The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for rollback that was successful. Please do not modify it.

JangFett (10 admins + 14 users/0/0)Edit

Two week deadline from first request, voting ends on June 14th.

SupportEdit

1. Jang is a great guy. He is an excellent contributor, with a wide knowledge of especially the Clone Wars. He has written several GAs and FAs, and he is an active reviewer on both the GAN and the FAN. He has recently been selected into the AgriCorps review panel, which shows how dedicated Wookieepedian he is. He is also very friendly, IRC-regular. Reverts much vandalism and speculation and warns vandals. Ideal candidate. I see no reason why he shouldn't be granted this small tool. Also per the "why not" doctrine. -- 1358 ^(Talk) 18:12, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
2. Bandwagoning! Skippy Farlstendoiro 18:15, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
3. For sure. Somebody's gotta keep an eye on the TCW articles. Xicer9^(Combadge) 18:28, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
4. Nice trend in great current users getting rollback. Graestan^(Talk) 18:40, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
5. Per Grae. And, candy. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 18:41, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
6. "Why not" principle referenced, check. Obligatory candy comment, check. Cue obligatory "limited powah" comment. -- Darth Culator ^(Talk) 18:49, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
7. JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 18:59, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
8. Candy! Atarumaster88 ^{(Talk page)} 19:05, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
9. NAYAYEN:TALK 19:08, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
10. Actually been thinking about nominating him myself. Chack Jadson ^(Talk) 19:12, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
11. —Master Jonathan ^{(Jedi Council Chambers)} 19:56, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
12. Jedi Kasra (comlink) 20:01, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
13. Per Grae. And since no one else has done it yet, in response to Culator: it's POWAH! Unlimited POWAAAH! Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Talk) 21:07, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
14. Certainly. Grunny (talk) 21:33, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
15. Hmmyes. Thefourdotelipsis 23:12, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
16. Havac 05:08, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
17. Cavalier One^{(Squadron channel)} 07:16, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
18. Jang has come a long way to have earned this Rollback nom. The "Why not?" doctrine doesn't apply here, because Jang has indeed earned this right. He's done very well to shed the so-called "noob" label that I think followed him around for a time when he first joined the site. He's vastly improved his editing and Wook acumen, he's refined his article-writing a great deal, and the AC was glad to admit him as their newest member. Well done, Jang. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:16, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
19. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 17:58, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
20. Pranay Sobusk ~ Talk 18:30, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
21. —Tommy ⁹²⁸¹ 18:43, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
22. OLIOSTER ^(talk) 20:17, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
23. I thought I'd already supported, but apparently that was one of the twenty other things he's currently nominated for. :) ~ SavageBob 01:01, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
24. Same as Bob. SoresuMakashi^{(Everything I tell you is a lie)} 12:43, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

NeutralEdit

Optional candidate Q&AEdit

CommentsEdit

• Nomination accepted via IRC. -- 1358 ^(Talk) 18:12, May 31, 2010 (UTC)