FANDOM


       
Good article
nominations
             
GoodIcon

This page is for the nomination of Good articles. A Good article is an article that adheres to certain quality standards but cannot reach Featured status due to its limited content. This page is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like. For a list of Good articles, see Wookieepedia:Good articles.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic if the length of the article supports it. This may not be appropriate on articles with limited content.
  9. …have no redlinks.
  10. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article would be preferred, though not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section.
  11. …ideally include a "Personality and traits" section on all character articles if information is available.
  12. …ideally include a "Powers and abilities" section for Force-sensitive characters and a "Skills and abilities" section for non–Force-sensitive characters, where said powers and/or abilities are stipulated.
  13. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  14. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  15. …counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, be at least 250 words long (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Alternatively, a Good article cannot exceed 1000 words. Articles that do so should be nominated for Featured status.
  16. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, select an article you feel is worthy of Good article status. Your nominated article must meet all sixteen requirements listed above to become a Good article.
  2. Add {{GAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for Good article status previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{GAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Per AgriCorps consensus, non-AgriCorps members are restricted to four nominations on the GAN page at any one time. Once one nomination is removed from the page as either successful or unsuccessful, another may be added.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. Any objections may be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. Once a nomination has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be AgriCorps votes—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. Alternatively, if a nomination receives a total of five AgriCorps/Inquisitorius votes—three of which must be AgriCorps votes—with no outstanding objections before one week has passed, the nomination will be considered successful.
  5. The article is placed on the Good article list.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 2 weeks.


Good article nominations

To nominate an article for Good article status, place the {{GAnom}} template on the top of the article and then follow the instructions above. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above. If an article has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be an AgriCorps vote—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. For complete instructions on archiving nominations, please see here.

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

EG-9

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:21, August 29, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I found writing this article quite enjoyable.

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote This was a bit hard to wrap my head around - it's like there's two completely unrelated droids. I guess that's what happens when you recycle art. Imperators II(Talk) 22:36, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ACvote MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 04:07, September 18, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ah, that cool droid
  • I'm not really convinced that EG-9's name being similar to a completely unrelated droid line constitutes a conflict of sources.
    • Your right, of course. I've removed it from the Bts and relegated it to a (glorious!) see also section instead. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:45, August 29, 2017 (UTC)
      • I agree, knowing this from prior experience, that those See also sections can be pretty invisible. Imperators II(Talk) 11:02, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • Databank backup link!
  • Amazon backup link! Imperators II(Talk) 21:55, August 29, 2017 (UTC)
    • Replaced with SW.com article that reveals the international release date was four days before the NA release, with backup link of course. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:45, August 29, 2017 (UTC)
  • In order to make the intro longer than one sentence, please add a bit to it stating EG-9 was repairing a moisture vaporator in 32 BBY.
  • I want to see some date format consistency in the BTS. Full date for first source, year for the rest; or full format for all; or years for all.
    • Done, barring the film itself. I found differing dates for the Screenplay, so I used the Caro Bay/Barnes and Noble one. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:17, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • Wow, can all those specific ship names really be sourced to Illustrated Screenplay?
  • The last paragraph of BTS is really confusing. "used an image of EG-9 to depict an unidentified droid" — so EG-9 was actually assigned the orange-and-silver appearance before he was made into a Mos Espa droid by the Visual Dictionary? "This droid was later identified as EG-9 in Star Wars: The Phantom Menace: The Expanded Visual Dictionary, making EG-9 canon within the Legends continuity." — this combined with the rest of the paragraph makes me think the Sources list might be missing some helpful {{1stID}}, {{1stp}}, or {{C}} tags. Imperators II(Talk) 11:02, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
    • EG-9 was depicted as being this droid in the "Trash Talking Droids" animatic and the Hyperspace concept art, which seems to only be available in low quality online these days. Strictly speaking, the current tags are accurate. The Screenplay, which we list as a source, also pictured him (or at least a storyboard of him), while Podracimg Tales' was his first IU appearance outside of his deleted scene. I've rewritten the last sentence a bit. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 14:10, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
      • I never knew that Hyperspace piece of concept art existed. It's so cool. Imperators II(Talk) 22:36, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
Fred strikes back
  • "fifth degree labor droid" sounds like there are five degrees of labor droids. I'm not sure how to reword that to make it clearer that the degrees apply to droids in general, but I do think it could be easily misunderstood in its current form. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 08:33, September 5, 2017 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Some formatting issues. Firstly, I'd like to see the BTS subsectioned, particularly to partition off the cut content. It looks like the thing to do would be to put the first and third paragraphs in one subsection and the cut content in another.
  • Podracing Tales should use whichever SW.com template is appropriate.
    • I can't seem to find a functioning online backup of the comics, or do you mean something else? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:33, September 26, 2017 (UTC)
      • The Podracing Tales article says that comic was originally published on SW.com, which means there should be a URL for it and therefore a template (either Hyperspace or the SW.com template) to use with it. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:00, September 28, 2017 (UTC)\
        • The thing is, I can find that link. Only those for the individual chapters. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 14:27, October 2, 2017 (UTC)
          • Please repeat. It's not clear what you're saying here. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 11:57, November 18, 2017 (UTC)
            • I can’t find the link for a “main” article that could be linked to, only the individual chapters. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:25, December 3, 2017 (UTC)
  • The size of the article just isn't big enough to support a body image. It doesn't look good forced in like that between two sections. I'd recommend just removing the body image. And for that matter, rearranging the BTS per the previous objection might allow you move that concept art image out of the Appearances/Sources, which is never ideal, and into the BTS. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:50, September 20, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to remove nomination (AC only)

  1. ACvote Unaddressed objection more than two weeks old. Imperators II(Talk) 10:09, December 3, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 16:02, December 3, 2017 (UTC)


Wurokkk's musical piece

  • Nominated by: MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 08:45, October 27, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Here we go again. Best not be a Bith.

(2 ACs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 21:56, November 11, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Reviewed via IRC. Imperators II(Talk) 19:49, December 11, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:13, December 11, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ecks Dee
  • Per Wookieepedia:Mofferences/February 12, 2012, the infobox name field should include the "unidentified".
  • I would prefer if the bolded part of the intro reflected the title as close as possible.
  • Can the release date for the sourcebook be sourced to itself or does it need a third-party source? 1358 (Talk) 21:39, November 11, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Yushyn

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:38, October 27, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Time for a short break from film characters.

(3 ACs/0 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 18:12, November 12, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:47, November 21, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 14:07, November 23, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Toprawa
  • The overuse of the same sentence structure in the Biography's final paragraph becomes extremely repetitive. Please mix it up.
  • It's unnecessary to go into as much detail about his species as the article does in the P/T section. That's what his species article is for. I've therefore removed the parts to pertain more to his species than to this specific character.
    • Thanks. I'll keep that in mind for future articles with characters of unidentified species. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:05, November 21, 2017 (UTC)
  • I'd like to see the BTS utilize TV.com to reference the Rebels episode's air date, as I believe that's a little bit more authoritative than affiliate.zap2it.com. Note this is what we started doing for another Rebels nom.
  • Going along with the previous objection, the date ref used in this article doesn't work. I realize you probably copied it from some other article, as we went through the same thing on the Killun-71 nomination. You will see from the link provided in the previous objection how we properly referenced that episode's date using actual source material; you will likewise notice in the reference currently used in this article that no source material is actually being used to support this claim, "the first known episode to take place in the third year before the Battle of Yavin," nor is there any such support in that Rebels SH thread, despite someone's best efforts. I'm probably going to have to talk to you about this in person, so I will catch you on IRC. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:14, November 21, 2017 (UTC)
    • Ok, I'll wait till we've discussed it before making any changes. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:05, November 21, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Bormter

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 21:01, October 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The dragon base of Dragon Moff Drago "The Dragon" Delurin von Draco.

(3 ACs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:10, November 8, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:34, November 17, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 22:48, November 21, 2017 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 23:28, December 2, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

V'shar

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 13:31, November 1, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The swordy and religious planet of the Religious Sword People.

(3 ACs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:51, November 8, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:10, November 17, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 22:48, November 26, 2017 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 23:53, December 2, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ventran system

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 15:56, November 2, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Shatterpoint is an awesome novel.

(2 ACs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:57, November 8, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Dragon Vote. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:46, November 17, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 17:09, December 3, 2017 (UTC)
  4. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 17:51, December 12, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Sith cave

  • Nominated by: TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 06:20, November 5, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: What a great backstory for Darth Vader's castle!

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. You'd better keep an eye out for that "more to come" :P Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:12, November 5, 2017 (UTC)
  2. This is definitely appearing in upcoming issues of the Vader series --Lewisr (talk) 12:55, November 5, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

  • I agree that Darth Vader's castle will definitely be explored in the future, possibly in the new Darth Vader comic book series. But given the current Inquisitorius arc, it will be at least a few month later that they start another arc. It is also unknown if it will directly effect the "Sith cave" article. So the nomination doesn't violate the FA rule #6 about the article being stable. Not that anyone said that, but just in case :) TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 00:09, November 6, 2017 (UTC)


Ertrax

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 16:04, November 6, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Finally, we learn what the Ertraxi are.

(2 ACs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Reviewed via IRC. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:53, November 8, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ACvote My desire to call this is a terrestrial planet is high. ^.^ Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 03:39, December 8, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 00:50, December 15, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Imynusoph

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 23:39, November 7, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Time for some opera, you uncultured swines!

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Reviewed via IRC. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:58, November 12, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified long-legged mount

  • Nominated by: TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 04:54, November 9, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another cool thing that was cut from Rogue One.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

  • A mount appears again in Issue 39 of the Star Wars comics --Lewisr (talk) 08:23, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
    • It seems like this thing could appear throughout the Jedha arc. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:38, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
      • It appears that way, I guess rather than say every issue it may be good Anil if you keep an eye out throughout the arc, if you hadn't already planned that! --Lewisr (talk) 18:41, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
        • Yeah, I know that they can appear throughout the entire story arc, and I have already been following the series not just because of this nomination but it is really interesting! Unfortunately, in my country, I am able to buy the comic book issue a day after the US release and I'll sure update the article if anything comes up about the camels. I don't personally believe that there will be any major edits, Pablo Hidalgo even told me that the camels haven't been named yet. Thanks for letting me know anyway! TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 23:02, November 22, 2017 (UTC)


TK-710

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:50, November 12, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: It seems like Stormtrooper designations are the only names that have been getting changes between Legends and Canon.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Toos

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:53, November 12, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Nominations are always better when they come in Toos.

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. I could vote just for the pun. Good article! - Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 21:06, November 13, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Cobb Sonbepol

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:18, November 21, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Ront Brynloo's fellow cantina patron from Celebration

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Unification Wars (Galactic Republic)

  • Nominated by: Jace Onasi (talk) 04:18, November 28, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Imperators II(Talk) 10:43, November 28, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

  • Here's a link to the previous nomination.--Jace Onasi (talk) 04:18, November 28, 2017 (UTC)
  • I can confirm that Star Wars: Complete Vehicles does mention the Unification Wars, though it does not provide any additional information from the other cross-section books. I've added it as a source.--Jace Onasi (talk) 04:18, November 28, 2017 (UTC)
  • In the previous nomination, Imperators wanted feedback on the image of the Jedi. The image isn't time-period appropriate, since it is from just after the New Sith Wars. The Jedi also didn't have lightsabers back then. There aren't really any images on the wiki that would appropriately depict the Jedi of the time, however. Check the previous nomination to see the images we suggested.--Jace Onasi (talk) 04:27, November 28, 2017 (UTC)


Odik II

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 22:19, December 9, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Deep Core, Space Gulag.

(1 ACs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:06, December 12, 2017 (UTC)
  2. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 18:11, December 12, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:22, December 14, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • "It housed Galactic Empire's political detention wards in which many dissidents were secretly imprisoned." This sentence needs rewording to something like "It housed political detention wards belonging to the Galactic Empire where many dissidents were secretly imprisoned." Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:24, December 11, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Gos Hutta system

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 14:33, December 13, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Only Imperators-2013 would want to write something like that.

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Reviewed via IRC. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:46, December 13, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.