FANDOM


             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Premium-ComprehensiveArticle

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  13. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  14. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Anandra Milon's uncle

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:53, May 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I knew one day I'd return to 1000 Levels Down.

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 13:06, May 17, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 07:27, June 1, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 15:54, June 19, 2018 (UTC)
  4. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 18:46, June 20, 2018 (UTC)
  5. Cwedin(talk) 18:42, June 21, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Battle of Zaloriis

  • Nominated by: Commander Code-8 Hello There! 00:46, May 22, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: One day I'll have both versions of all these articles taken to status

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 06:07, May 23, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:56, June 3, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 08:24, June 4, 2018 (UTC)
  4. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 18:49, June 20, 2018 (UTC)
  5. Cwedin(talk) 18:47, June 21, 2018 (UTC)

Object

"Tommy"
  • I'd like to see a slight addition to the date ref, something like "The Empire Strikes Back: So You Want to Be a Jedi? places the Battle of Zaloriis before the Battle of Hoth, which Star Wars: Galactic Atlas dates to 3 ABY." Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 12:35, May 22, 2018 (UTC)
    • You and your time objections :P Thanks for the copy-edit, I wasn't previously aware that the policy for capitalizing human had changed for canon. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 01:13, May 23, 2018 (UTC)
      • You're welcome. Thanks for the article! Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 06:07, May 23, 2018 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • In the infobox you can't just say prior to 3 ABY, as the battle could have occured in that year, just before the Battle of Hoth. Ayrehead02 (talk) 06:12, May 24, 2018 (UTC)
    • Indeed. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 11:16, May 24, 2018 (UTC)
      • You don't seem to have changed the infobox? I also think you could reword that opening sentence to be more succinct. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:05, June 3, 2018 (UTC)
        • I must have forgotten to save the changes or something, pretty embarassing. Ended up splitting the opening sentence. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 09:49, June 3, 2018 (UTC)
Imp

Comments

Orchis 2

  • Nominated by: Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 08:34, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: There's very little to say about this place... Makes it the ideal comprehensive article candidate, I guess!

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 13:23, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 16:08, June 17, 2018 (UTC)
  3. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 18:54, June 20, 2018 (UTC)
  4. Cwedin(talk) 18:49, June 21, 2018 (UTC)

Object

What time is it? Tommy o'clock!
  • You're missing backup links.
    • There's no need for that actually, since both the writer and the illustrator can be sourced to the book directly. --Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 13:17, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
  • You don't need the full release date in the BTS, as it creates an unnecessary ref. The year will suffice, as that can be sourced to the book itself.
  • "an immense depository of records and artifacts that covered the majority of the moon's surface.[1]" What coved the majority of the moon's surface, the depository or the records and artifacts? Please rephrase. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 12:30, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
Imp
  • Does Galactic Atlas give any indication of a timespan for when the Graf Archive was present on the moon? Imperators II(Talk) 19:02, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
    • All that can be said is that the in-universe version of the book was published some time after the Battle of Starkiller Base (since said battle is the last mentioned event in the included timeline). I'll try and incorporate this in the article. --Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 19:18, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
      • ADDENDUM: Gammit Chond's maps are said to be ancient in the introduction. So I must assume that the book's "present time" is long after the First Order-Resistance war? --Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 19:20, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
        • That'd be nice to have included in the article, then. Imperators II(Talk) 04:13, June 16, 2018 (UTC)
          • Does my latest edit work for you? --Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 10:00, June 17, 2018 (UTC)
            • I've changed it to something both more concise and specific that's still supported by the source. Imperators II(Talk) 16:00, June 17, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Sloogaria system

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:08, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:15, June 17, 2018 (UTC)
  3. Cwedin(talk) 18:51, June 21, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Sulloria system

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 06:35, June 17, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:13, June 17, 2018 (UTC)
  3. Cwedin(talk) 18:52, June 21, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Taung & Zhell Society

  • Nominated by: Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 11:01, June 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Never would have thought Jerjerrod had so much in common with the Bushes!

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Rebel Files really has some great content. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:32, June 17, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 12:49, June 17, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 16:30, June 18, 2018 (UTC)
  4. Cwedin(talk) 18:58, June 21, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • The Skull and Bones reference is going to need a little more info or a second reference entirely since the tweets don't mention Yale and its location. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:12, June 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • Are Taungs and Zhells the correct pluralization? The Taung page seems inconsistent and the Zhell page doesn't use Zhell anywhere. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:47, June 17, 2018 (UTC)
    • Il'l go with the pluralization used in the referenced source ("Star Wars: The Essential Guide to Warfare Author's Cut, Part 2"): Taungs and Zhell. --Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 11:53, June 17, 2018 (UTC)
Imp

Comments

Bentora system

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:56, June 18, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Cwedin(talk) 19:01, June 21, 2018 (UTC)

Object

ymmoT
  • You have a double ref in the body. Is something else supposed to be sourced there? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:48, June 18, 2018 (UTC)
    • I suppose the Planetnamia ref is not even really necessary there. Please take a look. Imperators II(Talk) 17:53, June 18, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Masalou

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 09:48, June 20, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Cwedin(talk) 19:04, June 21, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:06, June 22, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

AT-PT

  • Nominated by: Cwedin(talk) 19:19, June 21, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: What does AT-PT really stand for? The galaxy may never know.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments