      • Ideally you should incorporate that into that earlier sentence. If that proves impossible, I'd rather relegate the link to a See also section. Imperators II(Talk) 20:12, August 13, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Compliant

  • Nominated by: Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:28, August 2, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:54, August 10, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Dynym Quid

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:38, August 4, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: It always feels weird nominating movie characters as CAs but there's really nothing on this guy.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 12:39, August 5, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 00:09, August 8, 2018 (UTC)
  3. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 16:33, August 11, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy
  • "as several fathiers raced passed": Do you mean "as several fathiers raced past" or "as several fathier racers passed"? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 11:07, August 5, 2018 (UTC)
    • Past, but I guess either would have worked. Good spot. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:01, August 5, 2018 (UTC)
This guy hates vowels
  • Is the human woman not notable enough for an article?
    • She doesn't really meet any of our notability requirements, no BTS info, no dialogue, no impact on plot etc. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:41, August 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • Is it quite accurate to say that his appearance is pictured only in the look and find book? I was under the impression that Pictured only referred to appearances in stuff like posters. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:37, August 7, 2018 (UTC)
    • I've always interpreted Picture Only as when a subject appears in a source, but there is no text related to them at all. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:41, August 7, 2018 (UTC)
      • Every other use of the template I can find goes by your line of thinking, I was wrong. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 00:09, August 8, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Enforcer

  • Nominated by: Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:25, August 5, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:56, August 10, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Piluvia system

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 15:50, August 9, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote I wonder what a salamander-storm would look like. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:02, August 10, 2018 (UTC)
  3. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 16:18, August 11, 2018 (UTC)
  4. ECvote MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 18:20, August 11, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy
  • Could you mention that the Torch Nebula was a sector? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 15:33, August 9, 2018 (UTC)
    • Tried going with something that doesn't sound misleading and/or redundant. Imperators II(Talk) 15:48, August 9, 2018 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • Again, I don't think the planetnamia ref is necessary if you're just saying that it shared it's name with something. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:10, August 10, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Noola system

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 15:35, August 9, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:20, August 10, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Gaddria system

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 15:37, August 9, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:00, August 10, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • I think you should add a little more information on the ambassador, I assumed it was a starship to start with. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:21, August 10, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Ethrani system

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 15:43, August 9, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:32, August 11, 2018 (UTC)
  3. Yo.-User:Fan26 (Talk) 05:27, August 12, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • The D'Astan sector page refers to the Valahari sector as a subsector. Is this inaccurate and there actually is a sector within a sector? Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:59, August 10, 2018 (UTC)
    • The Valahari sector is identified as such by the TCW comic, and it is placed within the D'Astan sector by the Online Companion. Imperators II(Talk) 12:54, August 11, 2018 (UTC)

Comments