This page is for requests for user rights.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

Contents 1 Requests for rollback 1.1 Requirements 1.2 Questions 1.3 Nominations 1.3.1 Cal Jedi (11 admins + 9 users/0/0) 1.3.1.1 Support 1.3.1.2 Oppose 1.3.1.3 Neutral 1.3.1.4 Optional candidate Q&A 1.3.1.5 Comments 2 Requests for adminship 2.1 Requirements 2.2 Questions 2.3 Nominations 3 Requests for bureaucratship 3.1 Requirements 3.2 Questions 3.3 Nominations

Requests for rollbackEdit

Rules:

• You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
• You cannot nominate yourself.
• Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.

To view past requests, see the RFR archive.

RequirementsEdit

There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for rollback rights.

1. They have an account under a screenname.
2. They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
3. They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
4. Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
5. Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)

QuestionsEdit

1. Why should you be granted rollback rights?

NominationsEdit

Cal Jedi (11 admins + 9 users/0/0)Edit

Two week deadline from first request, voting ends on June 2, 2012.

SupportEdit

1. Cal Jedi is an outstanding and level-headed users whom I'm sure everyone who edits the wiki knows. Since joining the wiki, he's been a dedicated contributor deeply involved in the site. With his 13,000 edits, he's among the most active users on the Wook at the moment—and his sheer amount of edits isn't everything. An excellent writer, Cal has written over 100 comprehensive articles, over 20 good articles, and a few articles as well. As a member of both AgriCorps and the Inquisitorius, he's involved in the core parts of the site. He is also an active RC patroller, constantly reverting vandalism and tagging nonsense pages for deletion. As someone who has known and interacted with Cal relatively much, I can say that Cal is someone who truly deserves some candy (candy reference - check) and some more responsibility. I believe giving him rollback would benefit not only his anti-vandalism work but also the community as a whole. 1358 ^(Talk) 21:25, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
2. I tab over to the Recent Changes feed and immediately see "User [[User:Cal Jedi]] used edit summary "Undo revision"" so I'm pretty sure he can use this.   :P   -- Darth Culator ^(Talk) 21:46, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
3. IFYLOFD ^{(Floyd's crib)} 22:04, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
4. Definitely deserves it. Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Talk) 22:37, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
5. Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 22:40, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
6. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 23:18, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
7. I thought Cal already had this, so....yes. — DigiFluid^{(Whine here)} 23:20, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
8. Agreed. Cade Calrayn 23:22, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
9. I've never thought rollback should be some kind of reward we just give to users we like...good thing this isn't the case! OLIOSTER ^(talk) 23:28, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
10. —MJ— _{Council Chambers} Sunday, May 20, 2012, 01:28 UTC
11. Absolutely. Corellian Premier^{All along the watchtower} 01:54, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
12. The ball goes a' rollin' CC7567 ^(talk) 05:52, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
13. Would make good use of the extra button. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 06:00, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
14. Everyone loves candy! And Cal should have candy. :D Trak Nar ^{Ramble on} 06:24, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
15. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 14:05, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
16. Cavalier One^{(Squadron channel)} 14:31, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
17. This is not a 'giving out candy' or a 'why not' moment for me. Cal definitely deserves this privilege since he earned it through his dedication to help keep Wookieepedia clean from vandalism. Keep it up, Cal. JangFett ^(Talk) 15:29, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
18. —Jedi Kasra (comlink) 15:57, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
19. What? This guy still has noob status? Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:34, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
20. There's no such thing as noob status (except being blocked perhaps), dear Tope (: – Tm_T@Wookieepedia:~$ 18:31, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
    • It's called a joke. Get it? Toprawa and Ralltiir 15:35, May 29, 2012 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

NeutralEdit

Optional candidate Q&AEdit

1. Why should you be granted rollback rights?
   • Actually, I think others who have been nominated for this before me have responded better than I can. I think Xd said it best with "So that I could revert faster?" :P I do believe Rollback is a tool, and I try to use anything I do on Wookieepedia as a tool, not a toy. Rollback would be a tool for me to use to help the community and Wookieepedia as a whole—the main reasons why we should be doing anything on Wookieepedia.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 23:22, May 19, 2012 (UTC)

CommentsEdit

• Nominated accepted on IRC. 1358 ^(Talk) 21:25, May 19, 2012 (UTC)

Requests for adminshipEdit

Rules:

• You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
• You cannot nominate yourself.
• Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.

To view past requests, see the RFA archive.

RequirementsEdit

There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for adminship.

1. They have an account under a screenname.
2. They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
3. They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
4. They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
5. They have had at least some major article contributions.
6. They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
7. They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
8. Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted.
9. Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
10. Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFA.

QuestionsEdit

Here are some general adminship questions. They are 100% optional, so feel free to answer all, some, or none of them.

NominationsEdit

Requests for bureaucratshipEdit

Rules:

• Admins may be nominated here purely by another admin or bureaucrat. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
• You cannot nominate yourself.
• Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.

To view past requests, see the RFB archive.

RequirementsEdit

There are some basic things to consider when nominating an admin for bureaucratship.

1. They are an administrator.
2. They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
3. They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
4. They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
5. They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
6. Registered users' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month—from the day the nomination is put forth—are counted).
7. Administrators' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted.
8. Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFB.

QuestionsEdit

NominationsEdit