FANDOM


       
Good article
nominations
             
Premium-GoodIcon

This page is for the nomination of Good articles. A Good article is an article that adheres to certain quality standards but cannot reach Featured status due to its limited content. This page is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like. For a list of Good articles, see Wookieepedia:Good articles.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic if the length of the article supports it. This may not be appropriate on articles with limited content.
  9. …have no redlinks.
  10. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article would be preferred, though not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section.
  11. …ideally include a "Personality and traits" section on all character articles if information is available.
  12. …ideally include a "Powers and abilities" section for Force-sensitive characters and a "Skills and abilities" section for non–Force-sensitive characters, where said powers and/or abilities are stipulated.
  13. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  14. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  15. …counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, be at least 250 words long (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Alternatively, a Good article cannot exceed 1000 words. Articles that do so should be nominated for Featured status.
  16. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, select an article you feel is worthy of Good article status. Your nominated article must meet all sixteen requirements listed above to become a Good article.
  2. Add {{GAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for Good article status previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{GAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Per AgriCorps consensus, non-AgriCorps members are restricted to four nominations on the GAN page at any one time. Once one nomination is removed from the page as either successful or unsuccessful, another may be added.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. Any objections may be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. Once a nomination has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be AgriCorps votes—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. Alternatively, if a nomination receives a total of five AgriCorps/Inquisitorius votes—three of which must be AgriCorps votes—with no outstanding objections before one week has passed, the nomination will be considered successful.
  5. The article is placed on the Good article list.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 2 weeks.


Good article nominations

To nominate an article for Good article status, place the {{GAnom}} template on the top of the article and then follow the instructions above. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above. If an article has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be an AgriCorps vote—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. For complete instructions on archiving nominations, please see here.

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Cobb Sonbepol

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:18, November 21, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Ront Brynloo's fellow cantina patron from Celebration

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Jinzler (talk) 19:43, January 16, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 08:19, February 16, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Jinzler
  • In the intro the following is stated: Shortly after the local moisture farmer Luke Skywalker and the hermit Obi-Wan Kenobi entered the bar. I feel like this would read better if some brief additional context was provided on why Skywalker and Kenobi had entered the bar. Jinzler (talk) 21:38, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • The biography starts with in the year 0 BBY - this first sentence could be read as reading that Sonbepol was sat in the bar for the whole year. It might be beneficial to revise this, perhaps to say something along the lines of in the year 0 BBY, shortly before the Battle of Yavin, for example, to date the events described to a more specific time in that year. Jinzler (talk) 21:38, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
Tommy
  • "Star Wars: Galactic Atlas establishes that the events of Star Wars: Episode IV A New Hope occur in 0 BBY." What about 0 ABY? Mightn't it be better to say before the battle of yavin to avoid confusion?Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 19:46, February 12, 2018 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
  • In the intro you have two consecutive sentences that start with "(shortly) after ..."; can we please reword?
  • The timeline in the intro and the body are somewhat contradictory. In the intro, you say they were sat at a table after Skywalker and Kenobi entered, whereas in the body, it's implied they were already there as the pair walked in.
    • Two birds with one stone, I guess. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:29, February 19, 2018 (UTC)
  • Man, that's a lot of names in such a short article. :P 1358 (Talk) 00:47, February 19, 2018 (UTC)
  • It was a busy day at the cantina. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:29, February 19, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Unification Wars (Galactic Republic)

  • Nominated by: Jace Onasi (talk) 04:18, November 28, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(2 ACs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Imperators II(Talk) 10:43, November 28, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:18, December 28, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Jinzler (talk) 13:20, January 21, 2018 (UTC)
  4. Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 20:26, February 12, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Toprawa
  • Reference 4 needs to cite the specific entry that this CSWE information is coming from. It would not be inappropriate to use the CSWECite template within this manual ref note.
  • Also in regards to that ref note, the wars could just have easily taken place in 25,053 BBY. Is there anything that specifically suggests a great time passed between the wars and the Republic's formation? The better way to word this is "by 25,053," which is basically saying "in or before." Please amend this in all appropriate places throughout the article. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:09, December 31, 2017 (UTC)
  • Some more referencing stuff. All external links must include an archive link where possible. Currently, Reference 3 needs one.
  • In Reference 9, Timeline 15 should use the {{TORweb}} template. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:08, February 13, 2018 (UTC)
Jinzler
  • Just one point from me - in the introduction you refer the conflict as "the Wars", whereas later in the article it is referred to as "the war" and "the wars". Could you please ensure that the article is consistent in terms of whether "Wars" is capitalized and in terms of whether it is referred to "wars" or "war". If any of the sources cited refer to it is "the Wars" then it would be fine to use that term or otherwise just "the wars" would be more appropriate. Jinzler (talk) 22:01, January 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • A nice little article. Jinzler (talk) 22:01, January 17, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

  • Here's a link to the previous nomination.--Jace Onasi (talk) 04:18, November 28, 2017 (UTC)
  • I can confirm that Star Wars: Complete Vehicles does mention the Unification Wars, though it does not provide any additional information from the other cross-section books. I've added it as a source.--Jace Onasi (talk) 04:18, November 28, 2017 (UTC)
  • In the previous nomination, Imperators wanted feedback on the image of the Jedi. The image isn't time-period appropriate, since it is from just after the New Sith Wars. The Jedi also didn't have lightsabers back then. There aren't really any images on the wiki that would appropriately depict the Jedi of the time, however. Check the previous nomination to see the images we suggested.--Jace Onasi (talk) 04:27, November 28, 2017 (UTC)


Poletec

  • Nominated by: B32(Talk)I-find-this-atire-appealing 00:20, December 29, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: This article has come a long way despite the depicted topic only appearing in unfinished episodes of the Star Wars: The Clone Wars.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Uncle Jangeth
  • For now, you'll need to expand the introduction. Run through the article and find relevant information for it. JangFett (Talk) 01:50, January 11, 2018 (UTC)
    • Done. -- Banana32 I-find-this-atire-appealing 20:36, January 11, 2018 (UTC)
      • Please correct those redirects. There's a number of them. JangFett (Talk) 03:14, January 26, 2018 (UTC)
        • Wow! I didn't realize how many there were in the introductory paragraph. I think they're all fixed now, however. --B32(Talk)I-find-this-atire-appealing 04:00, January 26, 2018 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
  • I would argue a typo in concept art does not warrant a mention in the Bts. Typos happen all the time and in this case it's fair to expect it was one rather than intentional. 1358 (Talk) 00:18, January 19, 2018 (UTC)
    • Okay, I deleted the information. --B32 I-find-this-atire-appealing 00:54, January 19, 2018 (UTC)
Tommy
  • I think you should expand the BTS with when they first appeared, when that was first released, and briefly that the episodes weren't finished.Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 20:29, February 12, 2018 (UTC)
    • Okay, I added that information. --B32(Talk)I-find-this-atire-appealing 22:36, February 12, 2018 (UTC)
      • "Canon", dates, episode title and StarWars.com need links.—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 22:40, February 12, 2018 (UTC)
        • Oh, I forgot to link. Fixed it. Any other recommendations? --B32(Talk)I-find-this-atire-appealing 23:16, February 12, 2018 (UTC)
          • A distant echo still needs linking, and I'd try to work the clone wars into there too.—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 09:44, February 13, 2018 (UTC)
            • Okay, I added and linked those articles. --B32(Talk)I-find-this-atire-appealing 20:08, February 15, 2018 (UTC)
              • I've switched the BTS paragraphs so the appearance-based one is first. That's it for now.—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 08:38, February 16, 2018 (UTC)
                • Okay, thanks! So are you planning to support? --B32(Talk)I-find-this-atire-appealing 20:12, February 16, 2018 (UTC)
                  • All in good time. At the moment you still have outstanding objections from Toprawa.—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 20:25, February 16, 2018 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • The infobox image is cropped too narrow. Infobox images should be 400px in width whenever possible, or a minimum of 250px in width to fit the infobox. The original image that this crop is coming from is humongous, so this shouldn't be a problem to fix. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:38, February 13, 2018 (UTC)
    • Hello! It seems I can't resize the image. --B32(Talk)I-find-this-atire-appealing 20:14, February 15, 2018 (UTC)
      • Yes, you can. It's a very simple matter of saving the original source image and cropping it in any image-editing software, such as MS Paint or Photoshop. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:02, February 16, 2018 (UTC)
        • Oh yeah! Sorry, I forgot that the image was taken from StarWars.com's large image in the entry. --B32(Talk)I-find-this-atire-appealing 20:32, February 16, 2018 (UTC)
          • Is the current one I just uploaded good? --B32(Talk)I-find-this-atire-appealing 20:46, February 16, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Viper Sensor Intelligence Systems

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 01:27, December 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I’ve always liked these old HoloNet articles; fanwank to the max. Original nomination can be found here.

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:16, January 24, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • I think the intro should definitely be expanded beyond one sentence. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:09, December 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • Could you describe their logo in description? Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:09, December 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • You should mention in the body that the HoloNet News story is called "Sensor Technology Dispute Settled in Takeover" in order to give context to the quote captions. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:24, January 1, 2018 (UTC)
    • Added. Do you think its okay to link to that HoloNet issue? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:28, January 6, 2018 (UTC)
      • I don't think you should link to external sites in article bodies. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:34, January 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • It's also worth mentioning that they employed at least one Vulptereen. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:24, January 1, 2018 (UTC)
    • Now mentioned in caption. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:28, January 6, 2018 (UTC)
      • That info shouldn't be caption exclusive and actually looking at the AAD-4 assault droid page you should include that it was 60 of those droids that marched into the tower and destroyed their security units. The three tanks destroying the administration and accounting divisions of Viper also seems relevant. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:34, January 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • I'd say that the history section is now long enough to split into three paragraphs. I'd also maybe move the image down into it. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:34, January 20, 2018 (UTC)
    • How does that look? - AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:52, January 20, 2018 (UTC)
      • Could you move the image entirely into the history section? It looks really odd in oasis at the moment. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:14, January 24, 2018 (UTC)
Jinzler
  • In the "Description" section it is mentioned that Rina Flow was ousted during the takeover by Arakyd. However, this is not explicitly stated during the "History" section in the description of these events, even though this is an important feature of these events. I think that this information should either be moved to the "History" section or otherwise at some point prior to the reference to Flo later in the article (eg "former VSIS president Rina Fio said the company..." it be stated that she was ousted by Arakyd. Jinzler (talk) 18:40, February 9, 2018 (UTC)
  • In the "History" section, reference is made to VSIS being "smaller" than Arakyd and was a "younger firm". It may be beneficial to include a sentence in the "Description" section to state that VSIS was a smaller and younger company than its competitor Arakyd. What do you think? Jinzler (talk) 18:40, February 9, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Orr'UrRuuR'R

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:40, January 1, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: NOMINATIONS! UNLIMITED NOMINATIONS!

(1 ACs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Jinzler (talk) 17:34, January 17, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 20:32, February 12, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 14:25, February 16, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Jinzler
  • In the year 32 BBY, Orr'UrRuuR'R was among a group of at least four Tuskens who fired from a cliff top at the podracers competing in the Boonta Eve Classic race as they passed through the Canyon Dune Turn portion of the course. This is a bit picky of me (apologies!) but the use of “they” here could be read as referring to the Tuskens or the podracers. Are you happy to clarify this? Jinzler (talk) 21:38, January 15, 2018 (UTC)
    • No worries, should be fixed now. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:59, January 15, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

KMD-RA-71

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Jinzler (talk) 19:45, February 10, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 12:39, February 13, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

R3-T2

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:02, January 3, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Background droid who appeared in a LEGO set 41 years after the fact.

(0 ACs/1 User/1 Total)

Support

  1. Provided all sources and adaptations were checked. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:57, January 5, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Hanzo
  • Intro needs expansion and more details such as its escape from the pirates being by 0 BBY. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 12:45, January 4, 2018 (UTC)
Jinzler
  • It could be worth a mention in the BTS section that R3-T2 appeared in the Lego set. The box of the Lego set also appears to depict R3-T2 being captured by Jawas, so that would also be with mentioning. Jinzler (talk) 07:37, January 31, 2018 (UTC)
  • You also could add an image of the Lego set or of the Lego R3-T2 to the BTS section. Jinzler (talk) 07:37, January 31, 2018 (UTC)
    • R3-T2 has also appeared in the background of a recent Golden Book, but I don't know if it's appropriate to list this stuff on the Legends page since it was released after the EU ended. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 07:43, January 31, 2018 (UTC)
      • I would agree with you that it is not necessary to mention the Golden Book. My thought process here was that if the Lego set is being listed as a source and we are happy that it is appropriate that it be listed here as a source, then it is therefore potentially worthy of a mention in the BTS section. My understanding is that Lego is non-canon and therefore still applicable to be mentioned in Legends articles if of relevance. I would agree that this is an area where perhaps some greater clarity could be provided in the Layout Guide. Jinzler (talk) 08:12, January 31, 2018 (UTC)
        • I'll ask on IRC sometime; until we can decide on something, I'll add the LEGO info to the article. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 08:15, January 31, 2018 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • Why are you counting a 2018 LEGO set as a legends appearance? Ayrehead02 (talk) 06:08, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
    • I've seen post-2014 LEGO sets listed on other Legends page; do we have a concrete policy in place concerning the LEGO stuff? - AV-6R7Crew Pit 06:10, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
      • Do you have any examples you could link? I can't really think of any good reason that we would treat LEGO as default Legends material. Since the set has the TLJ packaging and contains nothing that's explicitly Legends I'd say it doesn't need to be on the Legends page. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:27, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
        • Sandspeeder, for one, which is seemingly based off the old Kenner prototype. However, it was released in TLJ packaging and features the helmet of Dosmit Ræh. Wierd. Since there's no such ambiguity here, I'll remove it from the article. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:44, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
          • I think that sandspeeder might actually be based on Battlefront 2, and given Ræh's in it I'm fairly certain it shouldn't be in Legends; however, I'll double check that. Out of interest is R3-T2 actually named on the LEGO set? It might count a source for the name in canon. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:52, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
            • Just called "included astromech droid" on LEGO.com. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:18, February 12, 2018 (UTC)
  • The cantina's name can't be sourced to ANH. I'm not sure photoreceptors can either. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:52, February 11, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Loje Nella

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 05:10, January 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A character who's Bts history is far more interesting that what we actually know of them in-universe.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Ayrehead
  • I think you could expand quite a bit on the ROTJ part of the body. For example, context for Solo and Organa, the fact that the palace is on Tatooine and the fact that Jabba and the court clearly sat in wait in order to catch her. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:13, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
  • I think it's also relevant to mention that Jabba and many members of his court were killed not long after this. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:13, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
    • Is the implantation that Nella may have been aboard the sail barge? If so, that Insider article confirms she survived the events of RotJ. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:49, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
      • Ok well firstly, why isn't the fact that she survives ROTJ in the article? Secondly, the reason to include what happens next in the film is that since Jabba is her employer it seems fairly relevant when he suddenly dies given that it would presumably significantly impact her livelihood. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:17, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
        • The article just doesn't mark a skull next to her name. Expanded. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:27, January 18, 2018 (UTC)
          • I disagree with the statement of mentioning the Battle of Carkoon. From reading the article, I take it that Nella is last seen when Leia is captured, and I feel like that is adequate to instead simply mention that Leia and Han were both imprisoned as a result, and have the article end there. Also, FWIW Who's Who not having a skull next to names of characters isn't a necessary confirmation of survival. Ortugg and Wittin don't have the skulls, but Ortugg's entry in The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia reveals he died on the Khetanna, and The Official Star Wars Fact File 23 confirms Wittin's death at Carkoon. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:16, January 19, 2018 (UTC)
            • Ah ok, Hanzo's right that the skull thing probably isn't worth mentioning. I maintain that Jabba's death is relevant though, so I suppose we'll have to wait for others to weigh in. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:39, January 20, 2018 (UTC)
  • Can Jabba's full name or species be sourced to the encyclopedia entry? Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:13, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
    • Cited old Databank entry. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:00, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • Archives of the old SWBoards can be found here. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:13, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
    • I can't access the posts in question, as when I try to move to another page of a given thread, I get a 404 error. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:47, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
      • Hmm I hadn't quite realized how hard to navigate that site is. It seems like other pages in the thread are available, but you'll need to go through each of the start points for that thread to see the the different pages, if that makes sense. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:17, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
        • Looks like the first was archived, but apparently not the second. How do I link to the archive with this template? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 05:55, January 9, 2018 (UTC)
        • |archiveurl= is now at your disposal. Imperators II(Talk) 16:49, January 9, 2018 (UTC)
Hanzo
  • I'm making adaptations and sources a formal objection. I saw that the scene with Jabba catching Han and Leia (which includes Nella) is a video clip in Jabba's Encyclopedia entry (I know the link is sadly obsolete, but it is the same one used in the NuCanon Databank entry), and am requesting you to check further materials for the possibility of featuring the character.
    • Nothing in the adaptations. Nothing. Also, I don't think we include those StarWars.com video clips in our articles. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 06:15, January 26, 2018 (UTC)
      • I added that source myself, and yes we are supposed to include the old (obsolete) Encyclopedia entries in sources.
  • The intro also needs considerable expansion about the character. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:27, January 19, 2018 (UTC)
    • Expanded. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 06:15, January 26, 2018 (UTC)
      • Intro should mention the year 4 ABY, and establish that Jabba's Palace was on Tatooine. I also feel like the specific stuff related to her during the Rescue of Han Solo should be changed to something more general, rather than the play by play that was done. Thul Fain's intro is an example of how to write up the intros for those Jabba's Palace extras.
        • Does that look better? - AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:16, February 2, 2018 (UTC)
  • Leia should be mentioned as an Alliance leader, as no context is given for her.
    • Added her titles and that she was part of the Alliance. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:17, February 2, 2018 (UTC)
  • And I feel like her laughing should be moved from the biography to personality and traits. In the biography it sounds a little too play by play, but moving it to personality and traits would be ideal. Further, I think repeating that she was reluctantly working for Jabba and misappropriated his funds in the personality and traits would be ideal, as that's a clearly defining part of her personality. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:49, January 27, 2018 (UTC)
    • Done; souced the CCG to vary up the wording. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 04:28, February 10, 2018 (UTC)
  • I'm making another objection on how the Lapti Nek thing was dealt with in the intro. The intro now reads that Lapti Nek was simultaneous with Jabba and friends catching Leia, when Leia only arrived in the palace after Lapti Nek's performance. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 14:46, February 14, 2018 (UTC)
    • Added a “later” is there. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:23, February 14, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

  • Unfortunately, we don't have the old Message Boards archived in any satisfactory manner. Luckily, the species of Loje Nella was the subject of much controversy back in our early days (some users were even blocked over the issue), so we have a general idea of what each cited post would have said. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 05:10, January 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • Not making this an objection only because I don't know, but "Lapti Nek": The Music Video from Jabba's Palace is listed in her appearances, so would that mean she appeared in the original Lapti Nek footage? If so, this will be a formal objection as that needs to be detailed in the behind the scenes section. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:30, February 3, 2018 (UTC)
    • Yeah, she was featured in cut footage, between Jess and Tessek over by the bandstand. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:59, February 13, 2018 (UTC)
      • Added info to body and Bts; since its basically an extended version of the original Lapti Nek sequence, I see no reason it can't be included in the body. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:21, February 13, 2018 (UTC)
        • And I feel that detail should also be discussed in the intro as well. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:31, February 14, 2018 (UTC)


Jadonna Veloz

  • Nominated by: Jinzler (talk) 21:20, January 13, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: My first nomination in quite a while!

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Thanks for the quick response - everything looks good to me now. Nice work. ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:43, January 31, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Looks good!—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 12:34, February 16, 2018 (UTC)

Object

ProfessorTofty
  • The manual of style says that anything that's mentioned in a quote has to be linked within the quote if it can't be linked elsewhere in the article. So "bacta" would have to be linked, but I'll leave it to you as to whether or not you want to try to work it into the article. ProfessorTofty (talk) 15:08, January 25, 2018 (UTC)
    • I have now added a link in the article body to this. Jinzler (talk) 10:58, January 27, 2018 (UTC)
  • Is "Beldon" normally capitalized within the source material outside of the start of a sentence? Because you have it capitalized within the article at least twice, for example, "the ship passed a Beldon," but not within the quotation. ProfessorTofty (talk) 15:08, January 25, 2018 (UTC)
    • You are 100% right, it should be lowercase - I have now fixed this. Jinzler (talk) 10:58, January 27, 2018 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Does the source use the term "light-stock freighter"? Because I can only ever recall the term "stock-light freighter" being a thing.
  • The date reference should do a better job of manually explaining how you're arriving at c. 2 BBY exactly. I started it off for you to explain that ERC dates Rebel Dawn to that date range. Now you should explain that the story's events involving Veloz take place early in the story, therefore corresponding to 2 BBY, etc. etc. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 00:37, February 17, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

qaz-class Star Destroyer

  • Nominated by: — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 23:14, January 13, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Hopefully the first of many.

(1 ACs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:07, January 20, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Jinzler (talk) 22:15, February 7, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • Congratulations on your first nomination, Tommy! I've added audio to the Catalyst quote and as such think you might want to swap it with the current lead quote since it now includes the proper pronunciation. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:43, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
    • Thanks, I thought it was about time I had a go! Thanks for adding the audio, that's really useful in this article. Quotes swapped as suggested. — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 12:15, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • I think you can probably cut the Pablo tweet from the BTS entirely since it doesn't really tell us anything new and there's no way to back it up with a screenshot. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:43, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • I don't think the information about the stormtroopers is currently necessary in the characteristics section as you're currently extrapolating from a single trooper and it's covered later in history. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:43, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • I would expand slightly on the mission to Tibrin, something like "Leia Organa's mission to the planet Tibrin", with each of the separate relevant articles linked. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:43, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • You could provide a date for the Battle of Yavin. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:43, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • Clone Wars is currently intro exclusive. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:43, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • You should also add the ship's Legends origins to the BTS. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:10, January 16, 2018 (UTC)
    • Sorry but you may have to elaborate on that a bit, my legends knowledge it somewhat lacking. Does something in legends play a similar role to the ship's comparison with the kyber test? — Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 19:17, January 16, 2018 (UTC)
Jinzler
  • In the introduction, it is stated that the Star Destroyers continued to serve within the Imperial Navy until after the Battle of Yavin. The use of "until" here implies that the Imperial Navy stopped using them after the Battle of Yavin, whereas the impression I get from reading the body of the article is that that is not necessarily the case (ie they were still in use at the time of the Battle of Yavin but the sources don't stay that they were taken out of service at that time). Would you be happy to re-word this? Jinzler (talk) 07:18, February 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • In the History section: a test-firing commenced of a kyber crystal powered weapon that would later evolve into the superlaser of the Death Star. I believe it would be beneficial if you could add some brief additional context her on what the Death Star was (eg even just noting that it was a superweapon for example would be sufficient). Jinzler (talk) 07:18, February 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • As in the History section: The Malevolence was a new qaz-class Star Destroyer in the Imperial military at the time of Rebel operative Leia Organa's mission to the planet Tibrin. I feel that this would read better if, rather than state that it was a new Star Destroyer "in the Imperial military", you could start that it had recently entered service at the time of Leia's mission, or something similar. I feel that the way that this is worded at the moment doesn't flow very well. Jinzler (talk) 07:18, February 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nice work! Jinzler (talk) 07:18, February 7, 2018 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
  • If there's indeed no indication of "qaz" being capitalized, you need to reflect this in the title and the infobox as well.
  • The first paragraph of History needs trimming. The ship class itself isn't mentioned until the very last sentence.
  • The IPA pronounciation should be worked into the Bts as well.
  • Fwiw, it's not necessary to include every sub-affiliation in the infobox. Galactic Empire and Imperial Navy is sufficient; right now Imperial Military is technically infobox-exclusive. Just remove it altogether so that you won't have to work it into the body. 1358 (Talk) 20:23, February 16, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Flatcake

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:47, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
"It's always time for flatcakes."
―Ayrehead02 — Gnome-speakernotesListen (file info)[src]

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Let Uncle Jangeth help you
  • "One variety of flatcake were Trandoshani flatcakes." Fragment
    • Should be solved with the intro rewording. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:56, January 21, 2018 (UTC)
  • I'd avoid mentioning dates in the intro, unless you're intending to include the other dates, but then it'll get sloppy. Instead, focusing on what's important would make it a smoother read, if that makes sense.
    • Also, as a side note, I'd take a much closer look at the intro because it reads rather choppy, jumping from one point to the next without connection or smoothness.
      • Reworded the intro, how's it look now? Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:56, January 21, 2018 (UTC)
  • In the intro, you mentioned sautéed fruit, but the way you describe it there sounds like it's part of the dish, whereas in the history section, it seems like a side dish of choice. Maybe I'm reading this a little too much, but there's something odd here. What do you think?
    • The intro rewording should hopefully have taken care of this. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:56, January 21, 2018 (UTC)
  • I do recall the Attack of the Clones scene, in which the servant droid was preparing the food, and wasn't R2 around? Or am I thinking of something else? I think adding greater detail could remove this confusion.
    • The droid is holding a tray of flatcakes when it shoos R2 away from the food counter. This didn't really seem relevant to the flatcakes but I could add it if you'd like. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:56, January 21, 2018 (UTC)
      • You should since he was flipping flatcakes while dismissing R2. You don't have to go elaborately into detail, but the sentence in the article is teetering the line between intro material and part of an history section. JangFett (Talk) 21:32, February 9, 2018 (UTC)
        • Added, how's it look? Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:00, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
  • I believe it's best to eliminate Reference 7 and "11 BBY" all together due to it being speculation. Unlike other dates, which are confirmed by a source, we shouldn't assume or use math to determine dates for anything in any article.
    • Wookieepedia:Attribution has a section specifically stating that simple mathematical deduction is acceptable and many of our articles, including other status articles, use it in references. If you don't feel that's appropriate, I feel it may be an issue for a CT vote or Mofference rather than an objection here. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:56, January 21, 2018 (UTC)
  • Do you really need to split the short history section into two subsections?
    • I generally stick to two-three paragraphs per subsection due to how the text looks in the oasis skin. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:56, January 21, 2018 (UTC)
      • You're right. It does look better compared to Monobook. JangFett (Talk) 21:32, February 9, 2018 (UTC)
  • That's it for now. JangFett (Talk) 04:36, January 21, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

  • "In 11 BBY, the human Jedi-in-hiding Kanan Jarrus joked that he and the Twi'lek pilot Hera Syndulla could order flatcakes while they were cramped together in the cargo hold of the transport Moonglow-72 during the conflict on the planet Gorse." Hot. JangFett (Talk) 04:36, January 21, 2018 (UTC)
  • Ayre, move the page to Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Flatcake to eliminate (canon). JangFett (Talk) 21:46, February 9, 2018 (UTC)


Kubindi

(1 ACs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Reviewed via IRC. Imperators II(Talk) 23:13, January 14, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 12:45, February 13, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Peet Deretalia

  • Nominated by: Cwedin(talk) 03:28, February 14, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: "Will you BB my Valentine?"

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Can't find anything wrong. Nice!—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 12:43, February 16, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Victory-class Star Destroyer

  • Nominated by: —Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 16:01, February 16, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The intro pushed it over. From original nom: "A prize to anyone who can guess the pattern in my nominations."

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Meetra Surik's armband

  • Nominated by: – Tm_T@Wookieepedia:~$ 18:20, February 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Back in business

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Tommy
  • Some more links are needed: Color, starship in intro, hyperspace, asteroid, mining, sexes in intro, exile in intro, Peragus Mining Facility in intro.—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 19:16, February 18, 2018 (UTC)
  • Color parameter in infobox needs to be filled in.—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 19:16, February 18, 2018 (UTC)
  • BTS needs to be fully referenced.—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 19:16, February 18, 2018 (UTC)
  • Wouldn't "the asteroids of the Peragus asteroid field" sound better?—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 19:16, February 18, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

  • Per precedent (see the Miscellanea section on WP:GA), I'd recommend placing the Description section before History. 1358 (Talk) 02:45, February 19, 2018 (UTC)


Meetra Surik crystal

  • Nominated by: – Tm_T@Wookieepedia:~$ 09:53, February 18, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Why not?

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Tommy

Comments