- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Kalevala
- Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 23:17, January 25, 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Another TCW planet and follow up to my nom of bombing on Kalevala.
(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support
- Nice work Lewisr (talk) 02:37, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
- Imperators II(Talk) 20:51, January 31, 2017 (UTC)
- Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:37, February 1, 2017 (UTC)
- Cevan (talk) 21:45, February 2, 2017 (UTC)
- Corellian PremierThe Force will be with you always 15:34, May 1, 2017 (UTC)
Object
Imperators II
A slight difference in punctuation between the lead quote in this article and that on the bombing."represented Kalevala" - represented where?The Galactic Republic should be added to the infobox.Context for Coruscant, Mandalore and the Death Watch needed.Imperators II(Talk) 08:04, January 26, 2017 (UTC)210 words, please provide or draft an intro, maybe it goes over 250.Imperators II(Talk) 07:03, January 29, 2017 (UTC)- Not enough info for a description section, so I just made a separate history section. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 07:05, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
- There's kind of a conflict with WP:S Rule #1. Frankly, I don't see a problem with a short description section. Imperators II(Talk) 08:19, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
- Not enough info for a description section, so I just made a separate history section. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 07:05, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
Ayrehead
I feel it's worth mentioning Merrik's death since he ceases to be senator for the planet.Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:30, January 26, 2017 (UTC)You don't actually say that Death Watch were behind the bombing.Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:30, January 26, 2017 (UTC)
The CP
Sorry bud, gotta enforce WP:Sourcing Rule 1: intros should not be cited. Corellian PremierThe Force will be with you always 01:47, April 30, 2017 (UTC)
- Please see above objection. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 01:49, April 30, 2017 (UTC)
- Very well. Corellian PremierThe Force will be with you always 15:34, May 1, 2017 (UTC)
Comments
- I didn't want to add this as an objection because I'm not sure if there's an easy fix to this, and we might have to just wing with how it is, but I find the sentences in the history section to feel a lot like run-ons while reading them, even though they're not. This is because of all the context that's needed to be added; the sentences are simply a bit long and unwieldy to me, though I myself have a habit of writing such sentences, and I recognize sometimes there's a need for them. Anyways, take a look at it, but don't pressure yourself too much if you really can't find a way around this. Sol PacificusFirestorm 02:39, April 25, 2017 (UTC)