In the behind the scenes section you say Craddosk first appeared in Ezra's Gamble but he was only mentioned. Would it not be best to change it to saying he was first mentioned and then later in the paragraph where you say he was pictured in Galactic Defense changing that to he first appeared and was identified as Craddosk? --Lewisr (talk) 02:21, June 3, 2017 (UTC)
Good catch, looks like that was mistakenly changed in a copy-edit. I've reworded it a bit, so it should be good now. - Cwedin(talk) 18:45, June 3, 2017 (UTC)
"Cradossk was a Trandoshan male and the father of the bounty hunter Bossk. A seasoned warrior and respected bounty hunter,..." As you don't introduce Cradossk as a bounty hunter in the first sentence, the reader gets thrown off in the second sentence, thinking that you're referring to Bossk in the first clause of the second sentence. I recommend dropping Bossk's context here altogether.
I don't think adding Ezra's species as context really provides any value to the reader. Context for the sake of context is pointless. (edit: referring to the intro here. The way it's used in the body is fine)1358(Talk) 00:01, June 7, 2017 (UTC)
Fixed. Thanks for looking over the article! - Cwedin(talk) 02:44, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
"Like his father, Bossk became a bounty hunter, joining the Bounty Hunters' Guild" Is Cradossk's membership in the Guild also confirmed? The way it reads, it seems Cradossk is also a member. If that's the case, it's probably worth mentioning earlier in the article as well as in the infobox. 1358(Talk) 11:38, June 21, 2017 (UTC)
Cradossk's involvement with the Guild is unknown, so I've removed the mention to avoid confusion. - Cwedin(talk) 03:13, June 23, 2017 (UTC)