FANDOM


       
Good article
nominations
             
Premium-GoodIcon

This page is for the nomination of Good articles. A Good article is an article that adheres to certain quality standards but cannot reach Featured status due to its limited content. This page is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like. For a list of Good articles, see Wookieepedia:Good articles.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic if the length of the article supports it. This may not be appropriate on articles with limited content.
  9. …have no redlinks.
  10. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article would be preferred, though not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section.
  11. …ideally include a "Personality and traits" section on all character articles if information is available.
  12. …ideally include a "Powers and abilities" section for Force-sensitive characters and a "Skills and abilities" section for non–Force-sensitive characters, where said powers and/or abilities are stipulated.
  13. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  14. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  15. …counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, be at least 250 words long (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Alternatively, a Good article cannot exceed 1000 words. Articles that do so should be nominated for Featured status.
  16. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, select an article you feel is worthy of Good article status. Your nominated article must meet all sixteen requirements listed above to become a Good article.
  2. Add {{GAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for Good article status previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{GAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Per AgriCorps consensus, non-AgriCorps members are restricted to four nominations on the GAN page at any one time. Once one nomination is removed from the page as either successful or unsuccessful, another may be added.
  7. Users may not vote on their own articles.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. Any objections may be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. Once a nomination has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be AgriCorps votes—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. Alternatively, if a nomination receives a total of five AgriCorps/Inquisitorius votes—three of which must be AgriCorps votes—with no outstanding objections before one week has passed, the nomination will be considered successful.
  5. The article is placed on the Good article list.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 10 days.


Good article nominations

To nominate an article for Good article status, place the {{GAnom}} template on the top of the article and then follow the instructions above. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above. If an article has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be an AgriCorps vote—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. For complete instructions on archiving nominations, please see here.

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Torpedo Sphere

  • Nominated by: Vitus InfinitusTalk 04:45, March 20, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Death Star's baby cousin

(2 ACs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 15:43, March 26, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Nice to see these in Canon again. - Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 21:27, March 26, 2018 (UTC)
  3. So I realised my vote is meaningless after I left my original objections, but whatever, good work. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 15:25, April 15, 2018 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Remember to check the linking in date references in future. Ayrehead02 (talk) 06:41, May 15, 2018 (UTC)
  5. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 22:07, June 12, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Clone Just Wants to be Sure
  • Given my unfamiliarity with the Rebel Files, I just want to make sure that Durkteel's status in the Mid Rim can be sourced to the book. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:24, March 25, 2018 (UTC)
    • Yes, TRF confirms that Durkteel is a mid rim planet--Vitus InfinitusTalk 20:27, March 25, 2018 (UTC)
QGJ
Tommy
Ecks Dee
  • "that had an equatorial trench that ran throughout the equator of the battle station" This is a bit redundant wording. Obviously an equatorial trench goes along the equator per defition.
  • "At the center of the Torpedo Sphere" Given it's a sphere (or spheroid), you're going to have to elaborate a bit what "center" means. My initial thought was you're referring to the inner center of the sphere (coordinates 0,0,0).
    • How is it now?--Vitus InfinitusTalk 22:58, April 19, 2018 (UTC)
      • An equator acts as a vertical center and in a sphere, the entire equator is a horizontal center, so that's not appropriate terminology. However, I had a shot at rewording it; please have a look and see if it's fine with you. 1358 (Talk) 22:35, April 20, 2018 (UTC)
  • I don't think the word "basin" is appropriate since there's no water present.
  • Do we know who unearthed the archives? If we do, it'd be appropriate to mention.
    • Added--Vitus InfinitusTalk 22:58, April 19, 2018 (UTC)
      • I don't think you mention the entire chain of people since they're not directly relevant to the subject. Just go with construction crew -> Leia. 1358 (Talk) 22:35, April 20, 2018 (UTC)
  • I've done some rewording to break up a couple of run-on sentences so make sure to see if you're satisfied with them. 1358 (Talk) 21:48, April 19, 2018 (UTC)
  • The first link in reference 3 currently links to Black Ice, a starship, and that doesn't seem right.
  • Just checking: Does the source explicitly identify Durkteel as being in the Mid Rim? If not, it needs a separate reference or you could just remove it altogether. 1358 (Talk) 22:35, April 20, 2018 (UTC)
    • Yes the source explicitly states that Durkteel is a Mid Rim world several times--Vitus InfinitusTalk 06:03, April 21, 2018 (UTC)
  • "Sometime during the years 14 and 19 AFE," Between these years or just in those two years?
  • "Alliance Intelligence of the Rebel Alliance witnessed a spike" OK, this just sounds awkward. Can we reword to get rid of one of the Alliances or something? 1358 (Talk) 18:37, April 25, 2018 (UTC)
  • The second date reference has quite a run-on sentence and I'm not sure what the various "its" are referring to. Please rewrite for clarity. 1358 (Talk) 21:59, May 20, 2018 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • Could you include the authors of Black Ice in the BTS since you include them for Rebel Files. Its probably worth including the illustrators for both as well since they both include depictions of the ship. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:14, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
  • I don't think that the traffic spike allows them to deduce that a constellation Torpedo Spheres are active? The wording says that they will be looking at a constellation if the Empire can pump these out, which suggests to me that the Empire hadn't even managed to produce them yet. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:14, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
    • That's fair, though what led me to that point was that Delto said that the Torpedo Spheres are armed with etc. I reworded to address your objection--Vitus InfinitusTalk 05:08, May 8, 2018 (UTC)
      • The first paragraph of history is now one extremely long sentence. You should split it and also probably re-word this part: "and with intelligence on equipment suppliers, allowed Colonel Haxen Delto". Allowed seems like it shouldn't be there. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:27, May 8, 2018 (UTC)
        • Reworded--Vitus InfinitusTalk 17:30, May 8, 2018 (UTC)
          • The second sentence doesn't really link to the first now, you need to add "this information, supplemented with..." or something. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:02, May 8, 2018 (UTC)
  • Are you getting the information about the trenches purely from the image? If so I'm not sure that you can say which part of the sphere is the northern polar region or that those grey lines are even trenches to be honest. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:18, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
    • Yeah, how should I describe it?--Vitus InfinitusTalk 05:08, May 8, 2018 (UTC)
      • To be honest I'm not sure you need to describe those two lines. I guess if you really feel they need mentioning you could just call them gray lines, although that still sounds odd. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:27, May 8, 2018 (UTC)
  • Same objection as on Mass Shadow Generator for the dates, you can include 34 ABY for the discovery of the files and as such should change AFE to BBY. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:04, May 10, 2018 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • I think the History section needs to make some kind of mention of the Republic's torpedo siege platform from Catalyst. The connection between these two is obvious, if unstated. I would almost argue that the two should be merged if the Catalyst siege platform had been engineered by the Empire rather than the Republic. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 03:26, May 21, 2018 (UTC)
    • Done. Should I remove the "See also" section? Also, I haven't added the date for the invasion of Naboo because I want to confirm that the date can be sourced to Star Wars: Galactic Atlas first.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 17:14, May 21, 2018 (UTC)
      • Sorry to interject, but yes 32 BBY can be sourced to that. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:16, May 21, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

  • I will be on vacation and thus unavailable between May 31st to June 18th. I will not be able to address objections during that time as I will have no effective means of doing so. I will be taking care of all raised objections between now to the 31st, thank you for understanding.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 13:46, May 19, 2018 (UTC)


Wookiee Cookie

  • Nominated by: TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 11:02, March 20, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Waag mam ga moo. Uoo waa gaa moo.

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Good job on making me feel bad for a rathtar. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:06, April 15, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Grunny
  • In the opening quote "Repairs completed sir" there would normally be a comma before "sir," so is that how it's written in the subtitles?
    • Yeah, I thought the same, but I have just double-checked and that's how it is written in subtitles. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 18:45, March 20, 2018 (UTC)
  • The first two paragraphs of the History section are missing references.
  • In the opening sentence of the BTS, the Wookie Cookie first appearing in the video game should be referenced to LEGO Star Wars: The Force Awakens, as you can't source that to the starwars.com article that is currently the only reference for that sentence. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 17:59, March 20, 2018 (UTC)
Tommy
  • You should just have the year of release for LEGO Star Wars: The Force Awakens, so you can remove the other ref and just source it to the product itself, like you've done for the Holiday Special.
  • Context for Finn and Rey, and maybe just say that 3PO and BB-8 are droids.
  • "30" should be as "thirty". Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 09:43, April 15, 2018 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • We require that infobox images be 400px whenever possible for technical reasons. The article's other LEGO video game images are of sufficient resolution, so you should be able to get at least a 400px version of the infobox image. Might have to adjust the crop a little wider out. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:06, May 4, 2018 (UTC)
  • The Description section should detail which species were able to eat the food. Here is a recently passed GA as an example. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 16:05, May 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • One-sentence paragraphs are not ideal. See if you can find a way to expand the first "paragraph" of the History to be able to produce two sentences. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 16:18, May 7, 2018 (UTC)
Ayrehead

Comments

Toy Dampner

  • Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:13, March 25, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: It's time to start finishing up these N64 Racer pilots

(1 ACs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:29, April 13, 2018 (UTC)
  2. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 08:00, April 16, 2018 (UTC)
  3. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 17:06, May 26, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
Toprawa
  • Question, your answer to which may result in some formatting revisions: Are you taking any of the article's quotes from on-screen game captions? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:34, April 13, 2018 (UTC)
    • Ayrehead helped address this. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:42, April 13, 2018 (UTC)
      • Okay. I wish there were more captions in the game, but it's just the translated taunts. I see I apparently mis-heard the Fode quote (Several times, in fact). I further wish it could be clarified that the pilots were all speaking Huttese or not (Or that the other lines the pilots have were translated). Alas, no. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 22:58, April 24, 2018 (UTC)
  • There doesn't appear to be anything critical relating to Toy Dampner on that old Japanese Episode I racer site, as fascinating as it is to time travel back into the web like that. But I see there are multiple pages relating to specific characters and whatnot, so if there's a specific page that has Dampner info on it, that's what you should be linking to. Otherwise, it can just be removed. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:34, April 26, 2018 (UTC)
    • He's listed on the character page on the third page. There's a blurb that roughly translates too "*"Toy" to participate in the pod race is never a toy. His pod racer is very well-balanced. This pod racer demonstrates its capabilities quickly in any race, and it has excellent performance without upgrading.*". Largely sounds out of universe as player tips. I figured it might be a somewhat relevant link as it's the official site (I can link to that page of the site), but if the site in general doesn't seem relevant I can remove it. Your call, I think. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 00:13, May 3, 2018 (UTC)
      • No, the site and that information are perfectly relevant. I just want you to link to the actual page that has this information. Please replace the link with the URL to that third page with the character information. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:43, May 4, 2018 (UTC)
        • Ah, okay then. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 15:00, May 10, 2018 (UTC)
          • Is there any way for you to translate what this web page calls itself in the browser tab? Ideally, we would present that name, and I'm assuming it's not "Official Nintendo Japan Star Wars Episode I: Racer site." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 04:25, May 19, 2018 (UTC)
            • The text in the browser tab appears on the page itself, underneath the words "The Pilots." With Google translate, a more literal translation is "Introduction to pilots." The browser tab for the main page of the site is just "Star Wars Episode I Racer" (No colon after Star Wars). So, I suppose it the link could be written as "Star Wars Episode I Racer - The Pilots/Introduction to pilots (Page 3)." Maybe it's relation to Nintendo Power could be mentioned in parenthesis, if only for reader clarification. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 17:33, May 19, 2018 (UTC)
QGJ
  • {{Cite_web}} should be implemented for the first link in the External links section. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 16:17, April 15, 2018 (UTC)
    • Forgive me for interjecting, but actually it shouldn't. Citeweb is only meant to be used for actual citations in the course of an article's Notes and references. It's been a common misconception among newer editors over the past year or so to start using the template anywhere there's an external link, but that's not proper usage of the template. For items in the External links section like this one, just add a backup link next to the URL using {{C}}. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 16:25, April 15, 2018 (UTC)
Grunny
  • In the intro: "Dampner became a favorite on the moon Oovo IV, where the race courses sped through the prison Desolation Alley. Dampner was considered to be the crowd favorite for the deadly Executioner course," This reads as if the Executioner course could be a different course on which he is the favorite, rather than the course in Desolation Alley. I think this could be written more clearly.
  • In the intro, you refer to him as the "crowd favorite," but in the body you only refer to him as the "race favorite" and "track favorite." A "race favorite" or "track favorite" could just mean that they were considered the most likely person to win (such as when gambling on a race), but a "crowd favorite" is about their popularity with spectators. If they were the "crowd favorite," that should also be used in the body, rather than just in the intro. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 18:25, April 26, 2018 (UTC)
    • I'll double check when I get back to my guides, but I believe they use the terms "crowd" and "track" favorite interchangeably. "Race" favorite is interjected by myself as a way to vary wording.--Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 00:13, May 3, 2018 (UTC)
      • If "crowd" favorite is used in the source, I would make sure that is used in the body where appropriate, since it has a clearer meaning and more context than "race" or "track" favorite, so it shouldn't be only in the intro. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 07:02, May 11, 2018 (UTC)
        • 'Track favorite' I noticed seems to be used more in the game itself, so I just switched to that. Also added that he was the favorite in the bio now. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 23:20, May 14, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

With the GoG version out I've been looking at the audio files now and collecting new screenshots. The scripts for the pilots seem largely the same with some exceptions. All of it seems to be Huttese, which means most can probably be translated. I added a new quote to the P&T, which translates to "Careful punk." Do I need to translate that for the article? Or, just leave it as it is? Or does the spelling or meaning need sources?

I was thinking about adding new quotes to the other articles, and was wondering about trying to spell out some of the phrases, translating if possible (Slide's "Chuba pitdroid" is literally just "Hey you pitdroid"), or maybe being more vague like ""[Taunt]" - Pilot taunts a Pilot"--Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 23:20, May 14, 2018 (UTC)


Mass Shadow Generator

  • Nominated by: Vitus InfinitusTalk 16:41, April 10, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A CA that is now a bit too big

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Good work! Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:56, May 10, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Keep in mind the "See also" sections are only for topics not linked elsewhere in the article. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 06:49, June 1, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • You should split the first sentence of the history section. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:33, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
    • Done--Vitus InfinitusTalk 13:26, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
      • I think you might have forgotten to actually do this :P Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:05, April 30, 2018 (UTC)
        • Oops. Might have gotten ahead of myself. Now it's done--Vitus InfinitusTalk 21:25, April 30, 2018 (UTC)
  • Anywhere that you use the AFE dating system you should clarify that they're years you are talking about since most people aren't use to that format. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:33, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
    • Done--Vitus InfinitusTalk 13:26, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
      • I'd change it to "the years 14 and 19 AFE" as the current wording requires the reader to know what AFE stands for in order for it to make sense. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:05, April 30, 2018 (UTC)
  • I think you can date the discovery of the Rebel Files to 34 ABY since they are said to have been buried simultaneously with the Battle of Endor (4 ABY) and a comment says that "no-one has seen them for 30 years". Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:33, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
    • Added. Should I also add a note or just reference it to Rebel Files?--Vitus InfinitusTalk 13:26, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
      • You should definitely add a reference note. If ever in doubt when it comes to referencing a date the safest bet is to write a separate ref, especially with canon. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:05, April 30, 2018 (UTC)
        • Added--Vitus InfinitusTalk 21:25, April 30, 2018 (UTC)
          • Now I think about it, since you now have an ABY date in the article you should probably change the AFE dates to be BBY as well for consistency. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:20, May 10, 2018 (UTC)
  • Context for Korr Sella. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:33, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
  • I think you need to add something to the description section about the image it's based on being from a report that claims the thing might not have ever even existed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:33, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
    • Added--Vitus InfinitusTalk 13:26, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
      • I'd reword this to something more like: in a rebel report that acknowledged that the generator might be nothing more than a tall tale, it was depicted as... etc." Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:05, April 30, 2018 (UTC)
Imperators Shadow Generator
  • Formatting and linking in ref 3. Imperators II(Talk) 18:36, May 16, 2018 (UTC)
  • "Since The Rebel Files were buried on the same day as the Battle of Endor" — source? Imperators II(Talk) 18:36, May 16, 2018 (UTC)
  • The formatting of the in-universe Rebel Files' title is inconsistent in the article. Imperators II(Talk) 06:56, May 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • I've removed the fate of the Rebel Files from the article, as it was extraneous and not relevant to the article's subject. Imperators II(Talk) 06:56, May 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • The part about the generator supposedly being able to exist in realspace and hyperspace should be moved to Characteristics. Imperators II(Talk) 11:18, May 27, 2018 (UTC)
    • Done--Vitus InfinitusTalk 04:43, May 28, 2018 (UTC)
      • You should lead that section with the last sentence, as it is a more critical trait of the generator than its physical description. Imperators II(Talk) 17:32, May 31, 2018 (UTC)
  • Also, when you first refer to the generator in that section, you should use its full name. Imperators II(Talk) 11:18, May 27, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

  • I will be on vacation and thus unavailable between May 31st to June 18th. I will not be able to address objections during that time as I will have no effective means of doing so. I will be taking care of all raised objections between now to the 31st, thank you for understanding.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 13:47, May 19, 2018 (UTC)


EGL-21

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:23, April 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I assume Jason Fry got Geetaw and Amps confused, but until someone says otherwise this guy's apparently a competent welder despite his lack of arms.

(2 ACs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 06:28, May 23, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 21:47, June 18, 2018 (UTC)
  3. --Lewisr (talk) 21:52, June 18, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy
AV
  • Are we sure that the EGL-1 power droid is an actual thing? From what I can tell, the TFA Visual Dictionary just liked identifying droids by name, immediately followed by their classification, and wasn't indicative of a specific model.
    • Hmm, I guess this is up to interpretation. The databank and Visual Encyclopedia also refer to this droid as EGL-21 "Amps" Power Droid, a format that usually indicates a model rather than a individual. I'd be interested to see what others think. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:32, April 25, 2018 (UTC)
      • After looking at the other Visual Dictionaries I think you're right in saying that it isn't a model, just confusing formatting. The databank is still odd, but is clearly talking about an individual droid, not a model. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:20, June 3, 2018 (UTC)
  • Per Tope's objection here, I don't think it's necessary to include that EGL-1 was a second class droid outside of the infobox. Simply mentioning that he was a power droid should suffice. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:15, April 19, 2018 (UTC)
Fred strikes back

Comments

Dobbu Scay

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:20, April 15, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Let the Last Jedi nominations begin with what is clearly Mark Hamill's most significant contribution to Star Wars

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 22:28, April 24, 2018 (UTC)

Object

I hated everything about Canto Bight
  • I think there should be a link to Alcohol and a mention that Dobbu had been drinking in the bio.
    • I've pipelinked inebriated. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:59, April 24, 2018 (UTC)
  • I don't think multiple sections in the bio are necessary since they're both pretty short, if you make that change I think the second quote in that section would work just as well in the P&T
    • Forgive me for the interjection, but two paragraphs are usually enough to support an image, which, adding a quote if available, makes a perfectly valid subsection. And the two pairs of paragraphs here clearly talk about different things, i.e., the first about Scay's drunken encounter with BB-8 and the second about further events featuring/related to Scay. Imperators II(Talk) 02:54, April 24, 2018 (UTC)
  • Maybe add in the Bts that his name was only given in the credits. Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 02:15, April 24, 2018 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • In the infobox, you source him being male to the movie, while in the P&T you source it to the junior novel. Please make it consistent.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 03:48, May 10, 2018 (UTC)
  • The infobox image looks kind of grainy. Could you get a higher quality screenshot from the film?--Exiled Jedi (talk) 23:10, May 10, 2018 (UTC)
    • Any better now? Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:55, May 11, 2018 (UTC)
      • Honestly, I can't really tell that much of a difference with the new image. I watched the film last week and I am almost positive that you can get a much higher quality screenshot from the film.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 00:58, May 20, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

  • Not sure if you think this needs adding so I'll leave it down to you, in the comic adaption DJ asks 'What's your story roundy? Where'd you get the coinage?' to BB-8. BB-8 tells DJ that a drunk alien in a tuxedo mistook him for a slot machine --Lewisr (talk) 16:00, June 6, 2018 (UTC)


Ambush of Attichitcuk

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Fred strikes back
  • There's an unreferenced item in the infobox.
    • How careless of me.
  • Be careful of linking. See the article's history for my changes in the infobox and intro. Remember that you need to link the first mention of a topic and that it should only be linked once in the intro, once in the infobox, once in the body, and then in reference notes.
    • Thanks for doing that, I've adjusted some other linking issues too
  • More to come once I have some more time. Glad to have you back! MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 21:47, May 4, 2018 (UTC)
  • As there is more than one image related to the topic, {{Imagecat}} should be used. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 22:58, May 13, 2018 (UTC)
    • Since the second image is portraying the rescue, a separate event with its own article I don't think categorizing it as an image of the ambush would be accurate. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 01:01, May 14, 2018 (UTC)
      • I suppose that's fair. This all gets very confusing and convoluted because time is treated very weirdly in GB and it makes separating events iffy. I'll let this slide as {{Imagecat}} would be best used in Alaris Prime colonial war. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 21:16, May 14, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

2BB-2

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:03, April 28, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Since everyone is such a huge fan of Canto Bight, maybe I'll break up my TLJ nominations with some other stuff

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 18:30, June 1, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Harro Kelpura

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Ayrehead
Grunny
  • From reading the intro quote, I believe the first speaker is Kungurama, not Kelpura, is that right? If so, the order they are listed in the attribution should match the order in which they speak in the quote for clarity, so Kungurama should be mentioned first in the attribution for the quote. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 17:08, June 11, 2018 (UTC)

Comments


Unidentified dreadnought

  • Nominated by: Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 13:04, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I'm back! (*background groans*)

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Y-85 Titan dropship

  • Nominated by: Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 12:04, June 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I have a soft spot for these things, but I suspect we'll never see them in action.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Toh My!

Comments