It may not be a bad idea to mention in the behind the scenes section that the certificate was first pictured in canon in Star Wars Rebels: Rebel Journal by Ezra Bridger.Cevan(talk) 15:57, December 1, 2016 (UTC)
We should be trying to use an infobox whenever possible. For this subject, I think you would be ok with using either Artifact or Device, but if you wanted to be Superman, you could create a brand-new template for documents or something.Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:44, April 27, 2017 (UTC)
I've decided to use the Device template since I'm unfamiliar with created infobox templates. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:37, May 7, 2017 (UTC)
Is that really the best scan we can get for the infobox? It's clearly crooked.
Yes, its crooked like that in the book. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 23:50, July 24, 2017 (UTC)
I'm curious why you write "at some posting agencies" in the Description. Was it not accepted at some agencies?
In Ezra's Gamble, Bossk asked a posting agent if "this office [had] links for the Imperial Enforcement DataCore", implying that not all posting agencies had access. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 23:50, July 24, 2017 (UTC)
Some referencing notes: Always use an official publisher's product page to reference publication dates where possible. We have citation templates for most publishers. Only use Amazon in the instance a product page doesn't exist or otherwise doesn't provide a publication date. For this article, I've used the Disney Press website for Ezra's Gamble. The Studio Fun product page for Rebel Journal provides an October 7 pub. date rather than October 21, which I'm guessing is old data, so Amazon is an acceptable alternative here. When you do use the Amazon citation template, don't italicize the page name, even if it's a published title. Amazon doesn't italicize its page titles. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 00:54, July 21, 2017 (UTC)