Please sign up if you want to vote on matters such as this. QuentinGeorge 12:24, 11 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Comments
It's a shame, but this is a great article. MarcK 21:18, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)
LOL. But yeah, you're right there. QuentinGeorge 05:56, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Definitely! :D - Sikon [Talk] 06:05, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)
My goodness... I'd no idea. But MarcK's right: it is a great article. AngelQueen 12:39, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Featuring this article might help stem the proliferation of fanon garbage that gets dumped on Wookieepedia by people who get taken in by StupidShadow. Plus I agree that it really is a good article. It manages to keep a surprisingly even tone in describing a character everyone despises. —Darth Culator 18:07, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Oh yes, definitely. It's also a good laugh ;) --beeurd 19:28, 8 Oct 2005 (UTC)