Please reload your infobox. Also 501st dogma, I would recommend that you concentrate on your other noms before nominating others. You still have many others above. JangFett(Talk) 23:46, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
Reloaded. I realize I have quite a few noms on both the GAN and CAN pages. I was just waiting for objections. I'll slack off on nominating GANs unitl at least one has passed, but I still intend to get some articles ready to be nominated in the next few weeks. 501stdogma(talk) 00:01, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
While it's fine to write articles, please keep in mind that the more you nominate, the more you have to look after. Ideally, nominating new noms while waiting for objections for your old noms isn't the best way to go. JangFett(Talk) 14:36, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
"In response to the loss of one of their capital ships, the Imperials put in an Inquiry..." Because "Inquiry" is capitalized, it seems like it is a subject worth contextualizing. If so, please link and give a smidge of context, since it just appears suddenly to the reader. That's all, not bad.—Tommy9281 Sunday, May 6, 2012, 00:28 UTC
Judging from the BTS explanation, the 3 BBY date requires the double ref of Wreckage and the CSWE, which you've done in the infobox --- shouldn't the dating in the bio get the same sourcing?Menkooroo 04:49, May 14, 2012 (UTC)
Better? 501stdogma(talk) 20:04, May 14, 2012 (UTC)
"…one of the largest shipyards in the galaxy at that time." You haven't yet mentioned a time period in the body, so the reader won't know what "that" time is.
The infobox says that it was present for the Civil War, but the article and infobox both say that it was destroyed a year before the war began.
"Galactic" is repetitive in the first sentence of the History section. On this note, however, I don't think you need the context regarding the Galactic Civil War either here or in the intro. The way you currently use your mention of the war is to establish it as a reference for the timing of these events; you don't need to say who it was fought between in order to do that.
I think you can put "at least one" in the passengers field of the infobox, since we know the ship could carry at least one stormtrooper.
Is it a canonical fact that the ship's very first sighting IU (not just our current earliest knowledge of it) was at the battle where it was shot down?
Tis our earliest knowledge of its spoting. I'll remove it if you want.
Yeah, that would be best. Just because it's the earliest we've seen it so far from our OOU POV, doesn't mean it's the earliest it's appeared in the galaxy from a totally IU POV. Jonjedigrandmaster(Talk) 00:34, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
The Janelle article suggests that Aron hired Fett in 0 ABY—is that the case?
No proof. Boba could have been hired in 1 BBY, and just never gotten around to doing the job.
On that note, do we know with certainty that Aron hired Fett precisely "Three years after the incident," as you currently state?
Do we know why the Adjucator was sent to destroy the Anya Karu?
Nope, no reason given.
"…The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia, published in 2008 as an encyclopedia of everything Star Wars." This is a bit redundant.
"The entry in the Encyclopedia clearly stated that Janelle Harcourt died after the Anya Karu's sabotage, making the incident happen prior to 3 BBY." This doesn't fully clarify things unless you also mention to the reader the source that says that Janelle had died by 3 BBY.
One question on this: does the source say it was at least a year after Janelle's death? Could not both have happened in 3 BBY? Jonjedigrandmaster(Talk) 00:34, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
Doesn't say so, so I've changed it in the article. 501stdogma(talk) 12:06, May 26, 2012 (UTC)