FANDOM


       
Good article
nominations
             
Premium-GoodIcon

This page is for the nomination of Good articles. A Good article is an article that adheres to certain quality standards but cannot reach Featured status due to its limited content. This page is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like. For a list of Good articles, see Wookieepedia:Good articles.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic if the length of the article supports it. This may not be appropriate on articles with limited content.
  9. …have no redlinks.
  10. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article would be preferred, though not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section.
  11. …ideally include a "Personality and traits" section on all character articles if information is available.
  12. …ideally include a "Powers and abilities" section for Force-sensitive characters and a "Skills and abilities" section for non–Force-sensitive characters, where said powers and/or abilities are stipulated.
  13. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  14. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  15. …counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, be at least 250 words long (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Alternatively, a Good article cannot exceed 1000 words. Articles that do so should be nominated for Featured status.
  16. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, select an article you feel is worthy of Good article status. Your nominated article must meet all sixteen requirements listed above to become a Good article.
  2. Add {{GAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for Good article status previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{GAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Per AgriCorps consensus, non-AgriCorps members are restricted to four nominations on the GAN page at any one time. Once one nomination is removed from the page as either successful or unsuccessful, another may be added.
  7. Users may not vote on their own articles.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. Any objections may be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. Once a nomination has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be AgriCorps votes—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. Alternatively, if a nomination receives a total of five AgriCorps/Inquisitorius votes—three of which must be AgriCorps votes—with no outstanding objections before one week has passed, the nomination will be considered successful.
  5. The article is placed on the Good article list.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 10 days.


Good article nominations

To nominate an article for Good article status, place the {{GAnom}} template on the top of the article and then follow the instructions above. Nominated articles must meet all sixteen requirements stated above. If an article has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be an AgriCorps vote—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. For complete instructions on archiving nominations, please see here.

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Y-85 Titan dropship

  • Nominated by: Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 12:04, June 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I have a soft spot for these things, but I suspect we'll never see them in action.

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:19, June 30, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Toh My!
Ayrehead
  • You'll need to add a reference for 3 ABY since Complete Locations doesn't use the ABY dating system anywhere. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:45, June 30, 2018 (UTC)
Vitus
  • The infobox image is linked to two Legends sources.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 00:12, July 28, 2018 (UTC)
    • In fact, the very same image appears in the canon version of the book. The only difference is the font of the labels. --Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 06:59, July 28, 2018 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • I know you're not going to like this, but I firmly believe we should be using the actual picture of the vessel from the 2016 Canon version of Complete Locations. I fully understand your reason for wanting to use the Legends version of the image, that's it's essentially the exact same thing with the exception of the book's font. But I think it's that difference that we need to respect. If the images were exactly the same, I wouldn't raise this issue, but there is a difference in the source, no matter how minor, and I think we need to reflect that in our article for the sake of pure accuracy. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 15:07, August 10, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Anna Francolini

  • Nominated by: spookycat27talk
  • Nomination comments: Wanted to try this out, wookieepedia isn't my home wiki, but I do like writing random biographies sometimes

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Tommy
  • Article currently violates GAN rule 7. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 20:10, June 23, 2018 (UTC)
    • Sorry it's fixed now, I'd forgotten to remove it.spookycat27talk 20:21, June 23, 2018 (UTC)
Imp
  • Hi, welcome to the GAN. Please see this. Imperators II(Talk) 20:26, June 23, 2018 (UTC)
    • Fixed (hopefully) and thank you^^ spookycat27talk 20:42, June 23, 2018 (UTC)
  • Please eliminate any use of double referencing, i.e., two references one after another, like [3][10]. Either attribute each sentence/part of sentence/word(s) to the precise, specific references that support each bit of info, or write out a manual reference note that explains where the information is derived from. Imperators II(Talk) 20:57, June 23, 2018 (UTC)
  • Please fill out as much parameters as possible and appropriate in each usage of {{Cite_web}}. Imperators II(Talk) 20:57, June 23, 2018 (UTC)
    • I added all that were available, but a few didn't have authors listed, so I'm hoping that will be okay spookycat27talk 22:05, June 23, 2018 (UTC)
  • Please change all usages of to '. Imperators II(Talk) 20:57, June 23, 2018 (UTC)
  • Also, I'd sure like to see the other works in the infobox organized like here. Imperators II(Talk) 20:58, June 23, 2018 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • All OOU articles require a Bibliography section if applicable. This serves the same purpose as the Sources section in IU articles. The Bibliography section will list all officially licensed material the actress is mentioned in. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 14:39, August 16, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Elis Helrot

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:06, July 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Let me appease those unenthused by my TLJ nominations with some OT goodness.

(1 ACs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 00:44, July 24, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ACvote MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 22:08, August 17, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy
  • In ref 2, could you say GA also dates the Battle of Yavin to 0 BBY? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 10:28, July 7, 2018 (UTC)
Code-8
  • Is there a reason the Legends-canon split isn't acknowledged in the BTS? Commander Code-8 Hello There! 15:25, July 22, 2018 (UTC)
    • Oops, forgot to mention the decipher set was Legends. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:29, July 22, 2018 (UTC)
Fred strikes back
  • Could you reword the second to last sentence of the Bts? Currently, "Decipher, Inc. Star Wars Legends Star Wars Customizable Card Game's Premiere Limited set" looks and reads like one really long name for something. Maybe try splitting the three large links up.
  • I'm not familiar with the source, but are there any quotes that could be used for the body? MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 18:06, August 11, 2018 (UTC)
    • Unfortunately he just has that single speech bubble and no other lines. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:00, August 11, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Pellaeon

  • Nominated by: TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 13:01, July 24, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The original nomination was took down at my request after Toprawa had pointed out that Pellaeon would possibly require a significant expansion with the release of the then-upcoming novel Thrawn: Alliances. The book is released today and he is not in it, so here I go for a second nomination.

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. I fixed a few linking problems, but other than that, great work! --White-Helmeted Mandalorian/Riverdale Chauffeur (Wanna Discuss Something?) 18:56, July 24, 2018 (UTC)
  2. I look forward to a time when this article needs an update. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 14:13, August 13, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Get Commander Code-8
  • Missing any mention of Pellaeon's sex in the bio
    • Added it to the Personality and traits section if it is okay for you. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 21:26, August 8, 2018 (UTC)
  • I don't know if this came up in the original nomination but I think there's enough to warrant a P&T section, his shock at seeing the purrgil could go there
  • I'm not a fan of the "several unidentified objects" going in the body in quotations, since that's already seen in the above quote, maybe you could reword it to say several objects unfamiliar to the Imperials without using the quotations. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:11, August 8, 2018 (UTC)
    • Just realized that this one is explicitly allowed under the manual of style, so there's no pressure to change it. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 15:35, August 8, 2018 (UTC)
      • I know it's not mandatory, but I get what you mean. Changed it anyway. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 21:50, August 8, 2018 (UTC)
  • Is there room to create an article for whale, since "whale-like" is used to describe the purrgil here and in most sources?
    • As far as I can find, there is no mention of "whales" in the new canon except for the Databank entry for the purrgil and I didn't think that would be enough for an in-universe whales article. For now, I've linked it to a disambiguation page for other whale-like creatures in the Star Wars universe, but I can easily create a new "whale" article if you think otherwise. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 12:16, August 10, 2018 (UTC)
      • Per Tommy below a disambig link isn't the way to go about it. I think the current whale page can be moved to Whale (disambiguation) and a new one created in its place. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 14:39, August 11, 2018 (UTC)
  • Is it necessary to refer to Dave Filoni as the executive producer of Rebels after he's already been introduced as one of the writers? Commander Code-8 Hello There! 09:38, August 10, 2018 (UTC)
  • Last one: Please switch that use of "however" in the bio, it's making that sentence confusing to me. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 11:09, August 13, 2018 (UTC)
Tommy
  • It's generally bad practice to link to disambig pages in article text. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:41, August 10, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Secutor-class Star Destroyer

  • Nominated by: Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 09:12, August 10, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 02:05, August 14, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 16:19, August 17, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Jones

  • Nominated by: Cwedin(talk) 18:19, August 11, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 19:39, August 13, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy
  • Does the last biography paragraph have to be sourced to the comic? Surely all of that info could just be sourced to the film. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 15:25, August 13, 2018 (UTC)
    • Absolutely. I accidentally left the comic reference in while writing some fluff about Connix's conversation with Poe. - Cwedin(talk) 18:43, August 13, 2018 (UTC)
Fred strikes back
  • Why is the info from the novelization not in the bio? At least the bit about the computers and talking to the droid. I get that the Flight Officer bit could be considered a contradiction that would be covered in the Bts, but the rest seems to fit fine with the film. It's just not shown on screen. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 17:23, August 17, 2018 (UTC)
    • The film places Jones' conversation before the First Order's arrival, while the novel places that same (albeit reworked) conversation after the First Order arrives, and there's a third speaker. That clearly contradicts the film, so I think it's best to keep that info in the BTS. - Cwedin(talk) 18:31, August 17, 2018 (UTC)
      • Are we not sure it's a separate conversation that takes place shortly after the scene in the film? MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 18:49, August 17, 2018 (UTC)
        • Yep, unless Jones says the same thing to the same person twice. Maybe he just really loves those thirty pallets of cannon shells. :P - Cwedin(talk) 19:14, August 17, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Tuzes-Adaz

  • Nominated by: MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 03:55, August 15, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: More Clone Wars goodness.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments