- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Ash Jarvee[]
- Nominated by: Jinzler 20:27, November 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: A Karen Travis Jedi
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)[]
Support[]
- WP:TCW guest-nom? Clone Commander Lee Talk 14:11, November 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:19, November 15, 2011 (UTC)
- An excellent expansion.--Demos Traxen 22:37, November 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 21:14, November 16, 2011 (UTC)
- CC7567 (talk) 02:55, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
Object[]
Toprawa[]
Please reload the infobox.Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:28, November 15, 2011 (UTC)- Done --Jinzler 21:13, November 15, 2011 (UTC)
I'm guessing the British spelling of "defence" in the P/T quote can be changed to the Americanized "defense"?Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:51, November 15, 2011 (UTC)- Done --Jinzler 22:09, November 15, 2011 (UTC)
Attack of the Clone[]
- Just two really minor things before I review:
Is it "Leveler" or "the Leveler"? I believe it's the former, as that's the only way it ever gets referred to in the novel, but please double-check the novel and adjust the article if required.- You're right, I have now adjusted the article. --Jinzler 18:21, November 16, 2011 (UTC)
I was going to fix this myself, but I just wanted to make sure you're aware: there have been events before and after No Prisoners that take place in 21 BBY, as confirmed by Star Wars Annual 2011 and Clone Wars Gambit: Stealth, so those two sources can be cited to use the 21 BBY date for all No Prisoners material. It's not a "circa" date in this case—if you source the two aforementioned publications, the 21 BBY date is verified.CC7567 (talk) 06:00, November 16, 2011 (UTC)- Thank you, that is very useful to know. Fixed. --Jinzler 18:21, November 16, 2011 (UTC)
Similar to the Leveler objection, is it "the Wookiee Gunner" or "Wookiee Gunner"? Please check and clarify.- The latter form is correct; I have adjusted the article accordingly. --Jinzler 18:50, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
It might be appropriate to say early in the Bio that the Altisian Jedi weren't official members of the Grand Army of the Republic like those of the Jedi Order were, but that the Altisian Jedi still worked "in support of the Republic" at times. Referring back to what the novel says might help, as I can't remember exactly what's stated.- Added --Jinzler 18:50, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
Was the Altisian Jedi sect actually part of the Jedi Order, or was it separate, since Altis did break ties with Yoda to a certain extent? I know that the Jedi Order and the Altisian Jedi are both Jedi organizations, and I can't remember offhand the way that the novel presented it, but I would advise checking to see if it's explicitly stated one way or the other.- The novel does seem to indicate that the sect was a part of the Jedi Order. Pages 55 and 57 both make references to the Altisian Jedi's relationship with "the rest of the Jedi Order," which would seem to indicate that they were part of it. In addtion, page 57 also reveals that Altis considered his Padawans to be members of the Order. --Jinzler 18:50, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
Can any more elaboration be given as to the end part of the Bio, about Jarvee's participation in the relief effort on Yarille? Doesn't have to be a lot, but the book may have some more details. I remember Altis saying that the women approached the locals first to be more friendly to them, so that might be one of the things that could potentially be added.CC7567 (talk) 07:54, November 17, 2011 (UTC)- Done. Thank you for your review, please let me know if you have any further concerns with the article. --Jinzler 18:50, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments[]
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 02:55, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Just as a clarification, the novel does not give any context as to what the meaning of "dispactches" is in the context of this article. I'm not sure that were can apply the real-word definition. --Jinzler 20:27, November 5, 2011 (UTC)
- It sounds very much like that's intended to simply be a synonym for whatever report he would presumably have to file concerning the incident. I doubt we need a redlink/article for something like that. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:52, November 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Fair enough, that makes sense. I have removed the redlink. --Jinzler 22:09, November 15, 2011 (UTC)
- It sounds very much like that's intended to simply be a synonym for whatever report he would presumably have to file concerning the incident. I doubt we need a redlink/article for something like that. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:52, November 15, 2011 (UTC)