Fandom

Wookieepedia

Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

135,137pages on
this wiki
Add New Page
Talk114
             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  13. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  14. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all sixteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Kalevala

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Nice work Lewisr (talk) 02:37, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 20:51, January 31, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:37, February 1, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 21:45, February 2, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • A slight difference in punctuation between the lead quote in this article and that on the bombing.
  • "represented Kalevala" - represented where?
    • Done, though I'm not sure about the world's connection to the New Mandos. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:21, January 27, 2017 (UTC)
  • The Galactic Republic should be added to the infobox.
  • Context for Coruscant, Mandalore and the Death Watch needed. Imperators II(Talk) 08:04, January 26, 2017 (UTC)
  • 210 words, please provide or draft an intro, maybe it goes over 250. Imperators II(Talk) 07:03, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
    • Not enough info for a description section, so I just made a separate history section. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 07:05, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
      • There's kind of a conflict with WP:S Rule #1. Frankly, I don't see a problem with a short description section. Imperators II(Talk) 08:19, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
        • The note also says this: "If, of course, the information does not appear elsewhere in the article, then it is acceptable to source it in the introduction." As such, I would argue that adding a description section to the article would add nothing. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:58, January 31, 2017 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • I feel it's worth mentioning Merrik's death since he ceases to be senator for the planet. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:30, January 26, 2017 (UTC)
  • You don't actually say that Death Watch were behind the bombing. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:30, January 26, 2017 (UTC)
The CP

Sorry bud, gotta enforce WP:Ssourcing Rule 1: intros should not be cited. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 01:47, April 30, 2017 (UTC)

  • Please see above objection. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 01:49, April 30, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

  • I didn't want to add this as an objection because I'm not sure if there's an easy fix to this, and we might have to just wing with how it is, but I find the sentences in the history section to feel a lot like run-ons while reading them, even though they're not. This is because of all the context that's needed to be added; the sentences are simply a bit long and unwieldy to me, though I myself have a habit of writing such sentences, and I recognize sometimes there's a need for them. Anyways, take a look at it, but don't pressure yourself too much if you really can't find a way around this. Sol PacificusFirestorm 02:39, April 25, 2017 (UTC)


Jedi grammarian

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Supporting provided Imperators' and Brandon's objections are satisfied.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 17:53, February 17, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • "the term "heresy" mentioned in the doom of the Ordu Aspectu—a battle" —How can a term be mentioned in a battle?
    • I have changed that part to make it more clear. See if it works. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 22:03, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
  • Please switch to the Marvel citation template.
    • That is actually from comicstore.marvel.com and I'm not sure if it is possible to fit that into the template. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 15:29, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
      • No need to, just locate the issue's entry on marvel.com proper and use it in the template. Imperators II(Talk) 15:37, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
  • I fail to see how Category:Scientific occupations is applicable here. Maybe Category:Linguistic occupations should be a subcategory of that (that's another matter), but the grammarian rank doesn't seem to be connected to science in any other way than being connected to linguistics. Imperators II(Talk) 09:16, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
    • In real life, linguistics is identified as "the scientific study of language," and linguists are considered scientists (according to Linguistics and Scientist articles on Wikipedia). But feel free to remove them if you think they shouldn't be there. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 15:29, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
      • That is exactly why I mentioned the possibility of making that Linguistic category the subcategory of the Scientific category, in which case there'd be no need to include both the Linguistic category and its parent Scientific category on the article. I just did that for you, as I realized it's a {{Sofixit}}. :P Imperators II(Talk) 15:37, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
        • Oh, it wasn't a {{Sofixit}} at all :( I just did not do that because the Linguistic category also includes some articles (like "Interpreter" and "Translator") which do not necessarily study language or do anything scientific. I just forgot to write my opinion here, sorry about that. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 21:35, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
          • Ah, you're right, I hadn't noticed those. I've reverted my edit. Imperators II(Talk) 14:31, February 11, 2017 (UTC)
Brandon
  • Maybe it's just me, but this article feels like a huge reach. Like, I'd read that line and interpret it as Aphra just being cheeky. I don't think it's meant to suggest there was a rank called Jedi grammarian. I question whether this article needs to exist, tbh. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 16:53, February 10, 2017 (UTC)
    • I just didn't think of that while I was reading that part in the comic. I totally get what you are saying, she does that many times in the series (like returning with an awesome cannon and killing the raiders stuff), but I simply didn't get that vibe at that moment. I thought she was just saying that there were many other theories which contradict his father's. If the majority felt like you did, I agree it should be removed. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 21:35, February 10, 2017 (UTC)

Comments


Arhul Nemo

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:34, February 16, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: More Rogue One promotional mentions

(2 ECs/4 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 18:48, February 16, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 17:50, February 17, 2017 (UTC)
  3. --Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 08:48, February 19, 2017 (UTC)
  4. I wonder if we'll see Nemo in Rebel Rising? Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:19, February 25, 2017 (UTC)
  5. Sol PacificusFirestorm 02:42, April 25, 2017 (UTC)
  6. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 20:26, April 30, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Saul Karath's predecessor

  • Nominated by: —Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 17:43, February 17, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Getting back in the swing of things.

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Fixed up a couple of things but looks good! --Lewisr (talk) 18:14, February 17, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:35, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 20:16, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:21, February 25, 2017 (UTC)
  5. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:23, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead02
  • Good to see you back! You'll need to add a behind the scenes section but otherwise it looks good. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:14, February 17, 2017 (UTC)
    • Thanks, I plan to be back for a long time. My writing skills have diminished, and this gives me the opportunity to spruce them back up. Fixed the objection, I think.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 18:39, February 17, 2017 (UTC)
      • Can the release year of KOTOR be sourced to the game itself? Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:51, February 18, 2017 (UTC)
        • Removed year and reference, as the statement is self-referencing.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 11:40, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
          • Aaaand I added some stuff.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 13:09, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
            • The external link reference will need an archive link as well. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:55, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
              • Not quite sure how to do that...—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 16:02, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
                • No worries I've added the link for you. For future reference you just need to go to Archive.org and input the web address into the wayback machine. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:35, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
Imperators II

Comments

Ketticus Brayl

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:46, February 18, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: One of the lads.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 13:44, February 18, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 13:08, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:22, February 25, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ketticus Brayl's wife

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:46, February 18, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: What a lovely couple.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Heart-warming. Imperators II(Talk) 13:47, February 18, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 12:52, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:23, February 25, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Bar Neth system

  • Nominated by: Pyke syndicate AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:35, February 18, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 06:09, February 19, 2017 (UTC)
  2. --Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 08:45, February 19, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:23, February 25, 2017 (UTC)
  4. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 18:05, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Exiled Jedi
  • If the Bar Neth system is not mentioned in Star Tours, you will need to provide an explanation in the reference for how that source can be used to say that it was a quinary system.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 13:53, March 26, 2017 (UTC)
  • Looking over the Bar Neth article briefly, I believe this article should briefly mention Star Tours and the Frontier Vacation Package. That part seems large-scale enough to be mentioned in the system article.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 20:23, April 30, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Praya system

  • Nominated by: Pyke syndicate AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:36, February 18, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 06:10, February 19, 2017 (UTC)
  2. --Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 08:46, February 19, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:23, February 25, 2017 (UTC)
  4. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 18:05, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Q2-B3KO

  • Nominated by: Cevan IMPpress (talk) 19:52, February 28, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: "This goes out to all you robots 'cross the galaxy. It's time for you and me to rise up and strike back. Don't stop until we dominate, won't you feel great. When we exterminate all organic life!"

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 20:06, February 28, 2017 (UTC)
  2. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 18:02, March 1, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Nice.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 18:40, March 6, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:15, March 26, 2017 (UTC)
  5. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 00:26, April 9, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Vendusii system

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:05, March 11, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 00:19, March 13, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Jexeria system

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:29, March 26, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 14:30, March 26, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Vagar Praxut

(0 ECs/3 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 14:30, March 26, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:30, March 26, 2017 (UTC)
  3. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 04:48, April 29, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Lontar system

(0 ECs/3 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 14:26, March 26, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:53, March 26, 2017 (UTC)
  3. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 04:49, April 29, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • Could you add that it's in the Negs? Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:28, March 26, 2017 (UTC)
    • Since the Lontar system doesn't appear in any of the Atlas maps, including the one that depicts the Negs, and since the Negs don't actually cover the entire Colonies part of grid square J-9, I believe it's impossible to say with any certainty that the system indeed lay within the Negs. Imperators II(Talk) 14:47, March 26, 2017 (UTC)
      • Ah I was asking based on the Lontar article, but your reasoning seems sound. I suppose it needs removing from Lontar as well. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:53, March 26, 2017 (UTC)
        • Removed it. As the centuries-old saying goes, "Wookieepedia is not a source." :( Imperators II(Talk) 14:56, March 26, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Jefflac

  • Nominated by: ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:12, April 12, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The very definition of this sort of thing. A creature mentioned only once and in passing in the book Join the Resistance. As far as I can tell, everything is good to go. I don't think it requires an infobox, since we don't really know anything about the creature, other than a single non-native planet. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:12, April 12, 2017 (UTC)

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 05:05, April 12, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:33, April 12, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 01:07, April 13, 2017 (UTC)
  4. This reminds me of the time you suggested that I could nominate pendle or rumbat as comprehensive articles :D (though they need BtS sections). Sol PacificusFirestorm 02:47, April 25, 2017 (UTC)
  5. Yippee! MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 03:24, April 30, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • It's probably worth mentioning that the stampede was fleeing from rancors. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:49, April 12, 2017 (UTC)
  • You also need to either specify sentience or add a species of undefined sentience category. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:49, April 12, 2017 (UTC)
Fred strikes back
  • The links to the Join the Resistance book and series are broken. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 04:41, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
    • That was a {{sofixit}}, imo. Imperators II(Talk) 05:42, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
      • Had to leave the computer for a couple hours and didn't have time to figure out what should be linked where. Also, I tend to forget that links to redirects don't show up orange for everyone else, since I've had them show up that way on my end for a good four years now. Either way, I can look into the links, and I'll shoot Tofty a message on how to make them appear orange. It will save so much time while writing status articles. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 07:00, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
      • It appears you already fixed it. Very well. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 07:02, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
        • Didn't have anything to do with me, actually. The article that was at Join the Resistance was moved to Star Wars: Join the Resistance, while the article at Join the Resistance #1 was moved to Join the Resistance, resulting in one of the links becoming a redirect and the other going to the wrong page. In any case, thanks everyone for taking care of it. ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:18, April 29, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

  • Note that the Amazon template now has a field where you can add a backup link. I went ahead and did it for you. Imperators II(Talk) 05:42, April 29, 2017 (UTC)


Griggen Sylo

  • Nominated by: MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 04:20, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Nominated Paxi Sylo a few years back. Might as well knock out the parents as well.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 06:11, April 30, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:18, April 30, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead02
  • Good to see you back on the CAnoms page Fred! The databank backup link on both the parents and the child isn't working and since it's automated by the template I'm not sure how to fix it. To save you time here is the correct html. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:04, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
    • This is how you fix the template. (The date is from the correct URL Ayre found.) Imperators II(Talk) 16:32, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
  • Dantooine needs context. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:04, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
    • Added.
  • Probably worth specifying that the farm he lived on was large and in the outback. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:04, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
    • Done.
  • Could you add that the Empire was established in 19 BBY. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:04, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
    • Done.
  • .The BTS should also mention that the databank entry originated in 2004. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:04, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
    • Done.
    • That should be everything. Thanks for the review! MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 03:12, April 30, 2017 (UTC)
Imperators II
  • "In the year 31 BBY, the youngest of the Sylo children, Paxi, was born.[2]" - referencing in this sentence should be rearranged: the fact that Paxi was the youngest child should be attributed to a specific source, not the reference note for the date.
  • Ref 2 needs some more work - the Databank entry doesn't say the battle of Dantooine happened in 22 BBY.
  • You should not only mention the release date of the entry but that it's the old version of Databank, as well. Imperators II(Talk) 16:32, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
    • I believe we handled everything on IRC. Let me know if there's something I'm missing. Thanks for the review! MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 03:12, April 30, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Tashna Sylo

  • Nominated by: MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 04:21, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Part II: The probably wife but with gender never being specified so we must avoid speculation blarg.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 06:11, April 30, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:19, April 30, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • The databank backup link on both the parents and the child isn't working and since it's automated by the template I'm not sure how to fix it. To save you time here is the correct html. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:04, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
  • Dantooine needs context. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:04, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
  • Probably worth specifying that the farm he lived on was large and in the outback. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:04, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
  • Could you add that the Empire was established in 19 BBY. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:04, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
  • The BTS should also mention that the databank entry originated in 2004. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:04, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
    • Handled these simultaneously with the other article. Thanks again for the review! MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 03:12, April 30, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Beytolim

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:14, April 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: One of the couple of film characters newly named by the Visual Encyclopedia.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.