- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Unidentified OOM command battle droid lieutenant[]
- Nominated by: Kreivi Wolter 12:34, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Another droid nobody cares about.
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)[]
Support[]
- But...Mommy loves us... NaruHina Talk 20:14, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
- QuiGonJinn (Talk) 20:03, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Very nice job. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:25, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Would like to see that redlink taken care of, but otherwise nice job. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 23:33, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- CC7567 (talk) 06:57, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
Object[]
Xd1358[]
We don't usually link the bolded words in the introduction, as they are usually used to link the article from other pages such as portfolios.- Unlinked. Kreivi Wolter 18:00, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
Ranks and titles should be capitalized if they are referring to an individual, per our MOS.1358 (Talk) 13:03, February 6, 2011 (UTC)- Capitalized . Kreivi Wolter 18:00, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Just a note, but it's probably good to inform if you revert others' copy-edits. :) 1358 (Talk) 18:32, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, right, it is, kiitti : ) Kreivi Wolter 18:38, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
QGJ[]
There is some infobox-exclusive information, namely the manufacturer. It should be mentioned in the body as well.QuiGonJinn (Talk) 19:41, February 12, 2011 (UTC)- Could add only 4 words. Done. Kreivi Wolter 10:44, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
- That's five words :P QuiGonJinn (Talk) 20:03, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
- xP Kreivi Wolter 20:35, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Could add only 4 words. Done. Kreivi Wolter 10:44, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
Toprawa[]
Why not provide a link for this individual Munificent frigate? "serving aboard a Munificent-class star frigate under the command of a Neimoidian captain" and here "stationed at the command bridge of a Munificent-class star frigate."Same thing here. No link for this Acclamator? "noticed by a Republic Acclamator-class assault ship"Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:41, February 23, 2011 (UTC)- That's because there's no article for those. And frankly, I dont think they need one. Kreivi Wolter 09:38, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- I disagree. I think they're especially deserving of articles. They have a clearly defined, if canonically brief, operational history, commanding officer, and, thanks to this droid article alone, a distinguished crew. This droid article is no more "notable" than the individual starships are. The best course of action is to leave links for these articles, which will then require you to fill in any redlinks in the intro. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:48, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Why, oh why these kind of things aren't ever asked when others make GAs? But you have a very good point. Do you have any suggestion to the name of the Munificent frigate? Kreivi Wolter 20:37, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- The good thing is that we can go back and apply these links to those articles now. I would suggest just keeping the article names simple: Unidentified Munificent-class star frigate and Unidentified Acclamator-class assault ship. In the future, if need be, we can move them to parenthetical titles. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:41, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Aaand done. Kreivi Wolter 22:08, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Looks great. Thanks for making the change. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:25, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- No prob. Kreivi Wolter 22:28, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Looks great. Thanks for making the change. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:25, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Aaand done. Kreivi Wolter 22:08, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- The good thing is that we can go back and apply these links to those articles now. I would suggest just keeping the article names simple: Unidentified Munificent-class star frigate and Unidentified Acclamator-class assault ship. In the future, if need be, we can move them to parenthetical titles. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:41, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Why, oh why these kind of things aren't ever asked when others make GAs? But you have a very good point. Do you have any suggestion to the name of the Munificent frigate? Kreivi Wolter 20:37, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- I disagree. I think they're especially deserving of articles. They have a clearly defined, if canonically brief, operational history, commanding officer, and, thanks to this droid article alone, a distinguished crew. This droid article is no more "notable" than the individual starships are. The best course of action is to leave links for these articles, which will then require you to fill in any redlinks in the intro. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:48, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- That's because there's no article for those. And frankly, I dont think they need one. Kreivi Wolter 09:38, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
Comments[]
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 06:57, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Kreivi: please note that not all of TCW is placed in 21 BBY. The Star Wars Annual 2011 only places these events in 21 BBY, but that doesn't go for all of TCW—there was somewhat of an inconsistency with the dating in the article's intro, which I fixed in my copy-edit. Please keep this in mind for the future. CC7567 (talk) 06:57, February 27, 2011 (UTC)