Featured articles which have been previously featured on the main page can be showcased again, providing they still meet the standards outlined on the featured article nominations page. Before they can be added to the featured article queue, these articles must undergo a quick review to ensure there are no major problems.
Articles will be added to this page by the Inquisitorius in the order in which they were originally featured on the main page.
No more than thirty articles will be listed on this page at any given time.
Articles which have lost their FA status are not eligible and must go through the normal FAN process.
No articles which have appeared on the main page in the last two years will be put up for a vote.
How to vote:
Featured articles should be generally assumed to still meet the quality requirements. You should not need to thoroughly read the whole article, but should read through any major changes or additions since it was originally featured, along with checking for any major issues, such as missing or inaccurate information, failure to comply with the Manual of Style or Layout Guide, etc.
If you spot any issues that need fixing, you can either do so yourself or leave an objection, clearly stating what the problem is.
If issues are raised about an article then it cannot be put back on the queue until they are resolved. The original authors of an article are encouraged to fix any issues raised, but other users should feel free to contribute. If issues go unresolved, then the article will be given a more thorough review by the Inquisitorius at the next regular meeting.
Once you are satisfied that an article is suitable to be shown on the main page, then support it.
Once an article has four supporting votes, of which two must be from Inquisitors, it can be placed on the queue. Such articles will be added to the queue by the Inquisitorius when spaces are available. The number would be determined by how many new FAs were added to the queue that month. If we create 20 new FAs, then we'll only need to take 10 existing ones to maintain the length of the queue. In this way, the old FAs are used to regulate the length of the queue and to keep featuring a different one each day.
Articles with outstanding objections after three weeks are subject to removal from this page by Inquisitorius vote. Three Inquisitorius votes are required to remove an article.
Linking is pretty bad. And I'm pretty sure he wasn't in all five issues of The Ahakista Gambit. I'll go through and fix these within the next couple weeks if I have time.Menkooroo 15:08, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
My mistake. He is in all five. I'll work on the links soon. Menkooroo 14:16, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
At a glance, the Bts needs some expansion. He's also mention in the CSWE, which should be added to the Sources list.Kilson(Let's have a chat) 05:22, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
Some of the stuff in there that needs context currently doesn't.
Improper period use in some of the images' context. Those minor things just form glancing through it. I'll look closer at it later.—Cal Jedi(Personal Comm Channel) 02:03, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
Also, the article changes back and forth from calling it "Knowledge Bank" and "Bank." Does the source also call it "Bank?" If so, then it should be added at the beginning of the article along with "Knowledge Bank" as one of its names. If not, then it should be changed to just "Knowledge Bank" since it's not a name of a person that we can call by its last name.—Cal Jedi(Personal Comm Channel) 02:51, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
It's called "the Bank" in the lead quote, yes. But it's not really an alternate name, just an abbreviation. - Lord Hydronium 05:07, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
Huge copy-edit was needed, but how could I not do it for my favorite female character in Star Wars!—Cal Jedi(Personal Comm Channel) 04:38, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
While we don't have a standard layout guide for organizations, I think this should probably be reworked to adhere to the layout of other organization GA/FA's - primarily, there should be a Description/Overview and a History section, with the current sections reworked into those. The Notable Members section could also use some expansion, or it could be merged into the History section. CadeCalrayn 17:17, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
As a prelim, this might be sofixit, but let's see all intro links actually relinked in this article.Hanzo Hasashi 02:31, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
That ought to do it. If you want any more linking, do it yourself. :P -- Darth Culator(Talk) 20:31, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
I fixed the remaining ones. Hanzo Hasashi 04:05, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
An objection has been unaddressed for over 1 month. I believe that the amount of time passed can make it eligible for removal as a failure. Hanzo Hasashi 20:37, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
TBH, I think this is indeed a sofixit. I don't think it's worth removing the nomination for.—Cal Jedi(Personal Comm Channel) 01:40, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
I know it technically is. The fact is, though, I wish more people would be willing to contribute to that sub-user page I created. Hanzo Hasashi 03:32, May 2, 2012 (UTC)