The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

StarweirdEdit

• Nominated by: Chack Jadson ^(Talk) 22:54, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Freaky space zombie-ghosts. Just one of the many little-known, yet highly interesting supernatural things in the Star Wars universe.

(5 ACs/1 Users/6 Total)Edit

SupportEdit

1. --Eyrezer 23:23, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
2. Imagine one of these guys as a Jedi. Or even better…—Tommy ⁹²⁸¹ 23:24, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
3. SoresuMakashi^{(Everything I tell you is a lie)} 00:24, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
4. They certainly are weird. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 18:42, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
5. Grunny (talk) 00:49, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
6. Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Talk) 00:59, July 5, 2010 (UTC)

ObjectEdit

TommyEdit

• How come nowhere in the body does the article accept for the BtS talk about the Starweird's Force abilities?—Tommy ⁹²⁸¹ 04:42, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
  • Because that's in the section for roleplaying stats, which, as I understand it, are non-canon. If anyone can prove me wrong, feel free, but I don't think that sorta stuff is canon. Chack Jadson ^(Talk) 23:10, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
    • Fine by me.—Tommy ⁹²⁸¹ 23:24, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

SoresuEdit

• Very minor, but (unless it's from the source, of course) I think predators could be removed or reworded, as predation implies an ecological role. SoresuMakashi^{(Everything I tell you is a lie)} 11:44, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
• Removed. Would you prefer I remove the category as well? Chack Jadson ^(Talk) 14:52, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
  • I've done it myself. As I understand it, an animal isn't classified as a predator unless it feeds on their prey, something we do not have evidence of. SoresuMakashi^{(Everything I tell you is the truth)} 00:24, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
    • Cool. Chack Jadson ^(Talk) 14:40, July 4, 2010 (UTC)

JujiggumEdit

• Just one—is the history section really needed? The info in it seems like it could fit just fine in the biology and appearance section.
  • Based on the LG as I understand it, the article needs a history section. It says that species in the galaxy can be removed, but makes no such mention of leaving out the history. I could fit that information in another section, but the LG stipulates a history section, and I've got no qualms with that. Chack Jadson ^(Talk) 21:17, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
    • That's fair enough. I interpretated that the LG was more of a guideline, and that if info didn't fit in one section, then it didn't really need to be forced in, but it's not that big a deal. Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Talk) 00:59, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
• Great work, and a very interesting topic. Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Talk) 15:10, July 4, 2010 (UTC)

CommentsEdit

Approved by AgriCorps 00:59, July 5, 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks for the reviews, everyone. Chack Jadson ^(Talk) 21:17, July 4, 2010 (UTC)